Convexity Bound of Rankin-Selberg L-Function
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Let $f,g$ be primitive modularforms of arbitrary levels $N_1,N_2$, trivial nebentypus and same weight $k$. Let $L(fotimes g,s)=zeta(2s)sum_{ngeq1}frac{lambda_f(n)lambda_g(n)}{n^s}$ be the Rankin-Selberg L-Function where $lambda_f$ and $lambda_g$ are the respective normalized Hecke-Eigenvalues.
I'm looking for a simple upper bound of $L(fotimes g,frac12+it)$ in the level aspect which holds under general assumptions as given above. In nearly every piece of literature on subconvexity bounds (e.g. Introduction of "Rankin Selberg L-functions in the level aspect" by Kowalski, Michel, Vanderkam) there is the hint that the convexity bound ($sqrt N$ in the level aspect, $k$ in the weight aspect) is achieved by applying the Phragmén-Lindelöf principle. As far as I understood, this requires another bound of the function on the edges of the vertical strip $0<Re(s)<1$. So my questions are
- Is there an elementary proof to this problem?
- What bound can I use for $L(fotimes g, 1)$?
- How do I take care of the residue in $s=1$ for $f=overline{g}$?
convex-analysis analytic-number-theory modular-forms l-functions
New contributor
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Let $f,g$ be primitive modularforms of arbitrary levels $N_1,N_2$, trivial nebentypus and same weight $k$. Let $L(fotimes g,s)=zeta(2s)sum_{ngeq1}frac{lambda_f(n)lambda_g(n)}{n^s}$ be the Rankin-Selberg L-Function where $lambda_f$ and $lambda_g$ are the respective normalized Hecke-Eigenvalues.
I'm looking for a simple upper bound of $L(fotimes g,frac12+it)$ in the level aspect which holds under general assumptions as given above. In nearly every piece of literature on subconvexity bounds (e.g. Introduction of "Rankin Selberg L-functions in the level aspect" by Kowalski, Michel, Vanderkam) there is the hint that the convexity bound ($sqrt N$ in the level aspect, $k$ in the weight aspect) is achieved by applying the Phragmén-Lindelöf principle. As far as I understood, this requires another bound of the function on the edges of the vertical strip $0<Re(s)<1$. So my questions are
- Is there an elementary proof to this problem?
- What bound can I use for $L(fotimes g, 1)$?
- How do I take care of the residue in $s=1$ for $f=overline{g}$?
convex-analysis analytic-number-theory modular-forms l-functions
New contributor
1
I'd say : add finitely many Euler factors to $L(fotimes g, s)$ to obtain a Dirichlet series $H(s)$ with functional equation. Obtain a bound $H(1+it) = O(log^m(t))$ (in the same way you showed the PNT for $L(f,s)$ ?). Use the functional equation to obtain a bound for $H(it)$. Apply the convexity theorem. I don't know if the implied constants are effective. What the found for $L(fotimes g,frac12+it)$ would be useful for ?
– reuns
yesterday
Thanks for your comment. I use the bound as a factor for a more general result which applies not only to newforms but to arbitrary cusp forms. The readers can insert a stronger bound if they want quantitatively better results but I just need an elementarily introduced placeholder instead of a reference to an article of 30 pages about any subconvexity bound.
– Nodt Greenish
yesterday
1
By the way, $L(s,f otimes g)$ is not equal to $sum_{n = 1}^{infty} frac{lambda_f(n) lambda_g(n)}{n^s}$. Rather, it is equal (up to some Euler factors at bad primes) to this Dirichlet series times $L(2s,chi_f chi_g)$, where $chi_f, chi_g$ are the nebentypen of $f$ and $g$.
– Peter Humphries
yesterday
Alright, so I need a factor of $zeta(2s)$. Thanks for that reminder @PeterHumphries, I will watch out for that in my notation.
– Nodt Greenish
yesterday
@reuns I define $H(s)=(2pi)^{-2s}Gamma(s+k-1)Gamma(s)L(s,fotimes g)$ which allows the functional equation $H(1-s)=H(s)$ for $fneq g$. So for $L(fotimes f,s)$ I need another estimation...
– Nodt Greenish
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Let $f,g$ be primitive modularforms of arbitrary levels $N_1,N_2$, trivial nebentypus and same weight $k$. Let $L(fotimes g,s)=zeta(2s)sum_{ngeq1}frac{lambda_f(n)lambda_g(n)}{n^s}$ be the Rankin-Selberg L-Function where $lambda_f$ and $lambda_g$ are the respective normalized Hecke-Eigenvalues.
I'm looking for a simple upper bound of $L(fotimes g,frac12+it)$ in the level aspect which holds under general assumptions as given above. In nearly every piece of literature on subconvexity bounds (e.g. Introduction of "Rankin Selberg L-functions in the level aspect" by Kowalski, Michel, Vanderkam) there is the hint that the convexity bound ($sqrt N$ in the level aspect, $k$ in the weight aspect) is achieved by applying the Phragmén-Lindelöf principle. As far as I understood, this requires another bound of the function on the edges of the vertical strip $0<Re(s)<1$. So my questions are
- Is there an elementary proof to this problem?
- What bound can I use for $L(fotimes g, 1)$?
- How do I take care of the residue in $s=1$ for $f=overline{g}$?
convex-analysis analytic-number-theory modular-forms l-functions
New contributor
Let $f,g$ be primitive modularforms of arbitrary levels $N_1,N_2$, trivial nebentypus and same weight $k$. Let $L(fotimes g,s)=zeta(2s)sum_{ngeq1}frac{lambda_f(n)lambda_g(n)}{n^s}$ be the Rankin-Selberg L-Function where $lambda_f$ and $lambda_g$ are the respective normalized Hecke-Eigenvalues.
I'm looking for a simple upper bound of $L(fotimes g,frac12+it)$ in the level aspect which holds under general assumptions as given above. In nearly every piece of literature on subconvexity bounds (e.g. Introduction of "Rankin Selberg L-functions in the level aspect" by Kowalski, Michel, Vanderkam) there is the hint that the convexity bound ($sqrt N$ in the level aspect, $k$ in the weight aspect) is achieved by applying the Phragmén-Lindelöf principle. As far as I understood, this requires another bound of the function on the edges of the vertical strip $0<Re(s)<1$. So my questions are
- Is there an elementary proof to this problem?
- What bound can I use for $L(fotimes g, 1)$?
- How do I take care of the residue in $s=1$ for $f=overline{g}$?
convex-analysis analytic-number-theory modular-forms l-functions
convex-analysis analytic-number-theory modular-forms l-functions
New contributor
New contributor
edited yesterday
New contributor
asked 2 days ago
Nodt Greenish
266
266
New contributor
New contributor
1
I'd say : add finitely many Euler factors to $L(fotimes g, s)$ to obtain a Dirichlet series $H(s)$ with functional equation. Obtain a bound $H(1+it) = O(log^m(t))$ (in the same way you showed the PNT for $L(f,s)$ ?). Use the functional equation to obtain a bound for $H(it)$. Apply the convexity theorem. I don't know if the implied constants are effective. What the found for $L(fotimes g,frac12+it)$ would be useful for ?
– reuns
yesterday
Thanks for your comment. I use the bound as a factor for a more general result which applies not only to newforms but to arbitrary cusp forms. The readers can insert a stronger bound if they want quantitatively better results but I just need an elementarily introduced placeholder instead of a reference to an article of 30 pages about any subconvexity bound.
– Nodt Greenish
yesterday
1
By the way, $L(s,f otimes g)$ is not equal to $sum_{n = 1}^{infty} frac{lambda_f(n) lambda_g(n)}{n^s}$. Rather, it is equal (up to some Euler factors at bad primes) to this Dirichlet series times $L(2s,chi_f chi_g)$, where $chi_f, chi_g$ are the nebentypen of $f$ and $g$.
– Peter Humphries
yesterday
Alright, so I need a factor of $zeta(2s)$. Thanks for that reminder @PeterHumphries, I will watch out for that in my notation.
– Nodt Greenish
yesterday
@reuns I define $H(s)=(2pi)^{-2s}Gamma(s+k-1)Gamma(s)L(s,fotimes g)$ which allows the functional equation $H(1-s)=H(s)$ for $fneq g$. So for $L(fotimes f,s)$ I need another estimation...
– Nodt Greenish
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
1
I'd say : add finitely many Euler factors to $L(fotimes g, s)$ to obtain a Dirichlet series $H(s)$ with functional equation. Obtain a bound $H(1+it) = O(log^m(t))$ (in the same way you showed the PNT for $L(f,s)$ ?). Use the functional equation to obtain a bound for $H(it)$. Apply the convexity theorem. I don't know if the implied constants are effective. What the found for $L(fotimes g,frac12+it)$ would be useful for ?
– reuns
yesterday
Thanks for your comment. I use the bound as a factor for a more general result which applies not only to newforms but to arbitrary cusp forms. The readers can insert a stronger bound if they want quantitatively better results but I just need an elementarily introduced placeholder instead of a reference to an article of 30 pages about any subconvexity bound.
– Nodt Greenish
yesterday
1
By the way, $L(s,f otimes g)$ is not equal to $sum_{n = 1}^{infty} frac{lambda_f(n) lambda_g(n)}{n^s}$. Rather, it is equal (up to some Euler factors at bad primes) to this Dirichlet series times $L(2s,chi_f chi_g)$, where $chi_f, chi_g$ are the nebentypen of $f$ and $g$.
– Peter Humphries
yesterday
Alright, so I need a factor of $zeta(2s)$. Thanks for that reminder @PeterHumphries, I will watch out for that in my notation.
– Nodt Greenish
yesterday
@reuns I define $H(s)=(2pi)^{-2s}Gamma(s+k-1)Gamma(s)L(s,fotimes g)$ which allows the functional equation $H(1-s)=H(s)$ for $fneq g$. So for $L(fotimes f,s)$ I need another estimation...
– Nodt Greenish
yesterday
1
1
I'd say : add finitely many Euler factors to $L(fotimes g, s)$ to obtain a Dirichlet series $H(s)$ with functional equation. Obtain a bound $H(1+it) = O(log^m(t))$ (in the same way you showed the PNT for $L(f,s)$ ?). Use the functional equation to obtain a bound for $H(it)$. Apply the convexity theorem. I don't know if the implied constants are effective. What the found for $L(fotimes g,frac12+it)$ would be useful for ?
– reuns
yesterday
I'd say : add finitely many Euler factors to $L(fotimes g, s)$ to obtain a Dirichlet series $H(s)$ with functional equation. Obtain a bound $H(1+it) = O(log^m(t))$ (in the same way you showed the PNT for $L(f,s)$ ?). Use the functional equation to obtain a bound for $H(it)$. Apply the convexity theorem. I don't know if the implied constants are effective. What the found for $L(fotimes g,frac12+it)$ would be useful for ?
– reuns
yesterday
Thanks for your comment. I use the bound as a factor for a more general result which applies not only to newforms but to arbitrary cusp forms. The readers can insert a stronger bound if they want quantitatively better results but I just need an elementarily introduced placeholder instead of a reference to an article of 30 pages about any subconvexity bound.
– Nodt Greenish
yesterday
Thanks for your comment. I use the bound as a factor for a more general result which applies not only to newforms but to arbitrary cusp forms. The readers can insert a stronger bound if they want quantitatively better results but I just need an elementarily introduced placeholder instead of a reference to an article of 30 pages about any subconvexity bound.
– Nodt Greenish
yesterday
1
1
By the way, $L(s,f otimes g)$ is not equal to $sum_{n = 1}^{infty} frac{lambda_f(n) lambda_g(n)}{n^s}$. Rather, it is equal (up to some Euler factors at bad primes) to this Dirichlet series times $L(2s,chi_f chi_g)$, where $chi_f, chi_g$ are the nebentypen of $f$ and $g$.
– Peter Humphries
yesterday
By the way, $L(s,f otimes g)$ is not equal to $sum_{n = 1}^{infty} frac{lambda_f(n) lambda_g(n)}{n^s}$. Rather, it is equal (up to some Euler factors at bad primes) to this Dirichlet series times $L(2s,chi_f chi_g)$, where $chi_f, chi_g$ are the nebentypen of $f$ and $g$.
– Peter Humphries
yesterday
Alright, so I need a factor of $zeta(2s)$. Thanks for that reminder @PeterHumphries, I will watch out for that in my notation.
– Nodt Greenish
yesterday
Alright, so I need a factor of $zeta(2s)$. Thanks for that reminder @PeterHumphries, I will watch out for that in my notation.
– Nodt Greenish
yesterday
@reuns I define $H(s)=(2pi)^{-2s}Gamma(s+k-1)Gamma(s)L(s,fotimes g)$ which allows the functional equation $H(1-s)=H(s)$ for $fneq g$. So for $L(fotimes f,s)$ I need another estimation...
– Nodt Greenish
yesterday
@reuns I define $H(s)=(2pi)^{-2s}Gamma(s+k-1)Gamma(s)L(s,fotimes g)$ which allows the functional equation $H(1-s)=H(s)$ for $fneq g$. So for $L(fotimes f,s)$ I need another estimation...
– Nodt Greenish
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
To provide a brief answer which can be found in "Analytic Number Theory" of Iwaniec and Kowalsky:
We use the absolute convergence of $L(f,s)$ in $sigma>1$ (or the bound $|lambda(n)|leq tau(n)$), the functional equation, Stirling's estimate for the gamma function and the Phragmen-Lindelöf convexity principle.
All mentioned formulas can be found in the book as well.
New contributor
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
To provide a brief answer which can be found in "Analytic Number Theory" of Iwaniec and Kowalsky:
We use the absolute convergence of $L(f,s)$ in $sigma>1$ (or the bound $|lambda(n)|leq tau(n)$), the functional equation, Stirling's estimate for the gamma function and the Phragmen-Lindelöf convexity principle.
All mentioned formulas can be found in the book as well.
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
To provide a brief answer which can be found in "Analytic Number Theory" of Iwaniec and Kowalsky:
We use the absolute convergence of $L(f,s)$ in $sigma>1$ (or the bound $|lambda(n)|leq tau(n)$), the functional equation, Stirling's estimate for the gamma function and the Phragmen-Lindelöf convexity principle.
All mentioned formulas can be found in the book as well.
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
To provide a brief answer which can be found in "Analytic Number Theory" of Iwaniec and Kowalsky:
We use the absolute convergence of $L(f,s)$ in $sigma>1$ (or the bound $|lambda(n)|leq tau(n)$), the functional equation, Stirling's estimate for the gamma function and the Phragmen-Lindelöf convexity principle.
All mentioned formulas can be found in the book as well.
New contributor
To provide a brief answer which can be found in "Analytic Number Theory" of Iwaniec and Kowalsky:
We use the absolute convergence of $L(f,s)$ in $sigma>1$ (or the bound $|lambda(n)|leq tau(n)$), the functional equation, Stirling's estimate for the gamma function and the Phragmen-Lindelöf convexity principle.
All mentioned formulas can be found in the book as well.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 2 hours ago
Nodt Greenish
266
266
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Nodt Greenish is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Nodt Greenish is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Nodt Greenish is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Nodt Greenish is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2994407%2fconvexity-bound-of-rankin-selberg-l-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
I'd say : add finitely many Euler factors to $L(fotimes g, s)$ to obtain a Dirichlet series $H(s)$ with functional equation. Obtain a bound $H(1+it) = O(log^m(t))$ (in the same way you showed the PNT for $L(f,s)$ ?). Use the functional equation to obtain a bound for $H(it)$. Apply the convexity theorem. I don't know if the implied constants are effective. What the found for $L(fotimes g,frac12+it)$ would be useful for ?
– reuns
yesterday
Thanks for your comment. I use the bound as a factor for a more general result which applies not only to newforms but to arbitrary cusp forms. The readers can insert a stronger bound if they want quantitatively better results but I just need an elementarily introduced placeholder instead of a reference to an article of 30 pages about any subconvexity bound.
– Nodt Greenish
yesterday
1
By the way, $L(s,f otimes g)$ is not equal to $sum_{n = 1}^{infty} frac{lambda_f(n) lambda_g(n)}{n^s}$. Rather, it is equal (up to some Euler factors at bad primes) to this Dirichlet series times $L(2s,chi_f chi_g)$, where $chi_f, chi_g$ are the nebentypen of $f$ and $g$.
– Peter Humphries
yesterday
Alright, so I need a factor of $zeta(2s)$. Thanks for that reminder @PeterHumphries, I will watch out for that in my notation.
– Nodt Greenish
yesterday
@reuns I define $H(s)=(2pi)^{-2s}Gamma(s+k-1)Gamma(s)L(s,fotimes g)$ which allows the functional equation $H(1-s)=H(s)$ for $fneq g$. So for $L(fotimes f,s)$ I need another estimation...
– Nodt Greenish
yesterday