The 3 different equals
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
What is the difference between =
, ==
, and ===
?
I think using one equal sign is to declare a variable while two equal signs is for a comparison condition and lastly three equal signs is for comparing values of declared variables.
php comparison operators
add a comment |
What is the difference between =
, ==
, and ===
?
I think using one equal sign is to declare a variable while two equal signs is for a comparison condition and lastly three equal signs is for comparing values of declared variables.
php comparison operators
check out the example ... I have posted it would clarify more things ..
– InfantPro'Aravind'
Jan 14 '10 at 10:55
1
For advanced PHP users, knowing the difference between == and === and asking themself "is it faster to compare with == or with === when I'm sure that both the operands are the same type?", please look at my benchmark script below.
– lucaferrario
Jul 8 '13 at 14:04
@Strawberry I feel the question's tag should also include the javascript tag since it also applies to that language.
– Funk Forty Niner
Jun 11 '16 at 18:35
(Update): I have added the javascript tag in an edit, since there have been quite a few questions where people were using=
in javascript. That doesn't only apply to PHP but other languages also.
– Funk Forty Niner
Jun 11 '16 at 19:09
I went ahead and deleted the JavaScript tag: all answers here are only about PHP (except the latest which is very weak), there are differences between how the languages handle it, and there is already a similar de facto canonical JavaScript question (Which equals operator (== vs ===) should be used in JavaScript comparisons?).
– JJJ
May 16 '18 at 10:34
add a comment |
What is the difference between =
, ==
, and ===
?
I think using one equal sign is to declare a variable while two equal signs is for a comparison condition and lastly three equal signs is for comparing values of declared variables.
php comparison operators
What is the difference between =
, ==
, and ===
?
I think using one equal sign is to declare a variable while two equal signs is for a comparison condition and lastly three equal signs is for comparing values of declared variables.
php comparison operators
php comparison operators
edited May 16 '18 at 6:58
JJJ
29.3k147693
29.3k147693
asked Jan 14 '10 at 10:38
StrawberryStrawberry
24.3k48127182
24.3k48127182
check out the example ... I have posted it would clarify more things ..
– InfantPro'Aravind'
Jan 14 '10 at 10:55
1
For advanced PHP users, knowing the difference between == and === and asking themself "is it faster to compare with == or with === when I'm sure that both the operands are the same type?", please look at my benchmark script below.
– lucaferrario
Jul 8 '13 at 14:04
@Strawberry I feel the question's tag should also include the javascript tag since it also applies to that language.
– Funk Forty Niner
Jun 11 '16 at 18:35
(Update): I have added the javascript tag in an edit, since there have been quite a few questions where people were using=
in javascript. That doesn't only apply to PHP but other languages also.
– Funk Forty Niner
Jun 11 '16 at 19:09
I went ahead and deleted the JavaScript tag: all answers here are only about PHP (except the latest which is very weak), there are differences between how the languages handle it, and there is already a similar de facto canonical JavaScript question (Which equals operator (== vs ===) should be used in JavaScript comparisons?).
– JJJ
May 16 '18 at 10:34
add a comment |
check out the example ... I have posted it would clarify more things ..
– InfantPro'Aravind'
Jan 14 '10 at 10:55
1
For advanced PHP users, knowing the difference between == and === and asking themself "is it faster to compare with == or with === when I'm sure that both the operands are the same type?", please look at my benchmark script below.
– lucaferrario
Jul 8 '13 at 14:04
@Strawberry I feel the question's tag should also include the javascript tag since it also applies to that language.
– Funk Forty Niner
Jun 11 '16 at 18:35
(Update): I have added the javascript tag in an edit, since there have been quite a few questions where people were using=
in javascript. That doesn't only apply to PHP but other languages also.
– Funk Forty Niner
Jun 11 '16 at 19:09
I went ahead and deleted the JavaScript tag: all answers here are only about PHP (except the latest which is very weak), there are differences between how the languages handle it, and there is already a similar de facto canonical JavaScript question (Which equals operator (== vs ===) should be used in JavaScript comparisons?).
– JJJ
May 16 '18 at 10:34
check out the example ... I have posted it would clarify more things ..
– InfantPro'Aravind'
Jan 14 '10 at 10:55
check out the example ... I have posted it would clarify more things ..
– InfantPro'Aravind'
Jan 14 '10 at 10:55
1
1
For advanced PHP users, knowing the difference between == and === and asking themself "is it faster to compare with == or with === when I'm sure that both the operands are the same type?", please look at my benchmark script below.
– lucaferrario
Jul 8 '13 at 14:04
For advanced PHP users, knowing the difference between == and === and asking themself "is it faster to compare with == or with === when I'm sure that both the operands are the same type?", please look at my benchmark script below.
– lucaferrario
Jul 8 '13 at 14:04
@Strawberry I feel the question's tag should also include the javascript tag since it also applies to that language.
– Funk Forty Niner
Jun 11 '16 at 18:35
@Strawberry I feel the question's tag should also include the javascript tag since it also applies to that language.
– Funk Forty Niner
Jun 11 '16 at 18:35
(Update): I have added the javascript tag in an edit, since there have been quite a few questions where people were using
=
in javascript. That doesn't only apply to PHP but other languages also.– Funk Forty Niner
Jun 11 '16 at 19:09
(Update): I have added the javascript tag in an edit, since there have been quite a few questions where people were using
=
in javascript. That doesn't only apply to PHP but other languages also.– Funk Forty Niner
Jun 11 '16 at 19:09
I went ahead and deleted the JavaScript tag: all answers here are only about PHP (except the latest which is very weak), there are differences between how the languages handle it, and there is already a similar de facto canonical JavaScript question (Which equals operator (== vs ===) should be used in JavaScript comparisons?).
– JJJ
May 16 '18 at 10:34
I went ahead and deleted the JavaScript tag: all answers here are only about PHP (except the latest which is very weak), there are differences between how the languages handle it, and there is already a similar de facto canonical JavaScript question (Which equals operator (== vs ===) should be used in JavaScript comparisons?).
– JJJ
May 16 '18 at 10:34
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
You have =
the assignment operator, ==
the 'equal' comparison operator and ===
the 'identical' comparison operator.
$a = $b Assign Sets $a to be equal to $b.
$a == $b Equal TRUE if $a is equal to $b.
$a === $b Identical TRUE if $a is equal to $b, and they are of the same type. (introduced in PHP 4)
For more info on the need for ==
and ===
, and situations to use each, look at the docs.
when I compare two identical datetime, I have false result, why ? example : sandbox.onlinephpfunctions.com/code/…
– stloc
Jan 8 '16 at 9:20
1
@stloc,===
with objects tells you if they are the same object, not if they have the same content.
– Andrea
Jan 27 '16 at 20:22
Introduced in PHP4, funny in Y2018 ;-)
– Mvorisek
Jul 13 '18 at 15:36
add a comment |
=
is the assignment operator
==
is the comparison operator (checks if
two variables have equal values)
===
is the identical comparison
operator (checks if two variables
have equal values and are of the same
type).
add a comment |
= assignment operator
== checks if two variables have the same value
=== checks if two variables have the same value AND if their types are the same
1
Also know about != and !== 'not' versions of the two comparison operators. Some languages use := as assignment, just to avoid this kind of confusion.
– Phil Perry
Aug 21 '13 at 16:57
add a comment |
For advanced PHP users, knowing the difference between ==
and ===
and asking themselves "is it faster to compare with ==
or with ===
when I'm sure that both the operands are the same type?"
The short and general answer is: There is no performance gain in using ===
in this cases, so you should probably use ==
.
For the ones interested in benchmarking it themselves, you can use the following code I wrote ad-hoc and try different values for $a
and $b
:
<?php
// CONFIGURATION
$cycles = 1000000;
$a = 'random string 1';
$b = 'random string 2';
// FUNCTIONS
function compare_two_equals($a, $b) {
if ($a == $b) {
return TRUE;
} else {
return FALSE;
}
}
function compare_three_equals($a, $b) {
if ($a === $b) {
return TRUE;
} else {
return FALSE;
}
}
// EXECUTION
$time = microtime(TRUE);
for ($count_a = 0; $count_a < $cycles; $count_a++) {
compare_two_equals($a, $b);
}
$time_two_a = microtime(TRUE) - $time;
$time = microtime(TRUE);
for ($count_a = 0; $count_a < $cycles; $count_a++) {
compare_three_equals($a, $b);
}
$time_three_a = microtime(TRUE) - $time;
$time = microtime(TRUE);
for ($count_a = 0; $count_a < $cycles; $count_a++) {
compare_two_equals($a, $b);
}
$time_two_b = microtime(TRUE) - $time;
$time = microtime(TRUE);
for ($count_a = 0; $count_a < $cycles; $count_a++) {
compare_three_equals($a, $b);
}
$time_three_b = microtime(TRUE) - $time;
$time = microtime(TRUE);
// RESULTS PRINTING
print "<br />nCOMPARE == (FIRST TRY): " . number_format($time_two_a, 3) . " seconds";
print "<br />nCOMPARE == (SECOND TRY): " . number_format($time_two_b, 3) . " seconds";
print "<br />nCOMPARE === (FIRST TRY): " . number_format($time_three_a, 3) . " seconds";
print "<br />nCOMPARE === (SECOND TRY): " . number_format($time_three_b, 3) . " seconds";
?>
NOTE: The comparison is valid only when each "FIRST TRY" is very close to its "SECOND TRY". If they are significantly different, it means that the processor was busy doing something else while executing the comparisons and so the results are unreliable and the benchmark should be run again.
8
Microbenchmarks like this are not very reliable. It is also highly unlikely that you'd ever want to worry about==
or===
as the cause of your performance problem. IMO: It's better to be strict (===
) unless you explicitly want to be loose (==
) about your comparisons. The number of strange edge cases i.e."5 is not a number" == 5
can lead to wacky bugs.===
never suffers from this problem.
– gnarf
Nov 12 '13 at 5:00
My test was to tell programmers that if they're choosing===
for performance reasons, they're wrong. So programmers are free to choose===
or==
based on logical reasons but not on performance reasons: there are different cases to prefer the one or the other and performance must not be taken into account at all.
– lucaferrario
Feb 18 '16 at 15:40
add a comment |
The = operator assigns the value to a variable
$six = 6; value 6 is assigned to variable $six
== operator check if the value of both variables is equal and mostly used in conditions like if statements
$a = 2;
$b = 2;
if ($a == $b) {
echo both variables have the same value;
}
=== operator similar to == (check if the value equals) and also check if both of same data type
$a = 2;
$b = "2";
if ($a === $b) {
echo "both variable have same value and of same data type";
} else {
echo 'both variable is either not equal or not of same data type';
}
// here $a is of type int whereas $b is of type string. So here the output
add a comment |
protected by Rizier123 Jun 18 '15 at 16:50
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You have =
the assignment operator, ==
the 'equal' comparison operator and ===
the 'identical' comparison operator.
$a = $b Assign Sets $a to be equal to $b.
$a == $b Equal TRUE if $a is equal to $b.
$a === $b Identical TRUE if $a is equal to $b, and they are of the same type. (introduced in PHP 4)
For more info on the need for ==
and ===
, and situations to use each, look at the docs.
when I compare two identical datetime, I have false result, why ? example : sandbox.onlinephpfunctions.com/code/…
– stloc
Jan 8 '16 at 9:20
1
@stloc,===
with objects tells you if they are the same object, not if they have the same content.
– Andrea
Jan 27 '16 at 20:22
Introduced in PHP4, funny in Y2018 ;-)
– Mvorisek
Jul 13 '18 at 15:36
add a comment |
You have =
the assignment operator, ==
the 'equal' comparison operator and ===
the 'identical' comparison operator.
$a = $b Assign Sets $a to be equal to $b.
$a == $b Equal TRUE if $a is equal to $b.
$a === $b Identical TRUE if $a is equal to $b, and they are of the same type. (introduced in PHP 4)
For more info on the need for ==
and ===
, and situations to use each, look at the docs.
when I compare two identical datetime, I have false result, why ? example : sandbox.onlinephpfunctions.com/code/…
– stloc
Jan 8 '16 at 9:20
1
@stloc,===
with objects tells you if they are the same object, not if they have the same content.
– Andrea
Jan 27 '16 at 20:22
Introduced in PHP4, funny in Y2018 ;-)
– Mvorisek
Jul 13 '18 at 15:36
add a comment |
You have =
the assignment operator, ==
the 'equal' comparison operator and ===
the 'identical' comparison operator.
$a = $b Assign Sets $a to be equal to $b.
$a == $b Equal TRUE if $a is equal to $b.
$a === $b Identical TRUE if $a is equal to $b, and they are of the same type. (introduced in PHP 4)
For more info on the need for ==
and ===
, and situations to use each, look at the docs.
You have =
the assignment operator, ==
the 'equal' comparison operator and ===
the 'identical' comparison operator.
$a = $b Assign Sets $a to be equal to $b.
$a == $b Equal TRUE if $a is equal to $b.
$a === $b Identical TRUE if $a is equal to $b, and they are of the same type. (introduced in PHP 4)
For more info on the need for ==
and ===
, and situations to use each, look at the docs.
edited Aug 16 '16 at 14:26
MC Emperor
9,342125690
9,342125690
answered Jan 14 '10 at 10:43
gnarfgnarf
91.7k19116156
91.7k19116156
when I compare two identical datetime, I have false result, why ? example : sandbox.onlinephpfunctions.com/code/…
– stloc
Jan 8 '16 at 9:20
1
@stloc,===
with objects tells you if they are the same object, not if they have the same content.
– Andrea
Jan 27 '16 at 20:22
Introduced in PHP4, funny in Y2018 ;-)
– Mvorisek
Jul 13 '18 at 15:36
add a comment |
when I compare two identical datetime, I have false result, why ? example : sandbox.onlinephpfunctions.com/code/…
– stloc
Jan 8 '16 at 9:20
1
@stloc,===
with objects tells you if they are the same object, not if they have the same content.
– Andrea
Jan 27 '16 at 20:22
Introduced in PHP4, funny in Y2018 ;-)
– Mvorisek
Jul 13 '18 at 15:36
when I compare two identical datetime, I have false result, why ? example : sandbox.onlinephpfunctions.com/code/…
– stloc
Jan 8 '16 at 9:20
when I compare two identical datetime, I have false result, why ? example : sandbox.onlinephpfunctions.com/code/…
– stloc
Jan 8 '16 at 9:20
1
1
@stloc,
===
with objects tells you if they are the same object, not if they have the same content.– Andrea
Jan 27 '16 at 20:22
@stloc,
===
with objects tells you if they are the same object, not if they have the same content.– Andrea
Jan 27 '16 at 20:22
Introduced in PHP4, funny in Y2018 ;-)
– Mvorisek
Jul 13 '18 at 15:36
Introduced in PHP4, funny in Y2018 ;-)
– Mvorisek
Jul 13 '18 at 15:36
add a comment |
=
is the assignment operator
==
is the comparison operator (checks if
two variables have equal values)
===
is the identical comparison
operator (checks if two variables
have equal values and are of the same
type).
add a comment |
=
is the assignment operator
==
is the comparison operator (checks if
two variables have equal values)
===
is the identical comparison
operator (checks if two variables
have equal values and are of the same
type).
add a comment |
=
is the assignment operator
==
is the comparison operator (checks if
two variables have equal values)
===
is the identical comparison
operator (checks if two variables
have equal values and are of the same
type).
=
is the assignment operator
==
is the comparison operator (checks if
two variables have equal values)
===
is the identical comparison
operator (checks if two variables
have equal values and are of the same
type).
answered Jan 14 '10 at 10:44
Rich AdamsRich Adams
21.1k43058
21.1k43058
add a comment |
add a comment |
= assignment operator
== checks if two variables have the same value
=== checks if two variables have the same value AND if their types are the same
1
Also know about != and !== 'not' versions of the two comparison operators. Some languages use := as assignment, just to avoid this kind of confusion.
– Phil Perry
Aug 21 '13 at 16:57
add a comment |
= assignment operator
== checks if two variables have the same value
=== checks if two variables have the same value AND if their types are the same
1
Also know about != and !== 'not' versions of the two comparison operators. Some languages use := as assignment, just to avoid this kind of confusion.
– Phil Perry
Aug 21 '13 at 16:57
add a comment |
= assignment operator
== checks if two variables have the same value
=== checks if two variables have the same value AND if their types are the same
= assignment operator
== checks if two variables have the same value
=== checks if two variables have the same value AND if their types are the same
answered Jan 14 '10 at 10:44
Silvio DonniniSilvio Donnini
2,47612329
2,47612329
1
Also know about != and !== 'not' versions of the two comparison operators. Some languages use := as assignment, just to avoid this kind of confusion.
– Phil Perry
Aug 21 '13 at 16:57
add a comment |
1
Also know about != and !== 'not' versions of the two comparison operators. Some languages use := as assignment, just to avoid this kind of confusion.
– Phil Perry
Aug 21 '13 at 16:57
1
1
Also know about != and !== 'not' versions of the two comparison operators. Some languages use := as assignment, just to avoid this kind of confusion.
– Phil Perry
Aug 21 '13 at 16:57
Also know about != and !== 'not' versions of the two comparison operators. Some languages use := as assignment, just to avoid this kind of confusion.
– Phil Perry
Aug 21 '13 at 16:57
add a comment |
For advanced PHP users, knowing the difference between ==
and ===
and asking themselves "is it faster to compare with ==
or with ===
when I'm sure that both the operands are the same type?"
The short and general answer is: There is no performance gain in using ===
in this cases, so you should probably use ==
.
For the ones interested in benchmarking it themselves, you can use the following code I wrote ad-hoc and try different values for $a
and $b
:
<?php
// CONFIGURATION
$cycles = 1000000;
$a = 'random string 1';
$b = 'random string 2';
// FUNCTIONS
function compare_two_equals($a, $b) {
if ($a == $b) {
return TRUE;
} else {
return FALSE;
}
}
function compare_three_equals($a, $b) {
if ($a === $b) {
return TRUE;
} else {
return FALSE;
}
}
// EXECUTION
$time = microtime(TRUE);
for ($count_a = 0; $count_a < $cycles; $count_a++) {
compare_two_equals($a, $b);
}
$time_two_a = microtime(TRUE) - $time;
$time = microtime(TRUE);
for ($count_a = 0; $count_a < $cycles; $count_a++) {
compare_three_equals($a, $b);
}
$time_three_a = microtime(TRUE) - $time;
$time = microtime(TRUE);
for ($count_a = 0; $count_a < $cycles; $count_a++) {
compare_two_equals($a, $b);
}
$time_two_b = microtime(TRUE) - $time;
$time = microtime(TRUE);
for ($count_a = 0; $count_a < $cycles; $count_a++) {
compare_three_equals($a, $b);
}
$time_three_b = microtime(TRUE) - $time;
$time = microtime(TRUE);
// RESULTS PRINTING
print "<br />nCOMPARE == (FIRST TRY): " . number_format($time_two_a, 3) . " seconds";
print "<br />nCOMPARE == (SECOND TRY): " . number_format($time_two_b, 3) . " seconds";
print "<br />nCOMPARE === (FIRST TRY): " . number_format($time_three_a, 3) . " seconds";
print "<br />nCOMPARE === (SECOND TRY): " . number_format($time_three_b, 3) . " seconds";
?>
NOTE: The comparison is valid only when each "FIRST TRY" is very close to its "SECOND TRY". If they are significantly different, it means that the processor was busy doing something else while executing the comparisons and so the results are unreliable and the benchmark should be run again.
8
Microbenchmarks like this are not very reliable. It is also highly unlikely that you'd ever want to worry about==
or===
as the cause of your performance problem. IMO: It's better to be strict (===
) unless you explicitly want to be loose (==
) about your comparisons. The number of strange edge cases i.e."5 is not a number" == 5
can lead to wacky bugs.===
never suffers from this problem.
– gnarf
Nov 12 '13 at 5:00
My test was to tell programmers that if they're choosing===
for performance reasons, they're wrong. So programmers are free to choose===
or==
based on logical reasons but not on performance reasons: there are different cases to prefer the one or the other and performance must not be taken into account at all.
– lucaferrario
Feb 18 '16 at 15:40
add a comment |
For advanced PHP users, knowing the difference between ==
and ===
and asking themselves "is it faster to compare with ==
or with ===
when I'm sure that both the operands are the same type?"
The short and general answer is: There is no performance gain in using ===
in this cases, so you should probably use ==
.
For the ones interested in benchmarking it themselves, you can use the following code I wrote ad-hoc and try different values for $a
and $b
:
<?php
// CONFIGURATION
$cycles = 1000000;
$a = 'random string 1';
$b = 'random string 2';
// FUNCTIONS
function compare_two_equals($a, $b) {
if ($a == $b) {
return TRUE;
} else {
return FALSE;
}
}
function compare_three_equals($a, $b) {
if ($a === $b) {
return TRUE;
} else {
return FALSE;
}
}
// EXECUTION
$time = microtime(TRUE);
for ($count_a = 0; $count_a < $cycles; $count_a++) {
compare_two_equals($a, $b);
}
$time_two_a = microtime(TRUE) - $time;
$time = microtime(TRUE);
for ($count_a = 0; $count_a < $cycles; $count_a++) {
compare_three_equals($a, $b);
}
$time_three_a = microtime(TRUE) - $time;
$time = microtime(TRUE);
for ($count_a = 0; $count_a < $cycles; $count_a++) {
compare_two_equals($a, $b);
}
$time_two_b = microtime(TRUE) - $time;
$time = microtime(TRUE);
for ($count_a = 0; $count_a < $cycles; $count_a++) {
compare_three_equals($a, $b);
}
$time_three_b = microtime(TRUE) - $time;
$time = microtime(TRUE);
// RESULTS PRINTING
print "<br />nCOMPARE == (FIRST TRY): " . number_format($time_two_a, 3) . " seconds";
print "<br />nCOMPARE == (SECOND TRY): " . number_format($time_two_b, 3) . " seconds";
print "<br />nCOMPARE === (FIRST TRY): " . number_format($time_three_a, 3) . " seconds";
print "<br />nCOMPARE === (SECOND TRY): " . number_format($time_three_b, 3) . " seconds";
?>
NOTE: The comparison is valid only when each "FIRST TRY" is very close to its "SECOND TRY". If they are significantly different, it means that the processor was busy doing something else while executing the comparisons and so the results are unreliable and the benchmark should be run again.
8
Microbenchmarks like this are not very reliable. It is also highly unlikely that you'd ever want to worry about==
or===
as the cause of your performance problem. IMO: It's better to be strict (===
) unless you explicitly want to be loose (==
) about your comparisons. The number of strange edge cases i.e."5 is not a number" == 5
can lead to wacky bugs.===
never suffers from this problem.
– gnarf
Nov 12 '13 at 5:00
My test was to tell programmers that if they're choosing===
for performance reasons, they're wrong. So programmers are free to choose===
or==
based on logical reasons but not on performance reasons: there are different cases to prefer the one or the other and performance must not be taken into account at all.
– lucaferrario
Feb 18 '16 at 15:40
add a comment |
For advanced PHP users, knowing the difference between ==
and ===
and asking themselves "is it faster to compare with ==
or with ===
when I'm sure that both the operands are the same type?"
The short and general answer is: There is no performance gain in using ===
in this cases, so you should probably use ==
.
For the ones interested in benchmarking it themselves, you can use the following code I wrote ad-hoc and try different values for $a
and $b
:
<?php
// CONFIGURATION
$cycles = 1000000;
$a = 'random string 1';
$b = 'random string 2';
// FUNCTIONS
function compare_two_equals($a, $b) {
if ($a == $b) {
return TRUE;
} else {
return FALSE;
}
}
function compare_three_equals($a, $b) {
if ($a === $b) {
return TRUE;
} else {
return FALSE;
}
}
// EXECUTION
$time = microtime(TRUE);
for ($count_a = 0; $count_a < $cycles; $count_a++) {
compare_two_equals($a, $b);
}
$time_two_a = microtime(TRUE) - $time;
$time = microtime(TRUE);
for ($count_a = 0; $count_a < $cycles; $count_a++) {
compare_three_equals($a, $b);
}
$time_three_a = microtime(TRUE) - $time;
$time = microtime(TRUE);
for ($count_a = 0; $count_a < $cycles; $count_a++) {
compare_two_equals($a, $b);
}
$time_two_b = microtime(TRUE) - $time;
$time = microtime(TRUE);
for ($count_a = 0; $count_a < $cycles; $count_a++) {
compare_three_equals($a, $b);
}
$time_three_b = microtime(TRUE) - $time;
$time = microtime(TRUE);
// RESULTS PRINTING
print "<br />nCOMPARE == (FIRST TRY): " . number_format($time_two_a, 3) . " seconds";
print "<br />nCOMPARE == (SECOND TRY): " . number_format($time_two_b, 3) . " seconds";
print "<br />nCOMPARE === (FIRST TRY): " . number_format($time_three_a, 3) . " seconds";
print "<br />nCOMPARE === (SECOND TRY): " . number_format($time_three_b, 3) . " seconds";
?>
NOTE: The comparison is valid only when each "FIRST TRY" is very close to its "SECOND TRY". If they are significantly different, it means that the processor was busy doing something else while executing the comparisons and so the results are unreliable and the benchmark should be run again.
For advanced PHP users, knowing the difference between ==
and ===
and asking themselves "is it faster to compare with ==
or with ===
when I'm sure that both the operands are the same type?"
The short and general answer is: There is no performance gain in using ===
in this cases, so you should probably use ==
.
For the ones interested in benchmarking it themselves, you can use the following code I wrote ad-hoc and try different values for $a
and $b
:
<?php
// CONFIGURATION
$cycles = 1000000;
$a = 'random string 1';
$b = 'random string 2';
// FUNCTIONS
function compare_two_equals($a, $b) {
if ($a == $b) {
return TRUE;
} else {
return FALSE;
}
}
function compare_three_equals($a, $b) {
if ($a === $b) {
return TRUE;
} else {
return FALSE;
}
}
// EXECUTION
$time = microtime(TRUE);
for ($count_a = 0; $count_a < $cycles; $count_a++) {
compare_two_equals($a, $b);
}
$time_two_a = microtime(TRUE) - $time;
$time = microtime(TRUE);
for ($count_a = 0; $count_a < $cycles; $count_a++) {
compare_three_equals($a, $b);
}
$time_three_a = microtime(TRUE) - $time;
$time = microtime(TRUE);
for ($count_a = 0; $count_a < $cycles; $count_a++) {
compare_two_equals($a, $b);
}
$time_two_b = microtime(TRUE) - $time;
$time = microtime(TRUE);
for ($count_a = 0; $count_a < $cycles; $count_a++) {
compare_three_equals($a, $b);
}
$time_three_b = microtime(TRUE) - $time;
$time = microtime(TRUE);
// RESULTS PRINTING
print "<br />nCOMPARE == (FIRST TRY): " . number_format($time_two_a, 3) . " seconds";
print "<br />nCOMPARE == (SECOND TRY): " . number_format($time_two_b, 3) . " seconds";
print "<br />nCOMPARE === (FIRST TRY): " . number_format($time_three_a, 3) . " seconds";
print "<br />nCOMPARE === (SECOND TRY): " . number_format($time_three_b, 3) . " seconds";
?>
NOTE: The comparison is valid only when each "FIRST TRY" is very close to its "SECOND TRY". If they are significantly different, it means that the processor was busy doing something else while executing the comparisons and so the results are unreliable and the benchmark should be run again.
edited Jan 1 '16 at 15:20
Peter Mortensen
13.9k1987114
13.9k1987114
answered Jul 8 '13 at 14:03
lucaferrariolucaferrario
83289
83289
8
Microbenchmarks like this are not very reliable. It is also highly unlikely that you'd ever want to worry about==
or===
as the cause of your performance problem. IMO: It's better to be strict (===
) unless you explicitly want to be loose (==
) about your comparisons. The number of strange edge cases i.e."5 is not a number" == 5
can lead to wacky bugs.===
never suffers from this problem.
– gnarf
Nov 12 '13 at 5:00
My test was to tell programmers that if they're choosing===
for performance reasons, they're wrong. So programmers are free to choose===
or==
based on logical reasons but not on performance reasons: there are different cases to prefer the one or the other and performance must not be taken into account at all.
– lucaferrario
Feb 18 '16 at 15:40
add a comment |
8
Microbenchmarks like this are not very reliable. It is also highly unlikely that you'd ever want to worry about==
or===
as the cause of your performance problem. IMO: It's better to be strict (===
) unless you explicitly want to be loose (==
) about your comparisons. The number of strange edge cases i.e."5 is not a number" == 5
can lead to wacky bugs.===
never suffers from this problem.
– gnarf
Nov 12 '13 at 5:00
My test was to tell programmers that if they're choosing===
for performance reasons, they're wrong. So programmers are free to choose===
or==
based on logical reasons but not on performance reasons: there are different cases to prefer the one or the other and performance must not be taken into account at all.
– lucaferrario
Feb 18 '16 at 15:40
8
8
Microbenchmarks like this are not very reliable. It is also highly unlikely that you'd ever want to worry about
==
or ===
as the cause of your performance problem. IMO: It's better to be strict (===
) unless you explicitly want to be loose (==
) about your comparisons. The number of strange edge cases i.e. "5 is not a number" == 5
can lead to wacky bugs. ===
never suffers from this problem.– gnarf
Nov 12 '13 at 5:00
Microbenchmarks like this are not very reliable. It is also highly unlikely that you'd ever want to worry about
==
or ===
as the cause of your performance problem. IMO: It's better to be strict (===
) unless you explicitly want to be loose (==
) about your comparisons. The number of strange edge cases i.e. "5 is not a number" == 5
can lead to wacky bugs. ===
never suffers from this problem.– gnarf
Nov 12 '13 at 5:00
My test was to tell programmers that if they're choosing
===
for performance reasons, they're wrong. So programmers are free to choose ===
or ==
based on logical reasons but not on performance reasons: there are different cases to prefer the one or the other and performance must not be taken into account at all.– lucaferrario
Feb 18 '16 at 15:40
My test was to tell programmers that if they're choosing
===
for performance reasons, they're wrong. So programmers are free to choose ===
or ==
based on logical reasons but not on performance reasons: there are different cases to prefer the one or the other and performance must not be taken into account at all.– lucaferrario
Feb 18 '16 at 15:40
add a comment |
The = operator assigns the value to a variable
$six = 6; value 6 is assigned to variable $six
== operator check if the value of both variables is equal and mostly used in conditions like if statements
$a = 2;
$b = 2;
if ($a == $b) {
echo both variables have the same value;
}
=== operator similar to == (check if the value equals) and also check if both of same data type
$a = 2;
$b = "2";
if ($a === $b) {
echo "both variable have same value and of same data type";
} else {
echo 'both variable is either not equal or not of same data type';
}
// here $a is of type int whereas $b is of type string. So here the output
add a comment |
The = operator assigns the value to a variable
$six = 6; value 6 is assigned to variable $six
== operator check if the value of both variables is equal and mostly used in conditions like if statements
$a = 2;
$b = 2;
if ($a == $b) {
echo both variables have the same value;
}
=== operator similar to == (check if the value equals) and also check if both of same data type
$a = 2;
$b = "2";
if ($a === $b) {
echo "both variable have same value and of same data type";
} else {
echo 'both variable is either not equal or not of same data type';
}
// here $a is of type int whereas $b is of type string. So here the output
add a comment |
The = operator assigns the value to a variable
$six = 6; value 6 is assigned to variable $six
== operator check if the value of both variables is equal and mostly used in conditions like if statements
$a = 2;
$b = 2;
if ($a == $b) {
echo both variables have the same value;
}
=== operator similar to == (check if the value equals) and also check if both of same data type
$a = 2;
$b = "2";
if ($a === $b) {
echo "both variable have same value and of same data type";
} else {
echo 'both variable is either not equal or not of same data type';
}
// here $a is of type int whereas $b is of type string. So here the output
The = operator assigns the value to a variable
$six = 6; value 6 is assigned to variable $six
== operator check if the value of both variables is equal and mostly used in conditions like if statements
$a = 2;
$b = 2;
if ($a == $b) {
echo both variables have the same value;
}
=== operator similar to == (check if the value equals) and also check if both of same data type
$a = 2;
$b = "2";
if ($a === $b) {
echo "both variable have same value and of same data type";
} else {
echo 'both variable is either not equal or not of same data type';
}
// here $a is of type int whereas $b is of type string. So here the output
answered Feb 25 at 13:12
GideonGideon
11615
11615
add a comment |
add a comment |
protected by Rizier123 Jun 18 '15 at 16:50
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
check out the example ... I have posted it would clarify more things ..
– InfantPro'Aravind'
Jan 14 '10 at 10:55
1
For advanced PHP users, knowing the difference between == and === and asking themself "is it faster to compare with == or with === when I'm sure that both the operands are the same type?", please look at my benchmark script below.
– lucaferrario
Jul 8 '13 at 14:04
@Strawberry I feel the question's tag should also include the javascript tag since it also applies to that language.
– Funk Forty Niner
Jun 11 '16 at 18:35
(Update): I have added the javascript tag in an edit, since there have been quite a few questions where people were using
=
in javascript. That doesn't only apply to PHP but other languages also.– Funk Forty Niner
Jun 11 '16 at 19:09
I went ahead and deleted the JavaScript tag: all answers here are only about PHP (except the latest which is very weak), there are differences between how the languages handle it, and there is already a similar de facto canonical JavaScript question (Which equals operator (== vs ===) should be used in JavaScript comparisons?).
– JJJ
May 16 '18 at 10:34