Given two subgroups what are the relationes of the commutators of the two subgroups?
$begingroup$
Let $G$ be a group, $H$ a subgroup of $G$ and $Ntriangleleft G.$ Let $S_N$ be the set of commutators in $N$, i.e. $S_N subset N, ,aba^{-1}b^{-1}in S_N $with $ a,b in G$ and $S_H$ the set of commutators in $H$, i.e.$,S_H subset H, ,cdc^{-1}d^{-1}in S_H$ with $c, d in G.$
What holds in general, $S_N=S_H, S_Nsubset S_H$ or $S_Hsubset S_N$ in the two cases
$1.,, Hcap N={e}$, and $2.,,Hcap Nneq {e}$ ?
abstract-algebra group-theory
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Let $G$ be a group, $H$ a subgroup of $G$ and $Ntriangleleft G.$ Let $S_N$ be the set of commutators in $N$, i.e. $S_N subset N, ,aba^{-1}b^{-1}in S_N $with $ a,b in G$ and $S_H$ the set of commutators in $H$, i.e.$,S_H subset H, ,cdc^{-1}d^{-1}in S_H$ with $c, d in G.$
What holds in general, $S_N=S_H, S_Nsubset S_H$ or $S_Hsubset S_N$ in the two cases
$1.,, Hcap N={e}$, and $2.,,Hcap Nneq {e}$ ?
abstract-algebra group-theory
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How come $;a,bin G;$ for the set of commutators of $;N;$ , and like wise for $;S_H;$ ?? Or you mean the set of commutators of the whole group $;G;$ that are contained in $;N;$ (in $;H;$ , resp.) ?
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Dec 28 '18 at 11:19
$begingroup$
Yes, by $S_N$ I meant the set of commutators of $G$ contained in $N$ and likewise for $S_H.$ That is how it is written in an algebra book.
$endgroup$
– user249018
Dec 28 '18 at 11:30
$begingroup$
I think you can lots of test cases in the group $text{Symm}(3)timestext{Symm}(3)$.
$endgroup$
– ancientmathematician
Dec 28 '18 at 12:08
1
$begingroup$
If $Hcap N ={e}$ then the only possible commutator in both is $e$, which is indeed a commutator ($e=eee^{-1}e^{-1}$) so $S_Ncap S_H={e}$ in this case. This suggests that the second condition also will not tell you much about the relationship of the sets of commutators. If the intersection of $H$ and $N$ is small, why should there be any significant relationship here?
$endgroup$
– Mark Bennet
Dec 28 '18 at 12:29
$begingroup$
@Mark Bennet. What makes the difference if the intersection $Hcap N$ is small or not ?
$endgroup$
– user249018
Dec 28 '18 at 12:47
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Let $G$ be a group, $H$ a subgroup of $G$ and $Ntriangleleft G.$ Let $S_N$ be the set of commutators in $N$, i.e. $S_N subset N, ,aba^{-1}b^{-1}in S_N $with $ a,b in G$ and $S_H$ the set of commutators in $H$, i.e.$,S_H subset H, ,cdc^{-1}d^{-1}in S_H$ with $c, d in G.$
What holds in general, $S_N=S_H, S_Nsubset S_H$ or $S_Hsubset S_N$ in the two cases
$1.,, Hcap N={e}$, and $2.,,Hcap Nneq {e}$ ?
abstract-algebra group-theory
$endgroup$
Let $G$ be a group, $H$ a subgroup of $G$ and $Ntriangleleft G.$ Let $S_N$ be the set of commutators in $N$, i.e. $S_N subset N, ,aba^{-1}b^{-1}in S_N $with $ a,b in G$ and $S_H$ the set of commutators in $H$, i.e.$,S_H subset H, ,cdc^{-1}d^{-1}in S_H$ with $c, d in G.$
What holds in general, $S_N=S_H, S_Nsubset S_H$ or $S_Hsubset S_N$ in the two cases
$1.,, Hcap N={e}$, and $2.,,Hcap Nneq {e}$ ?
abstract-algebra group-theory
abstract-algebra group-theory
asked Dec 28 '18 at 11:08
user249018user249018
435138
435138
$begingroup$
How come $;a,bin G;$ for the set of commutators of $;N;$ , and like wise for $;S_H;$ ?? Or you mean the set of commutators of the whole group $;G;$ that are contained in $;N;$ (in $;H;$ , resp.) ?
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Dec 28 '18 at 11:19
$begingroup$
Yes, by $S_N$ I meant the set of commutators of $G$ contained in $N$ and likewise for $S_H.$ That is how it is written in an algebra book.
$endgroup$
– user249018
Dec 28 '18 at 11:30
$begingroup$
I think you can lots of test cases in the group $text{Symm}(3)timestext{Symm}(3)$.
$endgroup$
– ancientmathematician
Dec 28 '18 at 12:08
1
$begingroup$
If $Hcap N ={e}$ then the only possible commutator in both is $e$, which is indeed a commutator ($e=eee^{-1}e^{-1}$) so $S_Ncap S_H={e}$ in this case. This suggests that the second condition also will not tell you much about the relationship of the sets of commutators. If the intersection of $H$ and $N$ is small, why should there be any significant relationship here?
$endgroup$
– Mark Bennet
Dec 28 '18 at 12:29
$begingroup$
@Mark Bennet. What makes the difference if the intersection $Hcap N$ is small or not ?
$endgroup$
– user249018
Dec 28 '18 at 12:47
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
How come $;a,bin G;$ for the set of commutators of $;N;$ , and like wise for $;S_H;$ ?? Or you mean the set of commutators of the whole group $;G;$ that are contained in $;N;$ (in $;H;$ , resp.) ?
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Dec 28 '18 at 11:19
$begingroup$
Yes, by $S_N$ I meant the set of commutators of $G$ contained in $N$ and likewise for $S_H.$ That is how it is written in an algebra book.
$endgroup$
– user249018
Dec 28 '18 at 11:30
$begingroup$
I think you can lots of test cases in the group $text{Symm}(3)timestext{Symm}(3)$.
$endgroup$
– ancientmathematician
Dec 28 '18 at 12:08
1
$begingroup$
If $Hcap N ={e}$ then the only possible commutator in both is $e$, which is indeed a commutator ($e=eee^{-1}e^{-1}$) so $S_Ncap S_H={e}$ in this case. This suggests that the second condition also will not tell you much about the relationship of the sets of commutators. If the intersection of $H$ and $N$ is small, why should there be any significant relationship here?
$endgroup$
– Mark Bennet
Dec 28 '18 at 12:29
$begingroup$
@Mark Bennet. What makes the difference if the intersection $Hcap N$ is small or not ?
$endgroup$
– user249018
Dec 28 '18 at 12:47
$begingroup$
How come $;a,bin G;$ for the set of commutators of $;N;$ , and like wise for $;S_H;$ ?? Or you mean the set of commutators of the whole group $;G;$ that are contained in $;N;$ (in $;H;$ , resp.) ?
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Dec 28 '18 at 11:19
$begingroup$
How come $;a,bin G;$ for the set of commutators of $;N;$ , and like wise for $;S_H;$ ?? Or you mean the set of commutators of the whole group $;G;$ that are contained in $;N;$ (in $;H;$ , resp.) ?
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Dec 28 '18 at 11:19
$begingroup$
Yes, by $S_N$ I meant the set of commutators of $G$ contained in $N$ and likewise for $S_H.$ That is how it is written in an algebra book.
$endgroup$
– user249018
Dec 28 '18 at 11:30
$begingroup$
Yes, by $S_N$ I meant the set of commutators of $G$ contained in $N$ and likewise for $S_H.$ That is how it is written in an algebra book.
$endgroup$
– user249018
Dec 28 '18 at 11:30
$begingroup$
I think you can lots of test cases in the group $text{Symm}(3)timestext{Symm}(3)$.
$endgroup$
– ancientmathematician
Dec 28 '18 at 12:08
$begingroup$
I think you can lots of test cases in the group $text{Symm}(3)timestext{Symm}(3)$.
$endgroup$
– ancientmathematician
Dec 28 '18 at 12:08
1
1
$begingroup$
If $Hcap N ={e}$ then the only possible commutator in both is $e$, which is indeed a commutator ($e=eee^{-1}e^{-1}$) so $S_Ncap S_H={e}$ in this case. This suggests that the second condition also will not tell you much about the relationship of the sets of commutators. If the intersection of $H$ and $N$ is small, why should there be any significant relationship here?
$endgroup$
– Mark Bennet
Dec 28 '18 at 12:29
$begingroup$
If $Hcap N ={e}$ then the only possible commutator in both is $e$, which is indeed a commutator ($e=eee^{-1}e^{-1}$) so $S_Ncap S_H={e}$ in this case. This suggests that the second condition also will not tell you much about the relationship of the sets of commutators. If the intersection of $H$ and $N$ is small, why should there be any significant relationship here?
$endgroup$
– Mark Bennet
Dec 28 '18 at 12:29
$begingroup$
@Mark Bennet. What makes the difference if the intersection $Hcap N$ is small or not ?
$endgroup$
– user249018
Dec 28 '18 at 12:47
$begingroup$
@Mark Bennet. What makes the difference if the intersection $Hcap N$ is small or not ?
$endgroup$
– user249018
Dec 28 '18 at 12:47
|
show 1 more comment
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054787%2fgiven-two-subgroups-what-are-the-relationes-of-the-commutators-of-the-two-subgro%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054787%2fgiven-two-subgroups-what-are-the-relationes-of-the-commutators-of-the-two-subgro%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
How come $;a,bin G;$ for the set of commutators of $;N;$ , and like wise for $;S_H;$ ?? Or you mean the set of commutators of the whole group $;G;$ that are contained in $;N;$ (in $;H;$ , resp.) ?
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Dec 28 '18 at 11:19
$begingroup$
Yes, by $S_N$ I meant the set of commutators of $G$ contained in $N$ and likewise for $S_H.$ That is how it is written in an algebra book.
$endgroup$
– user249018
Dec 28 '18 at 11:30
$begingroup$
I think you can lots of test cases in the group $text{Symm}(3)timestext{Symm}(3)$.
$endgroup$
– ancientmathematician
Dec 28 '18 at 12:08
1
$begingroup$
If $Hcap N ={e}$ then the only possible commutator in both is $e$, which is indeed a commutator ($e=eee^{-1}e^{-1}$) so $S_Ncap S_H={e}$ in this case. This suggests that the second condition also will not tell you much about the relationship of the sets of commutators. If the intersection of $H$ and $N$ is small, why should there be any significant relationship here?
$endgroup$
– Mark Bennet
Dec 28 '18 at 12:29
$begingroup$
@Mark Bennet. What makes the difference if the intersection $Hcap N$ is small or not ?
$endgroup$
– user249018
Dec 28 '18 at 12:47