My External Hard drive was not properly removed and now will not mount
I recently bought a computer for my Wife, windows (her choice not mine). Before we paid, I asked the salesman to check whether my hard drive would work with windows 7 (as sometimes windows can be iffy). It worked fine, however, the salesman yanked my hard drive out without removing it safely. Now it wont mount, in my Ubuntu computer or her new windows. I've tried a lot of instructions but none work.
This is what I'm up against:
sammy@Fart:~$ sudo fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders, total 976773168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00077cf7
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 * 2048 206847 102400 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda2 206848 20482047 10137600 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda3 20482048 177605687 78561820 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda4 177606654 976771071 399582209 5 Extended
/dev/sda5 177606656 971016191 396704768 83 Linux
/dev/sda6 971018240 976771071 2876416 82 Linux swap / Solaris
Disk /dev/sdb: 500.1 GB, 500107861504 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders, total 976773167 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0xe640222c
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 63 976768064 488384001 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
So, would I be right in presuming that my hard drive is /dev/sdb1 ?
I tried to mount it manually and got this error message:
sammy@Fart:~$ sudo mount -t ntfs /dev/sdb1 /media
Error reading bootsector: Input/output error
Failed to mount '/dev/sdb1': Input/output error
NTFS is either inconsistent, or there is a hardware fault, or it's a
SoftRAID/FakeRAID hardware. In the first case run chkdsk /f on Windows
then reboot into Windows twice. The usage of the /f parameter is very
important! If the device is a SoftRAID/FakeRAID then first activate
it and mount a different device under the /dev/mapper/ directory, (e.g.
/dev/mapper/nvidia_eahaabcc1). Please see the 'dmraid' documentation
for more details.
I tried to run chkdsk /f on windows but it would not run due to my disk already being used by another process. Now I'm stuck. I'm not new to ubuntu but I'm not a computer whizz either. I don't really know anything about softraid/fakeraid and have no idea what to do.
Any help would be very much appreciated.
P.S.
(To answer the first question you may have on your mind, yes I regret calling my computer "fart")
Thanks alot,
Sammy
Update: I've now successfully completed check disk and it hasn't solved a thing. Nothing suggested has worked and I've run out of ideas.
boot mount hard-drive
|
show 1 more comment
I recently bought a computer for my Wife, windows (her choice not mine). Before we paid, I asked the salesman to check whether my hard drive would work with windows 7 (as sometimes windows can be iffy). It worked fine, however, the salesman yanked my hard drive out without removing it safely. Now it wont mount, in my Ubuntu computer or her new windows. I've tried a lot of instructions but none work.
This is what I'm up against:
sammy@Fart:~$ sudo fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders, total 976773168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00077cf7
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 * 2048 206847 102400 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda2 206848 20482047 10137600 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda3 20482048 177605687 78561820 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda4 177606654 976771071 399582209 5 Extended
/dev/sda5 177606656 971016191 396704768 83 Linux
/dev/sda6 971018240 976771071 2876416 82 Linux swap / Solaris
Disk /dev/sdb: 500.1 GB, 500107861504 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders, total 976773167 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0xe640222c
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 63 976768064 488384001 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
So, would I be right in presuming that my hard drive is /dev/sdb1 ?
I tried to mount it manually and got this error message:
sammy@Fart:~$ sudo mount -t ntfs /dev/sdb1 /media
Error reading bootsector: Input/output error
Failed to mount '/dev/sdb1': Input/output error
NTFS is either inconsistent, or there is a hardware fault, or it's a
SoftRAID/FakeRAID hardware. In the first case run chkdsk /f on Windows
then reboot into Windows twice. The usage of the /f parameter is very
important! If the device is a SoftRAID/FakeRAID then first activate
it and mount a different device under the /dev/mapper/ directory, (e.g.
/dev/mapper/nvidia_eahaabcc1). Please see the 'dmraid' documentation
for more details.
I tried to run chkdsk /f on windows but it would not run due to my disk already being used by another process. Now I'm stuck. I'm not new to ubuntu but I'm not a computer whizz either. I don't really know anything about softraid/fakeraid and have no idea what to do.
Any help would be very much appreciated.
P.S.
(To answer the first question you may have on your mind, yes I regret calling my computer "fart")
Thanks alot,
Sammy
Update: I've now successfully completed check disk and it hasn't solved a thing. Nothing suggested has worked and I've run out of ideas.
boot mount hard-drive
1
Try checking the disk from within windows, by right clicking, choose Properties --> Tools Tab --> and Check. Let me know.
– Mitch♦
Feb 10 '14 at 8:21
Hi Mitch,Thanks for your reply. Unfortunately the disk wont mount in Ubuntu or Windows. Although in Windows it does register when you click the safely remove drive icon as an unknown usb device. I've tried safely removing it and plugging it in again a few times but to no avail. I can also see it in run chkdsk /f but get stuck there without actually being able to check the disk. There's no way I can find to right click the disk, although the windows machine I'm using is Chinese and navigation is a problem. (I'm in China) How would one right click an unmounted disk? Thanks again, Sammy.
– Klubijar
Feb 10 '14 at 9:55
Take a look at askubuntu.com/questions/74105/…. Does it help?
– Mitch♦
Feb 10 '14 at 10:49
I've been able to run a dskchk on windows now but I'm unable to boot windows after the disk check. I'm going to try it again on another pc but, I didn't seem to work. I tried "sudo ntfsfix /dev/sdb1" but I got "Mounting volume... Error opening '/dev/sdb1': No such device or address FAILED Attempting to correct errors... Error opening '/dev/sdb1': No such device or address FAILED Failed to startup volume: No such device or address Error opening '/dev/sdb1': No such device or address Volume is corrupt. You should run chkdsk." On windows I can't even get to the stage were I'm able to right click
– Klubijar
Feb 11 '14 at 2:14
If you are getting an I/O error then it looks like the drive is dead. Rundmesg
after getting that error for more details about what went wrong.
– psusi
Mar 27 '14 at 19:29
|
show 1 more comment
I recently bought a computer for my Wife, windows (her choice not mine). Before we paid, I asked the salesman to check whether my hard drive would work with windows 7 (as sometimes windows can be iffy). It worked fine, however, the salesman yanked my hard drive out without removing it safely. Now it wont mount, in my Ubuntu computer or her new windows. I've tried a lot of instructions but none work.
This is what I'm up against:
sammy@Fart:~$ sudo fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders, total 976773168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00077cf7
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 * 2048 206847 102400 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda2 206848 20482047 10137600 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda3 20482048 177605687 78561820 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda4 177606654 976771071 399582209 5 Extended
/dev/sda5 177606656 971016191 396704768 83 Linux
/dev/sda6 971018240 976771071 2876416 82 Linux swap / Solaris
Disk /dev/sdb: 500.1 GB, 500107861504 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders, total 976773167 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0xe640222c
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 63 976768064 488384001 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
So, would I be right in presuming that my hard drive is /dev/sdb1 ?
I tried to mount it manually and got this error message:
sammy@Fart:~$ sudo mount -t ntfs /dev/sdb1 /media
Error reading bootsector: Input/output error
Failed to mount '/dev/sdb1': Input/output error
NTFS is either inconsistent, or there is a hardware fault, or it's a
SoftRAID/FakeRAID hardware. In the first case run chkdsk /f on Windows
then reboot into Windows twice. The usage of the /f parameter is very
important! If the device is a SoftRAID/FakeRAID then first activate
it and mount a different device under the /dev/mapper/ directory, (e.g.
/dev/mapper/nvidia_eahaabcc1). Please see the 'dmraid' documentation
for more details.
I tried to run chkdsk /f on windows but it would not run due to my disk already being used by another process. Now I'm stuck. I'm not new to ubuntu but I'm not a computer whizz either. I don't really know anything about softraid/fakeraid and have no idea what to do.
Any help would be very much appreciated.
P.S.
(To answer the first question you may have on your mind, yes I regret calling my computer "fart")
Thanks alot,
Sammy
Update: I've now successfully completed check disk and it hasn't solved a thing. Nothing suggested has worked and I've run out of ideas.
boot mount hard-drive
I recently bought a computer for my Wife, windows (her choice not mine). Before we paid, I asked the salesman to check whether my hard drive would work with windows 7 (as sometimes windows can be iffy). It worked fine, however, the salesman yanked my hard drive out without removing it safely. Now it wont mount, in my Ubuntu computer or her new windows. I've tried a lot of instructions but none work.
This is what I'm up against:
sammy@Fart:~$ sudo fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders, total 976773168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00077cf7
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 * 2048 206847 102400 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda2 206848 20482047 10137600 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda3 20482048 177605687 78561820 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda4 177606654 976771071 399582209 5 Extended
/dev/sda5 177606656 971016191 396704768 83 Linux
/dev/sda6 971018240 976771071 2876416 82 Linux swap / Solaris
Disk /dev/sdb: 500.1 GB, 500107861504 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders, total 976773167 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0xe640222c
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 63 976768064 488384001 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
So, would I be right in presuming that my hard drive is /dev/sdb1 ?
I tried to mount it manually and got this error message:
sammy@Fart:~$ sudo mount -t ntfs /dev/sdb1 /media
Error reading bootsector: Input/output error
Failed to mount '/dev/sdb1': Input/output error
NTFS is either inconsistent, or there is a hardware fault, or it's a
SoftRAID/FakeRAID hardware. In the first case run chkdsk /f on Windows
then reboot into Windows twice. The usage of the /f parameter is very
important! If the device is a SoftRAID/FakeRAID then first activate
it and mount a different device under the /dev/mapper/ directory, (e.g.
/dev/mapper/nvidia_eahaabcc1). Please see the 'dmraid' documentation
for more details.
I tried to run chkdsk /f on windows but it would not run due to my disk already being used by another process. Now I'm stuck. I'm not new to ubuntu but I'm not a computer whizz either. I don't really know anything about softraid/fakeraid and have no idea what to do.
Any help would be very much appreciated.
P.S.
(To answer the first question you may have on your mind, yes I regret calling my computer "fart")
Thanks alot,
Sammy
Update: I've now successfully completed check disk and it hasn't solved a thing. Nothing suggested has worked and I've run out of ideas.
boot mount hard-drive
boot mount hard-drive
edited Feb 11 '14 at 3:17
Klubijar
asked Feb 10 '14 at 7:21
KlubijarKlubijar
1613
1613
1
Try checking the disk from within windows, by right clicking, choose Properties --> Tools Tab --> and Check. Let me know.
– Mitch♦
Feb 10 '14 at 8:21
Hi Mitch,Thanks for your reply. Unfortunately the disk wont mount in Ubuntu or Windows. Although in Windows it does register when you click the safely remove drive icon as an unknown usb device. I've tried safely removing it and plugging it in again a few times but to no avail. I can also see it in run chkdsk /f but get stuck there without actually being able to check the disk. There's no way I can find to right click the disk, although the windows machine I'm using is Chinese and navigation is a problem. (I'm in China) How would one right click an unmounted disk? Thanks again, Sammy.
– Klubijar
Feb 10 '14 at 9:55
Take a look at askubuntu.com/questions/74105/…. Does it help?
– Mitch♦
Feb 10 '14 at 10:49
I've been able to run a dskchk on windows now but I'm unable to boot windows after the disk check. I'm going to try it again on another pc but, I didn't seem to work. I tried "sudo ntfsfix /dev/sdb1" but I got "Mounting volume... Error opening '/dev/sdb1': No such device or address FAILED Attempting to correct errors... Error opening '/dev/sdb1': No such device or address FAILED Failed to startup volume: No such device or address Error opening '/dev/sdb1': No such device or address Volume is corrupt. You should run chkdsk." On windows I can't even get to the stage were I'm able to right click
– Klubijar
Feb 11 '14 at 2:14
If you are getting an I/O error then it looks like the drive is dead. Rundmesg
after getting that error for more details about what went wrong.
– psusi
Mar 27 '14 at 19:29
|
show 1 more comment
1
Try checking the disk from within windows, by right clicking, choose Properties --> Tools Tab --> and Check. Let me know.
– Mitch♦
Feb 10 '14 at 8:21
Hi Mitch,Thanks for your reply. Unfortunately the disk wont mount in Ubuntu or Windows. Although in Windows it does register when you click the safely remove drive icon as an unknown usb device. I've tried safely removing it and plugging it in again a few times but to no avail. I can also see it in run chkdsk /f but get stuck there without actually being able to check the disk. There's no way I can find to right click the disk, although the windows machine I'm using is Chinese and navigation is a problem. (I'm in China) How would one right click an unmounted disk? Thanks again, Sammy.
– Klubijar
Feb 10 '14 at 9:55
Take a look at askubuntu.com/questions/74105/…. Does it help?
– Mitch♦
Feb 10 '14 at 10:49
I've been able to run a dskchk on windows now but I'm unable to boot windows after the disk check. I'm going to try it again on another pc but, I didn't seem to work. I tried "sudo ntfsfix /dev/sdb1" but I got "Mounting volume... Error opening '/dev/sdb1': No such device or address FAILED Attempting to correct errors... Error opening '/dev/sdb1': No such device or address FAILED Failed to startup volume: No such device or address Error opening '/dev/sdb1': No such device or address Volume is corrupt. You should run chkdsk." On windows I can't even get to the stage were I'm able to right click
– Klubijar
Feb 11 '14 at 2:14
If you are getting an I/O error then it looks like the drive is dead. Rundmesg
after getting that error for more details about what went wrong.
– psusi
Mar 27 '14 at 19:29
1
1
Try checking the disk from within windows, by right clicking, choose Properties --> Tools Tab --> and Check. Let me know.
– Mitch♦
Feb 10 '14 at 8:21
Try checking the disk from within windows, by right clicking, choose Properties --> Tools Tab --> and Check. Let me know.
– Mitch♦
Feb 10 '14 at 8:21
Hi Mitch,Thanks for your reply. Unfortunately the disk wont mount in Ubuntu or Windows. Although in Windows it does register when you click the safely remove drive icon as an unknown usb device. I've tried safely removing it and plugging it in again a few times but to no avail. I can also see it in run chkdsk /f but get stuck there without actually being able to check the disk. There's no way I can find to right click the disk, although the windows machine I'm using is Chinese and navigation is a problem. (I'm in China) How would one right click an unmounted disk? Thanks again, Sammy.
– Klubijar
Feb 10 '14 at 9:55
Hi Mitch,Thanks for your reply. Unfortunately the disk wont mount in Ubuntu or Windows. Although in Windows it does register when you click the safely remove drive icon as an unknown usb device. I've tried safely removing it and plugging it in again a few times but to no avail. I can also see it in run chkdsk /f but get stuck there without actually being able to check the disk. There's no way I can find to right click the disk, although the windows machine I'm using is Chinese and navigation is a problem. (I'm in China) How would one right click an unmounted disk? Thanks again, Sammy.
– Klubijar
Feb 10 '14 at 9:55
Take a look at askubuntu.com/questions/74105/…. Does it help?
– Mitch♦
Feb 10 '14 at 10:49
Take a look at askubuntu.com/questions/74105/…. Does it help?
– Mitch♦
Feb 10 '14 at 10:49
I've been able to run a dskchk on windows now but I'm unable to boot windows after the disk check. I'm going to try it again on another pc but, I didn't seem to work. I tried "sudo ntfsfix /dev/sdb1" but I got "Mounting volume... Error opening '/dev/sdb1': No such device or address FAILED Attempting to correct errors... Error opening '/dev/sdb1': No such device or address FAILED Failed to startup volume: No such device or address Error opening '/dev/sdb1': No such device or address Volume is corrupt. You should run chkdsk." On windows I can't even get to the stage were I'm able to right click
– Klubijar
Feb 11 '14 at 2:14
I've been able to run a dskchk on windows now but I'm unable to boot windows after the disk check. I'm going to try it again on another pc but, I didn't seem to work. I tried "sudo ntfsfix /dev/sdb1" but I got "Mounting volume... Error opening '/dev/sdb1': No such device or address FAILED Attempting to correct errors... Error opening '/dev/sdb1': No such device or address FAILED Failed to startup volume: No such device or address Error opening '/dev/sdb1': No such device or address Volume is corrupt. You should run chkdsk." On windows I can't even get to the stage were I'm able to right click
– Klubijar
Feb 11 '14 at 2:14
If you are getting an I/O error then it looks like the drive is dead. Run
dmesg
after getting that error for more details about what went wrong.– psusi
Mar 27 '14 at 19:29
If you are getting an I/O error then it looks like the drive is dead. Run
dmesg
after getting that error for more details about what went wrong.– psusi
Mar 27 '14 at 19:29
|
show 1 more comment
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Already answered:
Fix corrupt NTFS partition without Windows
Please try and see if it matches your case, using Gparted is a highly recommended solution, saved a lot of hassle for me (although all the other options suggested there are quite good as well).
Hi Yaron, thanks for your input. I had a look at that post and I'm not sure it matches my case. I'm unable to see my troubled external hard drive using gparted or test disk. Also none of the terminal instructions seem to help. Thanks anyway.
– Klubijar
Feb 11 '14 at 2:54
If it's a USB drive, can you please remove it from it's case and adapter and try to connect it to your PC directly? (If it's a laptop it might be a little complicated).
– Yaron
May 2 '14 at 14:25
add a comment |
From own experience: 'ungraceful' detachment of a removable device resulted in inconsistent reference to the volume's first sector in the mbr partition table.
Using a Disk editor (e.g. wxHexEditor), locate the ntfs boot sector.
Make sure this lies on sector 63 (64th sector).
Tas
This is entirely wrong. Nothing changes in the partition table, and the boot sector is normally on sector 2048 these days, not 63. You also didn't say what to do if it isn't there ( or how to tell ), and in any case, it's location is also completely unrelated to an ungraceful removal.
– psusi
Mar 27 '14 at 19:32
Thanks for correcting my answer,however,no matter how wrong or unrelated may sound to you,that's what happened to a usb drive of mine. The entire sector was filled with garbage, this case looks a little different. How to tell? You simply examine the sector #63 with a disk editor. If it isn't there you could search for a sector starting with eb-52-90-(NTFS etc.) and ending with 55aa. You are right though, these days, 63 seems highly unlikely for the first sector of an ntfs volume. If 63 is not bogus, the device might be an originally FAT formatted drive, later re-formatted as ntfs. cheers Tas
– Tas
Mar 27 '14 at 21:56
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f418861%2fmy-external-hard-drive-was-not-properly-removed-and-now-will-not-mount%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Already answered:
Fix corrupt NTFS partition without Windows
Please try and see if it matches your case, using Gparted is a highly recommended solution, saved a lot of hassle for me (although all the other options suggested there are quite good as well).
Hi Yaron, thanks for your input. I had a look at that post and I'm not sure it matches my case. I'm unable to see my troubled external hard drive using gparted or test disk. Also none of the terminal instructions seem to help. Thanks anyway.
– Klubijar
Feb 11 '14 at 2:54
If it's a USB drive, can you please remove it from it's case and adapter and try to connect it to your PC directly? (If it's a laptop it might be a little complicated).
– Yaron
May 2 '14 at 14:25
add a comment |
Already answered:
Fix corrupt NTFS partition without Windows
Please try and see if it matches your case, using Gparted is a highly recommended solution, saved a lot of hassle for me (although all the other options suggested there are quite good as well).
Hi Yaron, thanks for your input. I had a look at that post and I'm not sure it matches my case. I'm unable to see my troubled external hard drive using gparted or test disk. Also none of the terminal instructions seem to help. Thanks anyway.
– Klubijar
Feb 11 '14 at 2:54
If it's a USB drive, can you please remove it from it's case and adapter and try to connect it to your PC directly? (If it's a laptop it might be a little complicated).
– Yaron
May 2 '14 at 14:25
add a comment |
Already answered:
Fix corrupt NTFS partition without Windows
Please try and see if it matches your case, using Gparted is a highly recommended solution, saved a lot of hassle for me (although all the other options suggested there are quite good as well).
Already answered:
Fix corrupt NTFS partition without Windows
Please try and see if it matches your case, using Gparted is a highly recommended solution, saved a lot of hassle for me (although all the other options suggested there are quite good as well).
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:24
Community♦
1
1
answered Feb 10 '14 at 10:50
YaronYaron
202212
202212
Hi Yaron, thanks for your input. I had a look at that post and I'm not sure it matches my case. I'm unable to see my troubled external hard drive using gparted or test disk. Also none of the terminal instructions seem to help. Thanks anyway.
– Klubijar
Feb 11 '14 at 2:54
If it's a USB drive, can you please remove it from it's case and adapter and try to connect it to your PC directly? (If it's a laptop it might be a little complicated).
– Yaron
May 2 '14 at 14:25
add a comment |
Hi Yaron, thanks for your input. I had a look at that post and I'm not sure it matches my case. I'm unable to see my troubled external hard drive using gparted or test disk. Also none of the terminal instructions seem to help. Thanks anyway.
– Klubijar
Feb 11 '14 at 2:54
If it's a USB drive, can you please remove it from it's case and adapter and try to connect it to your PC directly? (If it's a laptop it might be a little complicated).
– Yaron
May 2 '14 at 14:25
Hi Yaron, thanks for your input. I had a look at that post and I'm not sure it matches my case. I'm unable to see my troubled external hard drive using gparted or test disk. Also none of the terminal instructions seem to help. Thanks anyway.
– Klubijar
Feb 11 '14 at 2:54
Hi Yaron, thanks for your input. I had a look at that post and I'm not sure it matches my case. I'm unable to see my troubled external hard drive using gparted or test disk. Also none of the terminal instructions seem to help. Thanks anyway.
– Klubijar
Feb 11 '14 at 2:54
If it's a USB drive, can you please remove it from it's case and adapter and try to connect it to your PC directly? (If it's a laptop it might be a little complicated).
– Yaron
May 2 '14 at 14:25
If it's a USB drive, can you please remove it from it's case and adapter and try to connect it to your PC directly? (If it's a laptop it might be a little complicated).
– Yaron
May 2 '14 at 14:25
add a comment |
From own experience: 'ungraceful' detachment of a removable device resulted in inconsistent reference to the volume's first sector in the mbr partition table.
Using a Disk editor (e.g. wxHexEditor), locate the ntfs boot sector.
Make sure this lies on sector 63 (64th sector).
Tas
This is entirely wrong. Nothing changes in the partition table, and the boot sector is normally on sector 2048 these days, not 63. You also didn't say what to do if it isn't there ( or how to tell ), and in any case, it's location is also completely unrelated to an ungraceful removal.
– psusi
Mar 27 '14 at 19:32
Thanks for correcting my answer,however,no matter how wrong or unrelated may sound to you,that's what happened to a usb drive of mine. The entire sector was filled with garbage, this case looks a little different. How to tell? You simply examine the sector #63 with a disk editor. If it isn't there you could search for a sector starting with eb-52-90-(NTFS etc.) and ending with 55aa. You are right though, these days, 63 seems highly unlikely for the first sector of an ntfs volume. If 63 is not bogus, the device might be an originally FAT formatted drive, later re-formatted as ntfs. cheers Tas
– Tas
Mar 27 '14 at 21:56
add a comment |
From own experience: 'ungraceful' detachment of a removable device resulted in inconsistent reference to the volume's first sector in the mbr partition table.
Using a Disk editor (e.g. wxHexEditor), locate the ntfs boot sector.
Make sure this lies on sector 63 (64th sector).
Tas
This is entirely wrong. Nothing changes in the partition table, and the boot sector is normally on sector 2048 these days, not 63. You also didn't say what to do if it isn't there ( or how to tell ), and in any case, it's location is also completely unrelated to an ungraceful removal.
– psusi
Mar 27 '14 at 19:32
Thanks for correcting my answer,however,no matter how wrong or unrelated may sound to you,that's what happened to a usb drive of mine. The entire sector was filled with garbage, this case looks a little different. How to tell? You simply examine the sector #63 with a disk editor. If it isn't there you could search for a sector starting with eb-52-90-(NTFS etc.) and ending with 55aa. You are right though, these days, 63 seems highly unlikely for the first sector of an ntfs volume. If 63 is not bogus, the device might be an originally FAT formatted drive, later re-formatted as ntfs. cheers Tas
– Tas
Mar 27 '14 at 21:56
add a comment |
From own experience: 'ungraceful' detachment of a removable device resulted in inconsistent reference to the volume's first sector in the mbr partition table.
Using a Disk editor (e.g. wxHexEditor), locate the ntfs boot sector.
Make sure this lies on sector 63 (64th sector).
Tas
From own experience: 'ungraceful' detachment of a removable device resulted in inconsistent reference to the volume's first sector in the mbr partition table.
Using a Disk editor (e.g. wxHexEditor), locate the ntfs boot sector.
Make sure this lies on sector 63 (64th sector).
Tas
answered Mar 27 '14 at 17:12
TasTas
1
1
This is entirely wrong. Nothing changes in the partition table, and the boot sector is normally on sector 2048 these days, not 63. You also didn't say what to do if it isn't there ( or how to tell ), and in any case, it's location is also completely unrelated to an ungraceful removal.
– psusi
Mar 27 '14 at 19:32
Thanks for correcting my answer,however,no matter how wrong or unrelated may sound to you,that's what happened to a usb drive of mine. The entire sector was filled with garbage, this case looks a little different. How to tell? You simply examine the sector #63 with a disk editor. If it isn't there you could search for a sector starting with eb-52-90-(NTFS etc.) and ending with 55aa. You are right though, these days, 63 seems highly unlikely for the first sector of an ntfs volume. If 63 is not bogus, the device might be an originally FAT formatted drive, later re-formatted as ntfs. cheers Tas
– Tas
Mar 27 '14 at 21:56
add a comment |
This is entirely wrong. Nothing changes in the partition table, and the boot sector is normally on sector 2048 these days, not 63. You also didn't say what to do if it isn't there ( or how to tell ), and in any case, it's location is also completely unrelated to an ungraceful removal.
– psusi
Mar 27 '14 at 19:32
Thanks for correcting my answer,however,no matter how wrong or unrelated may sound to you,that's what happened to a usb drive of mine. The entire sector was filled with garbage, this case looks a little different. How to tell? You simply examine the sector #63 with a disk editor. If it isn't there you could search for a sector starting with eb-52-90-(NTFS etc.) and ending with 55aa. You are right though, these days, 63 seems highly unlikely for the first sector of an ntfs volume. If 63 is not bogus, the device might be an originally FAT formatted drive, later re-formatted as ntfs. cheers Tas
– Tas
Mar 27 '14 at 21:56
This is entirely wrong. Nothing changes in the partition table, and the boot sector is normally on sector 2048 these days, not 63. You also didn't say what to do if it isn't there ( or how to tell ), and in any case, it's location is also completely unrelated to an ungraceful removal.
– psusi
Mar 27 '14 at 19:32
This is entirely wrong. Nothing changes in the partition table, and the boot sector is normally on sector 2048 these days, not 63. You also didn't say what to do if it isn't there ( or how to tell ), and in any case, it's location is also completely unrelated to an ungraceful removal.
– psusi
Mar 27 '14 at 19:32
Thanks for correcting my answer,however,no matter how wrong or unrelated may sound to you,that's what happened to a usb drive of mine. The entire sector was filled with garbage, this case looks a little different. How to tell? You simply examine the sector #63 with a disk editor. If it isn't there you could search for a sector starting with eb-52-90-(NTFS etc.) and ending with 55aa. You are right though, these days, 63 seems highly unlikely for the first sector of an ntfs volume. If 63 is not bogus, the device might be an originally FAT formatted drive, later re-formatted as ntfs. cheers Tas
– Tas
Mar 27 '14 at 21:56
Thanks for correcting my answer,however,no matter how wrong or unrelated may sound to you,that's what happened to a usb drive of mine. The entire sector was filled with garbage, this case looks a little different. How to tell? You simply examine the sector #63 with a disk editor. If it isn't there you could search for a sector starting with eb-52-90-(NTFS etc.) and ending with 55aa. You are right though, these days, 63 seems highly unlikely for the first sector of an ntfs volume. If 63 is not bogus, the device might be an originally FAT formatted drive, later re-formatted as ntfs. cheers Tas
– Tas
Mar 27 '14 at 21:56
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f418861%2fmy-external-hard-drive-was-not-properly-removed-and-now-will-not-mount%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Try checking the disk from within windows, by right clicking, choose Properties --> Tools Tab --> and Check. Let me know.
– Mitch♦
Feb 10 '14 at 8:21
Hi Mitch,Thanks for your reply. Unfortunately the disk wont mount in Ubuntu or Windows. Although in Windows it does register when you click the safely remove drive icon as an unknown usb device. I've tried safely removing it and plugging it in again a few times but to no avail. I can also see it in run chkdsk /f but get stuck there without actually being able to check the disk. There's no way I can find to right click the disk, although the windows machine I'm using is Chinese and navigation is a problem. (I'm in China) How would one right click an unmounted disk? Thanks again, Sammy.
– Klubijar
Feb 10 '14 at 9:55
Take a look at askubuntu.com/questions/74105/…. Does it help?
– Mitch♦
Feb 10 '14 at 10:49
I've been able to run a dskchk on windows now but I'm unable to boot windows after the disk check. I'm going to try it again on another pc but, I didn't seem to work. I tried "sudo ntfsfix /dev/sdb1" but I got "Mounting volume... Error opening '/dev/sdb1': No such device or address FAILED Attempting to correct errors... Error opening '/dev/sdb1': No such device or address FAILED Failed to startup volume: No such device or address Error opening '/dev/sdb1': No such device or address Volume is corrupt. You should run chkdsk." On windows I can't even get to the stage were I'm able to right click
– Klubijar
Feb 11 '14 at 2:14
If you are getting an I/O error then it looks like the drive is dead. Run
dmesg
after getting that error for more details about what went wrong.– psusi
Mar 27 '14 at 19:29