Springer journal math font [duplicate]

This question already has an answer here:

How do I find out what fonts are used in a document/picture?

6 answers

I'm trying to troubleshoot proofs for an article in a Springer (linguistics) journal. It'd be useful to test out some potential solutions myself rather than describing what I want to the typesetters and asking them to figure things out.

However, I can't figure out how to approximate the Springer math font. It looks similar in some respects (e.g., delimiters) to newtxmath, but other things look unlike any package I'm familiar with (e.g., the Greek letters, mathsf/mathtt).

Is there any way to approximate Springer's latex style (in particular, the math font), or is this impossible without whatever proprietary tools they're using?

Editing to add a photo of a representative formula. The delimiters and the alphabetic letters are very newtxmath, the lambda and binary/relational operations are not.
enter image description here

edited Mar 9 at 15:55

asked Mar 9 at 15:30

Simon C

436213

marked as duplicate by samcarter, Kurt, Phelype Oleinik, Henri Menke, JouleV Mar 11 at 5:23

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

Springer, several years ago, had a ‘Springer font’, based on Adobe's Minion Pro. Maybe try to see if the homonymous package yields a correct result.

– Bernard
Mar 9 at 15:46

1

See the update. Doesn't look Minion-y.

– Simon C
Mar 9 at 15:55

1

I think they use the MathTime Professional 2 fonts, a subset of which (the so-called Lite version) can be downloaded, installed and used for free.

– Pavel Rudnev
Mar 10 at 11:30

add a comment |

This question already has an answer here:

How do I find out what fonts are used in a document/picture?

6 answers

Is there any way to approximate Springer's latex style (in particular, the math font), or is this impossible without whatever proprietary tools they're using?

Editing to add a photo of a representative formula. The delimiters and the alphabetic letters are very newtxmath, the lambda and binary/relational operations are not.
enter image description here

edited Mar 9 at 15:55

asked Mar 9 at 15:30

Simon C

436213

marked as duplicate by samcarter, Kurt, Phelype Oleinik, Henri Menke, JouleV Mar 11 at 5:23

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

Springer, several years ago, had a ‘Springer font’, based on Adobe's Minion Pro. Maybe try to see if the homonymous package yields a correct result.

– Bernard
Mar 9 at 15:46

1

See the update. Doesn't look Minion-y.

– Simon C
Mar 9 at 15:55

1

I think they use the MathTime Professional 2 fonts, a subset of which (the so-called Lite version) can be downloaded, installed and used for free.

– Pavel Rudnev
Mar 10 at 11:30

add a comment |

This question already has an answer here:

How do I find out what fonts are used in a document/picture?

6 answers

Is there any way to approximate Springer's latex style (in particular, the math font), or is this impossible without whatever proprietary tools they're using?

Editing to add a photo of a representative formula. The delimiters and the alphabetic letters are very newtxmath, the lambda and binary/relational operations are not.
enter image description here

edited Mar 9 at 15:55

asked Mar 9 at 15:30

Simon C

436213

This question already has an answer here:

How do I find out what fonts are used in a document/picture?

6 answers

Is there any way to approximate Springer's latex style (in particular, the math font), or is this impossible without whatever proprietary tools they're using?

Editing to add a photo of a representative formula. The delimiters and the alphabetic letters are very newtxmath, the lambda and binary/relational operations are not.
enter image description here

This question already has an answer here:

How do I find out what fonts are used in a document/picture?

6 answers

fonts

edited Mar 9 at 15:55

asked Mar 9 at 15:30

Simon C

436213

edited Mar 9 at 15:55

asked Mar 9 at 15:30

Simon C

436213

edited Mar 9 at 15:55

asked Mar 9 at 15:30

Simon C

436213

asked Mar 9 at 15:30

Simon C

436213

asked Mar 9 at 15:30

Simon C

436213

marked as duplicate by samcarter, Kurt, Phelype Oleinik, Henri Menke, JouleV Mar 11 at 5:23

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

marked as duplicate by samcarter, Kurt, Phelype Oleinik, Henri Menke, JouleV Mar 11 at 5:23

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

Springer, several years ago, had a ‘Springer font’, based on Adobe's Minion Pro. Maybe try to see if the homonymous package yields a correct result.

– Bernard
Mar 9 at 15:46

1

See the update. Doesn't look Minion-y.

– Simon C
Mar 9 at 15:55

1

I think they use the MathTime Professional 2 fonts, a subset of which (the so-called Lite version) can be downloaded, installed and used for free.

– Pavel Rudnev
Mar 10 at 11:30

add a comment |

Springer, several years ago, had a ‘Springer font’, based on Adobe's Minion Pro. Maybe try to see if the homonymous package yields a correct result.

– Bernard
Mar 9 at 15:46

1

See the update. Doesn't look Minion-y.

– Simon C
Mar 9 at 15:55

1

I think they use the MathTime Professional 2 fonts, a subset of which (the so-called Lite version) can be downloaded, installed and used for free.

– Pavel Rudnev
Mar 10 at 11:30

Springer, several years ago, had a ‘Springer font’, based on Adobe's Minion Pro. Maybe try to see if the homonymous package yields a correct result.

– Bernard
Mar 9 at 15:46

See the update. Doesn't look Minion-y.

– Simon C
Mar 9 at 15:55

I think they use the MathTime Professional 2 fonts, a subset of which (the so-called Lite version) can be downloaded, installed and used for free.

– Pavel Rudnev
Mar 10 at 11:30

add a comment |

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

Accepting totally with the comment of @Pavel Rudnev, you can choose two code options. For example to use the symbols lambda you can use usepackage[lite]{mtpro2} with uplambda or with libertine package.

They are very similar.

enter image description here

documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{article}

usepackage[lite]{mtpro2}

begin{document}

[uplambda, rightarrow]

end{document}

With the option usepackage[libertine]{newtxmath}:

enter image description here

documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{article}

usepackage[libertine]{newtxmath}

begin{document}

[uplambda]

end{document}

edited Mar 12 at 13:04

answered Mar 10 at 21:18

Sebastiano

11k42164

I agree it's based on mtpro2 with some borrowings from newtxmath and perhaps elsewhere. (Interesting, the uplambda is vertically squished in the proofs for some reason or other.) The rightarrow is the giveaway.

– Simon C
Mar 10 at 22:04

Thank you for to have accepted my answer. However the answer is given bt @Pavel Rudnev :-). For libertine I have taken severals hours to find it.

– Sebastiano
Mar 10 at 22:08

add a comment |

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

They are very similar.

enter image description here

documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{article}

usepackage[lite]{mtpro2}

begin{document}

[uplambda, rightarrow]

end{document}

With the option usepackage[libertine]{newtxmath}:

enter image description here

documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{article}

usepackage[libertine]{newtxmath}

begin{document}

[uplambda]

end{document}

edited Mar 12 at 13:04

answered Mar 10 at 21:18

Sebastiano

11k42164

I agree it's based on mtpro2 with some borrowings from newtxmath and perhaps elsewhere. (Interesting, the uplambda is vertically squished in the proofs for some reason or other.) The rightarrow is the giveaway.

– Simon C
Mar 10 at 22:04

Thank you for to have accepted my answer. However the answer is given bt @Pavel Rudnev :-). For libertine I have taken severals hours to find it.

– Sebastiano
Mar 10 at 22:08

add a comment |

They are very similar.

enter image description here

documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{article}

usepackage[lite]{mtpro2}

begin{document}

[uplambda, rightarrow]

end{document}

With the option usepackage[libertine]{newtxmath}:

enter image description here

documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{article}

usepackage[libertine]{newtxmath}

begin{document}

[uplambda]

end{document}

edited Mar 12 at 13:04

answered Mar 10 at 21:18

Sebastiano

11k42164

I agree it's based on mtpro2 with some borrowings from newtxmath and perhaps elsewhere. (Interesting, the uplambda is vertically squished in the proofs for some reason or other.) The rightarrow is the giveaway.

– Simon C
Mar 10 at 22:04

Thank you for to have accepted my answer. However the answer is given bt @Pavel Rudnev :-). For libertine I have taken severals hours to find it.

– Sebastiano
Mar 10 at 22:08

add a comment |

They are very similar.

enter image description here

documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{article}

usepackage[lite]{mtpro2}

begin{document}

[uplambda, rightarrow]

end{document}

With the option usepackage[libertine]{newtxmath}:

enter image description here

documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{article}

usepackage[libertine]{newtxmath}

begin{document}

[uplambda]

end{document}

edited Mar 12 at 13:04

answered Mar 10 at 21:18

Sebastiano

11k42164

They are very similar.

enter image description here

documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{article}

usepackage[lite]{mtpro2}

begin{document}

[uplambda, rightarrow]

end{document}

With the option usepackage[libertine]{newtxmath}:

enter image description here

documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{article}

usepackage[libertine]{newtxmath}

begin{document}

[uplambda]

end{document}

edited Mar 12 at 13:04

answered Mar 10 at 21:18

Sebastiano

11k42164

edited Mar 12 at 13:04

answered Mar 10 at 21:18

Sebastiano

11k42164

answered Mar 10 at 21:18

Sebastiano

11k42164

answered Mar 10 at 21:18

Sebastiano

11k42164

I agree it's based on mtpro2 with some borrowings from newtxmath and perhaps elsewhere. (Interesting, the uplambda is vertically squished in the proofs for some reason or other.) The rightarrow is the giveaway.

– Simon C
Mar 10 at 22:04

Thank you for to have accepted my answer. However the answer is given bt @Pavel Rudnev :-). For libertine I have taken severals hours to find it.

– Sebastiano
Mar 10 at 22:08

add a comment |

I agree it's based on mtpro2 with some borrowings from newtxmath and perhaps elsewhere. (Interesting, the uplambda is vertically squished in the proofs for some reason or other.) The rightarrow is the giveaway.

– Simon C
Mar 10 at 22:04

Thank you for to have accepted my answer. However the answer is given bt @Pavel Rudnev :-). For libertine I have taken severals hours to find it.

– Sebastiano
Mar 10 at 22:08

I agree it's based on mtpro2 with some borrowings from newtxmath and perhaps elsewhere. (Interesting, the uplambda is vertically squished in the proofs for some reason or other.) The rightarrow is the giveaway.

– Simon C
Mar 10 at 22:04

Thank you for to have accepted my answer. However the answer is given bt @Pavel Rudnev :-). For libertine I have taken severals hours to find it.

– Sebastiano
Mar 10 at 22:08

add a comment |

This page is only for reference, If you need detailed information, please check here

搜尋此網誌

Cfrgtkky