How did Lang use locally compact to deduce $|x|=1$ has minimum?
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $K$ be a complete field w.r.t non-trivial absolute value $|-|$ and $V$ a normed vector space over $K$. Let $||-||=u(-)$ be sup norm w.r.t a fixed basis of $V$ over $K$ and $||-||'=v(-)$ be another norm. Note that $kin K,||kx||=|k|cdot||x||$ and we have this similarly for $||-||'$.
It is clear that w.r.t the fixed basis $forall xin V,v(x)leq c u(x)$ which indicates continuity of $v$ against topology defined by $u$. Then Lang said "Hence $v$ has a minimum on the unit sphere w.r.t $u$(by local compactness)."
$textbf{Q:}$ How did Lang use local compactness to deduce minimum here? Here is my reasoning. Since absolute value is non-trivial, I can define $O$ and $exists |a|<1$. Now $a^nOcong O$ by multiplication. Since $K$ is locally compact, I can shrink $O$ by multiplication of $a^n$ into the compact neighborhood of $0$. Since $O$ is closed by definition, for some $n$, $a^nO$ is compact which forces $O$ compact by homeomorphism. Now boundary(i.e. unit sphere) is closed in compact set and hence it is compact. (This is rather elaborate reasoning by assuming $K$ is topological field to start with though it is not hard to demonstrate this is compatible with $|-|$.)
Alternatively one can realize compactness by direct application of $a^n U$ with $U$ being the set of norm 1 elements. This is trivially closed and use continuity argument of $a^n$ to shrink to a closed subset of compact neighborhood of $0$. Hence it is compact and achieve the minimum.
abstract-algebra general-topology number-theory
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $K$ be a complete field w.r.t non-trivial absolute value $|-|$ and $V$ a normed vector space over $K$. Let $||-||=u(-)$ be sup norm w.r.t a fixed basis of $V$ over $K$ and $||-||'=v(-)$ be another norm. Note that $kin K,||kx||=|k|cdot||x||$ and we have this similarly for $||-||'$.
It is clear that w.r.t the fixed basis $forall xin V,v(x)leq c u(x)$ which indicates continuity of $v$ against topology defined by $u$. Then Lang said "Hence $v$ has a minimum on the unit sphere w.r.t $u$(by local compactness)."
$textbf{Q:}$ How did Lang use local compactness to deduce minimum here? Here is my reasoning. Since absolute value is non-trivial, I can define $O$ and $exists |a|<1$. Now $a^nOcong O$ by multiplication. Since $K$ is locally compact, I can shrink $O$ by multiplication of $a^n$ into the compact neighborhood of $0$. Since $O$ is closed by definition, for some $n$, $a^nO$ is compact which forces $O$ compact by homeomorphism. Now boundary(i.e. unit sphere) is closed in compact set and hence it is compact. (This is rather elaborate reasoning by assuming $K$ is topological field to start with though it is not hard to demonstrate this is compatible with $|-|$.)
Alternatively one can realize compactness by direct application of $a^n U$ with $U$ being the set of norm 1 elements. This is trivially closed and use continuity argument of $a^n$ to shrink to a closed subset of compact neighborhood of $0$. Hence it is compact and achieve the minimum.
abstract-algebra general-topology number-theory
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $K$ be a complete field w.r.t non-trivial absolute value $|-|$ and $V$ a normed vector space over $K$. Let $||-||=u(-)$ be sup norm w.r.t a fixed basis of $V$ over $K$ and $||-||'=v(-)$ be another norm. Note that $kin K,||kx||=|k|cdot||x||$ and we have this similarly for $||-||'$.
It is clear that w.r.t the fixed basis $forall xin V,v(x)leq c u(x)$ which indicates continuity of $v$ against topology defined by $u$. Then Lang said "Hence $v$ has a minimum on the unit sphere w.r.t $u$(by local compactness)."
$textbf{Q:}$ How did Lang use local compactness to deduce minimum here? Here is my reasoning. Since absolute value is non-trivial, I can define $O$ and $exists |a|<1$. Now $a^nOcong O$ by multiplication. Since $K$ is locally compact, I can shrink $O$ by multiplication of $a^n$ into the compact neighborhood of $0$. Since $O$ is closed by definition, for some $n$, $a^nO$ is compact which forces $O$ compact by homeomorphism. Now boundary(i.e. unit sphere) is closed in compact set and hence it is compact. (This is rather elaborate reasoning by assuming $K$ is topological field to start with though it is not hard to demonstrate this is compatible with $|-|$.)
Alternatively one can realize compactness by direct application of $a^n U$ with $U$ being the set of norm 1 elements. This is trivially closed and use continuity argument of $a^n$ to shrink to a closed subset of compact neighborhood of $0$. Hence it is compact and achieve the minimum.
abstract-algebra general-topology number-theory
Let $K$ be a complete field w.r.t non-trivial absolute value $|-|$ and $V$ a normed vector space over $K$. Let $||-||=u(-)$ be sup norm w.r.t a fixed basis of $V$ over $K$ and $||-||'=v(-)$ be another norm. Note that $kin K,||kx||=|k|cdot||x||$ and we have this similarly for $||-||'$.
It is clear that w.r.t the fixed basis $forall xin V,v(x)leq c u(x)$ which indicates continuity of $v$ against topology defined by $u$. Then Lang said "Hence $v$ has a minimum on the unit sphere w.r.t $u$(by local compactness)."
$textbf{Q:}$ How did Lang use local compactness to deduce minimum here? Here is my reasoning. Since absolute value is non-trivial, I can define $O$ and $exists |a|<1$. Now $a^nOcong O$ by multiplication. Since $K$ is locally compact, I can shrink $O$ by multiplication of $a^n$ into the compact neighborhood of $0$. Since $O$ is closed by definition, for some $n$, $a^nO$ is compact which forces $O$ compact by homeomorphism. Now boundary(i.e. unit sphere) is closed in compact set and hence it is compact. (This is rather elaborate reasoning by assuming $K$ is topological field to start with though it is not hard to demonstrate this is compatible with $|-|$.)
Alternatively one can realize compactness by direct application of $a^n U$ with $U$ being the set of norm 1 elements. This is trivially closed and use continuity argument of $a^n$ to shrink to a closed subset of compact neighborhood of $0$. Hence it is compact and achieve the minimum.
abstract-algebra general-topology number-theory
abstract-algebra general-topology number-theory
asked yesterday
user45765
2,3432719
2,3432719
add a comment |
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2995361%2fhow-did-lang-use-locally-compact-to-deduce-x-1-has-minimum%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password