Fix a formula with fraction 1/2 in subscript mode
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
At this time for my book I am writing some formulas for radioactive decay. I'm using actually newtxtext
package as a text font and mt2pro
as a mathematical character and formula font. In the attached code I use newtxmath
so that everyone can compile it regularly keeping in mind that the situation is the same using mt2pro
. Precisely I would like to write the fraction 1/2
similar to the image below (green rectangle),
In other words, the backslash should be very close to the number 1 and 2, because as you can see in the formula (2), the expression is not only not visually good.
We appreciate your suggestions and your knowledge to make the visualization of my formulas better (especially the exponent of the formula (2)).
Here my MWE for 2nd image:
documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{book}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
T_{1/2}=frac {ln 2}{lambda}=tau ln 2<tau
end{equation}
begin{equation}
N(t)=N_0e^{-frac{tln 2}{T_{1/2}}}=N_0e^{ln 2^{-frac t{T_{1/2}}}}=N_0{2}^{-frac{t}{T_{1/2}}}
end{equation}
end{document}
math-mode mtpro newtxmath newtx
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
At this time for my book I am writing some formulas for radioactive decay. I'm using actually newtxtext
package as a text font and mt2pro
as a mathematical character and formula font. In the attached code I use newtxmath
so that everyone can compile it regularly keeping in mind that the situation is the same using mt2pro
. Precisely I would like to write the fraction 1/2
similar to the image below (green rectangle),
In other words, the backslash should be very close to the number 1 and 2, because as you can see in the formula (2), the expression is not only not visually good.
We appreciate your suggestions and your knowledge to make the visualization of my formulas better (especially the exponent of the formula (2)).
Here my MWE for 2nd image:
documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{book}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
T_{1/2}=frac {ln 2}{lambda}=tau ln 2<tau
end{equation}
begin{equation}
N(t)=N_0e^{-frac{tln 2}{T_{1/2}}}=N_0e^{ln 2^{-frac t{T_{1/2}}}}=N_0{2}^{-frac{t}{T_{1/2}}}
end{equation}
end{document}
math-mode mtpro newtxmath newtx
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
At this time for my book I am writing some formulas for radioactive decay. I'm using actually newtxtext
package as a text font and mt2pro
as a mathematical character and formula font. In the attached code I use newtxmath
so that everyone can compile it regularly keeping in mind that the situation is the same using mt2pro
. Precisely I would like to write the fraction 1/2
similar to the image below (green rectangle),
In other words, the backslash should be very close to the number 1 and 2, because as you can see in the formula (2), the expression is not only not visually good.
We appreciate your suggestions and your knowledge to make the visualization of my formulas better (especially the exponent of the formula (2)).
Here my MWE for 2nd image:
documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{book}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
T_{1/2}=frac {ln 2}{lambda}=tau ln 2<tau
end{equation}
begin{equation}
N(t)=N_0e^{-frac{tln 2}{T_{1/2}}}=N_0e^{ln 2^{-frac t{T_{1/2}}}}=N_0{2}^{-frac{t}{T_{1/2}}}
end{equation}
end{document}
math-mode mtpro newtxmath newtx
At this time for my book I am writing some formulas for radioactive decay. I'm using actually newtxtext
package as a text font and mt2pro
as a mathematical character and formula font. In the attached code I use newtxmath
so that everyone can compile it regularly keeping in mind that the situation is the same using mt2pro
. Precisely I would like to write the fraction 1/2
similar to the image below (green rectangle),
In other words, the backslash should be very close to the number 1 and 2, because as you can see in the formula (2), the expression is not only not visually good.
We appreciate your suggestions and your knowledge to make the visualization of my formulas better (especially the exponent of the formula (2)).
Here my MWE for 2nd image:
documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{book}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
T_{1/2}=frac {ln 2}{lambda}=tau ln 2<tau
end{equation}
begin{equation}
N(t)=N_0e^{-frac{tln 2}{T_{1/2}}}=N_0e^{ln 2^{-frac t{T_{1/2}}}}=N_0{2}^{-frac{t}{T_{1/2}}}
end{equation}
end{document}
math-mode mtpro newtxmath newtx
math-mode mtpro newtxmath newtx
edited Nov 13 at 9:48
asked Nov 12 at 22:41
Sebastiano
8,29541754
8,29541754
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
The digit 1 is much thinner than the other digits. Most fonts, however, define it with a bounding box equal to the ones for the other digits, for the sake of alignment in tables.
You can solve the special case by defining a suitable command:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
newcommand{one}{mspace{-1mu}1mspace{-1.5mu}}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
T_{one/2}=frac {ln 2}{lambda}=tau ln 2<tau
end{equation}
begin{equation}
N(t)=N_0e^{-frac{tln 2}{T_{one/2}}}=
N_0e^{ln 2^{-frac t{T_{one/2}}}}=N_0{2}^{-frac{t}{T_{one/2}}}
end{equation}
end{document}
I wouldn't touch the slash.
I would also omit the step with the fraction at second level superscript: it is unreadable and actually an easy application of logarithms. A short explanation after the equation is more than sufficient.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{book}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage{mathtools}
usepackage{nicefrac}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}=frac {ln 2}{lambda}=tau ln 2<tau
end{equation}
begin{equation}
N(t)=N_0e^{-frac{tln 2}{T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}}}=N_0e^{ln 2^{-frac t{T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}}}}=N_0{2}^{-frac{t}{T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}}}
end{equation}
end{document}
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
The digit 1 is much thinner than the other digits. Most fonts, however, define it with a bounding box equal to the ones for the other digits, for the sake of alignment in tables.
You can solve the special case by defining a suitable command:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
newcommand{one}{mspace{-1mu}1mspace{-1.5mu}}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
T_{one/2}=frac {ln 2}{lambda}=tau ln 2<tau
end{equation}
begin{equation}
N(t)=N_0e^{-frac{tln 2}{T_{one/2}}}=
N_0e^{ln 2^{-frac t{T_{one/2}}}}=N_0{2}^{-frac{t}{T_{one/2}}}
end{equation}
end{document}
I wouldn't touch the slash.
I would also omit the step with the fraction at second level superscript: it is unreadable and actually an easy application of logarithms. A short explanation after the equation is more than sufficient.
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
The digit 1 is much thinner than the other digits. Most fonts, however, define it with a bounding box equal to the ones for the other digits, for the sake of alignment in tables.
You can solve the special case by defining a suitable command:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
newcommand{one}{mspace{-1mu}1mspace{-1.5mu}}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
T_{one/2}=frac {ln 2}{lambda}=tau ln 2<tau
end{equation}
begin{equation}
N(t)=N_0e^{-frac{tln 2}{T_{one/2}}}=
N_0e^{ln 2^{-frac t{T_{one/2}}}}=N_0{2}^{-frac{t}{T_{one/2}}}
end{equation}
end{document}
I wouldn't touch the slash.
I would also omit the step with the fraction at second level superscript: it is unreadable and actually an easy application of logarithms. A short explanation after the equation is more than sufficient.
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
The digit 1 is much thinner than the other digits. Most fonts, however, define it with a bounding box equal to the ones for the other digits, for the sake of alignment in tables.
You can solve the special case by defining a suitable command:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
newcommand{one}{mspace{-1mu}1mspace{-1.5mu}}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
T_{one/2}=frac {ln 2}{lambda}=tau ln 2<tau
end{equation}
begin{equation}
N(t)=N_0e^{-frac{tln 2}{T_{one/2}}}=
N_0e^{ln 2^{-frac t{T_{one/2}}}}=N_0{2}^{-frac{t}{T_{one/2}}}
end{equation}
end{document}
I wouldn't touch the slash.
I would also omit the step with the fraction at second level superscript: it is unreadable and actually an easy application of logarithms. A short explanation after the equation is more than sufficient.
The digit 1 is much thinner than the other digits. Most fonts, however, define it with a bounding box equal to the ones for the other digits, for the sake of alignment in tables.
You can solve the special case by defining a suitable command:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
newcommand{one}{mspace{-1mu}1mspace{-1.5mu}}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
T_{one/2}=frac {ln 2}{lambda}=tau ln 2<tau
end{equation}
begin{equation}
N(t)=N_0e^{-frac{tln 2}{T_{one/2}}}=
N_0e^{ln 2^{-frac t{T_{one/2}}}}=N_0{2}^{-frac{t}{T_{one/2}}}
end{equation}
end{document}
I wouldn't touch the slash.
I would also omit the step with the fraction at second level superscript: it is unreadable and actually an easy application of logarithms. A short explanation after the equation is more than sufficient.
edited Nov 12 at 23:27
answered Nov 12 at 23:09
egreg
698k8518523120
698k8518523120
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{book}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage{mathtools}
usepackage{nicefrac}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}=frac {ln 2}{lambda}=tau ln 2<tau
end{equation}
begin{equation}
N(t)=N_0e^{-frac{tln 2}{T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}}}=N_0e^{ln 2^{-frac t{T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}}}}=N_0{2}^{-frac{t}{T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}}}
end{equation}
end{document}
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{book}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage{mathtools}
usepackage{nicefrac}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}=frac {ln 2}{lambda}=tau ln 2<tau
end{equation}
begin{equation}
N(t)=N_0e^{-frac{tln 2}{T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}}}=N_0e^{ln 2^{-frac t{T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}}}}=N_0{2}^{-frac{t}{T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}}}
end{equation}
end{document}
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{book}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage{mathtools}
usepackage{nicefrac}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}=frac {ln 2}{lambda}=tau ln 2<tau
end{equation}
begin{equation}
N(t)=N_0e^{-frac{tln 2}{T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}}}=N_0e^{ln 2^{-frac t{T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}}}}=N_0{2}^{-frac{t}{T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}}}
end{equation}
end{document}
documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{book}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage{mathtools}
usepackage{nicefrac}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}=frac {ln 2}{lambda}=tau ln 2<tau
end{equation}
begin{equation}
N(t)=N_0e^{-frac{tln 2}{T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}}}=N_0e^{ln 2^{-frac t{T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}}}}=N_0{2}^{-frac{t}{T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}}}
end{equation}
end{document}
answered Nov 12 at 22:50
daniel
3009
3009
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f459701%2ffix-a-formula-with-fraction-1-2-in-subscript-mode%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown