Convexity Bound of Rankin-Selberg L-Function











up vote
4
down vote

favorite












Let $f,g$ be primitive modularforms of arbitrary levels $N_1,N_2$, trivial nebentypus and same weight $k$. Let $L(fotimes g,s)=zeta(2s)sum_{ngeq1}frac{lambda_f(n)lambda_g(n)}{n^s}$ be the Rankin-Selberg L-Function where $lambda_f$ and $lambda_g$ are the respective normalized Hecke-Eigenvalues.



I'm looking for a simple upper bound of $L(fotimes g,frac12+it)$ in the level aspect which holds under general assumptions as given above. In nearly every piece of literature on subconvexity bounds (e.g. Introduction of "Rankin Selberg L-functions in the level aspect" by Kowalski, Michel, Vanderkam) there is the hint that the convexity bound ($sqrt N$ in the level aspect, $k$ in the weight aspect) is achieved by applying the Phragmén-Lindelöf principle. As far as I understood, this requires another bound of the function on the edges of the vertical strip $0<Re(s)<1$. So my questions are




  • Is there an elementary proof to this problem?

  • What bound can I use for $L(fotimes g, 1)$?

  • How do I take care of the residue in $s=1$ for $f=overline{g}$?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1




    I'd say : add finitely many Euler factors to $L(fotimes g, s)$ to obtain a Dirichlet series $H(s)$ with functional equation. Obtain a bound $H(1+it) = O(log^m(t))$ (in the same way you showed the PNT for $L(f,s)$ ?). Use the functional equation to obtain a bound for $H(it)$. Apply the convexity theorem. I don't know if the implied constants are effective. What the found for $L(fotimes g,frac12+it)$ would be useful for ?
    – reuns
    yesterday












  • Thanks for your comment. I use the bound as a factor for a more general result which applies not only to newforms but to arbitrary cusp forms. The readers can insert a stronger bound if they want quantitatively better results but I just need an elementarily introduced placeholder instead of a reference to an article of 30 pages about any subconvexity bound.
    – Nodt Greenish
    yesterday






  • 1




    By the way, $L(s,f otimes g)$ is not equal to $sum_{n = 1}^{infty} frac{lambda_f(n) lambda_g(n)}{n^s}$. Rather, it is equal (up to some Euler factors at bad primes) to this Dirichlet series times $L(2s,chi_f chi_g)$, where $chi_f, chi_g$ are the nebentypen of $f$ and $g$.
    – Peter Humphries
    yesterday










  • Alright, so I need a factor of $zeta(2s)$. Thanks for that reminder @PeterHumphries, I will watch out for that in my notation.
    – Nodt Greenish
    yesterday










  • @reuns I define $H(s)=(2pi)^{-2s}Gamma(s+k-1)Gamma(s)L(s,fotimes g)$ which allows the functional equation $H(1-s)=H(s)$ for $fneq g$. So for $L(fotimes f,s)$ I need another estimation...
    – Nodt Greenish
    yesterday















up vote
4
down vote

favorite












Let $f,g$ be primitive modularforms of arbitrary levels $N_1,N_2$, trivial nebentypus and same weight $k$. Let $L(fotimes g,s)=zeta(2s)sum_{ngeq1}frac{lambda_f(n)lambda_g(n)}{n^s}$ be the Rankin-Selberg L-Function where $lambda_f$ and $lambda_g$ are the respective normalized Hecke-Eigenvalues.



I'm looking for a simple upper bound of $L(fotimes g,frac12+it)$ in the level aspect which holds under general assumptions as given above. In nearly every piece of literature on subconvexity bounds (e.g. Introduction of "Rankin Selberg L-functions in the level aspect" by Kowalski, Michel, Vanderkam) there is the hint that the convexity bound ($sqrt N$ in the level aspect, $k$ in the weight aspect) is achieved by applying the Phragmén-Lindelöf principle. As far as I understood, this requires another bound of the function on the edges of the vertical strip $0<Re(s)<1$. So my questions are




  • Is there an elementary proof to this problem?

  • What bound can I use for $L(fotimes g, 1)$?

  • How do I take care of the residue in $s=1$ for $f=overline{g}$?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1




    I'd say : add finitely many Euler factors to $L(fotimes g, s)$ to obtain a Dirichlet series $H(s)$ with functional equation. Obtain a bound $H(1+it) = O(log^m(t))$ (in the same way you showed the PNT for $L(f,s)$ ?). Use the functional equation to obtain a bound for $H(it)$. Apply the convexity theorem. I don't know if the implied constants are effective. What the found for $L(fotimes g,frac12+it)$ would be useful for ?
    – reuns
    yesterday












  • Thanks for your comment. I use the bound as a factor for a more general result which applies not only to newforms but to arbitrary cusp forms. The readers can insert a stronger bound if they want quantitatively better results but I just need an elementarily introduced placeholder instead of a reference to an article of 30 pages about any subconvexity bound.
    – Nodt Greenish
    yesterday






  • 1




    By the way, $L(s,f otimes g)$ is not equal to $sum_{n = 1}^{infty} frac{lambda_f(n) lambda_g(n)}{n^s}$. Rather, it is equal (up to some Euler factors at bad primes) to this Dirichlet series times $L(2s,chi_f chi_g)$, where $chi_f, chi_g$ are the nebentypen of $f$ and $g$.
    – Peter Humphries
    yesterday










  • Alright, so I need a factor of $zeta(2s)$. Thanks for that reminder @PeterHumphries, I will watch out for that in my notation.
    – Nodt Greenish
    yesterday










  • @reuns I define $H(s)=(2pi)^{-2s}Gamma(s+k-1)Gamma(s)L(s,fotimes g)$ which allows the functional equation $H(1-s)=H(s)$ for $fneq g$. So for $L(fotimes f,s)$ I need another estimation...
    – Nodt Greenish
    yesterday













up vote
4
down vote

favorite









up vote
4
down vote

favorite











Let $f,g$ be primitive modularforms of arbitrary levels $N_1,N_2$, trivial nebentypus and same weight $k$. Let $L(fotimes g,s)=zeta(2s)sum_{ngeq1}frac{lambda_f(n)lambda_g(n)}{n^s}$ be the Rankin-Selberg L-Function where $lambda_f$ and $lambda_g$ are the respective normalized Hecke-Eigenvalues.



I'm looking for a simple upper bound of $L(fotimes g,frac12+it)$ in the level aspect which holds under general assumptions as given above. In nearly every piece of literature on subconvexity bounds (e.g. Introduction of "Rankin Selberg L-functions in the level aspect" by Kowalski, Michel, Vanderkam) there is the hint that the convexity bound ($sqrt N$ in the level aspect, $k$ in the weight aspect) is achieved by applying the Phragmén-Lindelöf principle. As far as I understood, this requires another bound of the function on the edges of the vertical strip $0<Re(s)<1$. So my questions are




  • Is there an elementary proof to this problem?

  • What bound can I use for $L(fotimes g, 1)$?

  • How do I take care of the residue in $s=1$ for $f=overline{g}$?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











Let $f,g$ be primitive modularforms of arbitrary levels $N_1,N_2$, trivial nebentypus and same weight $k$. Let $L(fotimes g,s)=zeta(2s)sum_{ngeq1}frac{lambda_f(n)lambda_g(n)}{n^s}$ be the Rankin-Selberg L-Function where $lambda_f$ and $lambda_g$ are the respective normalized Hecke-Eigenvalues.



I'm looking for a simple upper bound of $L(fotimes g,frac12+it)$ in the level aspect which holds under general assumptions as given above. In nearly every piece of literature on subconvexity bounds (e.g. Introduction of "Rankin Selberg L-functions in the level aspect" by Kowalski, Michel, Vanderkam) there is the hint that the convexity bound ($sqrt N$ in the level aspect, $k$ in the weight aspect) is achieved by applying the Phragmén-Lindelöf principle. As far as I understood, this requires another bound of the function on the edges of the vertical strip $0<Re(s)<1$. So my questions are




  • Is there an elementary proof to this problem?

  • What bound can I use for $L(fotimes g, 1)$?

  • How do I take care of the residue in $s=1$ for $f=overline{g}$?







convex-analysis analytic-number-theory modular-forms l-functions






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited yesterday





















New contributor




Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









Nodt Greenish

266




266




New contributor




Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1




    I'd say : add finitely many Euler factors to $L(fotimes g, s)$ to obtain a Dirichlet series $H(s)$ with functional equation. Obtain a bound $H(1+it) = O(log^m(t))$ (in the same way you showed the PNT for $L(f,s)$ ?). Use the functional equation to obtain a bound for $H(it)$. Apply the convexity theorem. I don't know if the implied constants are effective. What the found for $L(fotimes g,frac12+it)$ would be useful for ?
    – reuns
    yesterday












  • Thanks for your comment. I use the bound as a factor for a more general result which applies not only to newforms but to arbitrary cusp forms. The readers can insert a stronger bound if they want quantitatively better results but I just need an elementarily introduced placeholder instead of a reference to an article of 30 pages about any subconvexity bound.
    – Nodt Greenish
    yesterday






  • 1




    By the way, $L(s,f otimes g)$ is not equal to $sum_{n = 1}^{infty} frac{lambda_f(n) lambda_g(n)}{n^s}$. Rather, it is equal (up to some Euler factors at bad primes) to this Dirichlet series times $L(2s,chi_f chi_g)$, where $chi_f, chi_g$ are the nebentypen of $f$ and $g$.
    – Peter Humphries
    yesterday










  • Alright, so I need a factor of $zeta(2s)$. Thanks for that reminder @PeterHumphries, I will watch out for that in my notation.
    – Nodt Greenish
    yesterday










  • @reuns I define $H(s)=(2pi)^{-2s}Gamma(s+k-1)Gamma(s)L(s,fotimes g)$ which allows the functional equation $H(1-s)=H(s)$ for $fneq g$. So for $L(fotimes f,s)$ I need another estimation...
    – Nodt Greenish
    yesterday














  • 1




    I'd say : add finitely many Euler factors to $L(fotimes g, s)$ to obtain a Dirichlet series $H(s)$ with functional equation. Obtain a bound $H(1+it) = O(log^m(t))$ (in the same way you showed the PNT for $L(f,s)$ ?). Use the functional equation to obtain a bound for $H(it)$. Apply the convexity theorem. I don't know if the implied constants are effective. What the found for $L(fotimes g,frac12+it)$ would be useful for ?
    – reuns
    yesterday












  • Thanks for your comment. I use the bound as a factor for a more general result which applies not only to newforms but to arbitrary cusp forms. The readers can insert a stronger bound if they want quantitatively better results but I just need an elementarily introduced placeholder instead of a reference to an article of 30 pages about any subconvexity bound.
    – Nodt Greenish
    yesterday






  • 1




    By the way, $L(s,f otimes g)$ is not equal to $sum_{n = 1}^{infty} frac{lambda_f(n) lambda_g(n)}{n^s}$. Rather, it is equal (up to some Euler factors at bad primes) to this Dirichlet series times $L(2s,chi_f chi_g)$, where $chi_f, chi_g$ are the nebentypen of $f$ and $g$.
    – Peter Humphries
    yesterday










  • Alright, so I need a factor of $zeta(2s)$. Thanks for that reminder @PeterHumphries, I will watch out for that in my notation.
    – Nodt Greenish
    yesterday










  • @reuns I define $H(s)=(2pi)^{-2s}Gamma(s+k-1)Gamma(s)L(s,fotimes g)$ which allows the functional equation $H(1-s)=H(s)$ for $fneq g$. So for $L(fotimes f,s)$ I need another estimation...
    – Nodt Greenish
    yesterday








1




1




I'd say : add finitely many Euler factors to $L(fotimes g, s)$ to obtain a Dirichlet series $H(s)$ with functional equation. Obtain a bound $H(1+it) = O(log^m(t))$ (in the same way you showed the PNT for $L(f,s)$ ?). Use the functional equation to obtain a bound for $H(it)$. Apply the convexity theorem. I don't know if the implied constants are effective. What the found for $L(fotimes g,frac12+it)$ would be useful for ?
– reuns
yesterday






I'd say : add finitely many Euler factors to $L(fotimes g, s)$ to obtain a Dirichlet series $H(s)$ with functional equation. Obtain a bound $H(1+it) = O(log^m(t))$ (in the same way you showed the PNT for $L(f,s)$ ?). Use the functional equation to obtain a bound for $H(it)$. Apply the convexity theorem. I don't know if the implied constants are effective. What the found for $L(fotimes g,frac12+it)$ would be useful for ?
– reuns
yesterday














Thanks for your comment. I use the bound as a factor for a more general result which applies not only to newforms but to arbitrary cusp forms. The readers can insert a stronger bound if they want quantitatively better results but I just need an elementarily introduced placeholder instead of a reference to an article of 30 pages about any subconvexity bound.
– Nodt Greenish
yesterday




Thanks for your comment. I use the bound as a factor for a more general result which applies not only to newforms but to arbitrary cusp forms. The readers can insert a stronger bound if they want quantitatively better results but I just need an elementarily introduced placeholder instead of a reference to an article of 30 pages about any subconvexity bound.
– Nodt Greenish
yesterday




1




1




By the way, $L(s,f otimes g)$ is not equal to $sum_{n = 1}^{infty} frac{lambda_f(n) lambda_g(n)}{n^s}$. Rather, it is equal (up to some Euler factors at bad primes) to this Dirichlet series times $L(2s,chi_f chi_g)$, where $chi_f, chi_g$ are the nebentypen of $f$ and $g$.
– Peter Humphries
yesterday




By the way, $L(s,f otimes g)$ is not equal to $sum_{n = 1}^{infty} frac{lambda_f(n) lambda_g(n)}{n^s}$. Rather, it is equal (up to some Euler factors at bad primes) to this Dirichlet series times $L(2s,chi_f chi_g)$, where $chi_f, chi_g$ are the nebentypen of $f$ and $g$.
– Peter Humphries
yesterday












Alright, so I need a factor of $zeta(2s)$. Thanks for that reminder @PeterHumphries, I will watch out for that in my notation.
– Nodt Greenish
yesterday




Alright, so I need a factor of $zeta(2s)$. Thanks for that reminder @PeterHumphries, I will watch out for that in my notation.
– Nodt Greenish
yesterday












@reuns I define $H(s)=(2pi)^{-2s}Gamma(s+k-1)Gamma(s)L(s,fotimes g)$ which allows the functional equation $H(1-s)=H(s)$ for $fneq g$. So for $L(fotimes f,s)$ I need another estimation...
– Nodt Greenish
yesterday




@reuns I define $H(s)=(2pi)^{-2s}Gamma(s+k-1)Gamma(s)L(s,fotimes g)$ which allows the functional equation $H(1-s)=H(s)$ for $fneq g$. So for $L(fotimes f,s)$ I need another estimation...
– Nodt Greenish
yesterday










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













To provide a brief answer which can be found in "Analytic Number Theory" of Iwaniec and Kowalsky:



We use the absolute convergence of $L(f,s)$ in $sigma>1$ (or the bound $|lambda(n)|leq tau(n)$), the functional equation, Stirling's estimate for the gamma function and the Phragmen-Lindelöf convexity principle.



All mentioned formulas can be found in the book as well.






share|cite|improve this answer








New contributor




Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    Nodt Greenish is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2994407%2fconvexity-bound-of-rankin-selberg-l-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest
































    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    To provide a brief answer which can be found in "Analytic Number Theory" of Iwaniec and Kowalsky:



    We use the absolute convergence of $L(f,s)$ in $sigma>1$ (or the bound $|lambda(n)|leq tau(n)$), the functional equation, Stirling's estimate for the gamma function and the Phragmen-Lindelöf convexity principle.



    All mentioned formulas can be found in the book as well.






    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      up vote
      0
      down vote













      To provide a brief answer which can be found in "Analytic Number Theory" of Iwaniec and Kowalsky:



      We use the absolute convergence of $L(f,s)$ in $sigma>1$ (or the bound $|lambda(n)|leq tau(n)$), the functional equation, Stirling's estimate for the gamma function and the Phragmen-Lindelöf convexity principle.



      All mentioned formulas can be found in the book as well.






      share|cite|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        To provide a brief answer which can be found in "Analytic Number Theory" of Iwaniec and Kowalsky:



        We use the absolute convergence of $L(f,s)$ in $sigma>1$ (or the bound $|lambda(n)|leq tau(n)$), the functional equation, Stirling's estimate for the gamma function and the Phragmen-Lindelöf convexity principle.



        All mentioned formulas can be found in the book as well.






        share|cite|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        To provide a brief answer which can be found in "Analytic Number Theory" of Iwaniec and Kowalsky:



        We use the absolute convergence of $L(f,s)$ in $sigma>1$ (or the bound $|lambda(n)|leq tau(n)$), the functional equation, Stirling's estimate for the gamma function and the Phragmen-Lindelöf convexity principle.



        All mentioned formulas can be found in the book as well.







        share|cite|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer






        New contributor




        Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered 2 hours ago









        Nodt Greenish

        266




        266




        New contributor




        Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






















            Nodt Greenish is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            Nodt Greenish is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            Nodt Greenish is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Nodt Greenish is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.















             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2994407%2fconvexity-bound-of-rankin-selberg-l-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest




















































































            Popular posts from this blog

            How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

            Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

            Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents