LaTeX adjusting sum limits
is there a way to show sum limits partially in inline mode and partially in display mode? i.e., I want to write
begin{equation}
sum_{n=-infty}^{+infty} [...]
end{equation}
but this way the lower limit is too wide, and I don't like it. So I was hoping to write something like this:
begin{equation}
sum_{-infty}^{+infty}nolimits_{n} [...]
end{equation}
to write the index n on the right side of the sum symbol, while the limits of the summation remain above and below.
Of course it doesn't work, LaTeX is pissed because there is a double subscript. Anyone knows if it's possible to do what I want to?
math-operators
migrated from stackoverflow.com Jan 5 '13 at 12:45
This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.
add a comment |
is there a way to show sum limits partially in inline mode and partially in display mode? i.e., I want to write
begin{equation}
sum_{n=-infty}^{+infty} [...]
end{equation}
but this way the lower limit is too wide, and I don't like it. So I was hoping to write something like this:
begin{equation}
sum_{-infty}^{+infty}nolimits_{n} [...]
end{equation}
to write the index n on the right side of the sum symbol, while the limits of the summation remain above and below.
Of course it doesn't work, LaTeX is pissed because there is a double subscript. Anyone knows if it's possible to do what I want to?
math-operators
migrated from stackoverflow.com Jan 5 '13 at 12:45
This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.
add a comment |
is there a way to show sum limits partially in inline mode and partially in display mode? i.e., I want to write
begin{equation}
sum_{n=-infty}^{+infty} [...]
end{equation}
but this way the lower limit is too wide, and I don't like it. So I was hoping to write something like this:
begin{equation}
sum_{-infty}^{+infty}nolimits_{n} [...]
end{equation}
to write the index n on the right side of the sum symbol, while the limits of the summation remain above and below.
Of course it doesn't work, LaTeX is pissed because there is a double subscript. Anyone knows if it's possible to do what I want to?
math-operators
is there a way to show sum limits partially in inline mode and partially in display mode? i.e., I want to write
begin{equation}
sum_{n=-infty}^{+infty} [...]
end{equation}
but this way the lower limit is too wide, and I don't like it. So I was hoping to write something like this:
begin{equation}
sum_{-infty}^{+infty}nolimits_{n} [...]
end{equation}
to write the index n on the right side of the sum symbol, while the limits of the summation remain above and below.
Of course it doesn't work, LaTeX is pissed because there is a double subscript. Anyone knows if it's possible to do what I want to?
math-operators
math-operators
edited Jan 5 '13 at 12:57
mafp
14.5k252100
14.5k252100
asked Jan 4 '13 at 2:27
gbasogbaso
186126
186126
migrated from stackoverflow.com Jan 5 '13 at 12:45
This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.
migrated from stackoverflow.com Jan 5 '13 at 12:45
This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
In this instance a better approach would be to use mathtools
's mathclap
, which provides a centred overlap in math mode. The centred overlap implies a zero-width box containing stuff that overlaps on the left and right:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}% http://ctan.org/pkg/mathtools
begin{document}
begin{align*}
A &= sum_{n=-infty}^{+infty} f(x) \
B &= smashoperator[r]{sum_{n=-infty}^{+infty}} f(x) \
C &= sum_{mathclap{n=-infty}}^{+infty} f(x) \
D &= sum_{substack{n={}\-infty}}^{+infty} f(x) \
E &= sum_{-infty}^{infty}mathop{}_{mkern-5mu n} f(x)
end{align*}
end{document}
Sure mathtools
also loads amsmath
, but both these provide excellent tools in terms of typesetting mathematical content (and otherwise).
To add multiple things under a math operator (like sum
), see How do you put multiple things under a limit?, which suggests substack
(as I've done in the last horrible visual).
1
If you asked me, I vote for option no. 2.
– yo'
Jan 5 '13 at 13:13
Thank you. I am looking for something like point E., but with prod, not sum. When I tried copying using mathop{}_{mkern-5mu n} it did not look so good. How would you do it with prod?
– user119615
Feb 9 '17 at 12:09
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f89447%2flatex-adjusting-sum-limits%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
In this instance a better approach would be to use mathtools
's mathclap
, which provides a centred overlap in math mode. The centred overlap implies a zero-width box containing stuff that overlaps on the left and right:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}% http://ctan.org/pkg/mathtools
begin{document}
begin{align*}
A &= sum_{n=-infty}^{+infty} f(x) \
B &= smashoperator[r]{sum_{n=-infty}^{+infty}} f(x) \
C &= sum_{mathclap{n=-infty}}^{+infty} f(x) \
D &= sum_{substack{n={}\-infty}}^{+infty} f(x) \
E &= sum_{-infty}^{infty}mathop{}_{mkern-5mu n} f(x)
end{align*}
end{document}
Sure mathtools
also loads amsmath
, but both these provide excellent tools in terms of typesetting mathematical content (and otherwise).
To add multiple things under a math operator (like sum
), see How do you put multiple things under a limit?, which suggests substack
(as I've done in the last horrible visual).
1
If you asked me, I vote for option no. 2.
– yo'
Jan 5 '13 at 13:13
Thank you. I am looking for something like point E., but with prod, not sum. When I tried copying using mathop{}_{mkern-5mu n} it did not look so good. How would you do it with prod?
– user119615
Feb 9 '17 at 12:09
add a comment |
In this instance a better approach would be to use mathtools
's mathclap
, which provides a centred overlap in math mode. The centred overlap implies a zero-width box containing stuff that overlaps on the left and right:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}% http://ctan.org/pkg/mathtools
begin{document}
begin{align*}
A &= sum_{n=-infty}^{+infty} f(x) \
B &= smashoperator[r]{sum_{n=-infty}^{+infty}} f(x) \
C &= sum_{mathclap{n=-infty}}^{+infty} f(x) \
D &= sum_{substack{n={}\-infty}}^{+infty} f(x) \
E &= sum_{-infty}^{infty}mathop{}_{mkern-5mu n} f(x)
end{align*}
end{document}
Sure mathtools
also loads amsmath
, but both these provide excellent tools in terms of typesetting mathematical content (and otherwise).
To add multiple things under a math operator (like sum
), see How do you put multiple things under a limit?, which suggests substack
(as I've done in the last horrible visual).
1
If you asked me, I vote for option no. 2.
– yo'
Jan 5 '13 at 13:13
Thank you. I am looking for something like point E., but with prod, not sum. When I tried copying using mathop{}_{mkern-5mu n} it did not look so good. How would you do it with prod?
– user119615
Feb 9 '17 at 12:09
add a comment |
In this instance a better approach would be to use mathtools
's mathclap
, which provides a centred overlap in math mode. The centred overlap implies a zero-width box containing stuff that overlaps on the left and right:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}% http://ctan.org/pkg/mathtools
begin{document}
begin{align*}
A &= sum_{n=-infty}^{+infty} f(x) \
B &= smashoperator[r]{sum_{n=-infty}^{+infty}} f(x) \
C &= sum_{mathclap{n=-infty}}^{+infty} f(x) \
D &= sum_{substack{n={}\-infty}}^{+infty} f(x) \
E &= sum_{-infty}^{infty}mathop{}_{mkern-5mu n} f(x)
end{align*}
end{document}
Sure mathtools
also loads amsmath
, but both these provide excellent tools in terms of typesetting mathematical content (and otherwise).
To add multiple things under a math operator (like sum
), see How do you put multiple things under a limit?, which suggests substack
(as I've done in the last horrible visual).
In this instance a better approach would be to use mathtools
's mathclap
, which provides a centred overlap in math mode. The centred overlap implies a zero-width box containing stuff that overlaps on the left and right:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}% http://ctan.org/pkg/mathtools
begin{document}
begin{align*}
A &= sum_{n=-infty}^{+infty} f(x) \
B &= smashoperator[r]{sum_{n=-infty}^{+infty}} f(x) \
C &= sum_{mathclap{n=-infty}}^{+infty} f(x) \
D &= sum_{substack{n={}\-infty}}^{+infty} f(x) \
E &= sum_{-infty}^{infty}mathop{}_{mkern-5mu n} f(x)
end{align*}
end{document}
Sure mathtools
also loads amsmath
, but both these provide excellent tools in terms of typesetting mathematical content (and otherwise).
To add multiple things under a math operator (like sum
), see How do you put multiple things under a limit?, which suggests substack
(as I've done in the last horrible visual).
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:36
Community♦
1
1
answered Jan 4 '13 at 3:21
WernerWerner
448k709921697
448k709921697
1
If you asked me, I vote for option no. 2.
– yo'
Jan 5 '13 at 13:13
Thank you. I am looking for something like point E., but with prod, not sum. When I tried copying using mathop{}_{mkern-5mu n} it did not look so good. How would you do it with prod?
– user119615
Feb 9 '17 at 12:09
add a comment |
1
If you asked me, I vote for option no. 2.
– yo'
Jan 5 '13 at 13:13
Thank you. I am looking for something like point E., but with prod, not sum. When I tried copying using mathop{}_{mkern-5mu n} it did not look so good. How would you do it with prod?
– user119615
Feb 9 '17 at 12:09
1
1
If you asked me, I vote for option no. 2.
– yo'
Jan 5 '13 at 13:13
If you asked me, I vote for option no. 2.
– yo'
Jan 5 '13 at 13:13
Thank you. I am looking for something like point E., but with prod, not sum. When I tried copying using mathop{}_{mkern-5mu n} it did not look so good. How would you do it with prod?
– user119615
Feb 9 '17 at 12:09
Thank you. I am looking for something like point E., but with prod, not sum. When I tried copying using mathop{}_{mkern-5mu n} it did not look so good. How would you do it with prod?
– user119615
Feb 9 '17 at 12:09
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f89447%2flatex-adjusting-sum-limits%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown