Lebesgue outer measure of a union of 2 sets












0












$begingroup$


Let $Esubsetmathbb{R}$.



Define $displaystyle m^*(E)=infleft{sum_{n=1}^inftyell(I_n):Esubsetbigcup
_{n=1}^infty I_nright}$



Prove that $m^*(Ecup F)le m^*(E)+m^*(F)$ where $E$ and $F$ are any subsets of $mathbb{R}$.



My attempt:



My approach is to find a sequence of intervals ${K_n}$ of length $le m^*(E)+m^*(F)$ that covers $Ecup F$. Then we could say $m^*(Ecup F)lesum_{i=1}^inftyell(K_n)le m^*(E)+m^*(F)$.



Let ${I_n}$ be a sequence of intervals that covers $E$ such that $m^*(E)=sum_{n=1}^inftyell(I_n)$.



$Esubsetbigcup_{n=1}^infty I_n$



Let ${J_n}$ be a sequence of intervals that covers $F$ such that $m^*(F)=sum_{n=1}^inftyell(J_n)$.



$Fsubsetbigcup_{n=1}^infty J_n$



Let $K_n$ be the smallest interval that contains both $I_n$ and $J_n$. We claim that ${K_n}$ covers $Ecup F$. The trouble is that $sum_{n=1}^inftyell(K_n)notle m^*(E)+m^*(F)$. Is it possible to construct a suitable sequence of intervals from ${I_n}$ and ${J_n}$ that covers $Ecup F$ and has the appropriate measure?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I don't see why such ${I_n}$ should exist. The inf might not be achieved. This is true, for example, when $E = {x}$ is a single point.
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    Dec 2 '18 at 21:02










  • $begingroup$
    @mathworker21 In that case, wouldn't the inf just be 0? Sorry, I don't know what you mean?
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas
    Dec 2 '18 at 21:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @mathworker21 Oh, you mean there's no sequence of intervals with length 0 that covers $E={x}$!
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas
    Dec 2 '18 at 22:48
















0












$begingroup$


Let $Esubsetmathbb{R}$.



Define $displaystyle m^*(E)=infleft{sum_{n=1}^inftyell(I_n):Esubsetbigcup
_{n=1}^infty I_nright}$



Prove that $m^*(Ecup F)le m^*(E)+m^*(F)$ where $E$ and $F$ are any subsets of $mathbb{R}$.



My attempt:



My approach is to find a sequence of intervals ${K_n}$ of length $le m^*(E)+m^*(F)$ that covers $Ecup F$. Then we could say $m^*(Ecup F)lesum_{i=1}^inftyell(K_n)le m^*(E)+m^*(F)$.



Let ${I_n}$ be a sequence of intervals that covers $E$ such that $m^*(E)=sum_{n=1}^inftyell(I_n)$.



$Esubsetbigcup_{n=1}^infty I_n$



Let ${J_n}$ be a sequence of intervals that covers $F$ such that $m^*(F)=sum_{n=1}^inftyell(J_n)$.



$Fsubsetbigcup_{n=1}^infty J_n$



Let $K_n$ be the smallest interval that contains both $I_n$ and $J_n$. We claim that ${K_n}$ covers $Ecup F$. The trouble is that $sum_{n=1}^inftyell(K_n)notle m^*(E)+m^*(F)$. Is it possible to construct a suitable sequence of intervals from ${I_n}$ and ${J_n}$ that covers $Ecup F$ and has the appropriate measure?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I don't see why such ${I_n}$ should exist. The inf might not be achieved. This is true, for example, when $E = {x}$ is a single point.
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    Dec 2 '18 at 21:02










  • $begingroup$
    @mathworker21 In that case, wouldn't the inf just be 0? Sorry, I don't know what you mean?
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas
    Dec 2 '18 at 21:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @mathworker21 Oh, you mean there's no sequence of intervals with length 0 that covers $E={x}$!
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas
    Dec 2 '18 at 22:48














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Let $Esubsetmathbb{R}$.



Define $displaystyle m^*(E)=infleft{sum_{n=1}^inftyell(I_n):Esubsetbigcup
_{n=1}^infty I_nright}$



Prove that $m^*(Ecup F)le m^*(E)+m^*(F)$ where $E$ and $F$ are any subsets of $mathbb{R}$.



My attempt:



My approach is to find a sequence of intervals ${K_n}$ of length $le m^*(E)+m^*(F)$ that covers $Ecup F$. Then we could say $m^*(Ecup F)lesum_{i=1}^inftyell(K_n)le m^*(E)+m^*(F)$.



Let ${I_n}$ be a sequence of intervals that covers $E$ such that $m^*(E)=sum_{n=1}^inftyell(I_n)$.



$Esubsetbigcup_{n=1}^infty I_n$



Let ${J_n}$ be a sequence of intervals that covers $F$ such that $m^*(F)=sum_{n=1}^inftyell(J_n)$.



$Fsubsetbigcup_{n=1}^infty J_n$



Let $K_n$ be the smallest interval that contains both $I_n$ and $J_n$. We claim that ${K_n}$ covers $Ecup F$. The trouble is that $sum_{n=1}^inftyell(K_n)notle m^*(E)+m^*(F)$. Is it possible to construct a suitable sequence of intervals from ${I_n}$ and ${J_n}$ that covers $Ecup F$ and has the appropriate measure?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $Esubsetmathbb{R}$.



Define $displaystyle m^*(E)=infleft{sum_{n=1}^inftyell(I_n):Esubsetbigcup
_{n=1}^infty I_nright}$



Prove that $m^*(Ecup F)le m^*(E)+m^*(F)$ where $E$ and $F$ are any subsets of $mathbb{R}$.



My attempt:



My approach is to find a sequence of intervals ${K_n}$ of length $le m^*(E)+m^*(F)$ that covers $Ecup F$. Then we could say $m^*(Ecup F)lesum_{i=1}^inftyell(K_n)le m^*(E)+m^*(F)$.



Let ${I_n}$ be a sequence of intervals that covers $E$ such that $m^*(E)=sum_{n=1}^inftyell(I_n)$.



$Esubsetbigcup_{n=1}^infty I_n$



Let ${J_n}$ be a sequence of intervals that covers $F$ such that $m^*(F)=sum_{n=1}^inftyell(J_n)$.



$Fsubsetbigcup_{n=1}^infty J_n$



Let $K_n$ be the smallest interval that contains both $I_n$ and $J_n$. We claim that ${K_n}$ covers $Ecup F$. The trouble is that $sum_{n=1}^inftyell(K_n)notle m^*(E)+m^*(F)$. Is it possible to construct a suitable sequence of intervals from ${I_n}$ and ${J_n}$ that covers $Ecup F$ and has the appropriate measure?







real-analysis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 2 '18 at 21:04







Thomas

















asked Dec 2 '18 at 20:59









ThomasThomas

745418




745418












  • $begingroup$
    I don't see why such ${I_n}$ should exist. The inf might not be achieved. This is true, for example, when $E = {x}$ is a single point.
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    Dec 2 '18 at 21:02










  • $begingroup$
    @mathworker21 In that case, wouldn't the inf just be 0? Sorry, I don't know what you mean?
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas
    Dec 2 '18 at 21:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @mathworker21 Oh, you mean there's no sequence of intervals with length 0 that covers $E={x}$!
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas
    Dec 2 '18 at 22:48


















  • $begingroup$
    I don't see why such ${I_n}$ should exist. The inf might not be achieved. This is true, for example, when $E = {x}$ is a single point.
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    Dec 2 '18 at 21:02










  • $begingroup$
    @mathworker21 In that case, wouldn't the inf just be 0? Sorry, I don't know what you mean?
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas
    Dec 2 '18 at 21:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @mathworker21 Oh, you mean there's no sequence of intervals with length 0 that covers $E={x}$!
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas
    Dec 2 '18 at 22:48
















$begingroup$
I don't see why such ${I_n}$ should exist. The inf might not be achieved. This is true, for example, when $E = {x}$ is a single point.
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Dec 2 '18 at 21:02




$begingroup$
I don't see why such ${I_n}$ should exist. The inf might not be achieved. This is true, for example, when $E = {x}$ is a single point.
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Dec 2 '18 at 21:02












$begingroup$
@mathworker21 In that case, wouldn't the inf just be 0? Sorry, I don't know what you mean?
$endgroup$
– Thomas
Dec 2 '18 at 21:39




$begingroup$
@mathworker21 In that case, wouldn't the inf just be 0? Sorry, I don't know what you mean?
$endgroup$
– Thomas
Dec 2 '18 at 21:39




1




1




$begingroup$
@mathworker21 Oh, you mean there's no sequence of intervals with length 0 that covers $E={x}$!
$endgroup$
– Thomas
Dec 2 '18 at 22:48




$begingroup$
@mathworker21 Oh, you mean there's no sequence of intervals with length 0 that covers $E={x}$!
$endgroup$
– Thomas
Dec 2 '18 at 22:48










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Suppose $I^E_k$ covers $E$ and $I^F_l$ covers $F$. Then
$I^E_k,I^F_l,...$ are a cover for $E cup F$ and
$m^* (E cup F) le sum_k l(I^E_k) + sum_l l(I^F_k)$.



Now take the $inf$ over the
covers $I^E_k$ and $I^F_l$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3023185%2flebesgue-outer-measure-of-a-union-of-2-sets%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    Suppose $I^E_k$ covers $E$ and $I^F_l$ covers $F$. Then
    $I^E_k,I^F_l,...$ are a cover for $E cup F$ and
    $m^* (E cup F) le sum_k l(I^E_k) + sum_l l(I^F_k)$.



    Now take the $inf$ over the
    covers $I^E_k$ and $I^F_l$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      Suppose $I^E_k$ covers $E$ and $I^F_l$ covers $F$. Then
      $I^E_k,I^F_l,...$ are a cover for $E cup F$ and
      $m^* (E cup F) le sum_k l(I^E_k) + sum_l l(I^F_k)$.



      Now take the $inf$ over the
      covers $I^E_k$ and $I^F_l$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Suppose $I^E_k$ covers $E$ and $I^F_l$ covers $F$. Then
        $I^E_k,I^F_l,...$ are a cover for $E cup F$ and
        $m^* (E cup F) le sum_k l(I^E_k) + sum_l l(I^F_k)$.



        Now take the $inf$ over the
        covers $I^E_k$ and $I^F_l$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Suppose $I^E_k$ covers $E$ and $I^F_l$ covers $F$. Then
        $I^E_k,I^F_l,...$ are a cover for $E cup F$ and
        $m^* (E cup F) le sum_k l(I^E_k) + sum_l l(I^F_k)$.



        Now take the $inf$ over the
        covers $I^E_k$ and $I^F_l$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 2 '18 at 21:12









        copper.hatcopper.hat

        127k559160




        127k559160






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3023185%2flebesgue-outer-measure-of-a-union-of-2-sets%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

            ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

            Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?