Poster, tcolorbox, and small math font size
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I don't know why, but the math equation looks very small in my tcolorbox poster. Any idea why?
Thanks!
MWE:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc} % To switch to the T1 encoding
% usepackage{lmodern} % To switch to Latin Modern
usepackage{palatino}
usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, amsmath}
usepackage[a0paper]{geometry}
usepackage[poster,most]{tcolorbox}
pagestyle{empty}
begin{document}
begin{tcbposter}[
coverage = {
spread,
% interior style={top color=yellow,bottom color=yellow!50!red},
top=25mm, bottom=25mm, left=15mm, right=15mm,
},
poster = {showframe=false,columns=3,rows=5,spacing=13mm},
boxes = {
enhanced standard jigsaw,sharp corners=downhill,
arc=10mm, boxrule=2mm,
coltitle=black!85,
boxsep=0pt,
top=15mm,bottom=15mm,right=15mm,left=15mm,
colback=white,opacityback=0.75,colframe=cyan!30!white!90!black,
title style={left color=cyan!20!white!90!black,
right color=cyan!20!white!90!black,
},
fonttitle=Largescshapebfseries,
valign=center,
},
fontsize = 36pt
]
posterbox[blankest,interior engine=path,height=10cm,
halign=center,valign=center,colupper=black,
]{name=title,column=1,span=3,below=top}{
{Hugebftextsc{I Want A Title With\[.3em]
Small Caps Enabled}}\[.3em]
textsc{Here are Some Names}
}
posterbox[adjusted title=Security]
{name=security,below=title,column=2,span=1}{
I am some text, and here is a formula $hc(x,r) = sum x_i r_i bmod 2$, isn't it strange to have such a small formula?
$$hc(x,r) = sum x_i r_i bmod 2$$
}
end{tcbposter}
end{document}
-- EDIT --
Using usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign}
as proposed in comments works indeed (thanks!), but this font is a bit too different from the default one. The lmodern font on the other side gives an ugly sum symbol:
math-mode tcolorbox posters
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I don't know why, but the math equation looks very small in my tcolorbox poster. Any idea why?
Thanks!
MWE:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc} % To switch to the T1 encoding
% usepackage{lmodern} % To switch to Latin Modern
usepackage{palatino}
usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, amsmath}
usepackage[a0paper]{geometry}
usepackage[poster,most]{tcolorbox}
pagestyle{empty}
begin{document}
begin{tcbposter}[
coverage = {
spread,
% interior style={top color=yellow,bottom color=yellow!50!red},
top=25mm, bottom=25mm, left=15mm, right=15mm,
},
poster = {showframe=false,columns=3,rows=5,spacing=13mm},
boxes = {
enhanced standard jigsaw,sharp corners=downhill,
arc=10mm, boxrule=2mm,
coltitle=black!85,
boxsep=0pt,
top=15mm,bottom=15mm,right=15mm,left=15mm,
colback=white,opacityback=0.75,colframe=cyan!30!white!90!black,
title style={left color=cyan!20!white!90!black,
right color=cyan!20!white!90!black,
},
fonttitle=Largescshapebfseries,
valign=center,
},
fontsize = 36pt
]
posterbox[blankest,interior engine=path,height=10cm,
halign=center,valign=center,colupper=black,
]{name=title,column=1,span=3,below=top}{
{Hugebftextsc{I Want A Title With\[.3em]
Small Caps Enabled}}\[.3em]
textsc{Here are Some Names}
}
posterbox[adjusted title=Security]
{name=security,below=title,column=2,span=1}{
I am some text, and here is a formula $hc(x,r) = sum x_i r_i bmod 2$, isn't it strange to have such a small formula?
$$hc(x,r) = sum x_i r_i bmod 2$$
}
end{tcbposter}
end{document}
-- EDIT --
Using usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign}
as proposed in comments works indeed (thanks!), but this font is a bit too different from the default one. The lmodern font on the other side gives an ugly sum symbol:
math-mode tcolorbox posters
The math font you are currently using is not available in the size you want. A quick workaround could be to comment in thelmodern
and use this for math font
– samcarter
Nov 12 at 22:02
1
Personally I would combine palatino with a math font which is a bit heavier, for exampleusepackage{amssymb, amsthm, amsmath} usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign} usepackage{palatino}
– samcarter
Nov 12 at 22:07
@samcarter thanks for the comments. if I comment inlmodern
, thesum
symbol looks ugly and really small (less than a letter)
– tobiasBora
Nov 12 at 22:23
@samcarter : and themathdesign
shape indeed works, thanks! But I'm curious, is there a resizable math font that looks closer to the default one?
– tobiasBora
Nov 12 at 22:25
1
If you want to stay close at the default look, I'd uselmodern
and fix the sum symbol size with theexscale
package
– samcarter
Nov 12 at 22:26
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I don't know why, but the math equation looks very small in my tcolorbox poster. Any idea why?
Thanks!
MWE:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc} % To switch to the T1 encoding
% usepackage{lmodern} % To switch to Latin Modern
usepackage{palatino}
usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, amsmath}
usepackage[a0paper]{geometry}
usepackage[poster,most]{tcolorbox}
pagestyle{empty}
begin{document}
begin{tcbposter}[
coverage = {
spread,
% interior style={top color=yellow,bottom color=yellow!50!red},
top=25mm, bottom=25mm, left=15mm, right=15mm,
},
poster = {showframe=false,columns=3,rows=5,spacing=13mm},
boxes = {
enhanced standard jigsaw,sharp corners=downhill,
arc=10mm, boxrule=2mm,
coltitle=black!85,
boxsep=0pt,
top=15mm,bottom=15mm,right=15mm,left=15mm,
colback=white,opacityback=0.75,colframe=cyan!30!white!90!black,
title style={left color=cyan!20!white!90!black,
right color=cyan!20!white!90!black,
},
fonttitle=Largescshapebfseries,
valign=center,
},
fontsize = 36pt
]
posterbox[blankest,interior engine=path,height=10cm,
halign=center,valign=center,colupper=black,
]{name=title,column=1,span=3,below=top}{
{Hugebftextsc{I Want A Title With\[.3em]
Small Caps Enabled}}\[.3em]
textsc{Here are Some Names}
}
posterbox[adjusted title=Security]
{name=security,below=title,column=2,span=1}{
I am some text, and here is a formula $hc(x,r) = sum x_i r_i bmod 2$, isn't it strange to have such a small formula?
$$hc(x,r) = sum x_i r_i bmod 2$$
}
end{tcbposter}
end{document}
-- EDIT --
Using usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign}
as proposed in comments works indeed (thanks!), but this font is a bit too different from the default one. The lmodern font on the other side gives an ugly sum symbol:
math-mode tcolorbox posters
I don't know why, but the math equation looks very small in my tcolorbox poster. Any idea why?
Thanks!
MWE:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc} % To switch to the T1 encoding
% usepackage{lmodern} % To switch to Latin Modern
usepackage{palatino}
usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, amsmath}
usepackage[a0paper]{geometry}
usepackage[poster,most]{tcolorbox}
pagestyle{empty}
begin{document}
begin{tcbposter}[
coverage = {
spread,
% interior style={top color=yellow,bottom color=yellow!50!red},
top=25mm, bottom=25mm, left=15mm, right=15mm,
},
poster = {showframe=false,columns=3,rows=5,spacing=13mm},
boxes = {
enhanced standard jigsaw,sharp corners=downhill,
arc=10mm, boxrule=2mm,
coltitle=black!85,
boxsep=0pt,
top=15mm,bottom=15mm,right=15mm,left=15mm,
colback=white,opacityback=0.75,colframe=cyan!30!white!90!black,
title style={left color=cyan!20!white!90!black,
right color=cyan!20!white!90!black,
},
fonttitle=Largescshapebfseries,
valign=center,
},
fontsize = 36pt
]
posterbox[blankest,interior engine=path,height=10cm,
halign=center,valign=center,colupper=black,
]{name=title,column=1,span=3,below=top}{
{Hugebftextsc{I Want A Title With\[.3em]
Small Caps Enabled}}\[.3em]
textsc{Here are Some Names}
}
posterbox[adjusted title=Security]
{name=security,below=title,column=2,span=1}{
I am some text, and here is a formula $hc(x,r) = sum x_i r_i bmod 2$, isn't it strange to have such a small formula?
$$hc(x,r) = sum x_i r_i bmod 2$$
}
end{tcbposter}
end{document}
-- EDIT --
Using usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign}
as proposed in comments works indeed (thanks!), but this font is a bit too different from the default one. The lmodern font on the other side gives an ugly sum symbol:
math-mode tcolorbox posters
math-mode tcolorbox posters
edited Nov 12 at 22:27
asked Nov 12 at 21:28
tobiasBora
1,202313
1,202313
The math font you are currently using is not available in the size you want. A quick workaround could be to comment in thelmodern
and use this for math font
– samcarter
Nov 12 at 22:02
1
Personally I would combine palatino with a math font which is a bit heavier, for exampleusepackage{amssymb, amsthm, amsmath} usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign} usepackage{palatino}
– samcarter
Nov 12 at 22:07
@samcarter thanks for the comments. if I comment inlmodern
, thesum
symbol looks ugly and really small (less than a letter)
– tobiasBora
Nov 12 at 22:23
@samcarter : and themathdesign
shape indeed works, thanks! But I'm curious, is there a resizable math font that looks closer to the default one?
– tobiasBora
Nov 12 at 22:25
1
If you want to stay close at the default look, I'd uselmodern
and fix the sum symbol size with theexscale
package
– samcarter
Nov 12 at 22:26
|
show 1 more comment
The math font you are currently using is not available in the size you want. A quick workaround could be to comment in thelmodern
and use this for math font
– samcarter
Nov 12 at 22:02
1
Personally I would combine palatino with a math font which is a bit heavier, for exampleusepackage{amssymb, amsthm, amsmath} usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign} usepackage{palatino}
– samcarter
Nov 12 at 22:07
@samcarter thanks for the comments. if I comment inlmodern
, thesum
symbol looks ugly and really small (less than a letter)
– tobiasBora
Nov 12 at 22:23
@samcarter : and themathdesign
shape indeed works, thanks! But I'm curious, is there a resizable math font that looks closer to the default one?
– tobiasBora
Nov 12 at 22:25
1
If you want to stay close at the default look, I'd uselmodern
and fix the sum symbol size with theexscale
package
– samcarter
Nov 12 at 22:26
The math font you are currently using is not available in the size you want. A quick workaround could be to comment in the
lmodern
and use this for math font– samcarter
Nov 12 at 22:02
The math font you are currently using is not available in the size you want. A quick workaround could be to comment in the
lmodern
and use this for math font– samcarter
Nov 12 at 22:02
1
1
Personally I would combine palatino with a math font which is a bit heavier, for example
usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, amsmath} usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign} usepackage{palatino}
– samcarter
Nov 12 at 22:07
Personally I would combine palatino with a math font which is a bit heavier, for example
usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, amsmath} usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign} usepackage{palatino}
– samcarter
Nov 12 at 22:07
@samcarter thanks for the comments. if I comment in
lmodern
, the sum
symbol looks ugly and really small (less than a letter)– tobiasBora
Nov 12 at 22:23
@samcarter thanks for the comments. if I comment in
lmodern
, the sum
symbol looks ugly and really small (less than a letter)– tobiasBora
Nov 12 at 22:23
@samcarter : and the
mathdesign
shape indeed works, thanks! But I'm curious, is there a resizable math font that looks closer to the default one?– tobiasBora
Nov 12 at 22:25
@samcarter : and the
mathdesign
shape indeed works, thanks! But I'm curious, is there a resizable math font that looks closer to the default one?– tobiasBora
Nov 12 at 22:25
1
1
If you want to stay close at the default look, I'd use
lmodern
and fix the sum symbol size with the exscale
package– samcarter
Nov 12 at 22:26
If you want to stay close at the default look, I'd use
lmodern
and fix the sum symbol size with the exscale
package– samcarter
Nov 12 at 22:26
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
The problem is that the default math font you are using is not available in the size you request it. As a workaround use a math font with is scalable to this size.
If you want to keep the look of the default math font, you could comment in the lmodern
package you already have in your preamble and fix some remaining problems with the exscale
package:
usepackage{lmodern}
usepackage{palatino}
usepackage{exscale}
Personally I would combine your palatino font with a math font which is a bit heavier
usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, amsmath}
usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign}
usepackage{palatino}
Or use a similar font which also provides math. This will also save you from using the outdated palatino
package.
usepackage{newpxtext,newpxmath}
Isn't the use ofpalatino
discouraged (l2tabu)?
– TeXnician
Nov 13 at 11:41
@TeXnician Could very well be. I'll stress more to useusepackage{newpxtext,newpxmath}
instead.
– samcarter
Nov 13 at 11:43
@TeXnician what's the problem withpalatino
? Not that I'm using it, but I'm curious nonetheless.
– thymaro
Nov 13 at 12:21
@thymaro Please read the section in l2tabu. I just know that the authors of l2tabu mostly know what they are writing about.
– TeXnician
Nov 13 at 21:09
@TeXnician right. That's actually what I did after posting the comment. I should have done that before, though. I should probably read the whole document again, now that my understanding of TeX has grown. Last time I read it, I didn't quite grasp its reach.
– thymaro
Nov 13 at 21:12
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
The problem is that the default math font you are using is not available in the size you request it. As a workaround use a math font with is scalable to this size.
If you want to keep the look of the default math font, you could comment in the lmodern
package you already have in your preamble and fix some remaining problems with the exscale
package:
usepackage{lmodern}
usepackage{palatino}
usepackage{exscale}
Personally I would combine your palatino font with a math font which is a bit heavier
usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, amsmath}
usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign}
usepackage{palatino}
Or use a similar font which also provides math. This will also save you from using the outdated palatino
package.
usepackage{newpxtext,newpxmath}
Isn't the use ofpalatino
discouraged (l2tabu)?
– TeXnician
Nov 13 at 11:41
@TeXnician Could very well be. I'll stress more to useusepackage{newpxtext,newpxmath}
instead.
– samcarter
Nov 13 at 11:43
@TeXnician what's the problem withpalatino
? Not that I'm using it, but I'm curious nonetheless.
– thymaro
Nov 13 at 12:21
@thymaro Please read the section in l2tabu. I just know that the authors of l2tabu mostly know what they are writing about.
– TeXnician
Nov 13 at 21:09
@TeXnician right. That's actually what I did after posting the comment. I should have done that before, though. I should probably read the whole document again, now that my understanding of TeX has grown. Last time I read it, I didn't quite grasp its reach.
– thymaro
Nov 13 at 21:12
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
The problem is that the default math font you are using is not available in the size you request it. As a workaround use a math font with is scalable to this size.
If you want to keep the look of the default math font, you could comment in the lmodern
package you already have in your preamble and fix some remaining problems with the exscale
package:
usepackage{lmodern}
usepackage{palatino}
usepackage{exscale}
Personally I would combine your palatino font with a math font which is a bit heavier
usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, amsmath}
usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign}
usepackage{palatino}
Or use a similar font which also provides math. This will also save you from using the outdated palatino
package.
usepackage{newpxtext,newpxmath}
Isn't the use ofpalatino
discouraged (l2tabu)?
– TeXnician
Nov 13 at 11:41
@TeXnician Could very well be. I'll stress more to useusepackage{newpxtext,newpxmath}
instead.
– samcarter
Nov 13 at 11:43
@TeXnician what's the problem withpalatino
? Not that I'm using it, but I'm curious nonetheless.
– thymaro
Nov 13 at 12:21
@thymaro Please read the section in l2tabu. I just know that the authors of l2tabu mostly know what they are writing about.
– TeXnician
Nov 13 at 21:09
@TeXnician right. That's actually what I did after posting the comment. I should have done that before, though. I should probably read the whole document again, now that my understanding of TeX has grown. Last time I read it, I didn't quite grasp its reach.
– thymaro
Nov 13 at 21:12
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
The problem is that the default math font you are using is not available in the size you request it. As a workaround use a math font with is scalable to this size.
If you want to keep the look of the default math font, you could comment in the lmodern
package you already have in your preamble and fix some remaining problems with the exscale
package:
usepackage{lmodern}
usepackage{palatino}
usepackage{exscale}
Personally I would combine your palatino font with a math font which is a bit heavier
usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, amsmath}
usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign}
usepackage{palatino}
Or use a similar font which also provides math. This will also save you from using the outdated palatino
package.
usepackage{newpxtext,newpxmath}
The problem is that the default math font you are using is not available in the size you request it. As a workaround use a math font with is scalable to this size.
If you want to keep the look of the default math font, you could comment in the lmodern
package you already have in your preamble and fix some remaining problems with the exscale
package:
usepackage{lmodern}
usepackage{palatino}
usepackage{exscale}
Personally I would combine your palatino font with a math font which is a bit heavier
usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, amsmath}
usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign}
usepackage{palatino}
Or use a similar font which also provides math. This will also save you from using the outdated palatino
package.
usepackage{newpxtext,newpxmath}
edited Nov 13 at 11:44
answered Nov 12 at 22:37
samcarter
81.5k791262
81.5k791262
Isn't the use ofpalatino
discouraged (l2tabu)?
– TeXnician
Nov 13 at 11:41
@TeXnician Could very well be. I'll stress more to useusepackage{newpxtext,newpxmath}
instead.
– samcarter
Nov 13 at 11:43
@TeXnician what's the problem withpalatino
? Not that I'm using it, but I'm curious nonetheless.
– thymaro
Nov 13 at 12:21
@thymaro Please read the section in l2tabu. I just know that the authors of l2tabu mostly know what they are writing about.
– TeXnician
Nov 13 at 21:09
@TeXnician right. That's actually what I did after posting the comment. I should have done that before, though. I should probably read the whole document again, now that my understanding of TeX has grown. Last time I read it, I didn't quite grasp its reach.
– thymaro
Nov 13 at 21:12
add a comment |
Isn't the use ofpalatino
discouraged (l2tabu)?
– TeXnician
Nov 13 at 11:41
@TeXnician Could very well be. I'll stress more to useusepackage{newpxtext,newpxmath}
instead.
– samcarter
Nov 13 at 11:43
@TeXnician what's the problem withpalatino
? Not that I'm using it, but I'm curious nonetheless.
– thymaro
Nov 13 at 12:21
@thymaro Please read the section in l2tabu. I just know that the authors of l2tabu mostly know what they are writing about.
– TeXnician
Nov 13 at 21:09
@TeXnician right. That's actually what I did after posting the comment. I should have done that before, though. I should probably read the whole document again, now that my understanding of TeX has grown. Last time I read it, I didn't quite grasp its reach.
– thymaro
Nov 13 at 21:12
Isn't the use of
palatino
discouraged (l2tabu)?– TeXnician
Nov 13 at 11:41
Isn't the use of
palatino
discouraged (l2tabu)?– TeXnician
Nov 13 at 11:41
@TeXnician Could very well be. I'll stress more to use
usepackage{newpxtext,newpxmath}
instead.– samcarter
Nov 13 at 11:43
@TeXnician Could very well be. I'll stress more to use
usepackage{newpxtext,newpxmath}
instead.– samcarter
Nov 13 at 11:43
@TeXnician what's the problem with
palatino
? Not that I'm using it, but I'm curious nonetheless.– thymaro
Nov 13 at 12:21
@TeXnician what's the problem with
palatino
? Not that I'm using it, but I'm curious nonetheless.– thymaro
Nov 13 at 12:21
@thymaro Please read the section in l2tabu. I just know that the authors of l2tabu mostly know what they are writing about.
– TeXnician
Nov 13 at 21:09
@thymaro Please read the section in l2tabu. I just know that the authors of l2tabu mostly know what they are writing about.
– TeXnician
Nov 13 at 21:09
@TeXnician right. That's actually what I did after posting the comment. I should have done that before, though. I should probably read the whole document again, now that my understanding of TeX has grown. Last time I read it, I didn't quite grasp its reach.
– thymaro
Nov 13 at 21:12
@TeXnician right. That's actually what I did after posting the comment. I should have done that before, though. I should probably read the whole document again, now that my understanding of TeX has grown. Last time I read it, I didn't quite grasp its reach.
– thymaro
Nov 13 at 21:12
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f459688%2fposter-tcolorbox-and-small-math-font-size%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
The math font you are currently using is not available in the size you want. A quick workaround could be to comment in the
lmodern
and use this for math font– samcarter
Nov 12 at 22:02
1
Personally I would combine palatino with a math font which is a bit heavier, for example
usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, amsmath} usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign} usepackage{palatino}
– samcarter
Nov 12 at 22:07
@samcarter thanks for the comments. if I comment in
lmodern
, thesum
symbol looks ugly and really small (less than a letter)– tobiasBora
Nov 12 at 22:23
@samcarter : and the
mathdesign
shape indeed works, thanks! But I'm curious, is there a resizable math font that looks closer to the default one?– tobiasBora
Nov 12 at 22:25
1
If you want to stay close at the default look, I'd use
lmodern
and fix the sum symbol size with theexscale
package– samcarter
Nov 12 at 22:26