Which of the following is isomorphic to the group of units of $mathbb{Z}_{35}$? [closed]












-1












$begingroup$



  • $C_2 times C_2 times C_6$

  • $C_2 times C_{12}$

  • $C_{24}$


The group of units of $mathbb{Z}_{35}$ is $mathbb{Z}_{35}^#=
left{ 1,2,3,4,6,8,9,11,12,13,16,17,18,19,22,23,24,26,27,29,31,32,33,34 right}$
.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by Derek Holt, Jyrki Lahtonen, DRF, amWhy, ancientmathematician Dec 5 '18 at 17:48


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Jyrki Lahtonen, DRF, amWhy, ancientmathematician

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    what have you tried ? Why makes the three possibilities you gave non-isomorphic ?
    $endgroup$
    – user120527
    Nov 29 '18 at 18:03
















-1












$begingroup$



  • $C_2 times C_2 times C_6$

  • $C_2 times C_{12}$

  • $C_{24}$


The group of units of $mathbb{Z}_{35}$ is $mathbb{Z}_{35}^#=
left{ 1,2,3,4,6,8,9,11,12,13,16,17,18,19,22,23,24,26,27,29,31,32,33,34 right}$
.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by Derek Holt, Jyrki Lahtonen, DRF, amWhy, ancientmathematician Dec 5 '18 at 17:48


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Jyrki Lahtonen, DRF, amWhy, ancientmathematician

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    what have you tried ? Why makes the three possibilities you gave non-isomorphic ?
    $endgroup$
    – user120527
    Nov 29 '18 at 18:03














-1












-1








-1





$begingroup$



  • $C_2 times C_2 times C_6$

  • $C_2 times C_{12}$

  • $C_{24}$


The group of units of $mathbb{Z}_{35}$ is $mathbb{Z}_{35}^#=
left{ 1,2,3,4,6,8,9,11,12,13,16,17,18,19,22,23,24,26,27,29,31,32,33,34 right}$
.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$





  • $C_2 times C_2 times C_6$

  • $C_2 times C_{12}$

  • $C_{24}$


The group of units of $mathbb{Z}_{35}$ is $mathbb{Z}_{35}^#=
left{ 1,2,3,4,6,8,9,11,12,13,16,17,18,19,22,23,24,26,27,29,31,32,33,34 right}$
.







group-theory finite-groups






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 29 '18 at 17:55









vladr10vladr10

32




32




closed as off-topic by Derek Holt, Jyrki Lahtonen, DRF, amWhy, ancientmathematician Dec 5 '18 at 17:48


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Jyrki Lahtonen, DRF, amWhy, ancientmathematician

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







closed as off-topic by Derek Holt, Jyrki Lahtonen, DRF, amWhy, ancientmathematician Dec 5 '18 at 17:48


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Jyrki Lahtonen, DRF, amWhy, ancientmathematician

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    what have you tried ? Why makes the three possibilities you gave non-isomorphic ?
    $endgroup$
    – user120527
    Nov 29 '18 at 18:03














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    what have you tried ? Why makes the three possibilities you gave non-isomorphic ?
    $endgroup$
    – user120527
    Nov 29 '18 at 18:03








1




1




$begingroup$
what have you tried ? Why makes the three possibilities you gave non-isomorphic ?
$endgroup$
– user120527
Nov 29 '18 at 18:03




$begingroup$
what have you tried ? Why makes the three possibilities you gave non-isomorphic ?
$endgroup$
– user120527
Nov 29 '18 at 18:03










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

Hint: $mathbb{Z}_{35} cong mathbb{Z}_{5} times mathbb{Z}_{7}$, by the Chinese remainder theorem.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    Chinese Remainder Theorem, so $C_4 times C_6$. Then as pointed out below, you can write as $C_2 times C_3 times C_4 $ and thence as $C_2 times C_{12}$, clumsy though it is.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      With generators 17 and -1
      $endgroup$
      – C Monsour
      Nov 29 '18 at 18:22


















    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4












    $begingroup$

    Hint: $mathbb{Z}_{35} cong mathbb{Z}_{5} times mathbb{Z}_{7}$, by the Chinese remainder theorem.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      4












      $begingroup$

      Hint: $mathbb{Z}_{35} cong mathbb{Z}_{5} times mathbb{Z}_{7}$, by the Chinese remainder theorem.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        Hint: $mathbb{Z}_{35} cong mathbb{Z}_{5} times mathbb{Z}_{7}$, by the Chinese remainder theorem.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Hint: $mathbb{Z}_{35} cong mathbb{Z}_{5} times mathbb{Z}_{7}$, by the Chinese remainder theorem.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Nov 30 '18 at 10:10

























        answered Nov 29 '18 at 17:57









        lhflhf

        165k10171395




        165k10171395























            1












            $begingroup$

            Chinese Remainder Theorem, so $C_4 times C_6$. Then as pointed out below, you can write as $C_2 times C_3 times C_4 $ and thence as $C_2 times C_{12}$, clumsy though it is.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              With generators 17 and -1
              $endgroup$
              – C Monsour
              Nov 29 '18 at 18:22
















            1












            $begingroup$

            Chinese Remainder Theorem, so $C_4 times C_6$. Then as pointed out below, you can write as $C_2 times C_3 times C_4 $ and thence as $C_2 times C_{12}$, clumsy though it is.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              With generators 17 and -1
              $endgroup$
              – C Monsour
              Nov 29 '18 at 18:22














            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            Chinese Remainder Theorem, so $C_4 times C_6$. Then as pointed out below, you can write as $C_2 times C_3 times C_4 $ and thence as $C_2 times C_{12}$, clumsy though it is.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Chinese Remainder Theorem, so $C_4 times C_6$. Then as pointed out below, you can write as $C_2 times C_3 times C_4 $ and thence as $C_2 times C_{12}$, clumsy though it is.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Nov 29 '18 at 18:00

























            answered Nov 29 '18 at 17:58









            Richard MartinRichard Martin

            1,61318




            1,61318












            • $begingroup$
              With generators 17 and -1
              $endgroup$
              – C Monsour
              Nov 29 '18 at 18:22


















            • $begingroup$
              With generators 17 and -1
              $endgroup$
              – C Monsour
              Nov 29 '18 at 18:22
















            $begingroup$
            With generators 17 and -1
            $endgroup$
            – C Monsour
            Nov 29 '18 at 18:22




            $begingroup$
            With generators 17 and -1
            $endgroup$
            – C Monsour
            Nov 29 '18 at 18:22



            Popular posts from this blog

            How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

            Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

            Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents