Prove that $int_{E}f = int_{I}int_{[phi(x),psi(x)]}f(x,y)dydx$ using Fubini's Theorem












0












$begingroup$



Problem. Let $E$ be a domain in the plane bounded by the continuous curves $y = phi(x)$ and $y = psi(x)$ for $x in I = [a,b]$, where $phi(x), psi(x)$. Prove that if $f$ is a Borel measurable, integrable function defined on $E$, then
$$int_{E}f = int_{I}int_{[phi(x),psi(x)]}f(x,y)dydx.$$




My attempt. Use the Fubini's Theorem that says
$$int_{I}int_{[phi(x),psi(x)]}f(x,y)dydx = int_{I times [phi(x),psi(x)]}f(x,y)d(y times x)$$
where $x times y$ represents the product measure. But I could not relate $int_{E}f$ with $int_{I times [phi(x),psi(x)]}f$. I believe that this is the main point of the question. Can someone help me?






integration measure-theory







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Your equation at the end doesn't make sense as stated: In $Itimes [phi(x),psi(x)]$, you haven't said what $x$ is.
    $endgroup$
    – user25959
    Dec 8 '18 at 21:03
















0












$begingroup$



Problem. Let $E$ be a domain in the plane bounded by the continuous curves $y = phi(x)$ and $y = psi(x)$ for $x in I = [a,b]$, where $phi(x), psi(x)$. Prove that if $f$ is a Borel measurable, integrable function defined on $E$, then
$$int_{E}f = int_{I}int_{[phi(x),psi(x)]}f(x,y)dydx.$$




My attempt. Use the Fubini's Theorem that says
$$int_{I}int_{[phi(x),psi(x)]}f(x,y)dydx = int_{I times [phi(x),psi(x)]}f(x,y)d(y times x)$$
where $x times y$ represents the product measure. But I could not relate $int_{E}f$ with $int_{I times [phi(x),psi(x)]}f$. I believe that this is the main point of the question. Can someone help me?






integration measure-theory







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Your equation at the end doesn't make sense as stated: In $Itimes [phi(x),psi(x)]$, you haven't said what $x$ is.
    $endgroup$
    – user25959
    Dec 8 '18 at 21:03














0












0








0





$begingroup$



Problem. Let $E$ be a domain in the plane bounded by the continuous curves $y = phi(x)$ and $y = psi(x)$ for $x in I = [a,b]$, where $phi(x), psi(x)$. Prove that if $f$ is a Borel measurable, integrable function defined on $E$, then
$$int_{E}f = int_{I}int_{[phi(x),psi(x)]}f(x,y)dydx.$$




My attempt. Use the Fubini's Theorem that says
$$int_{I}int_{[phi(x),psi(x)]}f(x,y)dydx = int_{I times [phi(x),psi(x)]}f(x,y)d(y times x)$$
where $x times y$ represents the product measure. But I could not relate $int_{E}f$ with $int_{I times [phi(x),psi(x)]}f$. I believe that this is the main point of the question. Can someone help me?






integration measure-theory







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$





Problem. Let $E$ be a domain in the plane bounded by the continuous curves $y = phi(x)$ and $y = psi(x)$ for $x in I = [a,b]$, where $phi(x), psi(x)$. Prove that if $f$ is a Borel measurable, integrable function defined on $E$, then
$$int_{E}f = int_{I}int_{[phi(x),psi(x)]}f(x,y)dydx.$$




My attempt. Use the Fubini's Theorem that says
$$int_{I}int_{[phi(x),psi(x)]}f(x,y)dydx = int_{I times [phi(x),psi(x)]}f(x,y)d(y times x)$$
where $x times y$ represents the product measure. But I could not relate $int_{E}f$ with $int_{I times [phi(x),psi(x)]}f$. I believe that this is the main point of the question. Can someone help me?






integration measure-theory




integration measure-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 8 '18 at 20:52









Lucas CorrêaLucas Corrêa

1,5951421




1,5951421












  • $begingroup$
    Your equation at the end doesn't make sense as stated: In $Itimes [phi(x),psi(x)]$, you haven't said what $x$ is.
    $endgroup$
    – user25959
    Dec 8 '18 at 21:03


















  • $begingroup$
    Your equation at the end doesn't make sense as stated: In $Itimes [phi(x),psi(x)]$, you haven't said what $x$ is.
    $endgroup$
    – user25959
    Dec 8 '18 at 21:03
















$begingroup$
Your equation at the end doesn't make sense as stated: In $Itimes [phi(x),psi(x)]$, you haven't said what $x$ is.
$endgroup$
– user25959
Dec 8 '18 at 21:03




$begingroup$
Your equation at the end doesn't make sense as stated: In $Itimes [phi(x),psi(x)]$, you haven't said what $x$ is.
$endgroup$
– user25959
Dec 8 '18 at 21:03










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

The idea is to apply Fubini's theorem in $mathbb R^2.$ Recall that for any $g$ Borel measurable and integrable on $mathbb R^2,$ we have,
$$ int_{mathbb R^2} g = int_{mathbb R}int_{mathbb R} g(x,y),mathrm{d}x,mathrm{d}y. $$
The key trick is to embed the information about $E$ into this function $g.$ So we set,
$$ g = chi_E f. $$
Where $chi_E$ is the characteristic function of $E subset mathbb R^2.$ By our assumptions $g$ is indeed Borel measurable and integrable, such that,
$$ int_{mathbb R^2} chi_Ef = int_E f = int_{mathbb R}int_{mathbb R} chi_E(x,y)f(x,y),mathrm{d}x,mathrm{d}y. $$
Now $(x,y) in E$ if and only if $x in I$ and $varphi(x) leq y leq psi(x).$ So we conclude that,
$$ int_{mathbb R}int_{mathbb R} chi_E(x,y)f(x,y),mathrm{d}x,mathrm{d}y = int_I int_{psi(x)}^{varphi(x)} f(x,y),mathrm{d}x,mathrm{d}y, $$
from which the result follows.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Nice, I got it! Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – Lucas Corrêa
    Dec 8 '18 at 21:11











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031625%2fprove-that-int-ef-int-i-int-phix-psixfx-ydydx-using-fubini%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4












$begingroup$

The idea is to apply Fubini's theorem in $mathbb R^2.$ Recall that for any $g$ Borel measurable and integrable on $mathbb R^2,$ we have,
$$ int_{mathbb R^2} g = int_{mathbb R}int_{mathbb R} g(x,y),mathrm{d}x,mathrm{d}y. $$
The key trick is to embed the information about $E$ into this function $g.$ So we set,
$$ g = chi_E f. $$
Where $chi_E$ is the characteristic function of $E subset mathbb R^2.$ By our assumptions $g$ is indeed Borel measurable and integrable, such that,
$$ int_{mathbb R^2} chi_Ef = int_E f = int_{mathbb R}int_{mathbb R} chi_E(x,y)f(x,y),mathrm{d}x,mathrm{d}y. $$
Now $(x,y) in E$ if and only if $x in I$ and $varphi(x) leq y leq psi(x).$ So we conclude that,
$$ int_{mathbb R}int_{mathbb R} chi_E(x,y)f(x,y),mathrm{d}x,mathrm{d}y = int_I int_{psi(x)}^{varphi(x)} f(x,y),mathrm{d}x,mathrm{d}y, $$
from which the result follows.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Nice, I got it! Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – Lucas Corrêa
    Dec 8 '18 at 21:11
















4












$begingroup$

The idea is to apply Fubini's theorem in $mathbb R^2.$ Recall that for any $g$ Borel measurable and integrable on $mathbb R^2,$ we have,
$$ int_{mathbb R^2} g = int_{mathbb R}int_{mathbb R} g(x,y),mathrm{d}x,mathrm{d}y. $$
The key trick is to embed the information about $E$ into this function $g.$ So we set,
$$ g = chi_E f. $$
Where $chi_E$ is the characteristic function of $E subset mathbb R^2.$ By our assumptions $g$ is indeed Borel measurable and integrable, such that,
$$ int_{mathbb R^2} chi_Ef = int_E f = int_{mathbb R}int_{mathbb R} chi_E(x,y)f(x,y),mathrm{d}x,mathrm{d}y. $$
Now $(x,y) in E$ if and only if $x in I$ and $varphi(x) leq y leq psi(x).$ So we conclude that,
$$ int_{mathbb R}int_{mathbb R} chi_E(x,y)f(x,y),mathrm{d}x,mathrm{d}y = int_I int_{psi(x)}^{varphi(x)} f(x,y),mathrm{d}x,mathrm{d}y, $$
from which the result follows.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Nice, I got it! Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – Lucas Corrêa
    Dec 8 '18 at 21:11














4












4








4





$begingroup$

The idea is to apply Fubini's theorem in $mathbb R^2.$ Recall that for any $g$ Borel measurable and integrable on $mathbb R^2,$ we have,
$$ int_{mathbb R^2} g = int_{mathbb R}int_{mathbb R} g(x,y),mathrm{d}x,mathrm{d}y. $$
The key trick is to embed the information about $E$ into this function $g.$ So we set,
$$ g = chi_E f. $$
Where $chi_E$ is the characteristic function of $E subset mathbb R^2.$ By our assumptions $g$ is indeed Borel measurable and integrable, such that,
$$ int_{mathbb R^2} chi_Ef = int_E f = int_{mathbb R}int_{mathbb R} chi_E(x,y)f(x,y),mathrm{d}x,mathrm{d}y. $$
Now $(x,y) in E$ if and only if $x in I$ and $varphi(x) leq y leq psi(x).$ So we conclude that,
$$ int_{mathbb R}int_{mathbb R} chi_E(x,y)f(x,y),mathrm{d}x,mathrm{d}y = int_I int_{psi(x)}^{varphi(x)} f(x,y),mathrm{d}x,mathrm{d}y, $$
from which the result follows.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



The idea is to apply Fubini's theorem in $mathbb R^2.$ Recall that for any $g$ Borel measurable and integrable on $mathbb R^2,$ we have,
$$ int_{mathbb R^2} g = int_{mathbb R}int_{mathbb R} g(x,y),mathrm{d}x,mathrm{d}y. $$
The key trick is to embed the information about $E$ into this function $g.$ So we set,
$$ g = chi_E f. $$
Where $chi_E$ is the characteristic function of $E subset mathbb R^2.$ By our assumptions $g$ is indeed Borel measurable and integrable, such that,
$$ int_{mathbb R^2} chi_Ef = int_E f = int_{mathbb R}int_{mathbb R} chi_E(x,y)f(x,y),mathrm{d}x,mathrm{d}y. $$
Now $(x,y) in E$ if and only if $x in I$ and $varphi(x) leq y leq psi(x).$ So we conclude that,
$$ int_{mathbb R}int_{mathbb R} chi_E(x,y)f(x,y),mathrm{d}x,mathrm{d}y = int_I int_{psi(x)}^{varphi(x)} f(x,y),mathrm{d}x,mathrm{d}y, $$
from which the result follows.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 8 '18 at 21:03









ktoiktoi

2,4161618




2,4161618












  • $begingroup$
    Nice, I got it! Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – Lucas Corrêa
    Dec 8 '18 at 21:11


















  • $begingroup$
    Nice, I got it! Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – Lucas Corrêa
    Dec 8 '18 at 21:11
















$begingroup$
Nice, I got it! Thank you!
$endgroup$
– Lucas Corrêa
Dec 8 '18 at 21:11




$begingroup$
Nice, I got it! Thank you!
$endgroup$
– Lucas Corrêa
Dec 8 '18 at 21:11


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031625%2fprove-that-int-ef-int-i-int-phix-psixfx-ydydx-using-fubini%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

Image
3 Recently upgrade to 18.10 from 18.04, and using the terminal is becoming annoying: the new alert sound is a drip ( /usr/share/sounds/gnome/default/alerts/drip.ogg ), and the previous one is still located at ( /usr/share/sounds/ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg ). My issue is that at the gnome-terminal, when autocompleting or pressing left BOTH sounds are reproduced, at the same time. I want to just have ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg active, not both . At the moment I have been only able to reduce the volume of the alerts (but still both are played), or turn the alerts down (but I dislike both "solutions"). gnome-terminal 18.10 teminal-bell share | improve this question
Read more

Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

Image
up vote 5 down vote favorite 2 I would like to make it so that the vertical space below the title of each chapter is the same when using the Bjornstrup package (i.e. so that the descenders do not affect the spacing - as shown by the red arrow in the picture below). I think I'm fairly happy with the spacing around "A chapter", so I'd really like titles without descenders (e.g. "Contents") to have the same vertical spacing as "A chapter" below the title. I would also like to remove the large "0" in the contents title. Any help appreciated, as always. documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{book} % Packages[![enter image description here][1]][1] usepackage[left=3.5cm, right=3.5cm, top=4.3cm, bottom=4.25cm]{geometry} usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} usepackage{libertine} usepackage[libertine]{newtx
Read more

Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

Image
0 I want to add Tabulator js to my java project. I added tabulator.min.js, tabulator.min.css to resources folder. After that added to my html page these dependencies as recommending in readme.md. <link rel="stylesheet" th:href="@{/css/tabulator.min.css}"> <script type="text/javascript" th:src="@{/js/tabulator.min.js}"></script> Now my tables view all elements, that I have in the html page, but not correct. In the documentation of Tabulator is example how to create header and table, var table = new Tabulator("#example-table", { columns:[ {title:"Name", field:"name", sorter:"string", width:200, editor:true}, {title:"Age", field:"age", sorter:"
Read more