Integrating $x^c (1-x)^d$ from 0 to 1 using the gamma function












-1












$begingroup$


I am trying to solve the following integral:
$$
int_0^1 x^c (1-x)^d dx
$$

for some $c, d in mathbb{R}$
I know I have to use the gamma function, I have tried using the substitutions $u = lnfrac{1}{x}$ as well as $u = lnfrac{1}{1-x}$ to try to make this appear as a gamma function but neither have gotten me closer to an answer.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_function
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jan 2 at 11:17






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Try $x=sin^2(t)$
    $endgroup$
    – Claude Leibovici
    Jan 2 at 11:19
















-1












$begingroup$


I am trying to solve the following integral:
$$
int_0^1 x^c (1-x)^d dx
$$

for some $c, d in mathbb{R}$
I know I have to use the gamma function, I have tried using the substitutions $u = lnfrac{1}{x}$ as well as $u = lnfrac{1}{1-x}$ to try to make this appear as a gamma function but neither have gotten me closer to an answer.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_function
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jan 2 at 11:17






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Try $x=sin^2(t)$
    $endgroup$
    – Claude Leibovici
    Jan 2 at 11:19














-1












-1








-1





$begingroup$


I am trying to solve the following integral:
$$
int_0^1 x^c (1-x)^d dx
$$

for some $c, d in mathbb{R}$
I know I have to use the gamma function, I have tried using the substitutions $u = lnfrac{1}{x}$ as well as $u = lnfrac{1}{1-x}$ to try to make this appear as a gamma function but neither have gotten me closer to an answer.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I am trying to solve the following integral:
$$
int_0^1 x^c (1-x)^d dx
$$

for some $c, d in mathbb{R}$
I know I have to use the gamma function, I have tried using the substitutions $u = lnfrac{1}{x}$ as well as $u = lnfrac{1}{1-x}$ to try to make this appear as a gamma function but neither have gotten me closer to an answer.







integration gamma-function






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 2 at 11:11









Abdelrahman SamehAbdelrahman Sameh

32




32








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_function
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jan 2 at 11:17






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Try $x=sin^2(t)$
    $endgroup$
    – Claude Leibovici
    Jan 2 at 11:19














  • 4




    $begingroup$
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_function
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jan 2 at 11:17






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Try $x=sin^2(t)$
    $endgroup$
    – Claude Leibovici
    Jan 2 at 11:19








4




4




$begingroup$
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_function
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Jan 2 at 11:17




$begingroup$
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_function
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Jan 2 at 11:17




1




1




$begingroup$
Try $x=sin^2(t)$
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Jan 2 at 11:19




$begingroup$
Try $x=sin^2(t)$
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Jan 2 at 11:19










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Hint:



$$int_0^1 t^{x-1}(1-t)^{y-1}dt=B(x,y)=frac{Gamma(x)Gamma(y)}{Gamma(x+y)}$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    But is there a way to do it using only the gamma function and its definition?
    $endgroup$
    – Abdelrahman Sameh
    Jan 2 at 12:12










  • $begingroup$
    @AbdelrahmanSameh A proof of the Beta Function comes from using the definition of the gamma function. I believe it's on Wikipedia
    $endgroup$
    – Frank W.
    Jan 2 at 19:03












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3059350%2fintegrating-xc-1-xd-from-0-to-1-using-the-gamma-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

Hint:



$$int_0^1 t^{x-1}(1-t)^{y-1}dt=B(x,y)=frac{Gamma(x)Gamma(y)}{Gamma(x+y)}$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    But is there a way to do it using only the gamma function and its definition?
    $endgroup$
    – Abdelrahman Sameh
    Jan 2 at 12:12










  • $begingroup$
    @AbdelrahmanSameh A proof of the Beta Function comes from using the definition of the gamma function. I believe it's on Wikipedia
    $endgroup$
    – Frank W.
    Jan 2 at 19:03
















1












$begingroup$

Hint:



$$int_0^1 t^{x-1}(1-t)^{y-1}dt=B(x,y)=frac{Gamma(x)Gamma(y)}{Gamma(x+y)}$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    But is there a way to do it using only the gamma function and its definition?
    $endgroup$
    – Abdelrahman Sameh
    Jan 2 at 12:12










  • $begingroup$
    @AbdelrahmanSameh A proof of the Beta Function comes from using the definition of the gamma function. I believe it's on Wikipedia
    $endgroup$
    – Frank W.
    Jan 2 at 19:03














1












1








1





$begingroup$

Hint:



$$int_0^1 t^{x-1}(1-t)^{y-1}dt=B(x,y)=frac{Gamma(x)Gamma(y)}{Gamma(x+y)}$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Hint:



$$int_0^1 t^{x-1}(1-t)^{y-1}dt=B(x,y)=frac{Gamma(x)Gamma(y)}{Gamma(x+y)}$$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 2 at 11:51









DarkraiDarkrai

6,4361442




6,4361442












  • $begingroup$
    But is there a way to do it using only the gamma function and its definition?
    $endgroup$
    – Abdelrahman Sameh
    Jan 2 at 12:12










  • $begingroup$
    @AbdelrahmanSameh A proof of the Beta Function comes from using the definition of the gamma function. I believe it's on Wikipedia
    $endgroup$
    – Frank W.
    Jan 2 at 19:03


















  • $begingroup$
    But is there a way to do it using only the gamma function and its definition?
    $endgroup$
    – Abdelrahman Sameh
    Jan 2 at 12:12










  • $begingroup$
    @AbdelrahmanSameh A proof of the Beta Function comes from using the definition of the gamma function. I believe it's on Wikipedia
    $endgroup$
    – Frank W.
    Jan 2 at 19:03
















$begingroup$
But is there a way to do it using only the gamma function and its definition?
$endgroup$
– Abdelrahman Sameh
Jan 2 at 12:12




$begingroup$
But is there a way to do it using only the gamma function and its definition?
$endgroup$
– Abdelrahman Sameh
Jan 2 at 12:12












$begingroup$
@AbdelrahmanSameh A proof of the Beta Function comes from using the definition of the gamma function. I believe it's on Wikipedia
$endgroup$
– Frank W.
Jan 2 at 19:03




$begingroup$
@AbdelrahmanSameh A proof of the Beta Function comes from using the definition of the gamma function. I believe it's on Wikipedia
$endgroup$
– Frank W.
Jan 2 at 19:03


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3059350%2fintegrating-xc-1-xd-from-0-to-1-using-the-gamma-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents