If $f in H(Omega)$ holomorphic, then $|f(x) - f(y)| geq (1/2)|f'(c)||x-y|$
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I was reading Rudin's proof on the Open mapping theorem. He declare $Omega$ to be a region, which is connected and open.
Then he claims there is a neighbourhood of $c$ such that
$|f(x) - f(y)| geq (1/2)|f'(c)||x-y|.$ How is this obtained? Is it because being holomorphic yields the inequalities.
begin{align}
left |frac{ phi(x) - phi(y) }{x - y} - phi'(c) right | < (1/2)|phi'(c)| &iff -(1/2)|phi'(c)| <left| frac{ phi(x) - phi(y) }{x - y} right| - |phi'(c)| < (1/2)|phi'(c)| \
&iff (1/2)|phi'(c)||x-y| < left| phi(x) - phi(y) right|
end{align}
I am not sure how to fix the second $iff$ as it is only true in real analysis. Also I am not sure how to relax the last inequality to $leq$
complex-analysis inequality
asked Nov 16 at 3:54
Hawk
5,4381138102
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I was reading Rudin's proof on the Open mapping theorem. He declare $Omega$ to be a region, which is connected and open.
Then he claims there is a neighbourhood of $c$ such that
$|f(x) - f(y)| geq (1/2)|f'(c)||x-y|.$ How is this obtained? Is it because being holomorphic yields the inequalities.
begin{align}
left |frac{ phi(x) - phi(y) }{x - y} - phi'(c) right | < (1/2)|phi'(c)| &iff -(1/2)|phi'(c)| <left| frac{ phi(x) - phi(y) }{x - y} right| - |phi'(c)| < (1/2)|phi'(c)| \
&iff (1/2)|phi'(c)||x-y| < left| phi(x) - phi(y) right|
end{align}
I am not sure how to fix the second $iff$ as it is only true in real analysis. Also I am not sure how to relax the last inequality to $leq$
complex-analysis inequality
asked Nov 16 at 3:54
Hawk
5,4381138102
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I was reading Rudin's proof on the Open mapping theorem. He declare $Omega$ to be a region, which is connected and open.
Then he claims there is a neighbourhood of $c$ such that
$|f(x) - f(y)| geq (1/2)|f'(c)||x-y|.$ How is this obtained? Is it because being holomorphic yields the inequalities.
begin{align}
left |frac{ phi(x) - phi(y) }{x - y} - phi'(c) right | < (1/2)|phi'(c)| &iff -(1/2)|phi'(c)| <left| frac{ phi(x) - phi(y) }{x - y} right| - |phi'(c)| < (1/2)|phi'(c)| \
&iff (1/2)|phi'(c)||x-y| < left| phi(x) - phi(y) right|
end{align}
I am not sure how to fix the second $iff$ as it is only true in real analysis. Also I am not sure how to relax the last inequality to $leq$
complex-analysis inequality
asked Nov 16 at 3:54
Hawk
5,4381138102
I was reading Rudin's proof on the Open mapping theorem. He declare $Omega$ to be a region, which is connected and open.
Then he claims there is a neighbourhood of $c$ such that
$|f(x) - f(y)| geq (1/2)|f'(c)||x-y|.$ How is this obtained? Is it because being holomorphic yields the inequalities.
begin{align}
left |frac{ phi(x) - phi(y) }{x - y} - phi'(c) right | < (1/2)|phi'(c)| &iff -(1/2)|phi'(c)| <left| frac{ phi(x) - phi(y) }{x - y} right| - |phi'(c)| < (1/2)|phi'(c)| \
&iff (1/2)|phi'(c)||x-y| < left| phi(x) - phi(y) right|
end{align}
I am not sure how to fix the second $iff$ as it is only true in real analysis. Also I am not sure how to relax the last inequality to $leq$
complex-analysis inequality
complex-analysis inequality
asked Nov 16 at 3:54
Hawk
5,4381138102
asked Nov 16 at 3:54
Hawk
5,4381138102
asked Nov 16 at 3:54
Hawk
5,4381138102
asked Nov 16 at 3:54
Hawk
5,4381138102
asked Nov 16 at 3:54
Hawk
5,4381138102
5,4381138102
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
$|z_1-z_2| geq |z_2|-|z_1|$ for all complex numbers $z_1,z_2$. Hence $|frac {phi(x)-phi(y)} {x-y} -phi'(c)| geq |phi'(c)|- |frac {phi(x)-phi(y)} {x-y}|$ which gives $|frac {phi(x)-phi(y)} {x-y}| geq frac 1 2 |phi'(c)|$.
answered Nov 16 at 5:21
Kavi Rama Murthy
43.7k31751
Well now I feel silly asking...
– Hawk
Nov 16 at 8:17
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
$|z_1-z_2| geq |z_2|-|z_1|$ for all complex numbers $z_1,z_2$. Hence $|frac {phi(x)-phi(y)} {x-y} -phi'(c)| geq |phi'(c)|- |frac {phi(x)-phi(y)} {x-y}|$ which gives $|frac {phi(x)-phi(y)} {x-y}| geq frac 1 2 |phi'(c)|$.
answered Nov 16 at 5:21
Kavi Rama Murthy
43.7k31751
Well now I feel silly asking...
– Hawk
Nov 16 at 8:17
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
$|z_1-z_2| geq |z_2|-|z_1|$ for all complex numbers $z_1,z_2$. Hence $|frac {phi(x)-phi(y)} {x-y} -phi'(c)| geq |phi'(c)|- |frac {phi(x)-phi(y)} {x-y}|$ which gives $|frac {phi(x)-phi(y)} {x-y}| geq frac 1 2 |phi'(c)|$.
answered Nov 16 at 5:21
Kavi Rama Murthy
43.7k31751
Well now I feel silly asking...
– Hawk
Nov 16 at 8:17
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
$|z_1-z_2| geq |z_2|-|z_1|$ for all complex numbers $z_1,z_2$. Hence $|frac {phi(x)-phi(y)} {x-y} -phi'(c)| geq |phi'(c)|- |frac {phi(x)-phi(y)} {x-y}|$ which gives $|frac {phi(x)-phi(y)} {x-y}| geq frac 1 2 |phi'(c)|$.
answered Nov 16 at 5:21
Kavi Rama Murthy
43.7k31751
$|z_1-z_2| geq |z_2|-|z_1|$ for all complex numbers $z_1,z_2$. Hence $|frac {phi(x)-phi(y)} {x-y} -phi'(c)| geq |phi'(c)|- |frac {phi(x)-phi(y)} {x-y}|$ which gives $|frac {phi(x)-phi(y)} {x-y}| geq frac 1 2 |phi'(c)|$.
answered Nov 16 at 5:21
Kavi Rama Murthy
43.7k31751
edited Nov 16 at 6:26
answered Nov 16 at 5:21
Kavi Rama Murthy
43.7k31751
answered Nov 16 at 5:21
Kavi Rama Murthy
43.7k31751
answered Nov 16 at 5:21
Kavi Rama Murthy
43.7k31751
43.7k31751
Well now I feel silly asking...
– Hawk
Nov 16 at 8:17
add a comment |
Well now I feel silly asking...
– Hawk
Nov 16 at 8:17
Well now I feel silly asking...
– Hawk
Nov 16 at 8:17
Well now I feel silly asking...
– Hawk
Nov 16 at 8:17
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000694%2fif-f-in-h-omega-holomorphic-then-fx-fy-geq-1-2fcx-y%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
