$xin l_1$, show sequence $x ^{left( k right)} = left( x _{1} , . . . , x _{k} , 0 , . . . right)in l_1$...












1












$begingroup$


Given any (fixed) element $xin l_1$, show that the sequence $x ^{left( k right)} = left( x _{1} , . . . , x _{k} , 0 , . . . right)in l_1$ (i.e. the first $k$ terms of $x$ followed by all $0s$) converges to x in $l_1-norm$. Show that the same holds true in $l_2$, and gives an example showing that it fails in $l_ {infty}$.



$l_1-norm = sum_{n=1}^{infty}|x_n|$



$l_p$ is the collection of all real sequences $x=(x_n)$ for which $sum _{n=1}^{infty }|x_n|^p < {infty }$.



$l_{infty}$ is the collection of all bounded real sequences.



Actually, I did't understand this question. I didn't know what the limit x is.
So, I didn't know how to prove this problem.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $x$ is an element of $l^1$, and ${x^{(k)}}$ is a sequence of elements in $l^1$, the question is asking to show that $|x^{(k)} - x|_1$ goes to zero as $k$ approaches infinity.
    $endgroup$
    – Xiao
    Sep 17 '16 at 21:09
















1












$begingroup$


Given any (fixed) element $xin l_1$, show that the sequence $x ^{left( k right)} = left( x _{1} , . . . , x _{k} , 0 , . . . right)in l_1$ (i.e. the first $k$ terms of $x$ followed by all $0s$) converges to x in $l_1-norm$. Show that the same holds true in $l_2$, and gives an example showing that it fails in $l_ {infty}$.



$l_1-norm = sum_{n=1}^{infty}|x_n|$



$l_p$ is the collection of all real sequences $x=(x_n)$ for which $sum _{n=1}^{infty }|x_n|^p < {infty }$.



$l_{infty}$ is the collection of all bounded real sequences.



Actually, I did't understand this question. I didn't know what the limit x is.
So, I didn't know how to prove this problem.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $x$ is an element of $l^1$, and ${x^{(k)}}$ is a sequence of elements in $l^1$, the question is asking to show that $|x^{(k)} - x|_1$ goes to zero as $k$ approaches infinity.
    $endgroup$
    – Xiao
    Sep 17 '16 at 21:09














1












1








1





$begingroup$


Given any (fixed) element $xin l_1$, show that the sequence $x ^{left( k right)} = left( x _{1} , . . . , x _{k} , 0 , . . . right)in l_1$ (i.e. the first $k$ terms of $x$ followed by all $0s$) converges to x in $l_1-norm$. Show that the same holds true in $l_2$, and gives an example showing that it fails in $l_ {infty}$.



$l_1-norm = sum_{n=1}^{infty}|x_n|$



$l_p$ is the collection of all real sequences $x=(x_n)$ for which $sum _{n=1}^{infty }|x_n|^p < {infty }$.



$l_{infty}$ is the collection of all bounded real sequences.



Actually, I did't understand this question. I didn't know what the limit x is.
So, I didn't know how to prove this problem.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Given any (fixed) element $xin l_1$, show that the sequence $x ^{left( k right)} = left( x _{1} , . . . , x _{k} , 0 , . . . right)in l_1$ (i.e. the first $k$ terms of $x$ followed by all $0s$) converges to x in $l_1-norm$. Show that the same holds true in $l_2$, and gives an example showing that it fails in $l_ {infty}$.



$l_1-norm = sum_{n=1}^{infty}|x_n|$



$l_p$ is the collection of all real sequences $x=(x_n)$ for which $sum _{n=1}^{infty }|x_n|^p < {infty }$.



$l_{infty}$ is the collection of all bounded real sequences.



Actually, I did't understand this question. I didn't know what the limit x is.
So, I didn't know how to prove this problem.







real-analysis analysis metric-spaces norm normed-spaces






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jun 24 '17 at 6:32









Empty

8,12652661




8,12652661










asked Sep 17 '16 at 21:04









User90User90

38917




38917








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $x$ is an element of $l^1$, and ${x^{(k)}}$ is a sequence of elements in $l^1$, the question is asking to show that $|x^{(k)} - x|_1$ goes to zero as $k$ approaches infinity.
    $endgroup$
    – Xiao
    Sep 17 '16 at 21:09














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $x$ is an element of $l^1$, and ${x^{(k)}}$ is a sequence of elements in $l^1$, the question is asking to show that $|x^{(k)} - x|_1$ goes to zero as $k$ approaches infinity.
    $endgroup$
    – Xiao
    Sep 17 '16 at 21:09








1




1




$begingroup$
$x$ is an element of $l^1$, and ${x^{(k)}}$ is a sequence of elements in $l^1$, the question is asking to show that $|x^{(k)} - x|_1$ goes to zero as $k$ approaches infinity.
$endgroup$
– Xiao
Sep 17 '16 at 21:09




$begingroup$
$x$ is an element of $l^1$, and ${x^{(k)}}$ is a sequence of elements in $l^1$, the question is asking to show that $|x^{(k)} - x|_1$ goes to zero as $k$ approaches infinity.
$endgroup$
– Xiao
Sep 17 '16 at 21:09










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

The question is asking you to prove that the sequence $x^{(k)}$ converges to $x$ in the sense that for every $epsilon > 0$, $||x-x^{(k)}||_{l_1} < epsilon$ for all $k$ past a certain point.



Note $||x-x^{(k)}||_{l_1} = sum_{n=k+1}^{infty} x_n$. But we are given $x in l_1$ so that $sum_{n=1}^{infty} x_n$ converges. What does this tell you about sums of the form $sum_{n=k+1}^{infty} x_n$ for large $k$?






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1930763%2fx-in-l-1-show-sequence-x-left-k-right-left-x-1-x-k%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    The question is asking you to prove that the sequence $x^{(k)}$ converges to $x$ in the sense that for every $epsilon > 0$, $||x-x^{(k)}||_{l_1} < epsilon$ for all $k$ past a certain point.



    Note $||x-x^{(k)}||_{l_1} = sum_{n=k+1}^{infty} x_n$. But we are given $x in l_1$ so that $sum_{n=1}^{infty} x_n$ converges. What does this tell you about sums of the form $sum_{n=k+1}^{infty} x_n$ for large $k$?






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      The question is asking you to prove that the sequence $x^{(k)}$ converges to $x$ in the sense that for every $epsilon > 0$, $||x-x^{(k)}||_{l_1} < epsilon$ for all $k$ past a certain point.



      Note $||x-x^{(k)}||_{l_1} = sum_{n=k+1}^{infty} x_n$. But we are given $x in l_1$ so that $sum_{n=1}^{infty} x_n$ converges. What does this tell you about sums of the form $sum_{n=k+1}^{infty} x_n$ for large $k$?






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        The question is asking you to prove that the sequence $x^{(k)}$ converges to $x$ in the sense that for every $epsilon > 0$, $||x-x^{(k)}||_{l_1} < epsilon$ for all $k$ past a certain point.



        Note $||x-x^{(k)}||_{l_1} = sum_{n=k+1}^{infty} x_n$. But we are given $x in l_1$ so that $sum_{n=1}^{infty} x_n$ converges. What does this tell you about sums of the form $sum_{n=k+1}^{infty} x_n$ for large $k$?






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        The question is asking you to prove that the sequence $x^{(k)}$ converges to $x$ in the sense that for every $epsilon > 0$, $||x-x^{(k)}||_{l_1} < epsilon$ for all $k$ past a certain point.



        Note $||x-x^{(k)}||_{l_1} = sum_{n=k+1}^{infty} x_n$. But we are given $x in l_1$ so that $sum_{n=1}^{infty} x_n$ converges. What does this tell you about sums of the form $sum_{n=k+1}^{infty} x_n$ for large $k$?







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Nov 29 '18 at 15:26

























        answered Sep 17 '16 at 21:46









        mathworker21mathworker21

        8,9421928




        8,9421928






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1930763%2fx-in-l-1-show-sequence-x-left-k-right-left-x-1-x-k%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

            ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

            Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?