Prove all right angles are congruent?
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Prove all right angles are congruent.
I only have to prove one side to this argument, so I just need to the the other argument.
So basically, if two angles are right, then they must be congruent is what I am trying to prove.
All I have is my assumption that the two angles are right. And conclusion, therefore the angles are congruent.
geometry euclidean-geometry noneuclidean-geometry
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Prove all right angles are congruent.
I only have to prove one side to this argument, so I just need to the the other argument.
So basically, if two angles are right, then they must be congruent is what I am trying to prove.
All I have is my assumption that the two angles are right. And conclusion, therefore the angles are congruent.
geometry euclidean-geometry noneuclidean-geometry
1
What is your definition of Right Angle?
– Daniel
Apr 1 '15 at 0:00
1
an angle that is congruent to one of its supplements
– user217443
Apr 1 '15 at 0:07
if it helps, I have already proven that an angle congruent to a right angle, is also a right angle.
– user217443
Apr 1 '15 at 0:07
Don't have that yet
– user217443
Apr 1 '15 at 0:26
10
In the context of Eulid's Elements, this is a Postulate.
– André Nicolas
Apr 1 '15 at 1:26
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Prove all right angles are congruent.
I only have to prove one side to this argument, so I just need to the the other argument.
So basically, if two angles are right, then they must be congruent is what I am trying to prove.
All I have is my assumption that the two angles are right. And conclusion, therefore the angles are congruent.
geometry euclidean-geometry noneuclidean-geometry
Prove all right angles are congruent.
I only have to prove one side to this argument, so I just need to the the other argument.
So basically, if two angles are right, then they must be congruent is what I am trying to prove.
All I have is my assumption that the two angles are right. And conclusion, therefore the angles are congruent.
geometry euclidean-geometry noneuclidean-geometry
geometry euclidean-geometry noneuclidean-geometry
asked Mar 31 '15 at 23:50
user217443
2913
2913
1
What is your definition of Right Angle?
– Daniel
Apr 1 '15 at 0:00
1
an angle that is congruent to one of its supplements
– user217443
Apr 1 '15 at 0:07
if it helps, I have already proven that an angle congruent to a right angle, is also a right angle.
– user217443
Apr 1 '15 at 0:07
Don't have that yet
– user217443
Apr 1 '15 at 0:26
10
In the context of Eulid's Elements, this is a Postulate.
– André Nicolas
Apr 1 '15 at 1:26
|
show 2 more comments
1
What is your definition of Right Angle?
– Daniel
Apr 1 '15 at 0:00
1
an angle that is congruent to one of its supplements
– user217443
Apr 1 '15 at 0:07
if it helps, I have already proven that an angle congruent to a right angle, is also a right angle.
– user217443
Apr 1 '15 at 0:07
Don't have that yet
– user217443
Apr 1 '15 at 0:26
10
In the context of Eulid's Elements, this is a Postulate.
– André Nicolas
Apr 1 '15 at 1:26
1
1
What is your definition of Right Angle?
– Daniel
Apr 1 '15 at 0:00
What is your definition of Right Angle?
– Daniel
Apr 1 '15 at 0:00
1
1
an angle that is congruent to one of its supplements
– user217443
Apr 1 '15 at 0:07
an angle that is congruent to one of its supplements
– user217443
Apr 1 '15 at 0:07
if it helps, I have already proven that an angle congruent to a right angle, is also a right angle.
– user217443
Apr 1 '15 at 0:07
if it helps, I have already proven that an angle congruent to a right angle, is also a right angle.
– user217443
Apr 1 '15 at 0:07
Don't have that yet
– user217443
Apr 1 '15 at 0:26
Don't have that yet
– user217443
Apr 1 '15 at 0:26
10
10
In the context of Eulid's Elements, this is a Postulate.
– André Nicolas
Apr 1 '15 at 1:26
In the context of Eulid's Elements, this is a Postulate.
– André Nicolas
Apr 1 '15 at 1:26
|
show 2 more comments
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
We say that the angle $measuredangle AOB$ is the supplement of the angle $measuredangle Y$ if the latter is congruent to an adjacent angle $measuredangle BOC$ to $measuredangle AOB$ such that the points $A$, $O$ and $C$ are colineal.
Using this definition and the fact that an angle is Right iff it's congruent to one of its supplements (by definition), you can prove that all right angles are congruent as follows:
Let $measuredangle AOB$ be a right angle, then it's congruent to one of its supplements (and therefore to all of them). Let $measuredangle BOC$ be an adjacent supplement of $measuredangle AOB$, then $measuredangle AOB cong measuredangle BOC$ and $A$, $0$, $C$ are colineal.
Now let $Y$ be any other right angle and consider $D$ an exterior point of $measuredangle AOB$ such that $measuredangle AOD$ is a right angle congruent to $Y$. Here you have to prove that: $B$, $O$ and $D$ are colineal and once you have this prove that $measuredangle AOBcong measuredangle AOD$ (using "vertex opposites" arguments), I'm leaving that to you.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
If you define a right angle as the bisector of a straight angle - analogous to the idea of folding over a straight edge to get a fold perpendicular to that fold, with the same angle either side of the fold line to the straight line - it is clear that since straight lines are taken as similar, and you can create a straight angle by placing a point on a straight line, all bisectors of straight angles - all right angles - are also congruent.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
A straight angle has two right angles. If two angles are such that a supplement of the one equals itself then each must be a right angle. Since only a single parameter is involved congruence is established.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
By supplements do you mean they sum to 180 degrees or would form a line if they were adjacent? Have you considered a proof by contradiction? I love those! Then you could assume you have two right angles which are not congruent. Going that route we are given angle A is a right angle, angle 1 is a right angle, and angle A is not congruent to angle 1. Then there exists angle B which is a congruent supplement and linear pair to angle A and angle 2 which is a congruent supplement and linear pair to angle 1. Assuming that all lines are the same degrees (180 or whatever), angle B and angle 2 are both half lines (90 degrees or whatever). So angle B and angle 2 have the same measure and are congruent, which should bring about our contradiction. Angle A is congruent to angle B, angle B is congruent to angle 2, angle 2 is congruent to angle 1, so angle A is congruent to angle 1, except that it isn't by definition. Might have to do a little cleaning up in the middle there if you move from congruence to numbers and back.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1215067%2fprove-all-right-angles-are-congruent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
We say that the angle $measuredangle AOB$ is the supplement of the angle $measuredangle Y$ if the latter is congruent to an adjacent angle $measuredangle BOC$ to $measuredangle AOB$ such that the points $A$, $O$ and $C$ are colineal.
Using this definition and the fact that an angle is Right iff it's congruent to one of its supplements (by definition), you can prove that all right angles are congruent as follows:
Let $measuredangle AOB$ be a right angle, then it's congruent to one of its supplements (and therefore to all of them). Let $measuredangle BOC$ be an adjacent supplement of $measuredangle AOB$, then $measuredangle AOB cong measuredangle BOC$ and $A$, $0$, $C$ are colineal.
Now let $Y$ be any other right angle and consider $D$ an exterior point of $measuredangle AOB$ such that $measuredangle AOD$ is a right angle congruent to $Y$. Here you have to prove that: $B$, $O$ and $D$ are colineal and once you have this prove that $measuredangle AOBcong measuredangle AOD$ (using "vertex opposites" arguments), I'm leaving that to you.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
We say that the angle $measuredangle AOB$ is the supplement of the angle $measuredangle Y$ if the latter is congruent to an adjacent angle $measuredangle BOC$ to $measuredangle AOB$ such that the points $A$, $O$ and $C$ are colineal.
Using this definition and the fact that an angle is Right iff it's congruent to one of its supplements (by definition), you can prove that all right angles are congruent as follows:
Let $measuredangle AOB$ be a right angle, then it's congruent to one of its supplements (and therefore to all of them). Let $measuredangle BOC$ be an adjacent supplement of $measuredangle AOB$, then $measuredangle AOB cong measuredangle BOC$ and $A$, $0$, $C$ are colineal.
Now let $Y$ be any other right angle and consider $D$ an exterior point of $measuredangle AOB$ such that $measuredangle AOD$ is a right angle congruent to $Y$. Here you have to prove that: $B$, $O$ and $D$ are colineal and once you have this prove that $measuredangle AOBcong measuredangle AOD$ (using "vertex opposites" arguments), I'm leaving that to you.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
We say that the angle $measuredangle AOB$ is the supplement of the angle $measuredangle Y$ if the latter is congruent to an adjacent angle $measuredangle BOC$ to $measuredangle AOB$ such that the points $A$, $O$ and $C$ are colineal.
Using this definition and the fact that an angle is Right iff it's congruent to one of its supplements (by definition), you can prove that all right angles are congruent as follows:
Let $measuredangle AOB$ be a right angle, then it's congruent to one of its supplements (and therefore to all of them). Let $measuredangle BOC$ be an adjacent supplement of $measuredangle AOB$, then $measuredangle AOB cong measuredangle BOC$ and $A$, $0$, $C$ are colineal.
Now let $Y$ be any other right angle and consider $D$ an exterior point of $measuredangle AOB$ such that $measuredangle AOD$ is a right angle congruent to $Y$. Here you have to prove that: $B$, $O$ and $D$ are colineal and once you have this prove that $measuredangle AOBcong measuredangle AOD$ (using "vertex opposites" arguments), I'm leaving that to you.
We say that the angle $measuredangle AOB$ is the supplement of the angle $measuredangle Y$ if the latter is congruent to an adjacent angle $measuredangle BOC$ to $measuredangle AOB$ such that the points $A$, $O$ and $C$ are colineal.
Using this definition and the fact that an angle is Right iff it's congruent to one of its supplements (by definition), you can prove that all right angles are congruent as follows:
Let $measuredangle AOB$ be a right angle, then it's congruent to one of its supplements (and therefore to all of them). Let $measuredangle BOC$ be an adjacent supplement of $measuredangle AOB$, then $measuredangle AOB cong measuredangle BOC$ and $A$, $0$, $C$ are colineal.
Now let $Y$ be any other right angle and consider $D$ an exterior point of $measuredangle AOB$ such that $measuredangle AOD$ is a right angle congruent to $Y$. Here you have to prove that: $B$, $O$ and $D$ are colineal and once you have this prove that $measuredangle AOBcong measuredangle AOD$ (using "vertex opposites" arguments), I'm leaving that to you.
edited Apr 1 '15 at 2:03
answered Apr 1 '15 at 0:59
Daniel
5,64521639
5,64521639
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
If you define a right angle as the bisector of a straight angle - analogous to the idea of folding over a straight edge to get a fold perpendicular to that fold, with the same angle either side of the fold line to the straight line - it is clear that since straight lines are taken as similar, and you can create a straight angle by placing a point on a straight line, all bisectors of straight angles - all right angles - are also congruent.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
If you define a right angle as the bisector of a straight angle - analogous to the idea of folding over a straight edge to get a fold perpendicular to that fold, with the same angle either side of the fold line to the straight line - it is clear that since straight lines are taken as similar, and you can create a straight angle by placing a point on a straight line, all bisectors of straight angles - all right angles - are also congruent.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
If you define a right angle as the bisector of a straight angle - analogous to the idea of folding over a straight edge to get a fold perpendicular to that fold, with the same angle either side of the fold line to the straight line - it is clear that since straight lines are taken as similar, and you can create a straight angle by placing a point on a straight line, all bisectors of straight angles - all right angles - are also congruent.
If you define a right angle as the bisector of a straight angle - analogous to the idea of folding over a straight edge to get a fold perpendicular to that fold, with the same angle either side of the fold line to the straight line - it is clear that since straight lines are taken as similar, and you can create a straight angle by placing a point on a straight line, all bisectors of straight angles - all right angles - are also congruent.
answered Feb 1 '17 at 9:28
Joffan
32.1k43169
32.1k43169
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
A straight angle has two right angles. If two angles are such that a supplement of the one equals itself then each must be a right angle. Since only a single parameter is involved congruence is established.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
A straight angle has two right angles. If two angles are such that a supplement of the one equals itself then each must be a right angle. Since only a single parameter is involved congruence is established.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
A straight angle has two right angles. If two angles are such that a supplement of the one equals itself then each must be a right angle. Since only a single parameter is involved congruence is established.
A straight angle has two right angles. If two angles are such that a supplement of the one equals itself then each must be a right angle. Since only a single parameter is involved congruence is established.
answered Jul 20 '17 at 15:08
Narasimham
20.5k52158
20.5k52158
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
By supplements do you mean they sum to 180 degrees or would form a line if they were adjacent? Have you considered a proof by contradiction? I love those! Then you could assume you have two right angles which are not congruent. Going that route we are given angle A is a right angle, angle 1 is a right angle, and angle A is not congruent to angle 1. Then there exists angle B which is a congruent supplement and linear pair to angle A and angle 2 which is a congruent supplement and linear pair to angle 1. Assuming that all lines are the same degrees (180 or whatever), angle B and angle 2 are both half lines (90 degrees or whatever). So angle B and angle 2 have the same measure and are congruent, which should bring about our contradiction. Angle A is congruent to angle B, angle B is congruent to angle 2, angle 2 is congruent to angle 1, so angle A is congruent to angle 1, except that it isn't by definition. Might have to do a little cleaning up in the middle there if you move from congruence to numbers and back.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
By supplements do you mean they sum to 180 degrees or would form a line if they were adjacent? Have you considered a proof by contradiction? I love those! Then you could assume you have two right angles which are not congruent. Going that route we are given angle A is a right angle, angle 1 is a right angle, and angle A is not congruent to angle 1. Then there exists angle B which is a congruent supplement and linear pair to angle A and angle 2 which is a congruent supplement and linear pair to angle 1. Assuming that all lines are the same degrees (180 or whatever), angle B and angle 2 are both half lines (90 degrees or whatever). So angle B and angle 2 have the same measure and are congruent, which should bring about our contradiction. Angle A is congruent to angle B, angle B is congruent to angle 2, angle 2 is congruent to angle 1, so angle A is congruent to angle 1, except that it isn't by definition. Might have to do a little cleaning up in the middle there if you move from congruence to numbers and back.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
By supplements do you mean they sum to 180 degrees or would form a line if they were adjacent? Have you considered a proof by contradiction? I love those! Then you could assume you have two right angles which are not congruent. Going that route we are given angle A is a right angle, angle 1 is a right angle, and angle A is not congruent to angle 1. Then there exists angle B which is a congruent supplement and linear pair to angle A and angle 2 which is a congruent supplement and linear pair to angle 1. Assuming that all lines are the same degrees (180 or whatever), angle B and angle 2 are both half lines (90 degrees or whatever). So angle B and angle 2 have the same measure and are congruent, which should bring about our contradiction. Angle A is congruent to angle B, angle B is congruent to angle 2, angle 2 is congruent to angle 1, so angle A is congruent to angle 1, except that it isn't by definition. Might have to do a little cleaning up in the middle there if you move from congruence to numbers and back.
By supplements do you mean they sum to 180 degrees or would form a line if they were adjacent? Have you considered a proof by contradiction? I love those! Then you could assume you have two right angles which are not congruent. Going that route we are given angle A is a right angle, angle 1 is a right angle, and angle A is not congruent to angle 1. Then there exists angle B which is a congruent supplement and linear pair to angle A and angle 2 which is a congruent supplement and linear pair to angle 1. Assuming that all lines are the same degrees (180 or whatever), angle B and angle 2 are both half lines (90 degrees or whatever). So angle B and angle 2 have the same measure and are congruent, which should bring about our contradiction. Angle A is congruent to angle B, angle B is congruent to angle 2, angle 2 is congruent to angle 1, so angle A is congruent to angle 1, except that it isn't by definition. Might have to do a little cleaning up in the middle there if you move from congruence to numbers and back.
answered Oct 19 at 16:33
Jason Makepeace Rancho HS
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1215067%2fprove-all-right-angles-are-congruent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
What is your definition of Right Angle?
– Daniel
Apr 1 '15 at 0:00
1
an angle that is congruent to one of its supplements
– user217443
Apr 1 '15 at 0:07
if it helps, I have already proven that an angle congruent to a right angle, is also a right angle.
– user217443
Apr 1 '15 at 0:07
Don't have that yet
– user217443
Apr 1 '15 at 0:26
10
In the context of Eulid's Elements, this is a Postulate.
– André Nicolas
Apr 1 '15 at 1:26