Interpretation of change in log in regression
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have build a time series regression with the formula:
$$Deltalog A = alpha+betaDeltalog B $$
I have found $beta= -0.05$. I can't seem to figure out how to interpret this number. I know that in a log-log regression the coefficient denotes a procentual effect. But I can't figure out how to inpret it for a $Deltalog-Deltalog$ regression. Could someone help me out?
regression
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have build a time series regression with the formula:
$$Deltalog A = alpha+betaDeltalog B $$
I have found $beta= -0.05$. I can't seem to figure out how to interpret this number. I know that in a log-log regression the coefficient denotes a procentual effect. But I can't figure out how to inpret it for a $Deltalog-Deltalog$ regression. Could someone help me out?
regression
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have build a time series regression with the formula:
$$Deltalog A = alpha+betaDeltalog B $$
I have found $beta= -0.05$. I can't seem to figure out how to interpret this number. I know that in a log-log regression the coefficient denotes a procentual effect. But I can't figure out how to inpret it for a $Deltalog-Deltalog$ regression. Could someone help me out?
regression
I have build a time series regression with the formula:
$$Deltalog A = alpha+betaDeltalog B $$
I have found $beta= -0.05$. I can't seem to figure out how to interpret this number. I know that in a log-log regression the coefficient denotes a procentual effect. But I can't figure out how to inpret it for a $Deltalog-Deltalog$ regression. Could someone help me out?
regression
regression
asked 4 hours ago
Cardinal
587
587
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
The value $beta= -0.05$ represents the slope for the linear regression in the plane $Deltalog-Deltalog$ and $alpha$ is the $y$ value assumed for $B=1$.
For the exponential representation we have
$$Deltalog A = alpha+betaDeltalog B iff e^frac A{A_0}=e^{alpha}e^{left(frac B{B_0}right)^{beta}}$$
Yeah sure, but is there an interpretation like in the log-log plane?
– Cardinal
4 hours ago
@Cardinal Ah ok your doubt is about the not linear representation?
– gimusi
4 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
The value $beta= -0.05$ represents the slope for the linear regression in the plane $Deltalog-Deltalog$ and $alpha$ is the $y$ value assumed for $B=1$.
For the exponential representation we have
$$Deltalog A = alpha+betaDeltalog B iff e^frac A{A_0}=e^{alpha}e^{left(frac B{B_0}right)^{beta}}$$
Yeah sure, but is there an interpretation like in the log-log plane?
– Cardinal
4 hours ago
@Cardinal Ah ok your doubt is about the not linear representation?
– gimusi
4 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
The value $beta= -0.05$ represents the slope for the linear regression in the plane $Deltalog-Deltalog$ and $alpha$ is the $y$ value assumed for $B=1$.
For the exponential representation we have
$$Deltalog A = alpha+betaDeltalog B iff e^frac A{A_0}=e^{alpha}e^{left(frac B{B_0}right)^{beta}}$$
Yeah sure, but is there an interpretation like in the log-log plane?
– Cardinal
4 hours ago
@Cardinal Ah ok your doubt is about the not linear representation?
– gimusi
4 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
The value $beta= -0.05$ represents the slope for the linear regression in the plane $Deltalog-Deltalog$ and $alpha$ is the $y$ value assumed for $B=1$.
For the exponential representation we have
$$Deltalog A = alpha+betaDeltalog B iff e^frac A{A_0}=e^{alpha}e^{left(frac B{B_0}right)^{beta}}$$
The value $beta= -0.05$ represents the slope for the linear regression in the plane $Deltalog-Deltalog$ and $alpha$ is the $y$ value assumed for $B=1$.
For the exponential representation we have
$$Deltalog A = alpha+betaDeltalog B iff e^frac A{A_0}=e^{alpha}e^{left(frac B{B_0}right)^{beta}}$$
edited 4 hours ago
answered 4 hours ago
gimusi
83.8k74292
83.8k74292
Yeah sure, but is there an interpretation like in the log-log plane?
– Cardinal
4 hours ago
@Cardinal Ah ok your doubt is about the not linear representation?
– gimusi
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Yeah sure, but is there an interpretation like in the log-log plane?
– Cardinal
4 hours ago
@Cardinal Ah ok your doubt is about the not linear representation?
– gimusi
4 hours ago
Yeah sure, but is there an interpretation like in the log-log plane?
– Cardinal
4 hours ago
Yeah sure, but is there an interpretation like in the log-log plane?
– Cardinal
4 hours ago
@Cardinal Ah ok your doubt is about the not linear representation?
– gimusi
4 hours ago
@Cardinal Ah ok your doubt is about the not linear representation?
– gimusi
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2995472%2finterpretation-of-change-in-log-in-regression%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password