Constructing partition to show that lower sum and upper sum differ by less than $epsilon$











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












Let $f$ be a continuous, increasing function on $[a,b]$. I know that because $f$ is continuous, I can use epsilon-delta to prove that the lower sum $L(f,P)$ and upper sum $U(f,P)$ both converge given a partition of $[a,b]$: I can divide it equally into $n$ segments, such that the function differs by at most $frac{epsilon}{b-a}$ where the specific length of each section is determined by $delta$ from the epsilon-delta definition. (I think this explanation is correct; if not, please let me know).



However, my main question is does this result hold for a non-continuous strictly increasing function on $[a,b]$? If so, how would we prove that?



Additionally, is there an explicit way to construct a partition (based on $epsilon, b, a$) such that it is always the case for any strictly increasing function that the lower and upper sum get within epsilon of each other?










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    Let $f$ be a continuous, increasing function on $[a,b]$. I know that because $f$ is continuous, I can use epsilon-delta to prove that the lower sum $L(f,P)$ and upper sum $U(f,P)$ both converge given a partition of $[a,b]$: I can divide it equally into $n$ segments, such that the function differs by at most $frac{epsilon}{b-a}$ where the specific length of each section is determined by $delta$ from the epsilon-delta definition. (I think this explanation is correct; if not, please let me know).



    However, my main question is does this result hold for a non-continuous strictly increasing function on $[a,b]$? If so, how would we prove that?



    Additionally, is there an explicit way to construct a partition (based on $epsilon, b, a$) such that it is always the case for any strictly increasing function that the lower and upper sum get within epsilon of each other?










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      Let $f$ be a continuous, increasing function on $[a,b]$. I know that because $f$ is continuous, I can use epsilon-delta to prove that the lower sum $L(f,P)$ and upper sum $U(f,P)$ both converge given a partition of $[a,b]$: I can divide it equally into $n$ segments, such that the function differs by at most $frac{epsilon}{b-a}$ where the specific length of each section is determined by $delta$ from the epsilon-delta definition. (I think this explanation is correct; if not, please let me know).



      However, my main question is does this result hold for a non-continuous strictly increasing function on $[a,b]$? If so, how would we prove that?



      Additionally, is there an explicit way to construct a partition (based on $epsilon, b, a$) such that it is always the case for any strictly increasing function that the lower and upper sum get within epsilon of each other?










      share|cite|improve this question













      Let $f$ be a continuous, increasing function on $[a,b]$. I know that because $f$ is continuous, I can use epsilon-delta to prove that the lower sum $L(f,P)$ and upper sum $U(f,P)$ both converge given a partition of $[a,b]$: I can divide it equally into $n$ segments, such that the function differs by at most $frac{epsilon}{b-a}$ where the specific length of each section is determined by $delta$ from the epsilon-delta definition. (I think this explanation is correct; if not, please let me know).



      However, my main question is does this result hold for a non-continuous strictly increasing function on $[a,b]$? If so, how would we prove that?



      Additionally, is there an explicit way to construct a partition (based on $epsilon, b, a$) such that it is always the case for any strictly increasing function that the lower and upper sum get within epsilon of each other?







      calculus integration






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 16 at 4:50









      D.R.

      1,421620




      1,421620






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          An increasing function has at worst a countable number of discontinuities where right- and left-hand limits exist.



          Take a uniform partition $P_n = (x_0,x_1, ldots, x_n) $ with $x_k = a + (b-a)k/n$ and let $f_-(x)$ and $f_+(x)$ denote the left- and right-hand limits. Of course if $f$ is continuous at $x$, then $f_-(x) = f_+(x)$.



          Allowing for discontinuities at partition points we have $f_-(x_k) leqslant f(x_k) leqslant f_+(x_k)$ where the value $f(x_k)$ could be taken to be anywhere in $[f_-(x_k), f_+(x_k)]$ without affecting the integral.



          It is always true that $sup_{x in [x_{k-1},x_k]}f(x) = f(x_k)$ and $inf_{x in [x_{k-1},x_k]}f(x) = f(x_{k-1})$ regardless of how values are defined at discontinuity points.



          Thus,



          $$U(P_n,f) - L(P_n,f) = frac{b-a}{n}sum_{k=1}^nfleft(x_k right) - frac{b-a}{n}sum_{k=1}^nfleft(x_{k-1} right) \ = frac{b-a}{n} left(sum_{k=1}^n [f(x_k) - f(x_{k-1})] right) \ = frac{b-a}{n} left(f(b) - f(a) right), $$



          where the last equality follows because the sum is telescoping.



          Now observe that $U(P_n,f) - L(P_n,f) to 0$ as $n to infty$ and for all $n > frac{(b-a)(f(b)-f(a))}{epsilon}$ we have



          $$U(P_n,f) - L(P_n,f) < epsilon$$






          share|cite|improve this answer























            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000735%2fconstructing-partition-to-show-that-lower-sum-and-upper-sum-differ-by-less-than%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            1
            down vote



            accepted










            An increasing function has at worst a countable number of discontinuities where right- and left-hand limits exist.



            Take a uniform partition $P_n = (x_0,x_1, ldots, x_n) $ with $x_k = a + (b-a)k/n$ and let $f_-(x)$ and $f_+(x)$ denote the left- and right-hand limits. Of course if $f$ is continuous at $x$, then $f_-(x) = f_+(x)$.



            Allowing for discontinuities at partition points we have $f_-(x_k) leqslant f(x_k) leqslant f_+(x_k)$ where the value $f(x_k)$ could be taken to be anywhere in $[f_-(x_k), f_+(x_k)]$ without affecting the integral.



            It is always true that $sup_{x in [x_{k-1},x_k]}f(x) = f(x_k)$ and $inf_{x in [x_{k-1},x_k]}f(x) = f(x_{k-1})$ regardless of how values are defined at discontinuity points.



            Thus,



            $$U(P_n,f) - L(P_n,f) = frac{b-a}{n}sum_{k=1}^nfleft(x_k right) - frac{b-a}{n}sum_{k=1}^nfleft(x_{k-1} right) \ = frac{b-a}{n} left(sum_{k=1}^n [f(x_k) - f(x_{k-1})] right) \ = frac{b-a}{n} left(f(b) - f(a) right), $$



            where the last equality follows because the sum is telescoping.



            Now observe that $U(P_n,f) - L(P_n,f) to 0$ as $n to infty$ and for all $n > frac{(b-a)(f(b)-f(a))}{epsilon}$ we have



            $$U(P_n,f) - L(P_n,f) < epsilon$$






            share|cite|improve this answer



























              up vote
              1
              down vote



              accepted










              An increasing function has at worst a countable number of discontinuities where right- and left-hand limits exist.



              Take a uniform partition $P_n = (x_0,x_1, ldots, x_n) $ with $x_k = a + (b-a)k/n$ and let $f_-(x)$ and $f_+(x)$ denote the left- and right-hand limits. Of course if $f$ is continuous at $x$, then $f_-(x) = f_+(x)$.



              Allowing for discontinuities at partition points we have $f_-(x_k) leqslant f(x_k) leqslant f_+(x_k)$ where the value $f(x_k)$ could be taken to be anywhere in $[f_-(x_k), f_+(x_k)]$ without affecting the integral.



              It is always true that $sup_{x in [x_{k-1},x_k]}f(x) = f(x_k)$ and $inf_{x in [x_{k-1},x_k]}f(x) = f(x_{k-1})$ regardless of how values are defined at discontinuity points.



              Thus,



              $$U(P_n,f) - L(P_n,f) = frac{b-a}{n}sum_{k=1}^nfleft(x_k right) - frac{b-a}{n}sum_{k=1}^nfleft(x_{k-1} right) \ = frac{b-a}{n} left(sum_{k=1}^n [f(x_k) - f(x_{k-1})] right) \ = frac{b-a}{n} left(f(b) - f(a) right), $$



              where the last equality follows because the sum is telescoping.



              Now observe that $U(P_n,f) - L(P_n,f) to 0$ as $n to infty$ and for all $n > frac{(b-a)(f(b)-f(a))}{epsilon}$ we have



              $$U(P_n,f) - L(P_n,f) < epsilon$$






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted






                An increasing function has at worst a countable number of discontinuities where right- and left-hand limits exist.



                Take a uniform partition $P_n = (x_0,x_1, ldots, x_n) $ with $x_k = a + (b-a)k/n$ and let $f_-(x)$ and $f_+(x)$ denote the left- and right-hand limits. Of course if $f$ is continuous at $x$, then $f_-(x) = f_+(x)$.



                Allowing for discontinuities at partition points we have $f_-(x_k) leqslant f(x_k) leqslant f_+(x_k)$ where the value $f(x_k)$ could be taken to be anywhere in $[f_-(x_k), f_+(x_k)]$ without affecting the integral.



                It is always true that $sup_{x in [x_{k-1},x_k]}f(x) = f(x_k)$ and $inf_{x in [x_{k-1},x_k]}f(x) = f(x_{k-1})$ regardless of how values are defined at discontinuity points.



                Thus,



                $$U(P_n,f) - L(P_n,f) = frac{b-a}{n}sum_{k=1}^nfleft(x_k right) - frac{b-a}{n}sum_{k=1}^nfleft(x_{k-1} right) \ = frac{b-a}{n} left(sum_{k=1}^n [f(x_k) - f(x_{k-1})] right) \ = frac{b-a}{n} left(f(b) - f(a) right), $$



                where the last equality follows because the sum is telescoping.



                Now observe that $U(P_n,f) - L(P_n,f) to 0$ as $n to infty$ and for all $n > frac{(b-a)(f(b)-f(a))}{epsilon}$ we have



                $$U(P_n,f) - L(P_n,f) < epsilon$$






                share|cite|improve this answer














                An increasing function has at worst a countable number of discontinuities where right- and left-hand limits exist.



                Take a uniform partition $P_n = (x_0,x_1, ldots, x_n) $ with $x_k = a + (b-a)k/n$ and let $f_-(x)$ and $f_+(x)$ denote the left- and right-hand limits. Of course if $f$ is continuous at $x$, then $f_-(x) = f_+(x)$.



                Allowing for discontinuities at partition points we have $f_-(x_k) leqslant f(x_k) leqslant f_+(x_k)$ where the value $f(x_k)$ could be taken to be anywhere in $[f_-(x_k), f_+(x_k)]$ without affecting the integral.



                It is always true that $sup_{x in [x_{k-1},x_k]}f(x) = f(x_k)$ and $inf_{x in [x_{k-1},x_k]}f(x) = f(x_{k-1})$ regardless of how values are defined at discontinuity points.



                Thus,



                $$U(P_n,f) - L(P_n,f) = frac{b-a}{n}sum_{k=1}^nfleft(x_k right) - frac{b-a}{n}sum_{k=1}^nfleft(x_{k-1} right) \ = frac{b-a}{n} left(sum_{k=1}^n [f(x_k) - f(x_{k-1})] right) \ = frac{b-a}{n} left(f(b) - f(a) right), $$



                where the last equality follows because the sum is telescoping.



                Now observe that $U(P_n,f) - L(P_n,f) to 0$ as $n to infty$ and for all $n > frac{(b-a)(f(b)-f(a))}{epsilon}$ we have



                $$U(P_n,f) - L(P_n,f) < epsilon$$







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Nov 16 at 8:29

























                answered Nov 16 at 7:35









                RRL

                47.3k42368




                47.3k42368






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000735%2fconstructing-partition-to-show-that-lower-sum-and-upper-sum-differ-by-less-than%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

                    ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

                    Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?