Show affiliation directly under author name
I'm working on a paper with three authors, each with different affiliations. I want to list the authors such that their names are on one line and their affiliations are on another line just below it, lined up so that each affiliation is directly under the author name. Is there a way to accomplish this without manually spacing the affiliations? I've tried including a table in the author box but I get errors for using a table before the document begins.
As of now I have the affiliations in a footnote, and this is the code
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
%opening
title{ This is a Paper }
author{Author Afootnote{Affiliation A}, Author Bfootnote{Affiliation B}, and Author Cfootnote{Affiliation C}}
begin{document}
maketitle
end{document}
EDIT: There is a similar question in which one of the answers uses a custom function to display the affiliation directly under the author name, but the author names are scattered in a grid. If possible, I'd like to have the author names remain in a list like
Author A, Author B, and Author C
with the affiliations directly under the author names.
formatting author affiliation
add a comment |
I'm working on a paper with three authors, each with different affiliations. I want to list the authors such that their names are on one line and their affiliations are on another line just below it, lined up so that each affiliation is directly under the author name. Is there a way to accomplish this without manually spacing the affiliations? I've tried including a table in the author box but I get errors for using a table before the document begins.
As of now I have the affiliations in a footnote, and this is the code
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
%opening
title{ This is a Paper }
author{Author Afootnote{Affiliation A}, Author Bfootnote{Affiliation B}, and Author Cfootnote{Affiliation C}}
begin{document}
maketitle
end{document}
EDIT: There is a similar question in which one of the answers uses a custom function to display the affiliation directly under the author name, but the author names are scattered in a grid. If possible, I'd like to have the author names remain in a list like
Author A, Author B, and Author C
with the affiliations directly under the author names.
formatting author affiliation
Welcome to StackExchange! Does this answer help? tex.stackexchange.com/questions/381530/… It achieves the wanted effect
– FLonLon
Jan 29 at 20:43
Thanks for the response! The link isn't actually super helpful; let me edit my question to clarify why not. Given how I worded my question the link would have been helpful.
– jwil
Jan 29 at 21:01
add a comment |
I'm working on a paper with three authors, each with different affiliations. I want to list the authors such that their names are on one line and their affiliations are on another line just below it, lined up so that each affiliation is directly under the author name. Is there a way to accomplish this without manually spacing the affiliations? I've tried including a table in the author box but I get errors for using a table before the document begins.
As of now I have the affiliations in a footnote, and this is the code
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
%opening
title{ This is a Paper }
author{Author Afootnote{Affiliation A}, Author Bfootnote{Affiliation B}, and Author Cfootnote{Affiliation C}}
begin{document}
maketitle
end{document}
EDIT: There is a similar question in which one of the answers uses a custom function to display the affiliation directly under the author name, but the author names are scattered in a grid. If possible, I'd like to have the author names remain in a list like
Author A, Author B, and Author C
with the affiliations directly under the author names.
formatting author affiliation
I'm working on a paper with three authors, each with different affiliations. I want to list the authors such that their names are on one line and their affiliations are on another line just below it, lined up so that each affiliation is directly under the author name. Is there a way to accomplish this without manually spacing the affiliations? I've tried including a table in the author box but I get errors for using a table before the document begins.
As of now I have the affiliations in a footnote, and this is the code
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
%opening
title{ This is a Paper }
author{Author Afootnote{Affiliation A}, Author Bfootnote{Affiliation B}, and Author Cfootnote{Affiliation C}}
begin{document}
maketitle
end{document}
EDIT: There is a similar question in which one of the answers uses a custom function to display the affiliation directly under the author name, but the author names are scattered in a grid. If possible, I'd like to have the author names remain in a list like
Author A, Author B, and Author C
with the affiliations directly under the author names.
formatting author affiliation
formatting author affiliation
edited Jan 29 at 21:05
jwil
asked Jan 29 at 20:11
jwiljwil
83
83
Welcome to StackExchange! Does this answer help? tex.stackexchange.com/questions/381530/… It achieves the wanted effect
– FLonLon
Jan 29 at 20:43
Thanks for the response! The link isn't actually super helpful; let me edit my question to clarify why not. Given how I worded my question the link would have been helpful.
– jwil
Jan 29 at 21:01
add a comment |
Welcome to StackExchange! Does this answer help? tex.stackexchange.com/questions/381530/… It achieves the wanted effect
– FLonLon
Jan 29 at 20:43
Thanks for the response! The link isn't actually super helpful; let me edit my question to clarify why not. Given how I worded my question the link would have been helpful.
– jwil
Jan 29 at 21:01
Welcome to StackExchange! Does this answer help? tex.stackexchange.com/questions/381530/… It achieves the wanted effect
– FLonLon
Jan 29 at 20:43
Welcome to StackExchange! Does this answer help? tex.stackexchange.com/questions/381530/… It achieves the wanted effect
– FLonLon
Jan 29 at 20:43
Thanks for the response! The link isn't actually super helpful; let me edit my question to clarify why not. Given how I worded my question the link would have been helpful.
– jwil
Jan 29 at 21:01
Thanks for the response! The link isn't actually super helpful; let me edit my question to clarify why not. Given how I worded my question the link would have been helpful.
– jwil
Jan 29 at 21:01
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Just use standard LaTeX syntax inside the argument of author
, i.e., use and
to separate the three author blocks. Then each block should be of the form
Author Name \ Author Affiliation
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
title{ This is a Paper }
author{Author A\ small Affiliation A % "small" is optional
and
Author B\ small Affiliation B
and
Author C\ small Affiliation C}
date{today}
begin{document}
maketitle
end{document}
1
Thank you! This was exactly what I was looking for. I did edit the original question before I saw your answer, but simply adding a comma after authors A and B and the word "and" before author C achieved the desired effect. It looks a little clunky but it's what the editor wants.
– jwil
Jan 29 at 21:16
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f472453%2fshow-affiliation-directly-under-author-name%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Just use standard LaTeX syntax inside the argument of author
, i.e., use and
to separate the three author blocks. Then each block should be of the form
Author Name \ Author Affiliation
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
title{ This is a Paper }
author{Author A\ small Affiliation A % "small" is optional
and
Author B\ small Affiliation B
and
Author C\ small Affiliation C}
date{today}
begin{document}
maketitle
end{document}
1
Thank you! This was exactly what I was looking for. I did edit the original question before I saw your answer, but simply adding a comma after authors A and B and the word "and" before author C achieved the desired effect. It looks a little clunky but it's what the editor wants.
– jwil
Jan 29 at 21:16
add a comment |
Just use standard LaTeX syntax inside the argument of author
, i.e., use and
to separate the three author blocks. Then each block should be of the form
Author Name \ Author Affiliation
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
title{ This is a Paper }
author{Author A\ small Affiliation A % "small" is optional
and
Author B\ small Affiliation B
and
Author C\ small Affiliation C}
date{today}
begin{document}
maketitle
end{document}
1
Thank you! This was exactly what I was looking for. I did edit the original question before I saw your answer, but simply adding a comma after authors A and B and the word "and" before author C achieved the desired effect. It looks a little clunky but it's what the editor wants.
– jwil
Jan 29 at 21:16
add a comment |
Just use standard LaTeX syntax inside the argument of author
, i.e., use and
to separate the three author blocks. Then each block should be of the form
Author Name \ Author Affiliation
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
title{ This is a Paper }
author{Author A\ small Affiliation A % "small" is optional
and
Author B\ small Affiliation B
and
Author C\ small Affiliation C}
date{today}
begin{document}
maketitle
end{document}
Just use standard LaTeX syntax inside the argument of author
, i.e., use and
to separate the three author blocks. Then each block should be of the form
Author Name \ Author Affiliation
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
title{ This is a Paper }
author{Author A\ small Affiliation A % "small" is optional
and
Author B\ small Affiliation B
and
Author C\ small Affiliation C}
date{today}
begin{document}
maketitle
end{document}
answered Jan 29 at 20:57
MicoMico
278k30380768
278k30380768
1
Thank you! This was exactly what I was looking for. I did edit the original question before I saw your answer, but simply adding a comma after authors A and B and the word "and" before author C achieved the desired effect. It looks a little clunky but it's what the editor wants.
– jwil
Jan 29 at 21:16
add a comment |
1
Thank you! This was exactly what I was looking for. I did edit the original question before I saw your answer, but simply adding a comma after authors A and B and the word "and" before author C achieved the desired effect. It looks a little clunky but it's what the editor wants.
– jwil
Jan 29 at 21:16
1
1
Thank you! This was exactly what I was looking for. I did edit the original question before I saw your answer, but simply adding a comma after authors A and B and the word "and" before author C achieved the desired effect. It looks a little clunky but it's what the editor wants.
– jwil
Jan 29 at 21:16
Thank you! This was exactly what I was looking for. I did edit the original question before I saw your answer, but simply adding a comma after authors A and B and the word "and" before author C achieved the desired effect. It looks a little clunky but it's what the editor wants.
– jwil
Jan 29 at 21:16
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f472453%2fshow-affiliation-directly-under-author-name%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Welcome to StackExchange! Does this answer help? tex.stackexchange.com/questions/381530/… It achieves the wanted effect
– FLonLon
Jan 29 at 20:43
Thanks for the response! The link isn't actually super helpful; let me edit my question to clarify why not. Given how I worded my question the link would have been helpful.
– jwil
Jan 29 at 21:01