Draw an aircraft with Tikz
I want to draw a plane using the Tikz tool.
You will find, attached, a screenshot.
tikz-pgf 3d technical-drawing
|
show 8 more comments
I want to draw a plane using the Tikz tool.
You will find, attached, a screenshot.
tikz-pgf 3d technical-drawing
25
Please kindly provide a minimal working example to show your effort and to show what your problem is.
– kiss my armpit
May 17 '13 at 13:53
10
Though it might be fun to try, your question sounds like: "Please do this difficult drawing for me for free. Thanks." As @ClickMe says, explaining what you've tried yourself (preferably with some code) would help get past that impression.
– badroit
May 17 '13 at 14:00
10
Friends, please do not downvote this question if the score is already-1
.
– Paulo Cereda
May 17 '13 at 14:07
14
The question has received quite some downvotes. We should explain the OP (@physics) why we think that this question is "bad": Drawing such a complex graphics with tikz is a tedious job and it might be done much easier with the right tool. Since we don't know what the purpose is to do that with tikz, nobody will of course spend an hour or two drawing that airplane in tikz. If you (the OP) already have say 90% of the code, our job would easier and we know where the difficulty is.
– topskip
May 17 '13 at 14:14
10
I would just like to note that the TeX Stack Exchange community is one of the best communities I have encountered on the internet so far and that it is a pleasure and an absolute joy to be a part of it (although I am not talking much, I read Q&As every day). I appreciate it! Perhaps beautiful typography is one of the ways to find the best in people.:-)
– Harold Cavendish
May 17 '13 at 22:04
|
show 8 more comments
I want to draw a plane using the Tikz tool.
You will find, attached, a screenshot.
tikz-pgf 3d technical-drawing
I want to draw a plane using the Tikz tool.
You will find, attached, a screenshot.
tikz-pgf 3d technical-drawing
tikz-pgf 3d technical-drawing
edited May 18 '13 at 5:26
texenthusiast
5,097323107
5,097323107
asked May 17 '13 at 13:51
physicsphysics
4753714
4753714
25
Please kindly provide a minimal working example to show your effort and to show what your problem is.
– kiss my armpit
May 17 '13 at 13:53
10
Though it might be fun to try, your question sounds like: "Please do this difficult drawing for me for free. Thanks." As @ClickMe says, explaining what you've tried yourself (preferably with some code) would help get past that impression.
– badroit
May 17 '13 at 14:00
10
Friends, please do not downvote this question if the score is already-1
.
– Paulo Cereda
May 17 '13 at 14:07
14
The question has received quite some downvotes. We should explain the OP (@physics) why we think that this question is "bad": Drawing such a complex graphics with tikz is a tedious job and it might be done much easier with the right tool. Since we don't know what the purpose is to do that with tikz, nobody will of course spend an hour or two drawing that airplane in tikz. If you (the OP) already have say 90% of the code, our job would easier and we know where the difficulty is.
– topskip
May 17 '13 at 14:14
10
I would just like to note that the TeX Stack Exchange community is one of the best communities I have encountered on the internet so far and that it is a pleasure and an absolute joy to be a part of it (although I am not talking much, I read Q&As every day). I appreciate it! Perhaps beautiful typography is one of the ways to find the best in people.:-)
– Harold Cavendish
May 17 '13 at 22:04
|
show 8 more comments
25
Please kindly provide a minimal working example to show your effort and to show what your problem is.
– kiss my armpit
May 17 '13 at 13:53
10
Though it might be fun to try, your question sounds like: "Please do this difficult drawing for me for free. Thanks." As @ClickMe says, explaining what you've tried yourself (preferably with some code) would help get past that impression.
– badroit
May 17 '13 at 14:00
10
Friends, please do not downvote this question if the score is already-1
.
– Paulo Cereda
May 17 '13 at 14:07
14
The question has received quite some downvotes. We should explain the OP (@physics) why we think that this question is "bad": Drawing such a complex graphics with tikz is a tedious job and it might be done much easier with the right tool. Since we don't know what the purpose is to do that with tikz, nobody will of course spend an hour or two drawing that airplane in tikz. If you (the OP) already have say 90% of the code, our job would easier and we know where the difficulty is.
– topskip
May 17 '13 at 14:14
10
I would just like to note that the TeX Stack Exchange community is one of the best communities I have encountered on the internet so far and that it is a pleasure and an absolute joy to be a part of it (although I am not talking much, I read Q&As every day). I appreciate it! Perhaps beautiful typography is one of the ways to find the best in people.:-)
– Harold Cavendish
May 17 '13 at 22:04
25
25
Please kindly provide a minimal working example to show your effort and to show what your problem is.
– kiss my armpit
May 17 '13 at 13:53
Please kindly provide a minimal working example to show your effort and to show what your problem is.
– kiss my armpit
May 17 '13 at 13:53
10
10
Though it might be fun to try, your question sounds like: "Please do this difficult drawing for me for free. Thanks." As @ClickMe says, explaining what you've tried yourself (preferably with some code) would help get past that impression.
– badroit
May 17 '13 at 14:00
Though it might be fun to try, your question sounds like: "Please do this difficult drawing for me for free. Thanks." As @ClickMe says, explaining what you've tried yourself (preferably with some code) would help get past that impression.
– badroit
May 17 '13 at 14:00
10
10
Friends, please do not downvote this question if the score is already
-1
.– Paulo Cereda
May 17 '13 at 14:07
Friends, please do not downvote this question if the score is already
-1
.– Paulo Cereda
May 17 '13 at 14:07
14
14
The question has received quite some downvotes. We should explain the OP (@physics) why we think that this question is "bad": Drawing such a complex graphics with tikz is a tedious job and it might be done much easier with the right tool. Since we don't know what the purpose is to do that with tikz, nobody will of course spend an hour or two drawing that airplane in tikz. If you (the OP) already have say 90% of the code, our job would easier and we know where the difficulty is.
– topskip
May 17 '13 at 14:14
The question has received quite some downvotes. We should explain the OP (@physics) why we think that this question is "bad": Drawing such a complex graphics with tikz is a tedious job and it might be done much easier with the right tool. Since we don't know what the purpose is to do that with tikz, nobody will of course spend an hour or two drawing that airplane in tikz. If you (the OP) already have say 90% of the code, our job would easier and we know where the difficulty is.
– topskip
May 17 '13 at 14:14
10
10
I would just like to note that the TeX Stack Exchange community is one of the best communities I have encountered on the internet so far and that it is a pleasure and an absolute joy to be a part of it (although I am not talking much, I read Q&As every day). I appreciate it! Perhaps beautiful typography is one of the ways to find the best in people.
:-)
– Harold Cavendish
May 17 '13 at 22:04
I would just like to note that the TeX Stack Exchange community is one of the best communities I have encountered on the internet so far and that it is a pleasure and an absolute joy to be a part of it (although I am not talking much, I read Q&As every day). I appreciate it! Perhaps beautiful typography is one of the ways to find the best in people.
:-)
– Harold Cavendish
May 17 '13 at 22:04
|
show 8 more comments
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
It was suggested in chat
http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/9482087#9482087
That picture mode would be the ideal tool for the job here:
documentclass{article}
begin{document}
begin{picture}(200,100)
put(30,40){line(1,0){150}}
put(30,40){line(0,1){60}}
put(30,100){line(1,0){20}}
put(50,100){line(1,-4){10}}
put(60,60){line(1,0){100}}
put(160,60){line(1,-1){20}}
put(100,50){line(0,-1){80}}
put(130,50){line(0,-1){80}}
put(100,-30){line(1,0){30}}
put(100,61){line(0,1){49}}
put(130,61){line(0,1){49}}
put(100,110){line(1,0){30}}
end{picture}
end{document}
26
Best. Airplane. Ever.:)
– Paulo Cereda
May 17 '13 at 22:13
@PauloCereda: The tailplane is missing.
– AlexG
Jun 26 '14 at 8:02
5
@AlexG An exercise left for the reader.
– Sean Allred
Feb 21 '15 at 16:23
7
@SeanAllred the fuselage has been aerodynamically tuned to the extent that an additional wing on the tail is not needed in this design.
– David Carlisle
Feb 21 '15 at 16:32
1
It could take somebody a few minutes to realize it is just a drawing, not a real plane. If drawing a plane is an art, you are its Picasso.:)
– Diaa
Aug 9 '18 at 16:24
add a comment |
I would politely discourage anyone from drawing extremely technical drawings like this one
using pure LaTeX (TikZ or PStricks). Here I'm actually referencing abstract/non-mathematical drawings, including an airplane with Rolls-Royce Trent 1000 engines. Why?
Well, there are many other applications that you can use and easily export to a graphics format that can be included into your document using includegraphics
from graphicx
.
For example, searching the Google Sketchup 3D Warehouse for airplane gives you detailed 3D models of everything from a Boeing:
to a paper airplane
(on graphing paper!):
to a vintage toy wooden airplane:
Another 3D graphic tools, Sketch:3D Scene Description Translator not to be confused with google sketchup draws two- or three-dimensional solid objects and scenes by describing them in a tiny input language. Sketch emits PSTricks or TikZ/PGF code and allows embedding arbitrary LaTeX code for labeling and any other purpose the user can imagine. A novel feature allows LaTeX objects to be positioned with respect to 3d points in the scene. More details have a look at Italian document titled "Illustrazioni tridimensionali A con Sketch/LaTeX/PSTricks/Tikz nella didattica della Dinamica del Volo by A De Marco" at arstexnica no 4, Oct 2007. Some more related examples/hints by author
Figure 8(a) in above article 3D Illustrations using sketch of aircraft:
Similarly, OpenClipArt provides SVG images in abundance (sometimes more cartoon-like though), including many for airplanes. These can be converted to TikZ images using Inkscape.
Printing any of these to PDF if no other means exist (again, using free software like PDF Creator print driver
or otherwise) gives you a scalable vector graphics image which you can then use to overlay your annotations using techniques described in Drawing on an image with TikZ.
1
Werner's picture and Donald E. Knuth's one.
– kiss my armpit
May 17 '13 at 23:36
1
Thanks @Werner for having brought the attention on my paper about Sketch.
– agodemar
May 18 '13 at 9:16
These are great images from google. How would you include them in your document? After following the link above (for example for the paper airplane) I wind up getting a find in "dae" format. I have not idea what that is. Any suggestions?
– A.Ellett
Jun 26 '13 at 22:41
@A.Ellett: The images above are from Google Sketchup models. So (and what I typically do) is open up the model in Sketchup and print it to PDF. That transfers the model into a 2D vector graphics that you can "play" with (after playing with it to your liking in Sketchup itself). There is some loss of information (shadows, most notably). However, I'm also using the free version for these "conversions"; Google Sketchup Pro natively exports to PDF and other formats, but I haven't tried it.
– Werner
Jun 26 '13 at 22:51
add a comment |
You could start with something like this:
http://github.com/lahvak/TeX-stuff/blob/master/plane.tex
(I tried to include the code here, but it was too large.)
It will produce a picture like this:
You can then edit the code, clean it up, shorten it, etc.
Edit: I took the original .png
image, deleted some irrelevant parts, and use potrace
to get a vectorized version. That step would not be necessary if the original already was in a vector format. Then I use pstoedit
to convert it to an editable format. At least the version of pstoedit
on my computer does not do conversion to tikz, but metapost uses very similar syntax for path specifications, so I converted to metapost and eddited by hand.
Then I went through the file, adding color attributes to individual path to be able to locate which one is which, and, with a help of an overlayed grid, editted at least some of the paths. The editing could be carried much further, but as an example I feel this is sufficient. It is a tedious process, but IMHO it would be less work than creating the whole drawing from scratch in tikz.
As it is, it really did not take long, I had to interrupt the work several times, but altogether it took perhaps 30 minutes or so.
2
I'm interested to know how you did this, and perhaps how long it took you. My answer references the fact that non-mathematical yet technical drawings like this is better-suites for other languages. My first instinct is a tracing mechanism that takes (as input) any image and yields (as output) a vectorized version - almost like OCR.
– Werner
May 18 '13 at 13:08
@Werner I had the same thought hence resisted to post. But nevertheless potrace or autotrace to trace to vector and then inkscape2tikz to spit out TikZ code looks good. This process may need touchup time or more work to be done in TikZ to remove bad conversions.
– texenthusiast
May 18 '13 at 19:14
@Werner: see the last edit.
– Jan Hlavacek
May 18 '13 at 23:11
add a comment |
documentclass[preview,border=12pt]{standalone}
usepackage{bbding,graphicx}
begin{document}
scalebox{10}{Plane}
end{document}
Edit:
Responding to the requested animation:
documentclass[preview,border=12pt,multi]{standalone}
usepackage{bbding,graphicx,multido}
begin{document}
multido{i=10+-1}{10}{previewscalebox{i}{Plane}endpreview}
end{document}
How to enjoy it? Imagine that you are dropped from a plane.
3
No animation ? I'm disappointed ;)
– Tom Bombadil
May 17 '13 at 20:50
Look to me like the plane … drops.
– Qrrbrbirlbel
May 17 '13 at 21:02
11
@Qrrbrbirlbel: Yes. It is also correct. Motion is relative. I brush my teeth by rotating my head and hold my toothbrush motionless.
– kiss my armpit
May 17 '13 at 21:09
I wonder whybbding
is not part of texlive 2012?! LaTeX Error: File
bbding.sty' not found.` when I do pdflatex on the above code on Linux.pdfTeX 3.1415926-2.4-1.40.13 (TeX Live 2012/Debian)
– Nasser
May 17 '13 at 21:22
@Nasser: I used TeX Live 2012 that was regularly updated (but before TL got frozen).
– kiss my armpit
May 17 '13 at 21:24
|
show 1 more comment
An example, from pgfplots gallery:
add a comment |
fontawesome now offers a scalable alternative to the symbol from bbding, offering both an aeroplane symbol proper and two versions of a paper aeroplane.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{fontawesome}
begin{document}
faPlane faPaperPlane faPaperPlaneO
end{document}
And the font even scales correctly when compiled with pdfTeX. If you have problems with scaling make sure your TeX distribution is current as an earlier version was buggy in a way which affecting scaling with pdfTeX (but not Xe/LuaTeX).
add a comment |
The next revolution in aviation:
The duck plane
documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{tikzducks}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
duck
fill[orange] (0.7331,0.5229) .. controls (1.8688,-0.6326) and (2.2337,0.0383) .. (1.2819,0.7331) -- cycle;
fill[brown] (1.3848,1.6771) .. controls (1.2665,2.2823) and (0.5559,2.2697) .. (0.4000,1.6455) .. controls (0.5711,1.6714) and (0.8503,1.6562) .. (0.9926,1.6247) .. controls (0.9703,1.4641) and (1.0307,1.0718) .. (1.1444,1.0104) .. controls (1.3485,0.9002) and (1.4461,1.4498) .. (1.3848,1.6771) -- cycle;
fill[gray] (0.9153,1.4857) -- (0.9472,1.6278) -- (1.3926,1.5288) -- (1.3840,1.4228) -- cycle;
fill[gray] (0.6484,1.6773) -- (0.6601,1.7155) -- (0.7558,1.6863) -- (0.7441,1.6480) -- cycle;
draw[gray,fill=black] (0.83,1.57) circle (0.135);
draw[gray,fill=black] (0.54,1.65) circle (0.12);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f114783%2fdraw-an-aircraft-with-tikz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It was suggested in chat
http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/9482087#9482087
That picture mode would be the ideal tool for the job here:
documentclass{article}
begin{document}
begin{picture}(200,100)
put(30,40){line(1,0){150}}
put(30,40){line(0,1){60}}
put(30,100){line(1,0){20}}
put(50,100){line(1,-4){10}}
put(60,60){line(1,0){100}}
put(160,60){line(1,-1){20}}
put(100,50){line(0,-1){80}}
put(130,50){line(0,-1){80}}
put(100,-30){line(1,0){30}}
put(100,61){line(0,1){49}}
put(130,61){line(0,1){49}}
put(100,110){line(1,0){30}}
end{picture}
end{document}
26
Best. Airplane. Ever.:)
– Paulo Cereda
May 17 '13 at 22:13
@PauloCereda: The tailplane is missing.
– AlexG
Jun 26 '14 at 8:02
5
@AlexG An exercise left for the reader.
– Sean Allred
Feb 21 '15 at 16:23
7
@SeanAllred the fuselage has been aerodynamically tuned to the extent that an additional wing on the tail is not needed in this design.
– David Carlisle
Feb 21 '15 at 16:32
1
It could take somebody a few minutes to realize it is just a drawing, not a real plane. If drawing a plane is an art, you are its Picasso.:)
– Diaa
Aug 9 '18 at 16:24
add a comment |
It was suggested in chat
http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/9482087#9482087
That picture mode would be the ideal tool for the job here:
documentclass{article}
begin{document}
begin{picture}(200,100)
put(30,40){line(1,0){150}}
put(30,40){line(0,1){60}}
put(30,100){line(1,0){20}}
put(50,100){line(1,-4){10}}
put(60,60){line(1,0){100}}
put(160,60){line(1,-1){20}}
put(100,50){line(0,-1){80}}
put(130,50){line(0,-1){80}}
put(100,-30){line(1,0){30}}
put(100,61){line(0,1){49}}
put(130,61){line(0,1){49}}
put(100,110){line(1,0){30}}
end{picture}
end{document}
26
Best. Airplane. Ever.:)
– Paulo Cereda
May 17 '13 at 22:13
@PauloCereda: The tailplane is missing.
– AlexG
Jun 26 '14 at 8:02
5
@AlexG An exercise left for the reader.
– Sean Allred
Feb 21 '15 at 16:23
7
@SeanAllred the fuselage has been aerodynamically tuned to the extent that an additional wing on the tail is not needed in this design.
– David Carlisle
Feb 21 '15 at 16:32
1
It could take somebody a few minutes to realize it is just a drawing, not a real plane. If drawing a plane is an art, you are its Picasso.:)
– Diaa
Aug 9 '18 at 16:24
add a comment |
It was suggested in chat
http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/9482087#9482087
That picture mode would be the ideal tool for the job here:
documentclass{article}
begin{document}
begin{picture}(200,100)
put(30,40){line(1,0){150}}
put(30,40){line(0,1){60}}
put(30,100){line(1,0){20}}
put(50,100){line(1,-4){10}}
put(60,60){line(1,0){100}}
put(160,60){line(1,-1){20}}
put(100,50){line(0,-1){80}}
put(130,50){line(0,-1){80}}
put(100,-30){line(1,0){30}}
put(100,61){line(0,1){49}}
put(130,61){line(0,1){49}}
put(100,110){line(1,0){30}}
end{picture}
end{document}
It was suggested in chat
http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/9482087#9482087
That picture mode would be the ideal tool for the job here:
documentclass{article}
begin{document}
begin{picture}(200,100)
put(30,40){line(1,0){150}}
put(30,40){line(0,1){60}}
put(30,100){line(1,0){20}}
put(50,100){line(1,-4){10}}
put(60,60){line(1,0){100}}
put(160,60){line(1,-1){20}}
put(100,50){line(0,-1){80}}
put(130,50){line(0,-1){80}}
put(100,-30){line(1,0){30}}
put(100,61){line(0,1){49}}
put(130,61){line(0,1){49}}
put(100,110){line(1,0){30}}
end{picture}
end{document}
answered May 17 '13 at 21:33
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
494k4111381886
494k4111381886
26
Best. Airplane. Ever.:)
– Paulo Cereda
May 17 '13 at 22:13
@PauloCereda: The tailplane is missing.
– AlexG
Jun 26 '14 at 8:02
5
@AlexG An exercise left for the reader.
– Sean Allred
Feb 21 '15 at 16:23
7
@SeanAllred the fuselage has been aerodynamically tuned to the extent that an additional wing on the tail is not needed in this design.
– David Carlisle
Feb 21 '15 at 16:32
1
It could take somebody a few minutes to realize it is just a drawing, not a real plane. If drawing a plane is an art, you are its Picasso.:)
– Diaa
Aug 9 '18 at 16:24
add a comment |
26
Best. Airplane. Ever.:)
– Paulo Cereda
May 17 '13 at 22:13
@PauloCereda: The tailplane is missing.
– AlexG
Jun 26 '14 at 8:02
5
@AlexG An exercise left for the reader.
– Sean Allred
Feb 21 '15 at 16:23
7
@SeanAllred the fuselage has been aerodynamically tuned to the extent that an additional wing on the tail is not needed in this design.
– David Carlisle
Feb 21 '15 at 16:32
1
It could take somebody a few minutes to realize it is just a drawing, not a real plane. If drawing a plane is an art, you are its Picasso.:)
– Diaa
Aug 9 '18 at 16:24
26
26
Best. Airplane. Ever.
:)
– Paulo Cereda
May 17 '13 at 22:13
Best. Airplane. Ever.
:)
– Paulo Cereda
May 17 '13 at 22:13
@PauloCereda: The tailplane is missing.
– AlexG
Jun 26 '14 at 8:02
@PauloCereda: The tailplane is missing.
– AlexG
Jun 26 '14 at 8:02
5
5
@AlexG An exercise left for the reader.
– Sean Allred
Feb 21 '15 at 16:23
@AlexG An exercise left for the reader.
– Sean Allred
Feb 21 '15 at 16:23
7
7
@SeanAllred the fuselage has been aerodynamically tuned to the extent that an additional wing on the tail is not needed in this design.
– David Carlisle
Feb 21 '15 at 16:32
@SeanAllred the fuselage has been aerodynamically tuned to the extent that an additional wing on the tail is not needed in this design.
– David Carlisle
Feb 21 '15 at 16:32
1
1
It could take somebody a few minutes to realize it is just a drawing, not a real plane. If drawing a plane is an art, you are its Picasso.
:)
– Diaa
Aug 9 '18 at 16:24
It could take somebody a few minutes to realize it is just a drawing, not a real plane. If drawing a plane is an art, you are its Picasso.
:)
– Diaa
Aug 9 '18 at 16:24
add a comment |
I would politely discourage anyone from drawing extremely technical drawings like this one
using pure LaTeX (TikZ or PStricks). Here I'm actually referencing abstract/non-mathematical drawings, including an airplane with Rolls-Royce Trent 1000 engines. Why?
Well, there are many other applications that you can use and easily export to a graphics format that can be included into your document using includegraphics
from graphicx
.
For example, searching the Google Sketchup 3D Warehouse for airplane gives you detailed 3D models of everything from a Boeing:
to a paper airplane
(on graphing paper!):
to a vintage toy wooden airplane:
Another 3D graphic tools, Sketch:3D Scene Description Translator not to be confused with google sketchup draws two- or three-dimensional solid objects and scenes by describing them in a tiny input language. Sketch emits PSTricks or TikZ/PGF code and allows embedding arbitrary LaTeX code for labeling and any other purpose the user can imagine. A novel feature allows LaTeX objects to be positioned with respect to 3d points in the scene. More details have a look at Italian document titled "Illustrazioni tridimensionali A con Sketch/LaTeX/PSTricks/Tikz nella didattica della Dinamica del Volo by A De Marco" at arstexnica no 4, Oct 2007. Some more related examples/hints by author
Figure 8(a) in above article 3D Illustrations using sketch of aircraft:
Similarly, OpenClipArt provides SVG images in abundance (sometimes more cartoon-like though), including many for airplanes. These can be converted to TikZ images using Inkscape.
Printing any of these to PDF if no other means exist (again, using free software like PDF Creator print driver
or otherwise) gives you a scalable vector graphics image which you can then use to overlay your annotations using techniques described in Drawing on an image with TikZ.
1
Werner's picture and Donald E. Knuth's one.
– kiss my armpit
May 17 '13 at 23:36
1
Thanks @Werner for having brought the attention on my paper about Sketch.
– agodemar
May 18 '13 at 9:16
These are great images from google. How would you include them in your document? After following the link above (for example for the paper airplane) I wind up getting a find in "dae" format. I have not idea what that is. Any suggestions?
– A.Ellett
Jun 26 '13 at 22:41
@A.Ellett: The images above are from Google Sketchup models. So (and what I typically do) is open up the model in Sketchup and print it to PDF. That transfers the model into a 2D vector graphics that you can "play" with (after playing with it to your liking in Sketchup itself). There is some loss of information (shadows, most notably). However, I'm also using the free version for these "conversions"; Google Sketchup Pro natively exports to PDF and other formats, but I haven't tried it.
– Werner
Jun 26 '13 at 22:51
add a comment |
I would politely discourage anyone from drawing extremely technical drawings like this one
using pure LaTeX (TikZ or PStricks). Here I'm actually referencing abstract/non-mathematical drawings, including an airplane with Rolls-Royce Trent 1000 engines. Why?
Well, there are many other applications that you can use and easily export to a graphics format that can be included into your document using includegraphics
from graphicx
.
For example, searching the Google Sketchup 3D Warehouse for airplane gives you detailed 3D models of everything from a Boeing:
to a paper airplane
(on graphing paper!):
to a vintage toy wooden airplane:
Another 3D graphic tools, Sketch:3D Scene Description Translator not to be confused with google sketchup draws two- or three-dimensional solid objects and scenes by describing them in a tiny input language. Sketch emits PSTricks or TikZ/PGF code and allows embedding arbitrary LaTeX code for labeling and any other purpose the user can imagine. A novel feature allows LaTeX objects to be positioned with respect to 3d points in the scene. More details have a look at Italian document titled "Illustrazioni tridimensionali A con Sketch/LaTeX/PSTricks/Tikz nella didattica della Dinamica del Volo by A De Marco" at arstexnica no 4, Oct 2007. Some more related examples/hints by author
Figure 8(a) in above article 3D Illustrations using sketch of aircraft:
Similarly, OpenClipArt provides SVG images in abundance (sometimes more cartoon-like though), including many for airplanes. These can be converted to TikZ images using Inkscape.
Printing any of these to PDF if no other means exist (again, using free software like PDF Creator print driver
or otherwise) gives you a scalable vector graphics image which you can then use to overlay your annotations using techniques described in Drawing on an image with TikZ.
1
Werner's picture and Donald E. Knuth's one.
– kiss my armpit
May 17 '13 at 23:36
1
Thanks @Werner for having brought the attention on my paper about Sketch.
– agodemar
May 18 '13 at 9:16
These are great images from google. How would you include them in your document? After following the link above (for example for the paper airplane) I wind up getting a find in "dae" format. I have not idea what that is. Any suggestions?
– A.Ellett
Jun 26 '13 at 22:41
@A.Ellett: The images above are from Google Sketchup models. So (and what I typically do) is open up the model in Sketchup and print it to PDF. That transfers the model into a 2D vector graphics that you can "play" with (after playing with it to your liking in Sketchup itself). There is some loss of information (shadows, most notably). However, I'm also using the free version for these "conversions"; Google Sketchup Pro natively exports to PDF and other formats, but I haven't tried it.
– Werner
Jun 26 '13 at 22:51
add a comment |
I would politely discourage anyone from drawing extremely technical drawings like this one
using pure LaTeX (TikZ or PStricks). Here I'm actually referencing abstract/non-mathematical drawings, including an airplane with Rolls-Royce Trent 1000 engines. Why?
Well, there are many other applications that you can use and easily export to a graphics format that can be included into your document using includegraphics
from graphicx
.
For example, searching the Google Sketchup 3D Warehouse for airplane gives you detailed 3D models of everything from a Boeing:
to a paper airplane
(on graphing paper!):
to a vintage toy wooden airplane:
Another 3D graphic tools, Sketch:3D Scene Description Translator not to be confused with google sketchup draws two- or three-dimensional solid objects and scenes by describing them in a tiny input language. Sketch emits PSTricks or TikZ/PGF code and allows embedding arbitrary LaTeX code for labeling and any other purpose the user can imagine. A novel feature allows LaTeX objects to be positioned with respect to 3d points in the scene. More details have a look at Italian document titled "Illustrazioni tridimensionali A con Sketch/LaTeX/PSTricks/Tikz nella didattica della Dinamica del Volo by A De Marco" at arstexnica no 4, Oct 2007. Some more related examples/hints by author
Figure 8(a) in above article 3D Illustrations using sketch of aircraft:
Similarly, OpenClipArt provides SVG images in abundance (sometimes more cartoon-like though), including many for airplanes. These can be converted to TikZ images using Inkscape.
Printing any of these to PDF if no other means exist (again, using free software like PDF Creator print driver
or otherwise) gives you a scalable vector graphics image which you can then use to overlay your annotations using techniques described in Drawing on an image with TikZ.
I would politely discourage anyone from drawing extremely technical drawings like this one
using pure LaTeX (TikZ or PStricks). Here I'm actually referencing abstract/non-mathematical drawings, including an airplane with Rolls-Royce Trent 1000 engines. Why?
Well, there are many other applications that you can use and easily export to a graphics format that can be included into your document using includegraphics
from graphicx
.
For example, searching the Google Sketchup 3D Warehouse for airplane gives you detailed 3D models of everything from a Boeing:
to a paper airplane
(on graphing paper!):
to a vintage toy wooden airplane:
Another 3D graphic tools, Sketch:3D Scene Description Translator not to be confused with google sketchup draws two- or three-dimensional solid objects and scenes by describing them in a tiny input language. Sketch emits PSTricks or TikZ/PGF code and allows embedding arbitrary LaTeX code for labeling and any other purpose the user can imagine. A novel feature allows LaTeX objects to be positioned with respect to 3d points in the scene. More details have a look at Italian document titled "Illustrazioni tridimensionali A con Sketch/LaTeX/PSTricks/Tikz nella didattica della Dinamica del Volo by A De Marco" at arstexnica no 4, Oct 2007. Some more related examples/hints by author
Figure 8(a) in above article 3D Illustrations using sketch of aircraft:
Similarly, OpenClipArt provides SVG images in abundance (sometimes more cartoon-like though), including many for airplanes. These can be converted to TikZ images using Inkscape.
Printing any of these to PDF if no other means exist (again, using free software like PDF Creator print driver
or otherwise) gives you a scalable vector graphics image which you can then use to overlay your annotations using techniques described in Drawing on an image with TikZ.
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:35
community wiki
5 revs, 2 users 89%
Werner
1
Werner's picture and Donald E. Knuth's one.
– kiss my armpit
May 17 '13 at 23:36
1
Thanks @Werner for having brought the attention on my paper about Sketch.
– agodemar
May 18 '13 at 9:16
These are great images from google. How would you include them in your document? After following the link above (for example for the paper airplane) I wind up getting a find in "dae" format. I have not idea what that is. Any suggestions?
– A.Ellett
Jun 26 '13 at 22:41
@A.Ellett: The images above are from Google Sketchup models. So (and what I typically do) is open up the model in Sketchup and print it to PDF. That transfers the model into a 2D vector graphics that you can "play" with (after playing with it to your liking in Sketchup itself). There is some loss of information (shadows, most notably). However, I'm also using the free version for these "conversions"; Google Sketchup Pro natively exports to PDF and other formats, but I haven't tried it.
– Werner
Jun 26 '13 at 22:51
add a comment |
1
Werner's picture and Donald E. Knuth's one.
– kiss my armpit
May 17 '13 at 23:36
1
Thanks @Werner for having brought the attention on my paper about Sketch.
– agodemar
May 18 '13 at 9:16
These are great images from google. How would you include them in your document? After following the link above (for example for the paper airplane) I wind up getting a find in "dae" format. I have not idea what that is. Any suggestions?
– A.Ellett
Jun 26 '13 at 22:41
@A.Ellett: The images above are from Google Sketchup models. So (and what I typically do) is open up the model in Sketchup and print it to PDF. That transfers the model into a 2D vector graphics that you can "play" with (after playing with it to your liking in Sketchup itself). There is some loss of information (shadows, most notably). However, I'm also using the free version for these "conversions"; Google Sketchup Pro natively exports to PDF and other formats, but I haven't tried it.
– Werner
Jun 26 '13 at 22:51
1
1
Werner's picture and Donald E. Knuth's one.
– kiss my armpit
May 17 '13 at 23:36
Werner's picture and Donald E. Knuth's one.
– kiss my armpit
May 17 '13 at 23:36
1
1
Thanks @Werner for having brought the attention on my paper about Sketch.
– agodemar
May 18 '13 at 9:16
Thanks @Werner for having brought the attention on my paper about Sketch.
– agodemar
May 18 '13 at 9:16
These are great images from google. How would you include them in your document? After following the link above (for example for the paper airplane) I wind up getting a find in "dae" format. I have not idea what that is. Any suggestions?
– A.Ellett
Jun 26 '13 at 22:41
These are great images from google. How would you include them in your document? After following the link above (for example for the paper airplane) I wind up getting a find in "dae" format. I have not idea what that is. Any suggestions?
– A.Ellett
Jun 26 '13 at 22:41
@A.Ellett: The images above are from Google Sketchup models. So (and what I typically do) is open up the model in Sketchup and print it to PDF. That transfers the model into a 2D vector graphics that you can "play" with (after playing with it to your liking in Sketchup itself). There is some loss of information (shadows, most notably). However, I'm also using the free version for these "conversions"; Google Sketchup Pro natively exports to PDF and other formats, but I haven't tried it.
– Werner
Jun 26 '13 at 22:51
@A.Ellett: The images above are from Google Sketchup models. So (and what I typically do) is open up the model in Sketchup and print it to PDF. That transfers the model into a 2D vector graphics that you can "play" with (after playing with it to your liking in Sketchup itself). There is some loss of information (shadows, most notably). However, I'm also using the free version for these "conversions"; Google Sketchup Pro natively exports to PDF and other formats, but I haven't tried it.
– Werner
Jun 26 '13 at 22:51
add a comment |
You could start with something like this:
http://github.com/lahvak/TeX-stuff/blob/master/plane.tex
(I tried to include the code here, but it was too large.)
It will produce a picture like this:
You can then edit the code, clean it up, shorten it, etc.
Edit: I took the original .png
image, deleted some irrelevant parts, and use potrace
to get a vectorized version. That step would not be necessary if the original already was in a vector format. Then I use pstoedit
to convert it to an editable format. At least the version of pstoedit
on my computer does not do conversion to tikz, but metapost uses very similar syntax for path specifications, so I converted to metapost and eddited by hand.
Then I went through the file, adding color attributes to individual path to be able to locate which one is which, and, with a help of an overlayed grid, editted at least some of the paths. The editing could be carried much further, but as an example I feel this is sufficient. It is a tedious process, but IMHO it would be less work than creating the whole drawing from scratch in tikz.
As it is, it really did not take long, I had to interrupt the work several times, but altogether it took perhaps 30 minutes or so.
2
I'm interested to know how you did this, and perhaps how long it took you. My answer references the fact that non-mathematical yet technical drawings like this is better-suites for other languages. My first instinct is a tracing mechanism that takes (as input) any image and yields (as output) a vectorized version - almost like OCR.
– Werner
May 18 '13 at 13:08
@Werner I had the same thought hence resisted to post. But nevertheless potrace or autotrace to trace to vector and then inkscape2tikz to spit out TikZ code looks good. This process may need touchup time or more work to be done in TikZ to remove bad conversions.
– texenthusiast
May 18 '13 at 19:14
@Werner: see the last edit.
– Jan Hlavacek
May 18 '13 at 23:11
add a comment |
You could start with something like this:
http://github.com/lahvak/TeX-stuff/blob/master/plane.tex
(I tried to include the code here, but it was too large.)
It will produce a picture like this:
You can then edit the code, clean it up, shorten it, etc.
Edit: I took the original .png
image, deleted some irrelevant parts, and use potrace
to get a vectorized version. That step would not be necessary if the original already was in a vector format. Then I use pstoedit
to convert it to an editable format. At least the version of pstoedit
on my computer does not do conversion to tikz, but metapost uses very similar syntax for path specifications, so I converted to metapost and eddited by hand.
Then I went through the file, adding color attributes to individual path to be able to locate which one is which, and, with a help of an overlayed grid, editted at least some of the paths. The editing could be carried much further, but as an example I feel this is sufficient. It is a tedious process, but IMHO it would be less work than creating the whole drawing from scratch in tikz.
As it is, it really did not take long, I had to interrupt the work several times, but altogether it took perhaps 30 minutes or so.
2
I'm interested to know how you did this, and perhaps how long it took you. My answer references the fact that non-mathematical yet technical drawings like this is better-suites for other languages. My first instinct is a tracing mechanism that takes (as input) any image and yields (as output) a vectorized version - almost like OCR.
– Werner
May 18 '13 at 13:08
@Werner I had the same thought hence resisted to post. But nevertheless potrace or autotrace to trace to vector and then inkscape2tikz to spit out TikZ code looks good. This process may need touchup time or more work to be done in TikZ to remove bad conversions.
– texenthusiast
May 18 '13 at 19:14
@Werner: see the last edit.
– Jan Hlavacek
May 18 '13 at 23:11
add a comment |
You could start with something like this:
http://github.com/lahvak/TeX-stuff/blob/master/plane.tex
(I tried to include the code here, but it was too large.)
It will produce a picture like this:
You can then edit the code, clean it up, shorten it, etc.
Edit: I took the original .png
image, deleted some irrelevant parts, and use potrace
to get a vectorized version. That step would not be necessary if the original already was in a vector format. Then I use pstoedit
to convert it to an editable format. At least the version of pstoedit
on my computer does not do conversion to tikz, but metapost uses very similar syntax for path specifications, so I converted to metapost and eddited by hand.
Then I went through the file, adding color attributes to individual path to be able to locate which one is which, and, with a help of an overlayed grid, editted at least some of the paths. The editing could be carried much further, but as an example I feel this is sufficient. It is a tedious process, but IMHO it would be less work than creating the whole drawing from scratch in tikz.
As it is, it really did not take long, I had to interrupt the work several times, but altogether it took perhaps 30 minutes or so.
You could start with something like this:
http://github.com/lahvak/TeX-stuff/blob/master/plane.tex
(I tried to include the code here, but it was too large.)
It will produce a picture like this:
You can then edit the code, clean it up, shorten it, etc.
Edit: I took the original .png
image, deleted some irrelevant parts, and use potrace
to get a vectorized version. That step would not be necessary if the original already was in a vector format. Then I use pstoedit
to convert it to an editable format. At least the version of pstoedit
on my computer does not do conversion to tikz, but metapost uses very similar syntax for path specifications, so I converted to metapost and eddited by hand.
Then I went through the file, adding color attributes to individual path to be able to locate which one is which, and, with a help of an overlayed grid, editted at least some of the paths. The editing could be carried much further, but as an example I feel this is sufficient. It is a tedious process, but IMHO it would be less work than creating the whole drawing from scratch in tikz.
As it is, it really did not take long, I had to interrupt the work several times, but altogether it took perhaps 30 minutes or so.
edited May 18 '13 at 23:10
answered May 18 '13 at 6:02
Jan HlavacekJan Hlavacek
15.8k34776
15.8k34776
2
I'm interested to know how you did this, and perhaps how long it took you. My answer references the fact that non-mathematical yet technical drawings like this is better-suites for other languages. My first instinct is a tracing mechanism that takes (as input) any image and yields (as output) a vectorized version - almost like OCR.
– Werner
May 18 '13 at 13:08
@Werner I had the same thought hence resisted to post. But nevertheless potrace or autotrace to trace to vector and then inkscape2tikz to spit out TikZ code looks good. This process may need touchup time or more work to be done in TikZ to remove bad conversions.
– texenthusiast
May 18 '13 at 19:14
@Werner: see the last edit.
– Jan Hlavacek
May 18 '13 at 23:11
add a comment |
2
I'm interested to know how you did this, and perhaps how long it took you. My answer references the fact that non-mathematical yet technical drawings like this is better-suites for other languages. My first instinct is a tracing mechanism that takes (as input) any image and yields (as output) a vectorized version - almost like OCR.
– Werner
May 18 '13 at 13:08
@Werner I had the same thought hence resisted to post. But nevertheless potrace or autotrace to trace to vector and then inkscape2tikz to spit out TikZ code looks good. This process may need touchup time or more work to be done in TikZ to remove bad conversions.
– texenthusiast
May 18 '13 at 19:14
@Werner: see the last edit.
– Jan Hlavacek
May 18 '13 at 23:11
2
2
I'm interested to know how you did this, and perhaps how long it took you. My answer references the fact that non-mathematical yet technical drawings like this is better-suites for other languages. My first instinct is a tracing mechanism that takes (as input) any image and yields (as output) a vectorized version - almost like OCR.
– Werner
May 18 '13 at 13:08
I'm interested to know how you did this, and perhaps how long it took you. My answer references the fact that non-mathematical yet technical drawings like this is better-suites for other languages. My first instinct is a tracing mechanism that takes (as input) any image and yields (as output) a vectorized version - almost like OCR.
– Werner
May 18 '13 at 13:08
@Werner I had the same thought hence resisted to post. But nevertheless potrace or autotrace to trace to vector and then inkscape2tikz to spit out TikZ code looks good. This process may need touchup time or more work to be done in TikZ to remove bad conversions.
– texenthusiast
May 18 '13 at 19:14
@Werner I had the same thought hence resisted to post. But nevertheless potrace or autotrace to trace to vector and then inkscape2tikz to spit out TikZ code looks good. This process may need touchup time or more work to be done in TikZ to remove bad conversions.
– texenthusiast
May 18 '13 at 19:14
@Werner: see the last edit.
– Jan Hlavacek
May 18 '13 at 23:11
@Werner: see the last edit.
– Jan Hlavacek
May 18 '13 at 23:11
add a comment |
documentclass[preview,border=12pt]{standalone}
usepackage{bbding,graphicx}
begin{document}
scalebox{10}{Plane}
end{document}
Edit:
Responding to the requested animation:
documentclass[preview,border=12pt,multi]{standalone}
usepackage{bbding,graphicx,multido}
begin{document}
multido{i=10+-1}{10}{previewscalebox{i}{Plane}endpreview}
end{document}
How to enjoy it? Imagine that you are dropped from a plane.
3
No animation ? I'm disappointed ;)
– Tom Bombadil
May 17 '13 at 20:50
Look to me like the plane … drops.
– Qrrbrbirlbel
May 17 '13 at 21:02
11
@Qrrbrbirlbel: Yes. It is also correct. Motion is relative. I brush my teeth by rotating my head and hold my toothbrush motionless.
– kiss my armpit
May 17 '13 at 21:09
I wonder whybbding
is not part of texlive 2012?! LaTeX Error: File
bbding.sty' not found.` when I do pdflatex on the above code on Linux.pdfTeX 3.1415926-2.4-1.40.13 (TeX Live 2012/Debian)
– Nasser
May 17 '13 at 21:22
@Nasser: I used TeX Live 2012 that was regularly updated (but before TL got frozen).
– kiss my armpit
May 17 '13 at 21:24
|
show 1 more comment
documentclass[preview,border=12pt]{standalone}
usepackage{bbding,graphicx}
begin{document}
scalebox{10}{Plane}
end{document}
Edit:
Responding to the requested animation:
documentclass[preview,border=12pt,multi]{standalone}
usepackage{bbding,graphicx,multido}
begin{document}
multido{i=10+-1}{10}{previewscalebox{i}{Plane}endpreview}
end{document}
How to enjoy it? Imagine that you are dropped from a plane.
3
No animation ? I'm disappointed ;)
– Tom Bombadil
May 17 '13 at 20:50
Look to me like the plane … drops.
– Qrrbrbirlbel
May 17 '13 at 21:02
11
@Qrrbrbirlbel: Yes. It is also correct. Motion is relative. I brush my teeth by rotating my head and hold my toothbrush motionless.
– kiss my armpit
May 17 '13 at 21:09
I wonder whybbding
is not part of texlive 2012?! LaTeX Error: File
bbding.sty' not found.` when I do pdflatex on the above code on Linux.pdfTeX 3.1415926-2.4-1.40.13 (TeX Live 2012/Debian)
– Nasser
May 17 '13 at 21:22
@Nasser: I used TeX Live 2012 that was regularly updated (but before TL got frozen).
– kiss my armpit
May 17 '13 at 21:24
|
show 1 more comment
documentclass[preview,border=12pt]{standalone}
usepackage{bbding,graphicx}
begin{document}
scalebox{10}{Plane}
end{document}
Edit:
Responding to the requested animation:
documentclass[preview,border=12pt,multi]{standalone}
usepackage{bbding,graphicx,multido}
begin{document}
multido{i=10+-1}{10}{previewscalebox{i}{Plane}endpreview}
end{document}
How to enjoy it? Imagine that you are dropped from a plane.
documentclass[preview,border=12pt]{standalone}
usepackage{bbding,graphicx}
begin{document}
scalebox{10}{Plane}
end{document}
Edit:
Responding to the requested animation:
documentclass[preview,border=12pt,multi]{standalone}
usepackage{bbding,graphicx,multido}
begin{document}
multido{i=10+-1}{10}{previewscalebox{i}{Plane}endpreview}
end{document}
How to enjoy it? Imagine that you are dropped from a plane.
edited May 17 '13 at 21:00
answered May 17 '13 at 20:49
kiss my armpitkiss my armpit
13.2k20174406
13.2k20174406
3
No animation ? I'm disappointed ;)
– Tom Bombadil
May 17 '13 at 20:50
Look to me like the plane … drops.
– Qrrbrbirlbel
May 17 '13 at 21:02
11
@Qrrbrbirlbel: Yes. It is also correct. Motion is relative. I brush my teeth by rotating my head and hold my toothbrush motionless.
– kiss my armpit
May 17 '13 at 21:09
I wonder whybbding
is not part of texlive 2012?! LaTeX Error: File
bbding.sty' not found.` when I do pdflatex on the above code on Linux.pdfTeX 3.1415926-2.4-1.40.13 (TeX Live 2012/Debian)
– Nasser
May 17 '13 at 21:22
@Nasser: I used TeX Live 2012 that was regularly updated (but before TL got frozen).
– kiss my armpit
May 17 '13 at 21:24
|
show 1 more comment
3
No animation ? I'm disappointed ;)
– Tom Bombadil
May 17 '13 at 20:50
Look to me like the plane … drops.
– Qrrbrbirlbel
May 17 '13 at 21:02
11
@Qrrbrbirlbel: Yes. It is also correct. Motion is relative. I brush my teeth by rotating my head and hold my toothbrush motionless.
– kiss my armpit
May 17 '13 at 21:09
I wonder whybbding
is not part of texlive 2012?! LaTeX Error: File
bbding.sty' not found.` when I do pdflatex on the above code on Linux.pdfTeX 3.1415926-2.4-1.40.13 (TeX Live 2012/Debian)
– Nasser
May 17 '13 at 21:22
@Nasser: I used TeX Live 2012 that was regularly updated (but before TL got frozen).
– kiss my armpit
May 17 '13 at 21:24
3
3
No animation ? I'm disappointed ;)
– Tom Bombadil
May 17 '13 at 20:50
No animation ? I'm disappointed ;)
– Tom Bombadil
May 17 '13 at 20:50
Look to me like the plane … drops.
– Qrrbrbirlbel
May 17 '13 at 21:02
Look to me like the plane … drops.
– Qrrbrbirlbel
May 17 '13 at 21:02
11
11
@Qrrbrbirlbel: Yes. It is also correct. Motion is relative. I brush my teeth by rotating my head and hold my toothbrush motionless.
– kiss my armpit
May 17 '13 at 21:09
@Qrrbrbirlbel: Yes. It is also correct. Motion is relative. I brush my teeth by rotating my head and hold my toothbrush motionless.
– kiss my armpit
May 17 '13 at 21:09
I wonder why
bbding
is not part of texlive 2012? ! LaTeX Error: File
bbding.sty' not found.` when I do pdflatex on the above code on Linux. pdfTeX 3.1415926-2.4-1.40.13 (TeX Live 2012/Debian)
– Nasser
May 17 '13 at 21:22
I wonder why
bbding
is not part of texlive 2012? ! LaTeX Error: File
bbding.sty' not found.` when I do pdflatex on the above code on Linux. pdfTeX 3.1415926-2.4-1.40.13 (TeX Live 2012/Debian)
– Nasser
May 17 '13 at 21:22
@Nasser: I used TeX Live 2012 that was regularly updated (but before TL got frozen).
– kiss my armpit
May 17 '13 at 21:24
@Nasser: I used TeX Live 2012 that was regularly updated (but before TL got frozen).
– kiss my armpit
May 17 '13 at 21:24
|
show 1 more comment
An example, from pgfplots gallery:
add a comment |
An example, from pgfplots gallery:
add a comment |
An example, from pgfplots gallery:
An example, from pgfplots gallery:
answered May 18 '13 at 18:14
user13907
add a comment |
add a comment |
fontawesome now offers a scalable alternative to the symbol from bbding, offering both an aeroplane symbol proper and two versions of a paper aeroplane.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{fontawesome}
begin{document}
faPlane faPaperPlane faPaperPlaneO
end{document}
And the font even scales correctly when compiled with pdfTeX. If you have problems with scaling make sure your TeX distribution is current as an earlier version was buggy in a way which affecting scaling with pdfTeX (but not Xe/LuaTeX).
add a comment |
fontawesome now offers a scalable alternative to the symbol from bbding, offering both an aeroplane symbol proper and two versions of a paper aeroplane.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{fontawesome}
begin{document}
faPlane faPaperPlane faPaperPlaneO
end{document}
And the font even scales correctly when compiled with pdfTeX. If you have problems with scaling make sure your TeX distribution is current as an earlier version was buggy in a way which affecting scaling with pdfTeX (but not Xe/LuaTeX).
add a comment |
fontawesome now offers a scalable alternative to the symbol from bbding, offering both an aeroplane symbol proper and two versions of a paper aeroplane.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{fontawesome}
begin{document}
faPlane faPaperPlane faPaperPlaneO
end{document}
And the font even scales correctly when compiled with pdfTeX. If you have problems with scaling make sure your TeX distribution is current as an earlier version was buggy in a way which affecting scaling with pdfTeX (but not Xe/LuaTeX).
fontawesome now offers a scalable alternative to the symbol from bbding, offering both an aeroplane symbol proper and two versions of a paper aeroplane.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{fontawesome}
begin{document}
faPlane faPaperPlane faPaperPlaneO
end{document}
And the font even scales correctly when compiled with pdfTeX. If you have problems with scaling make sure your TeX distribution is current as an earlier version was buggy in a way which affecting scaling with pdfTeX (but not Xe/LuaTeX).
answered Jan 15 '16 at 2:51
cfrcfr
158k8191390
158k8191390
add a comment |
add a comment |
The next revolution in aviation:
The duck plane
documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{tikzducks}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
duck
fill[orange] (0.7331,0.5229) .. controls (1.8688,-0.6326) and (2.2337,0.0383) .. (1.2819,0.7331) -- cycle;
fill[brown] (1.3848,1.6771) .. controls (1.2665,2.2823) and (0.5559,2.2697) .. (0.4000,1.6455) .. controls (0.5711,1.6714) and (0.8503,1.6562) .. (0.9926,1.6247) .. controls (0.9703,1.4641) and (1.0307,1.0718) .. (1.1444,1.0104) .. controls (1.3485,0.9002) and (1.4461,1.4498) .. (1.3848,1.6771) -- cycle;
fill[gray] (0.9153,1.4857) -- (0.9472,1.6278) -- (1.3926,1.5288) -- (1.3840,1.4228) -- cycle;
fill[gray] (0.6484,1.6773) -- (0.6601,1.7155) -- (0.7558,1.6863) -- (0.7441,1.6480) -- cycle;
draw[gray,fill=black] (0.83,1.57) circle (0.135);
draw[gray,fill=black] (0.54,1.65) circle (0.12);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
add a comment |
The next revolution in aviation:
The duck plane
documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{tikzducks}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
duck
fill[orange] (0.7331,0.5229) .. controls (1.8688,-0.6326) and (2.2337,0.0383) .. (1.2819,0.7331) -- cycle;
fill[brown] (1.3848,1.6771) .. controls (1.2665,2.2823) and (0.5559,2.2697) .. (0.4000,1.6455) .. controls (0.5711,1.6714) and (0.8503,1.6562) .. (0.9926,1.6247) .. controls (0.9703,1.4641) and (1.0307,1.0718) .. (1.1444,1.0104) .. controls (1.3485,0.9002) and (1.4461,1.4498) .. (1.3848,1.6771) -- cycle;
fill[gray] (0.9153,1.4857) -- (0.9472,1.6278) -- (1.3926,1.5288) -- (1.3840,1.4228) -- cycle;
fill[gray] (0.6484,1.6773) -- (0.6601,1.7155) -- (0.7558,1.6863) -- (0.7441,1.6480) -- cycle;
draw[gray,fill=black] (0.83,1.57) circle (0.135);
draw[gray,fill=black] (0.54,1.65) circle (0.12);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
add a comment |
The next revolution in aviation:
The duck plane
documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{tikzducks}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
duck
fill[orange] (0.7331,0.5229) .. controls (1.8688,-0.6326) and (2.2337,0.0383) .. (1.2819,0.7331) -- cycle;
fill[brown] (1.3848,1.6771) .. controls (1.2665,2.2823) and (0.5559,2.2697) .. (0.4000,1.6455) .. controls (0.5711,1.6714) and (0.8503,1.6562) .. (0.9926,1.6247) .. controls (0.9703,1.4641) and (1.0307,1.0718) .. (1.1444,1.0104) .. controls (1.3485,0.9002) and (1.4461,1.4498) .. (1.3848,1.6771) -- cycle;
fill[gray] (0.9153,1.4857) -- (0.9472,1.6278) -- (1.3926,1.5288) -- (1.3840,1.4228) -- cycle;
fill[gray] (0.6484,1.6773) -- (0.6601,1.7155) -- (0.7558,1.6863) -- (0.7441,1.6480) -- cycle;
draw[gray,fill=black] (0.83,1.57) circle (0.135);
draw[gray,fill=black] (0.54,1.65) circle (0.12);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
The next revolution in aviation:
The duck plane
documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{tikzducks}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
duck
fill[orange] (0.7331,0.5229) .. controls (1.8688,-0.6326) and (2.2337,0.0383) .. (1.2819,0.7331) -- cycle;
fill[brown] (1.3848,1.6771) .. controls (1.2665,2.2823) and (0.5559,2.2697) .. (0.4000,1.6455) .. controls (0.5711,1.6714) and (0.8503,1.6562) .. (0.9926,1.6247) .. controls (0.9703,1.4641) and (1.0307,1.0718) .. (1.1444,1.0104) .. controls (1.3485,0.9002) and (1.4461,1.4498) .. (1.3848,1.6771) -- cycle;
fill[gray] (0.9153,1.4857) -- (0.9472,1.6278) -- (1.3926,1.5288) -- (1.3840,1.4228) -- cycle;
fill[gray] (0.6484,1.6773) -- (0.6601,1.7155) -- (0.7558,1.6863) -- (0.7441,1.6480) -- cycle;
draw[gray,fill=black] (0.83,1.57) circle (0.135);
draw[gray,fill=black] (0.54,1.65) circle (0.12);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
answered Mar 9 at 15:39
samcartersamcarter
91.9k7105297
91.9k7105297
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f114783%2fdraw-an-aircraft-with-tikz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
25
Please kindly provide a minimal working example to show your effort and to show what your problem is.
– kiss my armpit
May 17 '13 at 13:53
10
Though it might be fun to try, your question sounds like: "Please do this difficult drawing for me for free. Thanks." As @ClickMe says, explaining what you've tried yourself (preferably with some code) would help get past that impression.
– badroit
May 17 '13 at 14:00
10
Friends, please do not downvote this question if the score is already
-1
.– Paulo Cereda
May 17 '13 at 14:07
14
The question has received quite some downvotes. We should explain the OP (@physics) why we think that this question is "bad": Drawing such a complex graphics with tikz is a tedious job and it might be done much easier with the right tool. Since we don't know what the purpose is to do that with tikz, nobody will of course spend an hour or two drawing that airplane in tikz. If you (the OP) already have say 90% of the code, our job would easier and we know where the difficulty is.
– topskip
May 17 '13 at 14:14
10
I would just like to note that the TeX Stack Exchange community is one of the best communities I have encountered on the internet so far and that it is a pleasure and an absolute joy to be a part of it (although I am not talking much, I read Q&As every day). I appreciate it! Perhaps beautiful typography is one of the ways to find the best in people.
:-)
– Harold Cavendish
May 17 '13 at 22:04