Etiquette question: is there such a thing as accepting an offer 'too early'?












67















TLDR: Got a PhD offer at top choice, all details checked out, and I want to accept now (much earlier than the April 15th deadline).



A colleague (at the professor level) I mentioned this to said I should wait as it could look 'too earnest' accepting roughly 10 days after notification.



Is there any truth to this claim? I.e. does it 'look bad' (i.e. desperate) if I accept now? I'm just genuinely excited and am ready to lock it in.



Additional details (from comments):




  • This offer is a 'hard' offer such that it is from the department, many cc'd people, and is in writing


  • I have other 'hard' offers from other universities and have yet to hear back from a few more



Other relevant questions:




  • Responding to a prof's email about acceptance in a PhD program


Update:



Thank you all SO much for your input. I went ahead and accepted the offer and got feedback saying they appreciated the rapid response and the PI was eager to arrange a talk for next steps. While this is likely the standard positive response, I have marked Buffy's answer as correct. The first two sentences made the most sense: 'Actually, it is simple courtesy to accept as soon as you know you will do so. This helps the institution deal with its obligations to you and others.' I then let the other universities know immediately after and I hope this helps their search process.










share|improve this question




















  • 3





    I don't understand how 'looking too earnest' would be a bad thing. Can you elaborate on that (although I agree that you shouldn't accept until you are ready to do so)

    – Strawberry
    Feb 12 at 14:44











  • Hi Strawberry, I think as others have pointed out, the idea behind 'waiting' would be to see if they will increase the stipend or I can 'pit' different universities against each other to increase stipend (this is NOT what I want to do - just echoing sentiments below).

    – Reputable Misnomer
    Feb 12 at 14:56






  • 1





    There is such a thing as accepting "too early": if you accept the offer before it's made.

    – Mark
    Feb 12 at 23:13











  • There may be benefits to accepting an offer "too early." This includes non-work opportunities such as socials earlier-in that will help you build rapport before start date, and also helping them to supply you more quickly with necessary equipment, etc. before you begin. I realize this is not a complete answer.

    – Mikey
    Feb 14 at 19:35











  • No. It can be an offer you can't refuse. :)

    – Jay
    Feb 15 at 9:59
















67















TLDR: Got a PhD offer at top choice, all details checked out, and I want to accept now (much earlier than the April 15th deadline).



A colleague (at the professor level) I mentioned this to said I should wait as it could look 'too earnest' accepting roughly 10 days after notification.



Is there any truth to this claim? I.e. does it 'look bad' (i.e. desperate) if I accept now? I'm just genuinely excited and am ready to lock it in.



Additional details (from comments):




  • This offer is a 'hard' offer such that it is from the department, many cc'd people, and is in writing


  • I have other 'hard' offers from other universities and have yet to hear back from a few more



Other relevant questions:




  • Responding to a prof's email about acceptance in a PhD program


Update:



Thank you all SO much for your input. I went ahead and accepted the offer and got feedback saying they appreciated the rapid response and the PI was eager to arrange a talk for next steps. While this is likely the standard positive response, I have marked Buffy's answer as correct. The first two sentences made the most sense: 'Actually, it is simple courtesy to accept as soon as you know you will do so. This helps the institution deal with its obligations to you and others.' I then let the other universities know immediately after and I hope this helps their search process.










share|improve this question




















  • 3





    I don't understand how 'looking too earnest' would be a bad thing. Can you elaborate on that (although I agree that you shouldn't accept until you are ready to do so)

    – Strawberry
    Feb 12 at 14:44











  • Hi Strawberry, I think as others have pointed out, the idea behind 'waiting' would be to see if they will increase the stipend or I can 'pit' different universities against each other to increase stipend (this is NOT what I want to do - just echoing sentiments below).

    – Reputable Misnomer
    Feb 12 at 14:56






  • 1





    There is such a thing as accepting "too early": if you accept the offer before it's made.

    – Mark
    Feb 12 at 23:13











  • There may be benefits to accepting an offer "too early." This includes non-work opportunities such as socials earlier-in that will help you build rapport before start date, and also helping them to supply you more quickly with necessary equipment, etc. before you begin. I realize this is not a complete answer.

    – Mikey
    Feb 14 at 19:35











  • No. It can be an offer you can't refuse. :)

    – Jay
    Feb 15 at 9:59














67












67








67


4






TLDR: Got a PhD offer at top choice, all details checked out, and I want to accept now (much earlier than the April 15th deadline).



A colleague (at the professor level) I mentioned this to said I should wait as it could look 'too earnest' accepting roughly 10 days after notification.



Is there any truth to this claim? I.e. does it 'look bad' (i.e. desperate) if I accept now? I'm just genuinely excited and am ready to lock it in.



Additional details (from comments):




  • This offer is a 'hard' offer such that it is from the department, many cc'd people, and is in writing


  • I have other 'hard' offers from other universities and have yet to hear back from a few more



Other relevant questions:




  • Responding to a prof's email about acceptance in a PhD program


Update:



Thank you all SO much for your input. I went ahead and accepted the offer and got feedback saying they appreciated the rapid response and the PI was eager to arrange a talk for next steps. While this is likely the standard positive response, I have marked Buffy's answer as correct. The first two sentences made the most sense: 'Actually, it is simple courtesy to accept as soon as you know you will do so. This helps the institution deal with its obligations to you and others.' I then let the other universities know immediately after and I hope this helps their search process.










share|improve this question
















TLDR: Got a PhD offer at top choice, all details checked out, and I want to accept now (much earlier than the April 15th deadline).



A colleague (at the professor level) I mentioned this to said I should wait as it could look 'too earnest' accepting roughly 10 days after notification.



Is there any truth to this claim? I.e. does it 'look bad' (i.e. desperate) if I accept now? I'm just genuinely excited and am ready to lock it in.



Additional details (from comments):




  • This offer is a 'hard' offer such that it is from the department, many cc'd people, and is in writing


  • I have other 'hard' offers from other universities and have yet to hear back from a few more



Other relevant questions:




  • Responding to a prof's email about acceptance in a PhD program


Update:



Thank you all SO much for your input. I went ahead and accepted the offer and got feedback saying they appreciated the rapid response and the PI was eager to arrange a talk for next steps. While this is likely the standard positive response, I have marked Buffy's answer as correct. The first two sentences made the most sense: 'Actually, it is simple courtesy to accept as soon as you know you will do so. This helps the institution deal with its obligations to you and others.' I then let the other universities know immediately after and I hope this helps their search process.







graduate-admissions etiquette






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Feb 12 at 14:59







Reputable Misnomer

















asked Feb 11 at 19:28









Reputable MisnomerReputable Misnomer

476127




476127








  • 3





    I don't understand how 'looking too earnest' would be a bad thing. Can you elaborate on that (although I agree that you shouldn't accept until you are ready to do so)

    – Strawberry
    Feb 12 at 14:44











  • Hi Strawberry, I think as others have pointed out, the idea behind 'waiting' would be to see if they will increase the stipend or I can 'pit' different universities against each other to increase stipend (this is NOT what I want to do - just echoing sentiments below).

    – Reputable Misnomer
    Feb 12 at 14:56






  • 1





    There is such a thing as accepting "too early": if you accept the offer before it's made.

    – Mark
    Feb 12 at 23:13











  • There may be benefits to accepting an offer "too early." This includes non-work opportunities such as socials earlier-in that will help you build rapport before start date, and also helping them to supply you more quickly with necessary equipment, etc. before you begin. I realize this is not a complete answer.

    – Mikey
    Feb 14 at 19:35











  • No. It can be an offer you can't refuse. :)

    – Jay
    Feb 15 at 9:59














  • 3





    I don't understand how 'looking too earnest' would be a bad thing. Can you elaborate on that (although I agree that you shouldn't accept until you are ready to do so)

    – Strawberry
    Feb 12 at 14:44











  • Hi Strawberry, I think as others have pointed out, the idea behind 'waiting' would be to see if they will increase the stipend or I can 'pit' different universities against each other to increase stipend (this is NOT what I want to do - just echoing sentiments below).

    – Reputable Misnomer
    Feb 12 at 14:56






  • 1





    There is such a thing as accepting "too early": if you accept the offer before it's made.

    – Mark
    Feb 12 at 23:13











  • There may be benefits to accepting an offer "too early." This includes non-work opportunities such as socials earlier-in that will help you build rapport before start date, and also helping them to supply you more quickly with necessary equipment, etc. before you begin. I realize this is not a complete answer.

    – Mikey
    Feb 14 at 19:35











  • No. It can be an offer you can't refuse. :)

    – Jay
    Feb 15 at 9:59








3




3





I don't understand how 'looking too earnest' would be a bad thing. Can you elaborate on that (although I agree that you shouldn't accept until you are ready to do so)

– Strawberry
Feb 12 at 14:44





I don't understand how 'looking too earnest' would be a bad thing. Can you elaborate on that (although I agree that you shouldn't accept until you are ready to do so)

– Strawberry
Feb 12 at 14:44













Hi Strawberry, I think as others have pointed out, the idea behind 'waiting' would be to see if they will increase the stipend or I can 'pit' different universities against each other to increase stipend (this is NOT what I want to do - just echoing sentiments below).

– Reputable Misnomer
Feb 12 at 14:56





Hi Strawberry, I think as others have pointed out, the idea behind 'waiting' would be to see if they will increase the stipend or I can 'pit' different universities against each other to increase stipend (this is NOT what I want to do - just echoing sentiments below).

– Reputable Misnomer
Feb 12 at 14:56




1




1





There is such a thing as accepting "too early": if you accept the offer before it's made.

– Mark
Feb 12 at 23:13





There is such a thing as accepting "too early": if you accept the offer before it's made.

– Mark
Feb 12 at 23:13













There may be benefits to accepting an offer "too early." This includes non-work opportunities such as socials earlier-in that will help you build rapport before start date, and also helping them to supply you more quickly with necessary equipment, etc. before you begin. I realize this is not a complete answer.

– Mikey
Feb 14 at 19:35





There may be benefits to accepting an offer "too early." This includes non-work opportunities such as socials earlier-in that will help you build rapport before start date, and also helping them to supply you more quickly with necessary equipment, etc. before you begin. I realize this is not a complete answer.

– Mikey
Feb 14 at 19:35













No. It can be an offer you can't refuse. :)

– Jay
Feb 15 at 9:59





No. It can be an offer you can't refuse. :)

– Jay
Feb 15 at 9:59










7 Answers
7






active

oldest

votes


















196














Actually, it is simple courtesy to accept as soon as you know you will do so. This helps the institution deal with its obligations to you and others. It isn't a game you play for "advantage". You hope to develop a long term relationship with this institution. Treat them with respect and expect them to reciprocate.



Don't accept before you are ready, such as when other offers might come in, but don't delay for any perceived "strategic" reason.



Similarly, once you have accepted the offer, extend the other universities the courtesy of letting them know you will not be accepting theirs.






share|improve this answer





















  • 4





    My experience is that in reality if you leave it to the last minute (and lots do) there will be a lot of "Well, if she actually arrives then she can do this, but we can't be sure, so let's not give her that" and when you start there will be lots of running round and loose-end-ness going on. An early acceptance means you'll have a nice package waiting for you that everyone concerned has had time to mull over, if they're competent. Make sure you're sure though!

    – Dannie
    Feb 13 at 13:00



















96














I would take your colleagues advice - but not for the reason he cited.



Waiting a few days allows the excitement to die down and stops you from making rash decisions. Perhaps there is some catch in the agreement that you glazed over because you were too interested in the good parts.



You've also mentioned that other offers are coming in - waiting allows you to consider all of them properly. There might be a gem among them that you notice too late (if at all). It would be unfortunate to accept this offer moments before a better one arrives in the mail.



So I recommend waiting at least a couple of days just to cool down and consider your future carefully. If you have already done this, then I see no reason not to go ahead. As other answers have said, you want to build a positive relationship with these people and being prompt is a good way to start.






share|improve this answer



















  • 27





    This is good advice. At the minimum, one should wait until having sobered up from celebrating the offer before accepting!

    – Ti Strga
    Feb 12 at 21:51



















19














I doubt they will care much either way if you accept early or at the last minute. Appearing eager is not a bad thing. You should be excited to start a PhD.



It is courteous and prudent not to delay if your decision has really already been made. It means they and you can move forward with the process of registering as a student. It also means they can say no to waitlisted candidates.



However, if your decision is not certain yet, then don’t make it earlier than necessary. For example, you haven’t seen all the other options yet. And you haven’t visited. These could change your mind. So I would wait until you have a clearer picture.






share|improve this answer































    4














    A few questions to consider:




    • Do you have a binding contract signed off by them you just need to sign and send back? Or any other legally binding offer?

      Until you have that you need to be in a hurry (to get it, not to sign)


    Following your edit: you did not mention the country so I am not sure what "hard" means. They can write the nicest letter with "we want you!" and cc: the whole world, but if in your jurisdiction this is not binding you should be careful. It is not like you are buying a TV - this is a PhD program you are very eager to get into.

    For instance in France you get an offer letter which is legally binding.




    • Is there any advantage of waiting? Negotiations? A better offer from somewhere else you would be waiting for?

      If the answer is "no" you do not gain anything at waiting and your mind will be at peace once all the paperwork is over.


    Following your edit: so it looks like there are other events you are waiting for? (the replies from other schools)






    share|improve this answer

































      2














      There is no logical reason to delay your answer once you are certain of the deicsion you have taken.



      You are not in a position to negotiate, and the contract details for a PhD position (in the majority of cases, but you can correct me if it's different for you) are locked. You are not earning any "reputation point" or "coolness points" by waiting for the sake of waiting. Accepting as soon as you made up your mind - and I mean you are sure about it - is the correct, respectful, and polite thing to do so that the university has the time to start the paperwork and eventually notify other candidates that the position has been taken. Those candidates in turn can make up their minds on the offers they got. Essentially, there is quite a bit of people waiting on your answer so unless there are reasons to delay I would not do it.



      IF you have a reason to wanting to take some time, be it to let your emotions cool down and take a clear-headed decision or because you want to wait for other offers to come in and compare, then by all means do so. It is in your full rights. Otherwise, if you know you will want to take that place no matter what, lock it as soon as possible.



      Also remember, something many people underestimate is that once you sign a contract you have a job. You are employed with all the benefits that come with it. If the university burns down tomorrow and you have not signed a contract, you will lose it.
      I am sorry to say, but from the information you provided I don't see the reason in your colleague's advice.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      F. Remonato is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.
















      • 1





        "You are employed with all the benefits that come with it." - Not in the UK you aren't. (I don't know about other countries).

        – Martin Bonner
        Feb 14 at 17:16



















      0














      I think your advisor has the right instincts here. Any time you are in this sort of position (schools, job search, etc.) it makes more sense to wait. It can only be to your benefit. Also, school A may decide to up their offer, give you a visit, etc.



      It's not so much that anything bad will come of your accepting early. It won't make you look bad or too eager. But you are just not using the situation to max advantage.



      P.s. I think it's a good question. Should not be closed.






      share|improve this answer
























      • As a follow-up to this - do you have any recommendations as to whether I should communicate to the PI I am in contact with the offering university? E.g. is it worthwhile for me to communicate with that Prof that I intend to accept? My key worry is that I can open up my spots at other universities/university-associated-fellowships (as I've read and understood this selection process can be quite resource-intensive).

        – Reputable Misnomer
        Feb 11 at 19:43













      • Continue to communicate to this guy and deepen the relationship but don't make a commitment. Don't worry about the slots at other schools. They are running a bulk process and have people who decline/accept/don't show up out of the pool all the time. They will take care of themselves (e.g. letting in a few weaker candidates late if they need to). Be respectful but at the same time it is not your responsibility to optimize for them. Schools ding people all the time and get dinged all the time. Believe me they have a lot less at risk (from portfolio impact) than you do in the single commit.

        – guest
        Feb 11 at 20:03






      • 12





        This is a poor answer - this is an offer for admission for grad school, not a job offer. Trying to stretch out for a better negotiation position is going to make you look bad, not good. I also find it a bit offensive to think of the admissions process for PhDs as a "bulk process": there might be some bulk filtering early on in the process, but at the time of accepting students it is in my experience quite personal and individualized. At a top school, it's less about "letting in a few weaker candidates" and more about "extending offers to other well-qualified options."

        – Bryan Krause
        Feb 11 at 20:48






      • 2





        Disagree. Committees routinely get many decisions towards the end. Perhaps even the bulk of them. There are very few times you have this level of control, freedom. Take advantage. Oh...and from personal perspective 2 of 6 of my accepts sent fellowships (few extra thousand bucks but makes a big difference when you are so poor) AFTER the initial accept letter and before decision time. [And you don't need to let them know why you are waiting.]

        – guest
        Feb 11 at 20:51








      • 3





        Editing especially the latest comment into the answer would improve it.

        – Tommi Brander
        Feb 12 at 11:45



















      -1















      Is there any truth to this claim? I.e. does it 'look bad' (i.e. desperate) if I accept now?




      As others indicate, some people/organizations may "raise an eyebrow" at an immediate acceptance, but most wouldn't. Problem is, you don't know which is which.



      What I suggest you do is: Write them something which is almost an acceptance, but not quite. For example:




      Dear Mr. [Secretary / Investigator / Administrator's name],



      I was very pleased to receive your offer, and will in all likelihood accept it.



      In the mean time, I would like to know whether [something trivial here]. Also,
      once I accept, what exactly [some procedural-technical question here, timelines etc]?



      Respectfully,
      Reputable Misnomer




      So, you're asking about things that happen after your acceptance, as though you're about to to make those arrangements. But you still have not said the words "I accept". When you actually do accept, it will be after a (hopefully very short) while when you get an answer. And regardless of whether the answer is satisfying or not, I don't think anyone would think it strange that you accept then, because it's not an immediate acceptance.



      Also, this does "tie" them to you in the sense that you're telling them to expect an acceptance, so unless they're completely psycopathic they would not withdraw the offer without saying "please make a final decision immediately".






      share|improve this answer























        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "415"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f124804%2fetiquette-question-is-there-such-a-thing-as-accepting-an-offer-too-early%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        7 Answers
        7






        active

        oldest

        votes








        7 Answers
        7






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        196














        Actually, it is simple courtesy to accept as soon as you know you will do so. This helps the institution deal with its obligations to you and others. It isn't a game you play for "advantage". You hope to develop a long term relationship with this institution. Treat them with respect and expect them to reciprocate.



        Don't accept before you are ready, such as when other offers might come in, but don't delay for any perceived "strategic" reason.



        Similarly, once you have accepted the offer, extend the other universities the courtesy of letting them know you will not be accepting theirs.






        share|improve this answer





















        • 4





          My experience is that in reality if you leave it to the last minute (and lots do) there will be a lot of "Well, if she actually arrives then she can do this, but we can't be sure, so let's not give her that" and when you start there will be lots of running round and loose-end-ness going on. An early acceptance means you'll have a nice package waiting for you that everyone concerned has had time to mull over, if they're competent. Make sure you're sure though!

          – Dannie
          Feb 13 at 13:00
















        196














        Actually, it is simple courtesy to accept as soon as you know you will do so. This helps the institution deal with its obligations to you and others. It isn't a game you play for "advantage". You hope to develop a long term relationship with this institution. Treat them with respect and expect them to reciprocate.



        Don't accept before you are ready, such as when other offers might come in, but don't delay for any perceived "strategic" reason.



        Similarly, once you have accepted the offer, extend the other universities the courtesy of letting them know you will not be accepting theirs.






        share|improve this answer





















        • 4





          My experience is that in reality if you leave it to the last minute (and lots do) there will be a lot of "Well, if she actually arrives then she can do this, but we can't be sure, so let's not give her that" and when you start there will be lots of running round and loose-end-ness going on. An early acceptance means you'll have a nice package waiting for you that everyone concerned has had time to mull over, if they're competent. Make sure you're sure though!

          – Dannie
          Feb 13 at 13:00














        196












        196








        196







        Actually, it is simple courtesy to accept as soon as you know you will do so. This helps the institution deal with its obligations to you and others. It isn't a game you play for "advantage". You hope to develop a long term relationship with this institution. Treat them with respect and expect them to reciprocate.



        Don't accept before you are ready, such as when other offers might come in, but don't delay for any perceived "strategic" reason.



        Similarly, once you have accepted the offer, extend the other universities the courtesy of letting them know you will not be accepting theirs.






        share|improve this answer















        Actually, it is simple courtesy to accept as soon as you know you will do so. This helps the institution deal with its obligations to you and others. It isn't a game you play for "advantage". You hope to develop a long term relationship with this institution. Treat them with respect and expect them to reciprocate.



        Don't accept before you are ready, such as when other offers might come in, but don't delay for any perceived "strategic" reason.



        Similarly, once you have accepted the offer, extend the other universities the courtesy of letting them know you will not be accepting theirs.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Feb 14 at 13:34









        Kevin

        26116




        26116










        answered Feb 11 at 19:54









        BuffyBuffy

        47.3k13152239




        47.3k13152239








        • 4





          My experience is that in reality if you leave it to the last minute (and lots do) there will be a lot of "Well, if she actually arrives then she can do this, but we can't be sure, so let's not give her that" and when you start there will be lots of running round and loose-end-ness going on. An early acceptance means you'll have a nice package waiting for you that everyone concerned has had time to mull over, if they're competent. Make sure you're sure though!

          – Dannie
          Feb 13 at 13:00














        • 4





          My experience is that in reality if you leave it to the last minute (and lots do) there will be a lot of "Well, if she actually arrives then she can do this, but we can't be sure, so let's not give her that" and when you start there will be lots of running round and loose-end-ness going on. An early acceptance means you'll have a nice package waiting for you that everyone concerned has had time to mull over, if they're competent. Make sure you're sure though!

          – Dannie
          Feb 13 at 13:00








        4




        4





        My experience is that in reality if you leave it to the last minute (and lots do) there will be a lot of "Well, if she actually arrives then she can do this, but we can't be sure, so let's not give her that" and when you start there will be lots of running round and loose-end-ness going on. An early acceptance means you'll have a nice package waiting for you that everyone concerned has had time to mull over, if they're competent. Make sure you're sure though!

        – Dannie
        Feb 13 at 13:00





        My experience is that in reality if you leave it to the last minute (and lots do) there will be a lot of "Well, if she actually arrives then she can do this, but we can't be sure, so let's not give her that" and when you start there will be lots of running round and loose-end-ness going on. An early acceptance means you'll have a nice package waiting for you that everyone concerned has had time to mull over, if they're competent. Make sure you're sure though!

        – Dannie
        Feb 13 at 13:00











        96














        I would take your colleagues advice - but not for the reason he cited.



        Waiting a few days allows the excitement to die down and stops you from making rash decisions. Perhaps there is some catch in the agreement that you glazed over because you were too interested in the good parts.



        You've also mentioned that other offers are coming in - waiting allows you to consider all of them properly. There might be a gem among them that you notice too late (if at all). It would be unfortunate to accept this offer moments before a better one arrives in the mail.



        So I recommend waiting at least a couple of days just to cool down and consider your future carefully. If you have already done this, then I see no reason not to go ahead. As other answers have said, you want to build a positive relationship with these people and being prompt is a good way to start.






        share|improve this answer



















        • 27





          This is good advice. At the minimum, one should wait until having sobered up from celebrating the offer before accepting!

          – Ti Strga
          Feb 12 at 21:51
















        96














        I would take your colleagues advice - but not for the reason he cited.



        Waiting a few days allows the excitement to die down and stops you from making rash decisions. Perhaps there is some catch in the agreement that you glazed over because you were too interested in the good parts.



        You've also mentioned that other offers are coming in - waiting allows you to consider all of them properly. There might be a gem among them that you notice too late (if at all). It would be unfortunate to accept this offer moments before a better one arrives in the mail.



        So I recommend waiting at least a couple of days just to cool down and consider your future carefully. If you have already done this, then I see no reason not to go ahead. As other answers have said, you want to build a positive relationship with these people and being prompt is a good way to start.






        share|improve this answer



















        • 27





          This is good advice. At the minimum, one should wait until having sobered up from celebrating the offer before accepting!

          – Ti Strga
          Feb 12 at 21:51














        96












        96








        96







        I would take your colleagues advice - but not for the reason he cited.



        Waiting a few days allows the excitement to die down and stops you from making rash decisions. Perhaps there is some catch in the agreement that you glazed over because you were too interested in the good parts.



        You've also mentioned that other offers are coming in - waiting allows you to consider all of them properly. There might be a gem among them that you notice too late (if at all). It would be unfortunate to accept this offer moments before a better one arrives in the mail.



        So I recommend waiting at least a couple of days just to cool down and consider your future carefully. If you have already done this, then I see no reason not to go ahead. As other answers have said, you want to build a positive relationship with these people and being prompt is a good way to start.






        share|improve this answer













        I would take your colleagues advice - but not for the reason he cited.



        Waiting a few days allows the excitement to die down and stops you from making rash decisions. Perhaps there is some catch in the agreement that you glazed over because you were too interested in the good parts.



        You've also mentioned that other offers are coming in - waiting allows you to consider all of them properly. There might be a gem among them that you notice too late (if at all). It would be unfortunate to accept this offer moments before a better one arrives in the mail.



        So I recommend waiting at least a couple of days just to cool down and consider your future carefully. If you have already done this, then I see no reason not to go ahead. As other answers have said, you want to build a positive relationship with these people and being prompt is a good way to start.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Feb 12 at 0:20









        ShadowShadow

        80145




        80145








        • 27





          This is good advice. At the minimum, one should wait until having sobered up from celebrating the offer before accepting!

          – Ti Strga
          Feb 12 at 21:51














        • 27





          This is good advice. At the minimum, one should wait until having sobered up from celebrating the offer before accepting!

          – Ti Strga
          Feb 12 at 21:51








        27




        27





        This is good advice. At the minimum, one should wait until having sobered up from celebrating the offer before accepting!

        – Ti Strga
        Feb 12 at 21:51





        This is good advice. At the minimum, one should wait until having sobered up from celebrating the offer before accepting!

        – Ti Strga
        Feb 12 at 21:51











        19














        I doubt they will care much either way if you accept early or at the last minute. Appearing eager is not a bad thing. You should be excited to start a PhD.



        It is courteous and prudent not to delay if your decision has really already been made. It means they and you can move forward with the process of registering as a student. It also means they can say no to waitlisted candidates.



        However, if your decision is not certain yet, then don’t make it earlier than necessary. For example, you haven’t seen all the other options yet. And you haven’t visited. These could change your mind. So I would wait until you have a clearer picture.






        share|improve this answer




























          19














          I doubt they will care much either way if you accept early or at the last minute. Appearing eager is not a bad thing. You should be excited to start a PhD.



          It is courteous and prudent not to delay if your decision has really already been made. It means they and you can move forward with the process of registering as a student. It also means they can say no to waitlisted candidates.



          However, if your decision is not certain yet, then don’t make it earlier than necessary. For example, you haven’t seen all the other options yet. And you haven’t visited. These could change your mind. So I would wait until you have a clearer picture.






          share|improve this answer


























            19












            19








            19







            I doubt they will care much either way if you accept early or at the last minute. Appearing eager is not a bad thing. You should be excited to start a PhD.



            It is courteous and prudent not to delay if your decision has really already been made. It means they and you can move forward with the process of registering as a student. It also means they can say no to waitlisted candidates.



            However, if your decision is not certain yet, then don’t make it earlier than necessary. For example, you haven’t seen all the other options yet. And you haven’t visited. These could change your mind. So I would wait until you have a clearer picture.






            share|improve this answer













            I doubt they will care much either way if you accept early or at the last minute. Appearing eager is not a bad thing. You should be excited to start a PhD.



            It is courteous and prudent not to delay if your decision has really already been made. It means they and you can move forward with the process of registering as a student. It also means they can say no to waitlisted candidates.



            However, if your decision is not certain yet, then don’t make it earlier than necessary. For example, you haven’t seen all the other options yet. And you haven’t visited. These could change your mind. So I would wait until you have a clearer picture.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Feb 11 at 20:14









            ThomasThomas

            13.9k63051




            13.9k63051























                4














                A few questions to consider:




                • Do you have a binding contract signed off by them you just need to sign and send back? Or any other legally binding offer?

                  Until you have that you need to be in a hurry (to get it, not to sign)


                Following your edit: you did not mention the country so I am not sure what "hard" means. They can write the nicest letter with "we want you!" and cc: the whole world, but if in your jurisdiction this is not binding you should be careful. It is not like you are buying a TV - this is a PhD program you are very eager to get into.

                For instance in France you get an offer letter which is legally binding.




                • Is there any advantage of waiting? Negotiations? A better offer from somewhere else you would be waiting for?

                  If the answer is "no" you do not gain anything at waiting and your mind will be at peace once all the paperwork is over.


                Following your edit: so it looks like there are other events you are waiting for? (the replies from other schools)






                share|improve this answer






























                  4














                  A few questions to consider:




                  • Do you have a binding contract signed off by them you just need to sign and send back? Or any other legally binding offer?

                    Until you have that you need to be in a hurry (to get it, not to sign)


                  Following your edit: you did not mention the country so I am not sure what "hard" means. They can write the nicest letter with "we want you!" and cc: the whole world, but if in your jurisdiction this is not binding you should be careful. It is not like you are buying a TV - this is a PhD program you are very eager to get into.

                  For instance in France you get an offer letter which is legally binding.




                  • Is there any advantage of waiting? Negotiations? A better offer from somewhere else you would be waiting for?

                    If the answer is "no" you do not gain anything at waiting and your mind will be at peace once all the paperwork is over.


                  Following your edit: so it looks like there are other events you are waiting for? (the replies from other schools)






                  share|improve this answer




























                    4












                    4








                    4







                    A few questions to consider:




                    • Do you have a binding contract signed off by them you just need to sign and send back? Or any other legally binding offer?

                      Until you have that you need to be in a hurry (to get it, not to sign)


                    Following your edit: you did not mention the country so I am not sure what "hard" means. They can write the nicest letter with "we want you!" and cc: the whole world, but if in your jurisdiction this is not binding you should be careful. It is not like you are buying a TV - this is a PhD program you are very eager to get into.

                    For instance in France you get an offer letter which is legally binding.




                    • Is there any advantage of waiting? Negotiations? A better offer from somewhere else you would be waiting for?

                      If the answer is "no" you do not gain anything at waiting and your mind will be at peace once all the paperwork is over.


                    Following your edit: so it looks like there are other events you are waiting for? (the replies from other schools)






                    share|improve this answer















                    A few questions to consider:




                    • Do you have a binding contract signed off by them you just need to sign and send back? Or any other legally binding offer?

                      Until you have that you need to be in a hurry (to get it, not to sign)


                    Following your edit: you did not mention the country so I am not sure what "hard" means. They can write the nicest letter with "we want you!" and cc: the whole world, but if in your jurisdiction this is not binding you should be careful. It is not like you are buying a TV - this is a PhD program you are very eager to get into.

                    For instance in France you get an offer letter which is legally binding.




                    • Is there any advantage of waiting? Negotiations? A better offer from somewhere else you would be waiting for?

                      If the answer is "no" you do not gain anything at waiting and your mind will be at peace once all the paperwork is over.


                    Following your edit: so it looks like there are other events you are waiting for? (the replies from other schools)







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Feb 12 at 6:45

























                    answered Feb 11 at 20:42









                    WoJWoJ

                    2,739716




                    2,739716























                        2














                        There is no logical reason to delay your answer once you are certain of the deicsion you have taken.



                        You are not in a position to negotiate, and the contract details for a PhD position (in the majority of cases, but you can correct me if it's different for you) are locked. You are not earning any "reputation point" or "coolness points" by waiting for the sake of waiting. Accepting as soon as you made up your mind - and I mean you are sure about it - is the correct, respectful, and polite thing to do so that the university has the time to start the paperwork and eventually notify other candidates that the position has been taken. Those candidates in turn can make up their minds on the offers they got. Essentially, there is quite a bit of people waiting on your answer so unless there are reasons to delay I would not do it.



                        IF you have a reason to wanting to take some time, be it to let your emotions cool down and take a clear-headed decision or because you want to wait for other offers to come in and compare, then by all means do so. It is in your full rights. Otherwise, if you know you will want to take that place no matter what, lock it as soon as possible.



                        Also remember, something many people underestimate is that once you sign a contract you have a job. You are employed with all the benefits that come with it. If the university burns down tomorrow and you have not signed a contract, you will lose it.
                        I am sorry to say, but from the information you provided I don't see the reason in your colleague's advice.






                        share|improve this answer








                        New contributor




                        F. Remonato is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.
















                        • 1





                          "You are employed with all the benefits that come with it." - Not in the UK you aren't. (I don't know about other countries).

                          – Martin Bonner
                          Feb 14 at 17:16
















                        2














                        There is no logical reason to delay your answer once you are certain of the deicsion you have taken.



                        You are not in a position to negotiate, and the contract details for a PhD position (in the majority of cases, but you can correct me if it's different for you) are locked. You are not earning any "reputation point" or "coolness points" by waiting for the sake of waiting. Accepting as soon as you made up your mind - and I mean you are sure about it - is the correct, respectful, and polite thing to do so that the university has the time to start the paperwork and eventually notify other candidates that the position has been taken. Those candidates in turn can make up their minds on the offers they got. Essentially, there is quite a bit of people waiting on your answer so unless there are reasons to delay I would not do it.



                        IF you have a reason to wanting to take some time, be it to let your emotions cool down and take a clear-headed decision or because you want to wait for other offers to come in and compare, then by all means do so. It is in your full rights. Otherwise, if you know you will want to take that place no matter what, lock it as soon as possible.



                        Also remember, something many people underestimate is that once you sign a contract you have a job. You are employed with all the benefits that come with it. If the university burns down tomorrow and you have not signed a contract, you will lose it.
                        I am sorry to say, but from the information you provided I don't see the reason in your colleague's advice.






                        share|improve this answer








                        New contributor




                        F. Remonato is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.
















                        • 1





                          "You are employed with all the benefits that come with it." - Not in the UK you aren't. (I don't know about other countries).

                          – Martin Bonner
                          Feb 14 at 17:16














                        2












                        2








                        2







                        There is no logical reason to delay your answer once you are certain of the deicsion you have taken.



                        You are not in a position to negotiate, and the contract details for a PhD position (in the majority of cases, but you can correct me if it's different for you) are locked. You are not earning any "reputation point" or "coolness points" by waiting for the sake of waiting. Accepting as soon as you made up your mind - and I mean you are sure about it - is the correct, respectful, and polite thing to do so that the university has the time to start the paperwork and eventually notify other candidates that the position has been taken. Those candidates in turn can make up their minds on the offers they got. Essentially, there is quite a bit of people waiting on your answer so unless there are reasons to delay I would not do it.



                        IF you have a reason to wanting to take some time, be it to let your emotions cool down and take a clear-headed decision or because you want to wait for other offers to come in and compare, then by all means do so. It is in your full rights. Otherwise, if you know you will want to take that place no matter what, lock it as soon as possible.



                        Also remember, something many people underestimate is that once you sign a contract you have a job. You are employed with all the benefits that come with it. If the university burns down tomorrow and you have not signed a contract, you will lose it.
                        I am sorry to say, but from the information you provided I don't see the reason in your colleague's advice.






                        share|improve this answer








                        New contributor




                        F. Remonato is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.










                        There is no logical reason to delay your answer once you are certain of the deicsion you have taken.



                        You are not in a position to negotiate, and the contract details for a PhD position (in the majority of cases, but you can correct me if it's different for you) are locked. You are not earning any "reputation point" or "coolness points" by waiting for the sake of waiting. Accepting as soon as you made up your mind - and I mean you are sure about it - is the correct, respectful, and polite thing to do so that the university has the time to start the paperwork and eventually notify other candidates that the position has been taken. Those candidates in turn can make up their minds on the offers they got. Essentially, there is quite a bit of people waiting on your answer so unless there are reasons to delay I would not do it.



                        IF you have a reason to wanting to take some time, be it to let your emotions cool down and take a clear-headed decision or because you want to wait for other offers to come in and compare, then by all means do so. It is in your full rights. Otherwise, if you know you will want to take that place no matter what, lock it as soon as possible.



                        Also remember, something many people underestimate is that once you sign a contract you have a job. You are employed with all the benefits that come with it. If the university burns down tomorrow and you have not signed a contract, you will lose it.
                        I am sorry to say, but from the information you provided I don't see the reason in your colleague's advice.







                        share|improve this answer








                        New contributor




                        F. Remonato is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.









                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer






                        New contributor




                        F. Remonato is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.









                        answered Feb 12 at 12:15









                        F. RemonatoF. Remonato

                        211




                        211




                        New contributor




                        F. Remonato is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.





                        New contributor





                        F. Remonato is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.






                        F. Remonato is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.








                        • 1





                          "You are employed with all the benefits that come with it." - Not in the UK you aren't. (I don't know about other countries).

                          – Martin Bonner
                          Feb 14 at 17:16














                        • 1





                          "You are employed with all the benefits that come with it." - Not in the UK you aren't. (I don't know about other countries).

                          – Martin Bonner
                          Feb 14 at 17:16








                        1




                        1





                        "You are employed with all the benefits that come with it." - Not in the UK you aren't. (I don't know about other countries).

                        – Martin Bonner
                        Feb 14 at 17:16





                        "You are employed with all the benefits that come with it." - Not in the UK you aren't. (I don't know about other countries).

                        – Martin Bonner
                        Feb 14 at 17:16











                        0














                        I think your advisor has the right instincts here. Any time you are in this sort of position (schools, job search, etc.) it makes more sense to wait. It can only be to your benefit. Also, school A may decide to up their offer, give you a visit, etc.



                        It's not so much that anything bad will come of your accepting early. It won't make you look bad or too eager. But you are just not using the situation to max advantage.



                        P.s. I think it's a good question. Should not be closed.






                        share|improve this answer
























                        • As a follow-up to this - do you have any recommendations as to whether I should communicate to the PI I am in contact with the offering university? E.g. is it worthwhile for me to communicate with that Prof that I intend to accept? My key worry is that I can open up my spots at other universities/university-associated-fellowships (as I've read and understood this selection process can be quite resource-intensive).

                          – Reputable Misnomer
                          Feb 11 at 19:43













                        • Continue to communicate to this guy and deepen the relationship but don't make a commitment. Don't worry about the slots at other schools. They are running a bulk process and have people who decline/accept/don't show up out of the pool all the time. They will take care of themselves (e.g. letting in a few weaker candidates late if they need to). Be respectful but at the same time it is not your responsibility to optimize for them. Schools ding people all the time and get dinged all the time. Believe me they have a lot less at risk (from portfolio impact) than you do in the single commit.

                          – guest
                          Feb 11 at 20:03






                        • 12





                          This is a poor answer - this is an offer for admission for grad school, not a job offer. Trying to stretch out for a better negotiation position is going to make you look bad, not good. I also find it a bit offensive to think of the admissions process for PhDs as a "bulk process": there might be some bulk filtering early on in the process, but at the time of accepting students it is in my experience quite personal and individualized. At a top school, it's less about "letting in a few weaker candidates" and more about "extending offers to other well-qualified options."

                          – Bryan Krause
                          Feb 11 at 20:48






                        • 2





                          Disagree. Committees routinely get many decisions towards the end. Perhaps even the bulk of them. There are very few times you have this level of control, freedom. Take advantage. Oh...and from personal perspective 2 of 6 of my accepts sent fellowships (few extra thousand bucks but makes a big difference when you are so poor) AFTER the initial accept letter and before decision time. [And you don't need to let them know why you are waiting.]

                          – guest
                          Feb 11 at 20:51








                        • 3





                          Editing especially the latest comment into the answer would improve it.

                          – Tommi Brander
                          Feb 12 at 11:45
















                        0














                        I think your advisor has the right instincts here. Any time you are in this sort of position (schools, job search, etc.) it makes more sense to wait. It can only be to your benefit. Also, school A may decide to up their offer, give you a visit, etc.



                        It's not so much that anything bad will come of your accepting early. It won't make you look bad or too eager. But you are just not using the situation to max advantage.



                        P.s. I think it's a good question. Should not be closed.






                        share|improve this answer
























                        • As a follow-up to this - do you have any recommendations as to whether I should communicate to the PI I am in contact with the offering university? E.g. is it worthwhile for me to communicate with that Prof that I intend to accept? My key worry is that I can open up my spots at other universities/university-associated-fellowships (as I've read and understood this selection process can be quite resource-intensive).

                          – Reputable Misnomer
                          Feb 11 at 19:43













                        • Continue to communicate to this guy and deepen the relationship but don't make a commitment. Don't worry about the slots at other schools. They are running a bulk process and have people who decline/accept/don't show up out of the pool all the time. They will take care of themselves (e.g. letting in a few weaker candidates late if they need to). Be respectful but at the same time it is not your responsibility to optimize for them. Schools ding people all the time and get dinged all the time. Believe me they have a lot less at risk (from portfolio impact) than you do in the single commit.

                          – guest
                          Feb 11 at 20:03






                        • 12





                          This is a poor answer - this is an offer for admission for grad school, not a job offer. Trying to stretch out for a better negotiation position is going to make you look bad, not good. I also find it a bit offensive to think of the admissions process for PhDs as a "bulk process": there might be some bulk filtering early on in the process, but at the time of accepting students it is in my experience quite personal and individualized. At a top school, it's less about "letting in a few weaker candidates" and more about "extending offers to other well-qualified options."

                          – Bryan Krause
                          Feb 11 at 20:48






                        • 2





                          Disagree. Committees routinely get many decisions towards the end. Perhaps even the bulk of them. There are very few times you have this level of control, freedom. Take advantage. Oh...and from personal perspective 2 of 6 of my accepts sent fellowships (few extra thousand bucks but makes a big difference when you are so poor) AFTER the initial accept letter and before decision time. [And you don't need to let them know why you are waiting.]

                          – guest
                          Feb 11 at 20:51








                        • 3





                          Editing especially the latest comment into the answer would improve it.

                          – Tommi Brander
                          Feb 12 at 11:45














                        0












                        0








                        0







                        I think your advisor has the right instincts here. Any time you are in this sort of position (schools, job search, etc.) it makes more sense to wait. It can only be to your benefit. Also, school A may decide to up their offer, give you a visit, etc.



                        It's not so much that anything bad will come of your accepting early. It won't make you look bad or too eager. But you are just not using the situation to max advantage.



                        P.s. I think it's a good question. Should not be closed.






                        share|improve this answer













                        I think your advisor has the right instincts here. Any time you are in this sort of position (schools, job search, etc.) it makes more sense to wait. It can only be to your benefit. Also, school A may decide to up their offer, give you a visit, etc.



                        It's not so much that anything bad will come of your accepting early. It won't make you look bad or too eager. But you are just not using the situation to max advantage.



                        P.s. I think it's a good question. Should not be closed.







                        share|improve this answer












                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer










                        answered Feb 11 at 19:34









                        guestguest

                        4754




                        4754













                        • As a follow-up to this - do you have any recommendations as to whether I should communicate to the PI I am in contact with the offering university? E.g. is it worthwhile for me to communicate with that Prof that I intend to accept? My key worry is that I can open up my spots at other universities/university-associated-fellowships (as I've read and understood this selection process can be quite resource-intensive).

                          – Reputable Misnomer
                          Feb 11 at 19:43













                        • Continue to communicate to this guy and deepen the relationship but don't make a commitment. Don't worry about the slots at other schools. They are running a bulk process and have people who decline/accept/don't show up out of the pool all the time. They will take care of themselves (e.g. letting in a few weaker candidates late if they need to). Be respectful but at the same time it is not your responsibility to optimize for them. Schools ding people all the time and get dinged all the time. Believe me they have a lot less at risk (from portfolio impact) than you do in the single commit.

                          – guest
                          Feb 11 at 20:03






                        • 12





                          This is a poor answer - this is an offer for admission for grad school, not a job offer. Trying to stretch out for a better negotiation position is going to make you look bad, not good. I also find it a bit offensive to think of the admissions process for PhDs as a "bulk process": there might be some bulk filtering early on in the process, but at the time of accepting students it is in my experience quite personal and individualized. At a top school, it's less about "letting in a few weaker candidates" and more about "extending offers to other well-qualified options."

                          – Bryan Krause
                          Feb 11 at 20:48






                        • 2





                          Disagree. Committees routinely get many decisions towards the end. Perhaps even the bulk of them. There are very few times you have this level of control, freedom. Take advantage. Oh...and from personal perspective 2 of 6 of my accepts sent fellowships (few extra thousand bucks but makes a big difference when you are so poor) AFTER the initial accept letter and before decision time. [And you don't need to let them know why you are waiting.]

                          – guest
                          Feb 11 at 20:51








                        • 3





                          Editing especially the latest comment into the answer would improve it.

                          – Tommi Brander
                          Feb 12 at 11:45



















                        • As a follow-up to this - do you have any recommendations as to whether I should communicate to the PI I am in contact with the offering university? E.g. is it worthwhile for me to communicate with that Prof that I intend to accept? My key worry is that I can open up my spots at other universities/university-associated-fellowships (as I've read and understood this selection process can be quite resource-intensive).

                          – Reputable Misnomer
                          Feb 11 at 19:43













                        • Continue to communicate to this guy and deepen the relationship but don't make a commitment. Don't worry about the slots at other schools. They are running a bulk process and have people who decline/accept/don't show up out of the pool all the time. They will take care of themselves (e.g. letting in a few weaker candidates late if they need to). Be respectful but at the same time it is not your responsibility to optimize for them. Schools ding people all the time and get dinged all the time. Believe me they have a lot less at risk (from portfolio impact) than you do in the single commit.

                          – guest
                          Feb 11 at 20:03






                        • 12





                          This is a poor answer - this is an offer for admission for grad school, not a job offer. Trying to stretch out for a better negotiation position is going to make you look bad, not good. I also find it a bit offensive to think of the admissions process for PhDs as a "bulk process": there might be some bulk filtering early on in the process, but at the time of accepting students it is in my experience quite personal and individualized. At a top school, it's less about "letting in a few weaker candidates" and more about "extending offers to other well-qualified options."

                          – Bryan Krause
                          Feb 11 at 20:48






                        • 2





                          Disagree. Committees routinely get many decisions towards the end. Perhaps even the bulk of them. There are very few times you have this level of control, freedom. Take advantage. Oh...and from personal perspective 2 of 6 of my accepts sent fellowships (few extra thousand bucks but makes a big difference when you are so poor) AFTER the initial accept letter and before decision time. [And you don't need to let them know why you are waiting.]

                          – guest
                          Feb 11 at 20:51








                        • 3





                          Editing especially the latest comment into the answer would improve it.

                          – Tommi Brander
                          Feb 12 at 11:45

















                        As a follow-up to this - do you have any recommendations as to whether I should communicate to the PI I am in contact with the offering university? E.g. is it worthwhile for me to communicate with that Prof that I intend to accept? My key worry is that I can open up my spots at other universities/university-associated-fellowships (as I've read and understood this selection process can be quite resource-intensive).

                        – Reputable Misnomer
                        Feb 11 at 19:43







                        As a follow-up to this - do you have any recommendations as to whether I should communicate to the PI I am in contact with the offering university? E.g. is it worthwhile for me to communicate with that Prof that I intend to accept? My key worry is that I can open up my spots at other universities/university-associated-fellowships (as I've read and understood this selection process can be quite resource-intensive).

                        – Reputable Misnomer
                        Feb 11 at 19:43















                        Continue to communicate to this guy and deepen the relationship but don't make a commitment. Don't worry about the slots at other schools. They are running a bulk process and have people who decline/accept/don't show up out of the pool all the time. They will take care of themselves (e.g. letting in a few weaker candidates late if they need to). Be respectful but at the same time it is not your responsibility to optimize for them. Schools ding people all the time and get dinged all the time. Believe me they have a lot less at risk (from portfolio impact) than you do in the single commit.

                        – guest
                        Feb 11 at 20:03





                        Continue to communicate to this guy and deepen the relationship but don't make a commitment. Don't worry about the slots at other schools. They are running a bulk process and have people who decline/accept/don't show up out of the pool all the time. They will take care of themselves (e.g. letting in a few weaker candidates late if they need to). Be respectful but at the same time it is not your responsibility to optimize for them. Schools ding people all the time and get dinged all the time. Believe me they have a lot less at risk (from portfolio impact) than you do in the single commit.

                        – guest
                        Feb 11 at 20:03




                        12




                        12





                        This is a poor answer - this is an offer for admission for grad school, not a job offer. Trying to stretch out for a better negotiation position is going to make you look bad, not good. I also find it a bit offensive to think of the admissions process for PhDs as a "bulk process": there might be some bulk filtering early on in the process, but at the time of accepting students it is in my experience quite personal and individualized. At a top school, it's less about "letting in a few weaker candidates" and more about "extending offers to other well-qualified options."

                        – Bryan Krause
                        Feb 11 at 20:48





                        This is a poor answer - this is an offer for admission for grad school, not a job offer. Trying to stretch out for a better negotiation position is going to make you look bad, not good. I also find it a bit offensive to think of the admissions process for PhDs as a "bulk process": there might be some bulk filtering early on in the process, but at the time of accepting students it is in my experience quite personal and individualized. At a top school, it's less about "letting in a few weaker candidates" and more about "extending offers to other well-qualified options."

                        – Bryan Krause
                        Feb 11 at 20:48




                        2




                        2





                        Disagree. Committees routinely get many decisions towards the end. Perhaps even the bulk of them. There are very few times you have this level of control, freedom. Take advantage. Oh...and from personal perspective 2 of 6 of my accepts sent fellowships (few extra thousand bucks but makes a big difference when you are so poor) AFTER the initial accept letter and before decision time. [And you don't need to let them know why you are waiting.]

                        – guest
                        Feb 11 at 20:51







                        Disagree. Committees routinely get many decisions towards the end. Perhaps even the bulk of them. There are very few times you have this level of control, freedom. Take advantage. Oh...and from personal perspective 2 of 6 of my accepts sent fellowships (few extra thousand bucks but makes a big difference when you are so poor) AFTER the initial accept letter and before decision time. [And you don't need to let them know why you are waiting.]

                        – guest
                        Feb 11 at 20:51






                        3




                        3





                        Editing especially the latest comment into the answer would improve it.

                        – Tommi Brander
                        Feb 12 at 11:45





                        Editing especially the latest comment into the answer would improve it.

                        – Tommi Brander
                        Feb 12 at 11:45











                        -1















                        Is there any truth to this claim? I.e. does it 'look bad' (i.e. desperate) if I accept now?




                        As others indicate, some people/organizations may "raise an eyebrow" at an immediate acceptance, but most wouldn't. Problem is, you don't know which is which.



                        What I suggest you do is: Write them something which is almost an acceptance, but not quite. For example:




                        Dear Mr. [Secretary / Investigator / Administrator's name],



                        I was very pleased to receive your offer, and will in all likelihood accept it.



                        In the mean time, I would like to know whether [something trivial here]. Also,
                        once I accept, what exactly [some procedural-technical question here, timelines etc]?



                        Respectfully,
                        Reputable Misnomer




                        So, you're asking about things that happen after your acceptance, as though you're about to to make those arrangements. But you still have not said the words "I accept". When you actually do accept, it will be after a (hopefully very short) while when you get an answer. And regardless of whether the answer is satisfying or not, I don't think anyone would think it strange that you accept then, because it's not an immediate acceptance.



                        Also, this does "tie" them to you in the sense that you're telling them to expect an acceptance, so unless they're completely psycopathic they would not withdraw the offer without saying "please make a final decision immediately".






                        share|improve this answer




























                          -1















                          Is there any truth to this claim? I.e. does it 'look bad' (i.e. desperate) if I accept now?




                          As others indicate, some people/organizations may "raise an eyebrow" at an immediate acceptance, but most wouldn't. Problem is, you don't know which is which.



                          What I suggest you do is: Write them something which is almost an acceptance, but not quite. For example:




                          Dear Mr. [Secretary / Investigator / Administrator's name],



                          I was very pleased to receive your offer, and will in all likelihood accept it.



                          In the mean time, I would like to know whether [something trivial here]. Also,
                          once I accept, what exactly [some procedural-technical question here, timelines etc]?



                          Respectfully,
                          Reputable Misnomer




                          So, you're asking about things that happen after your acceptance, as though you're about to to make those arrangements. But you still have not said the words "I accept". When you actually do accept, it will be after a (hopefully very short) while when you get an answer. And regardless of whether the answer is satisfying or not, I don't think anyone would think it strange that you accept then, because it's not an immediate acceptance.



                          Also, this does "tie" them to you in the sense that you're telling them to expect an acceptance, so unless they're completely psycopathic they would not withdraw the offer without saying "please make a final decision immediately".






                          share|improve this answer


























                            -1












                            -1








                            -1








                            Is there any truth to this claim? I.e. does it 'look bad' (i.e. desperate) if I accept now?




                            As others indicate, some people/organizations may "raise an eyebrow" at an immediate acceptance, but most wouldn't. Problem is, you don't know which is which.



                            What I suggest you do is: Write them something which is almost an acceptance, but not quite. For example:




                            Dear Mr. [Secretary / Investigator / Administrator's name],



                            I was very pleased to receive your offer, and will in all likelihood accept it.



                            In the mean time, I would like to know whether [something trivial here]. Also,
                            once I accept, what exactly [some procedural-technical question here, timelines etc]?



                            Respectfully,
                            Reputable Misnomer




                            So, you're asking about things that happen after your acceptance, as though you're about to to make those arrangements. But you still have not said the words "I accept". When you actually do accept, it will be after a (hopefully very short) while when you get an answer. And regardless of whether the answer is satisfying or not, I don't think anyone would think it strange that you accept then, because it's not an immediate acceptance.



                            Also, this does "tie" them to you in the sense that you're telling them to expect an acceptance, so unless they're completely psycopathic they would not withdraw the offer without saying "please make a final decision immediately".






                            share|improve this answer














                            Is there any truth to this claim? I.e. does it 'look bad' (i.e. desperate) if I accept now?




                            As others indicate, some people/organizations may "raise an eyebrow" at an immediate acceptance, but most wouldn't. Problem is, you don't know which is which.



                            What I suggest you do is: Write them something which is almost an acceptance, but not quite. For example:




                            Dear Mr. [Secretary / Investigator / Administrator's name],



                            I was very pleased to receive your offer, and will in all likelihood accept it.



                            In the mean time, I would like to know whether [something trivial here]. Also,
                            once I accept, what exactly [some procedural-technical question here, timelines etc]?



                            Respectfully,
                            Reputable Misnomer




                            So, you're asking about things that happen after your acceptance, as though you're about to to make those arrangements. But you still have not said the words "I accept". When you actually do accept, it will be after a (hopefully very short) while when you get an answer. And regardless of whether the answer is satisfying or not, I don't think anyone would think it strange that you accept then, because it's not an immediate acceptance.



                            Also, this does "tie" them to you in the sense that you're telling them to expect an acceptance, so unless they're completely psycopathic they would not withdraw the offer without saying "please make a final decision immediately".







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered Feb 14 at 18:57









                            einpoklumeinpoklum

                            24.1k138138




                            24.1k138138






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f124804%2fetiquette-question-is-there-such-a-thing-as-accepting-an-offer-too-early%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

                                ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

                                Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?