What does “FRANCE TO PLACE” mean?
From Pat Hobby, Putative Father by F. Scott Fitzgerald:
He searched the orange pages frantically. Below the form sheets, the
past performances, the endless oracles for endless racetracks, his eye
was caught by a one-inch item:
LONDON. SEPTEMBER 3RD. ON THIS MORNING'S DECLARATION BY CHAMBERLAIN,
DOUGIE CABLES 'ENGLAND TO WIN. FRANCE TO PLACE. RUSSIA TO SHOW'.
Clearly this is a shorthand for something, but what?
meaning literature
|
show 4 more comments
From Pat Hobby, Putative Father by F. Scott Fitzgerald:
He searched the orange pages frantically. Below the form sheets, the
past performances, the endless oracles for endless racetracks, his eye
was caught by a one-inch item:
LONDON. SEPTEMBER 3RD. ON THIS MORNING'S DECLARATION BY CHAMBERLAIN,
DOUGIE CABLES 'ENGLAND TO WIN. FRANCE TO PLACE. RUSSIA TO SHOW'.
Clearly this is a shorthand for something, but what?
meaning literature
21
Win, place, and show are betting terms, often used in horse racing.
– Weather Vane
Feb 11 at 22:28
1
"ENGLAND TO WIN" is likely a reference to the war, nascent at the time.
– Guest
Feb 11 at 22:30
1
Not Nascent: on 3rd September 1939 Chamberlain declared war on Germany. Who was Dougie in the book? Why is the message on the sporting page? What is the context?
– Weather Vane
Feb 11 at 22:36
1
@WeatherVane The Cambridge Dictionary defines "nascent" as "only recently formed or started, but likely to grow larger quickly." So of course WW2 was nascent in September 1939.
– Guest
Feb 11 at 22:59
1
WW2 was nascent in the mid-30's and everybody knew it was inevitable. When war was declared, that was more explosion than nascence, which isn't really the right usage for an outbreak of war.
– Weather Vane
Feb 11 at 23:03
|
show 4 more comments
From Pat Hobby, Putative Father by F. Scott Fitzgerald:
He searched the orange pages frantically. Below the form sheets, the
past performances, the endless oracles for endless racetracks, his eye
was caught by a one-inch item:
LONDON. SEPTEMBER 3RD. ON THIS MORNING'S DECLARATION BY CHAMBERLAIN,
DOUGIE CABLES 'ENGLAND TO WIN. FRANCE TO PLACE. RUSSIA TO SHOW'.
Clearly this is a shorthand for something, but what?
meaning literature
From Pat Hobby, Putative Father by F. Scott Fitzgerald:
He searched the orange pages frantically. Below the form sheets, the
past performances, the endless oracles for endless racetracks, his eye
was caught by a one-inch item:
LONDON. SEPTEMBER 3RD. ON THIS MORNING'S DECLARATION BY CHAMBERLAIN,
DOUGIE CABLES 'ENGLAND TO WIN. FRANCE TO PLACE. RUSSIA TO SHOW'.
Clearly this is a shorthand for something, but what?
meaning literature
meaning literature
asked Feb 11 at 22:26
GuestGuest
12413
12413
21
Win, place, and show are betting terms, often used in horse racing.
– Weather Vane
Feb 11 at 22:28
1
"ENGLAND TO WIN" is likely a reference to the war, nascent at the time.
– Guest
Feb 11 at 22:30
1
Not Nascent: on 3rd September 1939 Chamberlain declared war on Germany. Who was Dougie in the book? Why is the message on the sporting page? What is the context?
– Weather Vane
Feb 11 at 22:36
1
@WeatherVane The Cambridge Dictionary defines "nascent" as "only recently formed or started, but likely to grow larger quickly." So of course WW2 was nascent in September 1939.
– Guest
Feb 11 at 22:59
1
WW2 was nascent in the mid-30's and everybody knew it was inevitable. When war was declared, that was more explosion than nascence, which isn't really the right usage for an outbreak of war.
– Weather Vane
Feb 11 at 23:03
|
show 4 more comments
21
Win, place, and show are betting terms, often used in horse racing.
– Weather Vane
Feb 11 at 22:28
1
"ENGLAND TO WIN" is likely a reference to the war, nascent at the time.
– Guest
Feb 11 at 22:30
1
Not Nascent: on 3rd September 1939 Chamberlain declared war on Germany. Who was Dougie in the book? Why is the message on the sporting page? What is the context?
– Weather Vane
Feb 11 at 22:36
1
@WeatherVane The Cambridge Dictionary defines "nascent" as "only recently formed or started, but likely to grow larger quickly." So of course WW2 was nascent in September 1939.
– Guest
Feb 11 at 22:59
1
WW2 was nascent in the mid-30's and everybody knew it was inevitable. When war was declared, that was more explosion than nascence, which isn't really the right usage for an outbreak of war.
– Weather Vane
Feb 11 at 23:03
21
21
Win, place, and show are betting terms, often used in horse racing.
– Weather Vane
Feb 11 at 22:28
Win, place, and show are betting terms, often used in horse racing.
– Weather Vane
Feb 11 at 22:28
1
1
"ENGLAND TO WIN" is likely a reference to the war, nascent at the time.
– Guest
Feb 11 at 22:30
"ENGLAND TO WIN" is likely a reference to the war, nascent at the time.
– Guest
Feb 11 at 22:30
1
1
Not Nascent: on 3rd September 1939 Chamberlain declared war on Germany. Who was Dougie in the book? Why is the message on the sporting page? What is the context?
– Weather Vane
Feb 11 at 22:36
Not Nascent: on 3rd September 1939 Chamberlain declared war on Germany. Who was Dougie in the book? Why is the message on the sporting page? What is the context?
– Weather Vane
Feb 11 at 22:36
1
1
@WeatherVane The Cambridge Dictionary defines "nascent" as "only recently formed or started, but likely to grow larger quickly." So of course WW2 was nascent in September 1939.
– Guest
Feb 11 at 22:59
@WeatherVane The Cambridge Dictionary defines "nascent" as "only recently formed or started, but likely to grow larger quickly." So of course WW2 was nascent in September 1939.
– Guest
Feb 11 at 22:59
1
1
WW2 was nascent in the mid-30's and everybody knew it was inevitable. When war was declared, that was more explosion than nascence, which isn't really the right usage for an outbreak of war.
– Weather Vane
Feb 11 at 23:03
WW2 was nascent in the mid-30's and everybody knew it was inevitable. When war was declared, that was more explosion than nascence, which isn't really the right usage for an outbreak of war.
– Weather Vane
Feb 11 at 23:03
|
show 4 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
It's a betting term.
Win — first place.
Place — second or first place.
Show — third, second or first place.
Source: oddsshark.com (among others).
Suggesting England would "win," France would finish second and Russia third. That is, someone was setting odds on the outcome of the war.
11
@Guest it was a cable (or telegram) which was expensive to send, thus in shorthand, from someone with a sense of humour.
– Weather Vane
Feb 11 at 22:33
3
@Guest - You are exactly right, and that's much of the point. Think about it.
– Hot Licks
Feb 11 at 23:18
6
@guest horseraces often have 10 or more participants in a single race. As such, even showing (third place) is considered an achievement. Being picked to show should not be considered disparaging.
– BowlOfRed
Feb 11 at 23:57
4
@Guest The great costs of waging a war, coupled with what is typically a negotiated peace afterwards, will inevitably lead to different nations winning more, losing less, etc. Since we are talking WWII, yes, the Allies won and the Axis lost, but those are sides. Now start counting what each nation had to spend during the war, the losses they took, etc. and you end up with a view that could be close to what was predicted: England was never invaded, France was totally (but very rapidly) occupied and Russia lost about 10 million people.
– Falc
Feb 12 at 16:11
2
It seems that the betting terms are not related to winning the war, but to declare war on Germany. England to declare first, and so on.
– Stefan
Feb 12 at 17:44
|
show 9 more comments
horse racing term
to place TFD
Games Second position for betting purposes, as in a horserace.
The prediction of the race is for England to win ... Russia to come in 3rd. But without more context ( doubtful horses name's could be England, France and Russia) it could be a political or some such metaphor.
2
The relevant context is "September 3rd". Britain declared war on Germany on September 3rd.
– Eric Lippert
Feb 12 at 15:58
add a comment |
Below the form sheets, the past performances, the endless oracles for endless racetracks
The context is a newspaper for horse racing bettors.
LONDON. SEPTEMBER 3RD. ON THIS MORNING'S DECLARATION BY CHAMBERLAIN
On September 1st, Germany invaded Poland. As a result, on September 3rd 1939 British Prime Minister Chamberlain declared war on Germany.
See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtJ_zbz1NyY
DOUGIE CABLES 'ENGLAND TO WIN. FRANCE TO PLACE. RUSSIA TO SHOW'.
As others have noted, this is horse race betting parlance for England will win, France will come in second, Russia will come in third.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f485107%2fwhat-does-france-to-place-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It's a betting term.
Win — first place.
Place — second or first place.
Show — third, second or first place.
Source: oddsshark.com (among others).
Suggesting England would "win," France would finish second and Russia third. That is, someone was setting odds on the outcome of the war.
11
@Guest it was a cable (or telegram) which was expensive to send, thus in shorthand, from someone with a sense of humour.
– Weather Vane
Feb 11 at 22:33
3
@Guest - You are exactly right, and that's much of the point. Think about it.
– Hot Licks
Feb 11 at 23:18
6
@guest horseraces often have 10 or more participants in a single race. As such, even showing (third place) is considered an achievement. Being picked to show should not be considered disparaging.
– BowlOfRed
Feb 11 at 23:57
4
@Guest The great costs of waging a war, coupled with what is typically a negotiated peace afterwards, will inevitably lead to different nations winning more, losing less, etc. Since we are talking WWII, yes, the Allies won and the Axis lost, but those are sides. Now start counting what each nation had to spend during the war, the losses they took, etc. and you end up with a view that could be close to what was predicted: England was never invaded, France was totally (but very rapidly) occupied and Russia lost about 10 million people.
– Falc
Feb 12 at 16:11
2
It seems that the betting terms are not related to winning the war, but to declare war on Germany. England to declare first, and so on.
– Stefan
Feb 12 at 17:44
|
show 9 more comments
It's a betting term.
Win — first place.
Place — second or first place.
Show — third, second or first place.
Source: oddsshark.com (among others).
Suggesting England would "win," France would finish second and Russia third. That is, someone was setting odds on the outcome of the war.
11
@Guest it was a cable (or telegram) which was expensive to send, thus in shorthand, from someone with a sense of humour.
– Weather Vane
Feb 11 at 22:33
3
@Guest - You are exactly right, and that's much of the point. Think about it.
– Hot Licks
Feb 11 at 23:18
6
@guest horseraces often have 10 or more participants in a single race. As such, even showing (third place) is considered an achievement. Being picked to show should not be considered disparaging.
– BowlOfRed
Feb 11 at 23:57
4
@Guest The great costs of waging a war, coupled with what is typically a negotiated peace afterwards, will inevitably lead to different nations winning more, losing less, etc. Since we are talking WWII, yes, the Allies won and the Axis lost, but those are sides. Now start counting what each nation had to spend during the war, the losses they took, etc. and you end up with a view that could be close to what was predicted: England was never invaded, France was totally (but very rapidly) occupied and Russia lost about 10 million people.
– Falc
Feb 12 at 16:11
2
It seems that the betting terms are not related to winning the war, but to declare war on Germany. England to declare first, and so on.
– Stefan
Feb 12 at 17:44
|
show 9 more comments
It's a betting term.
Win — first place.
Place — second or first place.
Show — third, second or first place.
Source: oddsshark.com (among others).
Suggesting England would "win," France would finish second and Russia third. That is, someone was setting odds on the outcome of the war.
It's a betting term.
Win — first place.
Place — second or first place.
Show — third, second or first place.
Source: oddsshark.com (among others).
Suggesting England would "win," France would finish second and Russia third. That is, someone was setting odds on the outcome of the war.
edited Feb 11 at 22:35
answered Feb 11 at 22:32
drewhartdrewhart
2,311615
2,311615
11
@Guest it was a cable (or telegram) which was expensive to send, thus in shorthand, from someone with a sense of humour.
– Weather Vane
Feb 11 at 22:33
3
@Guest - You are exactly right, and that's much of the point. Think about it.
– Hot Licks
Feb 11 at 23:18
6
@guest horseraces often have 10 or more participants in a single race. As such, even showing (third place) is considered an achievement. Being picked to show should not be considered disparaging.
– BowlOfRed
Feb 11 at 23:57
4
@Guest The great costs of waging a war, coupled with what is typically a negotiated peace afterwards, will inevitably lead to different nations winning more, losing less, etc. Since we are talking WWII, yes, the Allies won and the Axis lost, but those are sides. Now start counting what each nation had to spend during the war, the losses they took, etc. and you end up with a view that could be close to what was predicted: England was never invaded, France was totally (but very rapidly) occupied and Russia lost about 10 million people.
– Falc
Feb 12 at 16:11
2
It seems that the betting terms are not related to winning the war, but to declare war on Germany. England to declare first, and so on.
– Stefan
Feb 12 at 17:44
|
show 9 more comments
11
@Guest it was a cable (or telegram) which was expensive to send, thus in shorthand, from someone with a sense of humour.
– Weather Vane
Feb 11 at 22:33
3
@Guest - You are exactly right, and that's much of the point. Think about it.
– Hot Licks
Feb 11 at 23:18
6
@guest horseraces often have 10 or more participants in a single race. As such, even showing (third place) is considered an achievement. Being picked to show should not be considered disparaging.
– BowlOfRed
Feb 11 at 23:57
4
@Guest The great costs of waging a war, coupled with what is typically a negotiated peace afterwards, will inevitably lead to different nations winning more, losing less, etc. Since we are talking WWII, yes, the Allies won and the Axis lost, but those are sides. Now start counting what each nation had to spend during the war, the losses they took, etc. and you end up with a view that could be close to what was predicted: England was never invaded, France was totally (but very rapidly) occupied and Russia lost about 10 million people.
– Falc
Feb 12 at 16:11
2
It seems that the betting terms are not related to winning the war, but to declare war on Germany. England to declare first, and so on.
– Stefan
Feb 12 at 17:44
11
11
@Guest it was a cable (or telegram) which was expensive to send, thus in shorthand, from someone with a sense of humour.
– Weather Vane
Feb 11 at 22:33
@Guest it was a cable (or telegram) which was expensive to send, thus in shorthand, from someone with a sense of humour.
– Weather Vane
Feb 11 at 22:33
3
3
@Guest - You are exactly right, and that's much of the point. Think about it.
– Hot Licks
Feb 11 at 23:18
@Guest - You are exactly right, and that's much of the point. Think about it.
– Hot Licks
Feb 11 at 23:18
6
6
@guest horseraces often have 10 or more participants in a single race. As such, even showing (third place) is considered an achievement. Being picked to show should not be considered disparaging.
– BowlOfRed
Feb 11 at 23:57
@guest horseraces often have 10 or more participants in a single race. As such, even showing (third place) is considered an achievement. Being picked to show should not be considered disparaging.
– BowlOfRed
Feb 11 at 23:57
4
4
@Guest The great costs of waging a war, coupled with what is typically a negotiated peace afterwards, will inevitably lead to different nations winning more, losing less, etc. Since we are talking WWII, yes, the Allies won and the Axis lost, but those are sides. Now start counting what each nation had to spend during the war, the losses they took, etc. and you end up with a view that could be close to what was predicted: England was never invaded, France was totally (but very rapidly) occupied and Russia lost about 10 million people.
– Falc
Feb 12 at 16:11
@Guest The great costs of waging a war, coupled with what is typically a negotiated peace afterwards, will inevitably lead to different nations winning more, losing less, etc. Since we are talking WWII, yes, the Allies won and the Axis lost, but those are sides. Now start counting what each nation had to spend during the war, the losses they took, etc. and you end up with a view that could be close to what was predicted: England was never invaded, France was totally (but very rapidly) occupied and Russia lost about 10 million people.
– Falc
Feb 12 at 16:11
2
2
It seems that the betting terms are not related to winning the war, but to declare war on Germany. England to declare first, and so on.
– Stefan
Feb 12 at 17:44
It seems that the betting terms are not related to winning the war, but to declare war on Germany. England to declare first, and so on.
– Stefan
Feb 12 at 17:44
|
show 9 more comments
horse racing term
to place TFD
Games Second position for betting purposes, as in a horserace.
The prediction of the race is for England to win ... Russia to come in 3rd. But without more context ( doubtful horses name's could be England, France and Russia) it could be a political or some such metaphor.
2
The relevant context is "September 3rd". Britain declared war on Germany on September 3rd.
– Eric Lippert
Feb 12 at 15:58
add a comment |
horse racing term
to place TFD
Games Second position for betting purposes, as in a horserace.
The prediction of the race is for England to win ... Russia to come in 3rd. But without more context ( doubtful horses name's could be England, France and Russia) it could be a political or some such metaphor.
2
The relevant context is "September 3rd". Britain declared war on Germany on September 3rd.
– Eric Lippert
Feb 12 at 15:58
add a comment |
horse racing term
to place TFD
Games Second position for betting purposes, as in a horserace.
The prediction of the race is for England to win ... Russia to come in 3rd. But without more context ( doubtful horses name's could be England, France and Russia) it could be a political or some such metaphor.
horse racing term
to place TFD
Games Second position for betting purposes, as in a horserace.
The prediction of the race is for England to win ... Russia to come in 3rd. But without more context ( doubtful horses name's could be England, France and Russia) it could be a political or some such metaphor.
edited Feb 11 at 23:25
answered Feb 11 at 22:31
lbflbf
21.3k22574
21.3k22574
2
The relevant context is "September 3rd". Britain declared war on Germany on September 3rd.
– Eric Lippert
Feb 12 at 15:58
add a comment |
2
The relevant context is "September 3rd". Britain declared war on Germany on September 3rd.
– Eric Lippert
Feb 12 at 15:58
2
2
The relevant context is "September 3rd". Britain declared war on Germany on September 3rd.
– Eric Lippert
Feb 12 at 15:58
The relevant context is "September 3rd". Britain declared war on Germany on September 3rd.
– Eric Lippert
Feb 12 at 15:58
add a comment |
Below the form sheets, the past performances, the endless oracles for endless racetracks
The context is a newspaper for horse racing bettors.
LONDON. SEPTEMBER 3RD. ON THIS MORNING'S DECLARATION BY CHAMBERLAIN
On September 1st, Germany invaded Poland. As a result, on September 3rd 1939 British Prime Minister Chamberlain declared war on Germany.
See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtJ_zbz1NyY
DOUGIE CABLES 'ENGLAND TO WIN. FRANCE TO PLACE. RUSSIA TO SHOW'.
As others have noted, this is horse race betting parlance for England will win, France will come in second, Russia will come in third.
add a comment |
Below the form sheets, the past performances, the endless oracles for endless racetracks
The context is a newspaper for horse racing bettors.
LONDON. SEPTEMBER 3RD. ON THIS MORNING'S DECLARATION BY CHAMBERLAIN
On September 1st, Germany invaded Poland. As a result, on September 3rd 1939 British Prime Minister Chamberlain declared war on Germany.
See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtJ_zbz1NyY
DOUGIE CABLES 'ENGLAND TO WIN. FRANCE TO PLACE. RUSSIA TO SHOW'.
As others have noted, this is horse race betting parlance for England will win, France will come in second, Russia will come in third.
add a comment |
Below the form sheets, the past performances, the endless oracles for endless racetracks
The context is a newspaper for horse racing bettors.
LONDON. SEPTEMBER 3RD. ON THIS MORNING'S DECLARATION BY CHAMBERLAIN
On September 1st, Germany invaded Poland. As a result, on September 3rd 1939 British Prime Minister Chamberlain declared war on Germany.
See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtJ_zbz1NyY
DOUGIE CABLES 'ENGLAND TO WIN. FRANCE TO PLACE. RUSSIA TO SHOW'.
As others have noted, this is horse race betting parlance for England will win, France will come in second, Russia will come in third.
Below the form sheets, the past performances, the endless oracles for endless racetracks
The context is a newspaper for horse racing bettors.
LONDON. SEPTEMBER 3RD. ON THIS MORNING'S DECLARATION BY CHAMBERLAIN
On September 1st, Germany invaded Poland. As a result, on September 3rd 1939 British Prime Minister Chamberlain declared war on Germany.
See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtJ_zbz1NyY
DOUGIE CABLES 'ENGLAND TO WIN. FRANCE TO PLACE. RUSSIA TO SHOW'.
As others have noted, this is horse race betting parlance for England will win, France will come in second, Russia will come in third.
answered Feb 12 at 15:57
Eric LippertEric Lippert
1,445812
1,445812
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f485107%2fwhat-does-france-to-place-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
21
Win, place, and show are betting terms, often used in horse racing.
– Weather Vane
Feb 11 at 22:28
1
"ENGLAND TO WIN" is likely a reference to the war, nascent at the time.
– Guest
Feb 11 at 22:30
1
Not Nascent: on 3rd September 1939 Chamberlain declared war on Germany. Who was Dougie in the book? Why is the message on the sporting page? What is the context?
– Weather Vane
Feb 11 at 22:36
1
@WeatherVane The Cambridge Dictionary defines "nascent" as "only recently formed or started, but likely to grow larger quickly." So of course WW2 was nascent in September 1939.
– Guest
Feb 11 at 22:59
1
WW2 was nascent in the mid-30's and everybody knew it was inevitable. When war was declared, that was more explosion than nascence, which isn't really the right usage for an outbreak of war.
– Weather Vane
Feb 11 at 23:03