titlesec makes fancyhdr mistreating the document class
MWE is pretty simple:
documentclass[twoside]{article}
%usepackage{titlesec}
usepackage{fancyhdr}
begin{document}
pagestyle{fancy}
section{tist1}
subsection{a}
newpage
subsection{b}
end{document}
On the second page, there is the subsection name on the left and the section name on the right.
Now, uncomment the titlesec
import, and the behaviour changes: the section name on the left and nothing (actually, a fantom of non-existent chapter name) on the right.
It happens because titlesec
redefines chapter
as relax
, though normally it's undefined
in article
class. The fancyhdr
packages has a following check:
ifxchapter@undefined
It fails, and marks are defined as in classes that have chapters. I can work it around with
letchapterundefined
after usepackage{titlesec}
, or by explicitly redefining sectionmark
/subsectionmark
after pagestyle{fancy}
. But why should I? Is this a bug in titlesec
, or setting chapter
to relax
has some purpose?
UPD:
*File List*
article.cls 2018/09/03 v1.4i Standard LaTeX document class
size10.clo 2018/09/03 v1.4i Standard LaTeX file (size option)
titlesec.sty 2016/03/21 v2.10.2 Sectioning titles
fancyhdr.sty 2017/06/30 v3.9a Extensive control of page headers and footers
***********
fancyhdr titlesec article
add a comment |
MWE is pretty simple:
documentclass[twoside]{article}
%usepackage{titlesec}
usepackage{fancyhdr}
begin{document}
pagestyle{fancy}
section{tist1}
subsection{a}
newpage
subsection{b}
end{document}
On the second page, there is the subsection name on the left and the section name on the right.
Now, uncomment the titlesec
import, and the behaviour changes: the section name on the left and nothing (actually, a fantom of non-existent chapter name) on the right.
It happens because titlesec
redefines chapter
as relax
, though normally it's undefined
in article
class. The fancyhdr
packages has a following check:
ifxchapter@undefined
It fails, and marks are defined as in classes that have chapters. I can work it around with
letchapterundefined
after usepackage{titlesec}
, or by explicitly redefining sectionmark
/subsectionmark
after pagestyle{fancy}
. But why should I? Is this a bug in titlesec
, or setting chapter
to relax
has some purpose?
UPD:
*File List*
article.cls 2018/09/03 v1.4i Standard LaTeX document class
size10.clo 2018/09/03 v1.4i Standard LaTeX file (size option)
titlesec.sty 2016/03/21 v2.10.2 Sectioning titles
fancyhdr.sty 2017/06/30 v3.9a Extensive control of page headers and footers
***********
fancyhdr titlesec article
What versions of the packages are you using? (Putlistfiles
beforedocumentclass
and report the output here.) I get identical output with or withouttitlesec
.
– Alan Munn
Mar 12 at 2:54
@AlanMunn added to the post.
– bodqhrohro
Mar 12 at 12:02
Updatefancyhdr
; the current version is 2019/01/31 v3.10
– egreg
Mar 12 at 12:14
@egreg yes, the new version offancyhdr
has af@nch@ifundefined
macro which handles bothundefined
andrelax
, thanks. But anyway, is there any purpose to setchapter
torelax
instead ofundefined
intitlesec
?
– bodqhrohro
Mar 12 at 12:31
@bodqhrohro That should be asked to the package maintainer.
– egreg
Mar 12 at 13:06
add a comment |
MWE is pretty simple:
documentclass[twoside]{article}
%usepackage{titlesec}
usepackage{fancyhdr}
begin{document}
pagestyle{fancy}
section{tist1}
subsection{a}
newpage
subsection{b}
end{document}
On the second page, there is the subsection name on the left and the section name on the right.
Now, uncomment the titlesec
import, and the behaviour changes: the section name on the left and nothing (actually, a fantom of non-existent chapter name) on the right.
It happens because titlesec
redefines chapter
as relax
, though normally it's undefined
in article
class. The fancyhdr
packages has a following check:
ifxchapter@undefined
It fails, and marks are defined as in classes that have chapters. I can work it around with
letchapterundefined
after usepackage{titlesec}
, or by explicitly redefining sectionmark
/subsectionmark
after pagestyle{fancy}
. But why should I? Is this a bug in titlesec
, or setting chapter
to relax
has some purpose?
UPD:
*File List*
article.cls 2018/09/03 v1.4i Standard LaTeX document class
size10.clo 2018/09/03 v1.4i Standard LaTeX file (size option)
titlesec.sty 2016/03/21 v2.10.2 Sectioning titles
fancyhdr.sty 2017/06/30 v3.9a Extensive control of page headers and footers
***********
fancyhdr titlesec article
MWE is pretty simple:
documentclass[twoside]{article}
%usepackage{titlesec}
usepackage{fancyhdr}
begin{document}
pagestyle{fancy}
section{tist1}
subsection{a}
newpage
subsection{b}
end{document}
On the second page, there is the subsection name on the left and the section name on the right.
Now, uncomment the titlesec
import, and the behaviour changes: the section name on the left and nothing (actually, a fantom of non-existent chapter name) on the right.
It happens because titlesec
redefines chapter
as relax
, though normally it's undefined
in article
class. The fancyhdr
packages has a following check:
ifxchapter@undefined
It fails, and marks are defined as in classes that have chapters. I can work it around with
letchapterundefined
after usepackage{titlesec}
, or by explicitly redefining sectionmark
/subsectionmark
after pagestyle{fancy}
. But why should I? Is this a bug in titlesec
, or setting chapter
to relax
has some purpose?
UPD:
*File List*
article.cls 2018/09/03 v1.4i Standard LaTeX document class
size10.clo 2018/09/03 v1.4i Standard LaTeX file (size option)
titlesec.sty 2016/03/21 v2.10.2 Sectioning titles
fancyhdr.sty 2017/06/30 v3.9a Extensive control of page headers and footers
***********
fancyhdr titlesec article
fancyhdr titlesec article
edited Mar 12 at 12:00
bodqhrohro
asked Mar 12 at 1:15
bodqhrohrobodqhrohro
24816
24816
What versions of the packages are you using? (Putlistfiles
beforedocumentclass
and report the output here.) I get identical output with or withouttitlesec
.
– Alan Munn
Mar 12 at 2:54
@AlanMunn added to the post.
– bodqhrohro
Mar 12 at 12:02
Updatefancyhdr
; the current version is 2019/01/31 v3.10
– egreg
Mar 12 at 12:14
@egreg yes, the new version offancyhdr
has af@nch@ifundefined
macro which handles bothundefined
andrelax
, thanks. But anyway, is there any purpose to setchapter
torelax
instead ofundefined
intitlesec
?
– bodqhrohro
Mar 12 at 12:31
@bodqhrohro That should be asked to the package maintainer.
– egreg
Mar 12 at 13:06
add a comment |
What versions of the packages are you using? (Putlistfiles
beforedocumentclass
and report the output here.) I get identical output with or withouttitlesec
.
– Alan Munn
Mar 12 at 2:54
@AlanMunn added to the post.
– bodqhrohro
Mar 12 at 12:02
Updatefancyhdr
; the current version is 2019/01/31 v3.10
– egreg
Mar 12 at 12:14
@egreg yes, the new version offancyhdr
has af@nch@ifundefined
macro which handles bothundefined
andrelax
, thanks. But anyway, is there any purpose to setchapter
torelax
instead ofundefined
intitlesec
?
– bodqhrohro
Mar 12 at 12:31
@bodqhrohro That should be asked to the package maintainer.
– egreg
Mar 12 at 13:06
What versions of the packages are you using? (Put
listfiles
before documentclass
and report the output here.) I get identical output with or without titlesec
.– Alan Munn
Mar 12 at 2:54
What versions of the packages are you using? (Put
listfiles
before documentclass
and report the output here.) I get identical output with or without titlesec
.– Alan Munn
Mar 12 at 2:54
@AlanMunn added to the post.
– bodqhrohro
Mar 12 at 12:02
@AlanMunn added to the post.
– bodqhrohro
Mar 12 at 12:02
Update
fancyhdr
; the current version is 2019/01/31 v3.10– egreg
Mar 12 at 12:14
Update
fancyhdr
; the current version is 2019/01/31 v3.10– egreg
Mar 12 at 12:14
@egreg yes, the new version of
fancyhdr
has a f@nch@ifundefined
macro which handles both undefined
and relax
, thanks. But anyway, is there any purpose to set chapter
to relax
instead of undefined
in titlesec
?– bodqhrohro
Mar 12 at 12:31
@egreg yes, the new version of
fancyhdr
has a f@nch@ifundefined
macro which handles both undefined
and relax
, thanks. But anyway, is there any purpose to set chapter
to relax
instead of undefined
in titlesec
?– bodqhrohro
Mar 12 at 12:31
@bodqhrohro That should be asked to the package maintainer.
– egreg
Mar 12 at 13:06
@bodqhrohro That should be asked to the package maintainer.
– egreg
Mar 12 at 13:06
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479007%2ftitlesec-makes-fancyhdr-mistreating-the-document-class%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479007%2ftitlesec-makes-fancyhdr-mistreating-the-document-class%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
What versions of the packages are you using? (Put
listfiles
beforedocumentclass
and report the output here.) I get identical output with or withouttitlesec
.– Alan Munn
Mar 12 at 2:54
@AlanMunn added to the post.
– bodqhrohro
Mar 12 at 12:02
Update
fancyhdr
; the current version is 2019/01/31 v3.10– egreg
Mar 12 at 12:14
@egreg yes, the new version of
fancyhdr
has af@nch@ifundefined
macro which handles bothundefined
andrelax
, thanks. But anyway, is there any purpose to setchapter
torelax
instead ofundefined
intitlesec
?– bodqhrohro
Mar 12 at 12:31
@bodqhrohro That should be asked to the package maintainer.
– egreg
Mar 12 at 13:06