Is it possible for 2 (or more) wizards to share a spell book?











up vote
14
down vote

favorite












I have a party idea where a group of eager to learn young apprentices leave their masters tower after getting impatient with his method of teaching. But they only remember to take one spell book, and they just decide to go with it. Are there any rules that prevent this? Or any issues that could potentially arise from a situation like this?










share|improve this question


























    up vote
    14
    down vote

    favorite












    I have a party idea where a group of eager to learn young apprentices leave their masters tower after getting impatient with his method of teaching. But they only remember to take one spell book, and they just decide to go with it. Are there any rules that prevent this? Or any issues that could potentially arise from a situation like this?










    share|improve this question
























      up vote
      14
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      14
      down vote

      favorite











      I have a party idea where a group of eager to learn young apprentices leave their masters tower after getting impatient with his method of teaching. But they only remember to take one spell book, and they just decide to go with it. Are there any rules that prevent this? Or any issues that could potentially arise from a situation like this?










      share|improve this question













      I have a party idea where a group of eager to learn young apprentices leave their masters tower after getting impatient with his method of teaching. But they only remember to take one spell book, and they just decide to go with it. Are there any rules that prevent this? Or any issues that could potentially arise from a situation like this?







      dnd-5e spells wizard






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 22 at 12:58









      TheAussieSlime

      206111




      206111






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          27
          down vote



          accepted










          They can share the book, but not the spells



          If a wizard has another wizard's spellbook, they can't actually prepare the spell until they scribe it into their own spellbook. I don't see any real mechanical reason why you couldn't use a single spellbook for that purpose, but every apprentice would have to scribe their own copy of a spell in a way that they can understand and quickly memorize it.




          Copying that spell into your spellbook involves reproducing the basic form of the spell, then deciphering the unique system of notation used by the wizard who wrote it. You must practice the spell until you understand the sounds or gestures required, then transcribe it into your spellbook using your own notation.




          So your spellbook would end up with one spell as scribed by Apprentice A, who can now prepare that spell. The other apprentices can't prepare their spell from that entry, but they can copy that spell into their own scribed version of that spell.



          So your spellbook now has the same spell twice, and two different apprentices can prepare from it, but the other ones still can't do it. So it's not exactly the most effective way of storing your spells, because that spellbook is going to be a mess of different notations.



          Imagine sharing one character sheet with 4 different characters on it with your party, and you'll see where this will become incredibly frustrating for your wizards.



          As Gorp noted in the comments, this will result in your spellbook getting full pretty darn quickly, too.



          Want to share spells?



          Comments suggested that it wouldn't really be that big a deal if all wizards could use the spells from the book without scribing their own version into it, but I disagree, at the very least if this is a player party concept. A wizard is extremely flexible and learns a lot of spells already, if you allow a group of wizards to combine their level-up gained spells into a single book, and everybody benefits from it, then you've essentially given every wizard extra spells based on how many other wizards are in the party. This can easily lead to a party of wizards that has almost every spell of their level at their disposal. It's not the end of the world, but it's going to make them a lot more flexible, as now they can pick up all the utility spells and still take all the big nuke spells.






          share|improve this answer























          • Well spotted on the gap in my own (deleted) answer!
            – SeriousBri
            Nov 22 at 15:10






          • 4




            The paragraph you qouted prevents a wizard from preparing a spell from a new or unfamiliar source, but the question asks specifically about a group of wizards who have studied together. Is there a rule that prevents two or more wizards from sharing a system of notation (perhaps working together on transcribing new spells), or having very similar notations and e.g. writing differing elements only in the margins of a page? As is, I'm not convinced this fully answers the question.
            – Ruther Rendommeleigh
            Nov 22 at 16:34










          • Assumption: your interpretation is - at least in part - guided by balance concerns (sharing known spells between characters)? If so, those might we worth pointing out in the answer, as the question also asks about issues that could arise from allowing it.
            – Ruther Rendommeleigh
            Nov 22 at 16:36






          • 2




            @RutherRendommeleigh Presumably you would then have the issue where the wizards could not be preparing 2 different spells at the same time - either Apprentice A prepares Spell 1, and then Apprentice B prepares Spell 2, or they both prepare Spell 3 at the same time (i.e. the spellbook can only display each spell individually)
            – Chronocidal
            Nov 22 at 16:52






          • 1




            Re: the sharing spells section, a party of wizards with separate spell books can do that already, if they have any time and a bit of gold to do the scribing. It’s less a matter of it being something the game doesn’t want wizards to do then, and more just that sharing spells without paying the time and gold is slightly better than normal.
            – SevenSidedDie
            Nov 23 at 15:34











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "122"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f136063%2fis-it-possible-for-2-or-more-wizards-to-share-a-spell-book%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          27
          down vote



          accepted










          They can share the book, but not the spells



          If a wizard has another wizard's spellbook, they can't actually prepare the spell until they scribe it into their own spellbook. I don't see any real mechanical reason why you couldn't use a single spellbook for that purpose, but every apprentice would have to scribe their own copy of a spell in a way that they can understand and quickly memorize it.




          Copying that spell into your spellbook involves reproducing the basic form of the spell, then deciphering the unique system of notation used by the wizard who wrote it. You must practice the spell until you understand the sounds or gestures required, then transcribe it into your spellbook using your own notation.




          So your spellbook would end up with one spell as scribed by Apprentice A, who can now prepare that spell. The other apprentices can't prepare their spell from that entry, but they can copy that spell into their own scribed version of that spell.



          So your spellbook now has the same spell twice, and two different apprentices can prepare from it, but the other ones still can't do it. So it's not exactly the most effective way of storing your spells, because that spellbook is going to be a mess of different notations.



          Imagine sharing one character sheet with 4 different characters on it with your party, and you'll see where this will become incredibly frustrating for your wizards.



          As Gorp noted in the comments, this will result in your spellbook getting full pretty darn quickly, too.



          Want to share spells?



          Comments suggested that it wouldn't really be that big a deal if all wizards could use the spells from the book without scribing their own version into it, but I disagree, at the very least if this is a player party concept. A wizard is extremely flexible and learns a lot of spells already, if you allow a group of wizards to combine their level-up gained spells into a single book, and everybody benefits from it, then you've essentially given every wizard extra spells based on how many other wizards are in the party. This can easily lead to a party of wizards that has almost every spell of their level at their disposal. It's not the end of the world, but it's going to make them a lot more flexible, as now they can pick up all the utility spells and still take all the big nuke spells.






          share|improve this answer























          • Well spotted on the gap in my own (deleted) answer!
            – SeriousBri
            Nov 22 at 15:10






          • 4




            The paragraph you qouted prevents a wizard from preparing a spell from a new or unfamiliar source, but the question asks specifically about a group of wizards who have studied together. Is there a rule that prevents two or more wizards from sharing a system of notation (perhaps working together on transcribing new spells), or having very similar notations and e.g. writing differing elements only in the margins of a page? As is, I'm not convinced this fully answers the question.
            – Ruther Rendommeleigh
            Nov 22 at 16:34










          • Assumption: your interpretation is - at least in part - guided by balance concerns (sharing known spells between characters)? If so, those might we worth pointing out in the answer, as the question also asks about issues that could arise from allowing it.
            – Ruther Rendommeleigh
            Nov 22 at 16:36






          • 2




            @RutherRendommeleigh Presumably you would then have the issue where the wizards could not be preparing 2 different spells at the same time - either Apprentice A prepares Spell 1, and then Apprentice B prepares Spell 2, or they both prepare Spell 3 at the same time (i.e. the spellbook can only display each spell individually)
            – Chronocidal
            Nov 22 at 16:52






          • 1




            Re: the sharing spells section, a party of wizards with separate spell books can do that already, if they have any time and a bit of gold to do the scribing. It’s less a matter of it being something the game doesn’t want wizards to do then, and more just that sharing spells without paying the time and gold is slightly better than normal.
            – SevenSidedDie
            Nov 23 at 15:34















          up vote
          27
          down vote



          accepted










          They can share the book, but not the spells



          If a wizard has another wizard's spellbook, they can't actually prepare the spell until they scribe it into their own spellbook. I don't see any real mechanical reason why you couldn't use a single spellbook for that purpose, but every apprentice would have to scribe their own copy of a spell in a way that they can understand and quickly memorize it.




          Copying that spell into your spellbook involves reproducing the basic form of the spell, then deciphering the unique system of notation used by the wizard who wrote it. You must practice the spell until you understand the sounds or gestures required, then transcribe it into your spellbook using your own notation.




          So your spellbook would end up with one spell as scribed by Apprentice A, who can now prepare that spell. The other apprentices can't prepare their spell from that entry, but they can copy that spell into their own scribed version of that spell.



          So your spellbook now has the same spell twice, and two different apprentices can prepare from it, but the other ones still can't do it. So it's not exactly the most effective way of storing your spells, because that spellbook is going to be a mess of different notations.



          Imagine sharing one character sheet with 4 different characters on it with your party, and you'll see where this will become incredibly frustrating for your wizards.



          As Gorp noted in the comments, this will result in your spellbook getting full pretty darn quickly, too.



          Want to share spells?



          Comments suggested that it wouldn't really be that big a deal if all wizards could use the spells from the book without scribing their own version into it, but I disagree, at the very least if this is a player party concept. A wizard is extremely flexible and learns a lot of spells already, if you allow a group of wizards to combine their level-up gained spells into a single book, and everybody benefits from it, then you've essentially given every wizard extra spells based on how many other wizards are in the party. This can easily lead to a party of wizards that has almost every spell of their level at their disposal. It's not the end of the world, but it's going to make them a lot more flexible, as now they can pick up all the utility spells and still take all the big nuke spells.






          share|improve this answer























          • Well spotted on the gap in my own (deleted) answer!
            – SeriousBri
            Nov 22 at 15:10






          • 4




            The paragraph you qouted prevents a wizard from preparing a spell from a new or unfamiliar source, but the question asks specifically about a group of wizards who have studied together. Is there a rule that prevents two or more wizards from sharing a system of notation (perhaps working together on transcribing new spells), or having very similar notations and e.g. writing differing elements only in the margins of a page? As is, I'm not convinced this fully answers the question.
            – Ruther Rendommeleigh
            Nov 22 at 16:34










          • Assumption: your interpretation is - at least in part - guided by balance concerns (sharing known spells between characters)? If so, those might we worth pointing out in the answer, as the question also asks about issues that could arise from allowing it.
            – Ruther Rendommeleigh
            Nov 22 at 16:36






          • 2




            @RutherRendommeleigh Presumably you would then have the issue where the wizards could not be preparing 2 different spells at the same time - either Apprentice A prepares Spell 1, and then Apprentice B prepares Spell 2, or they both prepare Spell 3 at the same time (i.e. the spellbook can only display each spell individually)
            – Chronocidal
            Nov 22 at 16:52






          • 1




            Re: the sharing spells section, a party of wizards with separate spell books can do that already, if they have any time and a bit of gold to do the scribing. It’s less a matter of it being something the game doesn’t want wizards to do then, and more just that sharing spells without paying the time and gold is slightly better than normal.
            – SevenSidedDie
            Nov 23 at 15:34













          up vote
          27
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          27
          down vote



          accepted






          They can share the book, but not the spells



          If a wizard has another wizard's spellbook, they can't actually prepare the spell until they scribe it into their own spellbook. I don't see any real mechanical reason why you couldn't use a single spellbook for that purpose, but every apprentice would have to scribe their own copy of a spell in a way that they can understand and quickly memorize it.




          Copying that spell into your spellbook involves reproducing the basic form of the spell, then deciphering the unique system of notation used by the wizard who wrote it. You must practice the spell until you understand the sounds or gestures required, then transcribe it into your spellbook using your own notation.




          So your spellbook would end up with one spell as scribed by Apprentice A, who can now prepare that spell. The other apprentices can't prepare their spell from that entry, but they can copy that spell into their own scribed version of that spell.



          So your spellbook now has the same spell twice, and two different apprentices can prepare from it, but the other ones still can't do it. So it's not exactly the most effective way of storing your spells, because that spellbook is going to be a mess of different notations.



          Imagine sharing one character sheet with 4 different characters on it with your party, and you'll see where this will become incredibly frustrating for your wizards.



          As Gorp noted in the comments, this will result in your spellbook getting full pretty darn quickly, too.



          Want to share spells?



          Comments suggested that it wouldn't really be that big a deal if all wizards could use the spells from the book without scribing their own version into it, but I disagree, at the very least if this is a player party concept. A wizard is extremely flexible and learns a lot of spells already, if you allow a group of wizards to combine their level-up gained spells into a single book, and everybody benefits from it, then you've essentially given every wizard extra spells based on how many other wizards are in the party. This can easily lead to a party of wizards that has almost every spell of their level at their disposal. It's not the end of the world, but it's going to make them a lot more flexible, as now they can pick up all the utility spells and still take all the big nuke spells.






          share|improve this answer














          They can share the book, but not the spells



          If a wizard has another wizard's spellbook, they can't actually prepare the spell until they scribe it into their own spellbook. I don't see any real mechanical reason why you couldn't use a single spellbook for that purpose, but every apprentice would have to scribe their own copy of a spell in a way that they can understand and quickly memorize it.




          Copying that spell into your spellbook involves reproducing the basic form of the spell, then deciphering the unique system of notation used by the wizard who wrote it. You must practice the spell until you understand the sounds or gestures required, then transcribe it into your spellbook using your own notation.




          So your spellbook would end up with one spell as scribed by Apprentice A, who can now prepare that spell. The other apprentices can't prepare their spell from that entry, but they can copy that spell into their own scribed version of that spell.



          So your spellbook now has the same spell twice, and two different apprentices can prepare from it, but the other ones still can't do it. So it's not exactly the most effective way of storing your spells, because that spellbook is going to be a mess of different notations.



          Imagine sharing one character sheet with 4 different characters on it with your party, and you'll see where this will become incredibly frustrating for your wizards.



          As Gorp noted in the comments, this will result in your spellbook getting full pretty darn quickly, too.



          Want to share spells?



          Comments suggested that it wouldn't really be that big a deal if all wizards could use the spells from the book without scribing their own version into it, but I disagree, at the very least if this is a player party concept. A wizard is extremely flexible and learns a lot of spells already, if you allow a group of wizards to combine their level-up gained spells into a single book, and everybody benefits from it, then you've essentially given every wizard extra spells based on how many other wizards are in the party. This can easily lead to a party of wizards that has almost every spell of their level at their disposal. It's not the end of the world, but it's going to make them a lot more flexible, as now they can pick up all the utility spells and still take all the big nuke spells.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Nov 23 at 15:31









          SevenSidedDie

          203k27648927




          203k27648927










          answered Nov 22 at 13:09









          Theik

          12.1k5070




          12.1k5070












          • Well spotted on the gap in my own (deleted) answer!
            – SeriousBri
            Nov 22 at 15:10






          • 4




            The paragraph you qouted prevents a wizard from preparing a spell from a new or unfamiliar source, but the question asks specifically about a group of wizards who have studied together. Is there a rule that prevents two or more wizards from sharing a system of notation (perhaps working together on transcribing new spells), or having very similar notations and e.g. writing differing elements only in the margins of a page? As is, I'm not convinced this fully answers the question.
            – Ruther Rendommeleigh
            Nov 22 at 16:34










          • Assumption: your interpretation is - at least in part - guided by balance concerns (sharing known spells between characters)? If so, those might we worth pointing out in the answer, as the question also asks about issues that could arise from allowing it.
            – Ruther Rendommeleigh
            Nov 22 at 16:36






          • 2




            @RutherRendommeleigh Presumably you would then have the issue where the wizards could not be preparing 2 different spells at the same time - either Apprentice A prepares Spell 1, and then Apprentice B prepares Spell 2, or they both prepare Spell 3 at the same time (i.e. the spellbook can only display each spell individually)
            – Chronocidal
            Nov 22 at 16:52






          • 1




            Re: the sharing spells section, a party of wizards with separate spell books can do that already, if they have any time and a bit of gold to do the scribing. It’s less a matter of it being something the game doesn’t want wizards to do then, and more just that sharing spells without paying the time and gold is slightly better than normal.
            – SevenSidedDie
            Nov 23 at 15:34


















          • Well spotted on the gap in my own (deleted) answer!
            – SeriousBri
            Nov 22 at 15:10






          • 4




            The paragraph you qouted prevents a wizard from preparing a spell from a new or unfamiliar source, but the question asks specifically about a group of wizards who have studied together. Is there a rule that prevents two or more wizards from sharing a system of notation (perhaps working together on transcribing new spells), or having very similar notations and e.g. writing differing elements only in the margins of a page? As is, I'm not convinced this fully answers the question.
            – Ruther Rendommeleigh
            Nov 22 at 16:34










          • Assumption: your interpretation is - at least in part - guided by balance concerns (sharing known spells between characters)? If so, those might we worth pointing out in the answer, as the question also asks about issues that could arise from allowing it.
            – Ruther Rendommeleigh
            Nov 22 at 16:36






          • 2




            @RutherRendommeleigh Presumably you would then have the issue where the wizards could not be preparing 2 different spells at the same time - either Apprentice A prepares Spell 1, and then Apprentice B prepares Spell 2, or they both prepare Spell 3 at the same time (i.e. the spellbook can only display each spell individually)
            – Chronocidal
            Nov 22 at 16:52






          • 1




            Re: the sharing spells section, a party of wizards with separate spell books can do that already, if they have any time and a bit of gold to do the scribing. It’s less a matter of it being something the game doesn’t want wizards to do then, and more just that sharing spells without paying the time and gold is slightly better than normal.
            – SevenSidedDie
            Nov 23 at 15:34
















          Well spotted on the gap in my own (deleted) answer!
          – SeriousBri
          Nov 22 at 15:10




          Well spotted on the gap in my own (deleted) answer!
          – SeriousBri
          Nov 22 at 15:10




          4




          4




          The paragraph you qouted prevents a wizard from preparing a spell from a new or unfamiliar source, but the question asks specifically about a group of wizards who have studied together. Is there a rule that prevents two or more wizards from sharing a system of notation (perhaps working together on transcribing new spells), or having very similar notations and e.g. writing differing elements only in the margins of a page? As is, I'm not convinced this fully answers the question.
          – Ruther Rendommeleigh
          Nov 22 at 16:34




          The paragraph you qouted prevents a wizard from preparing a spell from a new or unfamiliar source, but the question asks specifically about a group of wizards who have studied together. Is there a rule that prevents two or more wizards from sharing a system of notation (perhaps working together on transcribing new spells), or having very similar notations and e.g. writing differing elements only in the margins of a page? As is, I'm not convinced this fully answers the question.
          – Ruther Rendommeleigh
          Nov 22 at 16:34












          Assumption: your interpretation is - at least in part - guided by balance concerns (sharing known spells between characters)? If so, those might we worth pointing out in the answer, as the question also asks about issues that could arise from allowing it.
          – Ruther Rendommeleigh
          Nov 22 at 16:36




          Assumption: your interpretation is - at least in part - guided by balance concerns (sharing known spells between characters)? If so, those might we worth pointing out in the answer, as the question also asks about issues that could arise from allowing it.
          – Ruther Rendommeleigh
          Nov 22 at 16:36




          2




          2




          @RutherRendommeleigh Presumably you would then have the issue where the wizards could not be preparing 2 different spells at the same time - either Apprentice A prepares Spell 1, and then Apprentice B prepares Spell 2, or they both prepare Spell 3 at the same time (i.e. the spellbook can only display each spell individually)
          – Chronocidal
          Nov 22 at 16:52




          @RutherRendommeleigh Presumably you would then have the issue where the wizards could not be preparing 2 different spells at the same time - either Apprentice A prepares Spell 1, and then Apprentice B prepares Spell 2, or they both prepare Spell 3 at the same time (i.e. the spellbook can only display each spell individually)
          – Chronocidal
          Nov 22 at 16:52




          1




          1




          Re: the sharing spells section, a party of wizards with separate spell books can do that already, if they have any time and a bit of gold to do the scribing. It’s less a matter of it being something the game doesn’t want wizards to do then, and more just that sharing spells without paying the time and gold is slightly better than normal.
          – SevenSidedDie
          Nov 23 at 15:34




          Re: the sharing spells section, a party of wizards with separate spell books can do that already, if they have any time and a bit of gold to do the scribing. It’s less a matter of it being something the game doesn’t want wizards to do then, and more just that sharing spells without paying the time and gold is slightly better than normal.
          – SevenSidedDie
          Nov 23 at 15:34


















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded



















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f136063%2fis-it-possible-for-2-or-more-wizards-to-share-a-spell-book%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

          Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

          Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents