How to prove $P(X_1=x_1,…,X_n=x_n, X=X)=P(X_1=x_1)cdot …cdot P(X_n=x_n)$?











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Suppose $n>1$ and $X_1,X_2,...,X_n$ are $n$ independent random variables (say with expotentional distribution) with $X=sum_{i=1}^n X_n$.



Then $X_1,X_2,...,X_n,X$ are mutually independent random variables.



Thus according to the theorem (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_probability_distribution#Additional_properties) $P(X_1=x_1,...,X_n=x_n, X=X)=P(X_1=x_1)cdot ...cdot P(X_n=x_n)cdot P(X=x)$.



However, the answer was $P(X_1=x_1,...,X_n=x_n, X=X)=P(X_1=x_1)cdot ...cdot P(X_n=x_n)$.



How could that be?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • If $n=1$, it should be obvious that there is a dependence
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    5 hours ago










  • $X$ is determined by the others. Also ${X=X}$ is an event with probability $1$, so the intersection of this event with any event $A$ has same the probability as $A$.
    – Fnacool
    5 hours ago










  • @HagenvonEitzen But for $n>1$, $X$ and $X_i$ all have different probability distribution.
    – user9976437
    5 hours ago










  • @Fnacool How to show they are dependent? And how to calculate this joint distribution? I'm not quite sure how to do this.
    – user9976437
    5 hours ago










  • Do you know what dependent means?
    – Mees de Vries
    4 hours ago















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Suppose $n>1$ and $X_1,X_2,...,X_n$ are $n$ independent random variables (say with expotentional distribution) with $X=sum_{i=1}^n X_n$.



Then $X_1,X_2,...,X_n,X$ are mutually independent random variables.



Thus according to the theorem (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_probability_distribution#Additional_properties) $P(X_1=x_1,...,X_n=x_n, X=X)=P(X_1=x_1)cdot ...cdot P(X_n=x_n)cdot P(X=x)$.



However, the answer was $P(X_1=x_1,...,X_n=x_n, X=X)=P(X_1=x_1)cdot ...cdot P(X_n=x_n)$.



How could that be?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • If $n=1$, it should be obvious that there is a dependence
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    5 hours ago










  • $X$ is determined by the others. Also ${X=X}$ is an event with probability $1$, so the intersection of this event with any event $A$ has same the probability as $A$.
    – Fnacool
    5 hours ago










  • @HagenvonEitzen But for $n>1$, $X$ and $X_i$ all have different probability distribution.
    – user9976437
    5 hours ago










  • @Fnacool How to show they are dependent? And how to calculate this joint distribution? I'm not quite sure how to do this.
    – user9976437
    5 hours ago










  • Do you know what dependent means?
    – Mees de Vries
    4 hours ago













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Suppose $n>1$ and $X_1,X_2,...,X_n$ are $n$ independent random variables (say with expotentional distribution) with $X=sum_{i=1}^n X_n$.



Then $X_1,X_2,...,X_n,X$ are mutually independent random variables.



Thus according to the theorem (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_probability_distribution#Additional_properties) $P(X_1=x_1,...,X_n=x_n, X=X)=P(X_1=x_1)cdot ...cdot P(X_n=x_n)cdot P(X=x)$.



However, the answer was $P(X_1=x_1,...,X_n=x_n, X=X)=P(X_1=x_1)cdot ...cdot P(X_n=x_n)$.



How could that be?










share|cite|improve this question















Suppose $n>1$ and $X_1,X_2,...,X_n$ are $n$ independent random variables (say with expotentional distribution) with $X=sum_{i=1}^n X_n$.



Then $X_1,X_2,...,X_n,X$ are mutually independent random variables.



Thus according to the theorem (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_probability_distribution#Additional_properties) $P(X_1=x_1,...,X_n=x_n, X=X)=P(X_1=x_1)cdot ...cdot P(X_n=x_n)cdot P(X=x)$.



However, the answer was $P(X_1=x_1,...,X_n=x_n, X=X)=P(X_1=x_1)cdot ...cdot P(X_n=x_n)$.



How could that be?







probability statistics independence






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 4 hours ago

























asked 5 hours ago









user9976437

466




466












  • If $n=1$, it should be obvious that there is a dependence
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    5 hours ago










  • $X$ is determined by the others. Also ${X=X}$ is an event with probability $1$, so the intersection of this event with any event $A$ has same the probability as $A$.
    – Fnacool
    5 hours ago










  • @HagenvonEitzen But for $n>1$, $X$ and $X_i$ all have different probability distribution.
    – user9976437
    5 hours ago










  • @Fnacool How to show they are dependent? And how to calculate this joint distribution? I'm not quite sure how to do this.
    – user9976437
    5 hours ago










  • Do you know what dependent means?
    – Mees de Vries
    4 hours ago


















  • If $n=1$, it should be obvious that there is a dependence
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    5 hours ago










  • $X$ is determined by the others. Also ${X=X}$ is an event with probability $1$, so the intersection of this event with any event $A$ has same the probability as $A$.
    – Fnacool
    5 hours ago










  • @HagenvonEitzen But for $n>1$, $X$ and $X_i$ all have different probability distribution.
    – user9976437
    5 hours ago










  • @Fnacool How to show they are dependent? And how to calculate this joint distribution? I'm not quite sure how to do this.
    – user9976437
    5 hours ago










  • Do you know what dependent means?
    – Mees de Vries
    4 hours ago
















If $n=1$, it should be obvious that there is a dependence
– Hagen von Eitzen
5 hours ago




If $n=1$, it should be obvious that there is a dependence
– Hagen von Eitzen
5 hours ago












$X$ is determined by the others. Also ${X=X}$ is an event with probability $1$, so the intersection of this event with any event $A$ has same the probability as $A$.
– Fnacool
5 hours ago




$X$ is determined by the others. Also ${X=X}$ is an event with probability $1$, so the intersection of this event with any event $A$ has same the probability as $A$.
– Fnacool
5 hours ago












@HagenvonEitzen But for $n>1$, $X$ and $X_i$ all have different probability distribution.
– user9976437
5 hours ago




@HagenvonEitzen But for $n>1$, $X$ and $X_i$ all have different probability distribution.
– user9976437
5 hours ago












@Fnacool How to show they are dependent? And how to calculate this joint distribution? I'm not quite sure how to do this.
– user9976437
5 hours ago




@Fnacool How to show they are dependent? And how to calculate this joint distribution? I'm not quite sure how to do this.
– user9976437
5 hours ago












Do you know what dependent means?
– Mees de Vries
4 hours ago




Do you know what dependent means?
– Mees de Vries
4 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













Random variable X is dependent on the other random variables.



$because$ Take an example, Suppose $X_i = i forall iin{1,2,...,n}$.Then we can completely tell whether for a particular n-dimensional vector $x, X=x$ or not.



$therefore$ The random variable X is not independent to other random variables,however, the result is true for $X_i's$ separately,i.e. $$P(X_1=x_1,X_2=x_2,...,X_n=x_n) = prod_{i=1}^nP(X_i=x_i)$$



Hope it helps:)






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2995471%2fhow-to-prove-px-1-x-1-x-n-x-n-x-x-px-1-x-1-cdot-cdot-px-n-x-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest
































    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Random variable X is dependent on the other random variables.



    $because$ Take an example, Suppose $X_i = i forall iin{1,2,...,n}$.Then we can completely tell whether for a particular n-dimensional vector $x, X=x$ or not.



    $therefore$ The random variable X is not independent to other random variables,however, the result is true for $X_i's$ separately,i.e. $$P(X_1=x_1,X_2=x_2,...,X_n=x_n) = prod_{i=1}^nP(X_i=x_i)$$



    Hope it helps:)






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      Random variable X is dependent on the other random variables.



      $because$ Take an example, Suppose $X_i = i forall iin{1,2,...,n}$.Then we can completely tell whether for a particular n-dimensional vector $x, X=x$ or not.



      $therefore$ The random variable X is not independent to other random variables,however, the result is true for $X_i's$ separately,i.e. $$P(X_1=x_1,X_2=x_2,...,X_n=x_n) = prod_{i=1}^nP(X_i=x_i)$$



      Hope it helps:)






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        Random variable X is dependent on the other random variables.



        $because$ Take an example, Suppose $X_i = i forall iin{1,2,...,n}$.Then we can completely tell whether for a particular n-dimensional vector $x, X=x$ or not.



        $therefore$ The random variable X is not independent to other random variables,however, the result is true for $X_i's$ separately,i.e. $$P(X_1=x_1,X_2=x_2,...,X_n=x_n) = prod_{i=1}^nP(X_i=x_i)$$



        Hope it helps:)






        share|cite|improve this answer












        Random variable X is dependent on the other random variables.



        $because$ Take an example, Suppose $X_i = i forall iin{1,2,...,n}$.Then we can completely tell whether for a particular n-dimensional vector $x, X=x$ or not.



        $therefore$ The random variable X is not independent to other random variables,however, the result is true for $X_i's$ separately,i.e. $$P(X_1=x_1,X_2=x_2,...,X_n=x_n) = prod_{i=1}^nP(X_i=x_i)$$



        Hope it helps:)







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 4 hours ago









        Crazy for maths

        1324




        1324






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2995471%2fhow-to-prove-px-1-x-1-x-n-x-n-x-x-px-1-x-1-cdot-cdot-px-n-x-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest




















































































            Popular posts from this blog

            How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

            Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

            Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?