Finding the Asymptote / Root of a reciprocal function
$begingroup$
$$y = frac{3}{8x - 3} $$
The y-intercept is $-1$ and the vertical asymptote is $x = frac{3}{8}$ but what would be the horizontal asymptote and the x-intercept in this case?
I am asking this as the numerator is not a linear function (it is just a constant 3 so I do not know what the horizontal asymptote or root would be). I follow the procedure below:
$$y = frac{ax + b}{cx + d}$$
root at $x = frac{-b}{a}$
intercept at $y = frac{b}{d} $
vertical asymptote at $x = frac{-d}{c} $
horizontal asymptote at $y = frac{a}{c}$
When finding the root, you get $0 = frac{3}{8x - 3}$ and then $0 = 3$ which is not true, therefore this must mean the curve does not cut the x-axis?
The horizontal asymptote (using what I posted above) would be $ y = frac{a}{c}$ which is $frac{0}{8}$ hence the horizontal asymptote is $ y = 0$?
functions graphing-functions
asked Apr 15 '14 at 12:35
NoahNoah
3914
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$y = frac{3}{8x - 3} $$
The y-intercept is $-1$ and the vertical asymptote is $x = frac{3}{8}$ but what would be the horizontal asymptote and the x-intercept in this case?
I am asking this as the numerator is not a linear function (it is just a constant 3 so I do not know what the horizontal asymptote or root would be). I follow the procedure below:
$$y = frac{ax + b}{cx + d}$$
root at $x = frac{-b}{a}$
intercept at $y = frac{b}{d} $
vertical asymptote at $x = frac{-d}{c} $
horizontal asymptote at $y = frac{a}{c}$
When finding the root, you get $0 = frac{3}{8x - 3}$ and then $0 = 3$ which is not true, therefore this must mean the curve does not cut the x-axis?
The horizontal asymptote (using what I posted above) would be $ y = frac{a}{c}$ which is $frac{0}{8}$ hence the horizontal asymptote is $ y = 0$?
functions graphing-functions
asked Apr 15 '14 at 12:35
NoahNoah
3914
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$y = frac{3}{8x - 3} $$
The y-intercept is $-1$ and the vertical asymptote is $x = frac{3}{8}$ but what would be the horizontal asymptote and the x-intercept in this case?
I am asking this as the numerator is not a linear function (it is just a constant 3 so I do not know what the horizontal asymptote or root would be). I follow the procedure below:
$$y = frac{ax + b}{cx + d}$$
root at $x = frac{-b}{a}$
intercept at $y = frac{b}{d} $
vertical asymptote at $x = frac{-d}{c} $
horizontal asymptote at $y = frac{a}{c}$
When finding the root, you get $0 = frac{3}{8x - 3}$ and then $0 = 3$ which is not true, therefore this must mean the curve does not cut the x-axis?
The horizontal asymptote (using what I posted above) would be $ y = frac{a}{c}$ which is $frac{0}{8}$ hence the horizontal asymptote is $ y = 0$?
functions graphing-functions
asked Apr 15 '14 at 12:35
NoahNoah
3914
$endgroup$
$$y = frac{3}{8x - 3} $$
The y-intercept is $-1$ and the vertical asymptote is $x = frac{3}{8}$ but what would be the horizontal asymptote and the x-intercept in this case?
I am asking this as the numerator is not a linear function (it is just a constant 3 so I do not know what the horizontal asymptote or root would be). I follow the procedure below:
$$y = frac{ax + b}{cx + d}$$
root at $x = frac{-b}{a}$
intercept at $y = frac{b}{d} $
vertical asymptote at $x = frac{-d}{c} $
horizontal asymptote at $y = frac{a}{c}$
When finding the root, you get $0 = frac{3}{8x - 3}$ and then $0 = 3$ which is not true, therefore this must mean the curve does not cut the x-axis?
The horizontal asymptote (using what I posted above) would be $ y = frac{a}{c}$ which is $frac{0}{8}$ hence the horizontal asymptote is $ y = 0$?
functions graphing-functions
functions graphing-functions
asked Apr 15 '14 at 12:35
NoahNoah
3914
asked Apr 15 '14 at 12:35
NoahNoah
3914
edited Apr 15 '14 at 13:18
Noah
asked Apr 15 '14 at 12:35
NoahNoah
3914
asked Apr 15 '14 at 12:35
NoahNoah
3914
asked Apr 15 '14 at 12:35
NoahNoah
3914
3914
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
For the horizontal asypmtotes, you want to see what happens when $x$ gets larger and larger (towards $infty$), or when it gets smaller and smaller (towards $-infty$).
Note that $frac{3}{8x-3}$ gets closer and closer to zero for larger values of $x$ (because the degree of $8x-3$ is greater than the degree of the constant $3$). That means that the horizontal asymptote to the right is 0. The same goes for the left side.
Note that, for the method you included, there is no $ax$-term in the numerator, hence $a=0$, and so you get the horizontal asymptotes at $y=frac{0}{c}=0$, just as it should be.
answered Apr 15 '14 at 14:06
naslundxnaslundx
8,00352941
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When the degree of the denominator is greater than the degree of the numerator, limits at $infty$ and at $-infty$ are both $0$. And yes, if you divide $3$ by any number (as in the function) the result can never be $0$, so there is no $x$-intercept.
answered Apr 15 '14 at 12:42
ajotatxeajotatxe
54.1k24190
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I have not studied limits, ever. So that statement confuses me somewhat (i.e. I do not fully understand it).
$endgroup$
– Noah
Apr 15 '14 at 13:19
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f754746%2ffinding-the-asymptote-root-of-a-reciprocal-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
For the horizontal asypmtotes, you want to see what happens when $x$ gets larger and larger (towards $infty$), or when it gets smaller and smaller (towards $-infty$).
Note that $frac{3}{8x-3}$ gets closer and closer to zero for larger values of $x$ (because the degree of $8x-3$ is greater than the degree of the constant $3$). That means that the horizontal asymptote to the right is 0. The same goes for the left side.
Note that, for the method you included, there is no $ax$-term in the numerator, hence $a=0$, and so you get the horizontal asymptotes at $y=frac{0}{c}=0$, just as it should be.
answered Apr 15 '14 at 14:06
naslundxnaslundx
8,00352941
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For the horizontal asypmtotes, you want to see what happens when $x$ gets larger and larger (towards $infty$), or when it gets smaller and smaller (towards $-infty$).
Note that $frac{3}{8x-3}$ gets closer and closer to zero for larger values of $x$ (because the degree of $8x-3$ is greater than the degree of the constant $3$). That means that the horizontal asymptote to the right is 0. The same goes for the left side.
Note that, for the method you included, there is no $ax$-term in the numerator, hence $a=0$, and so you get the horizontal asymptotes at $y=frac{0}{c}=0$, just as it should be.
answered Apr 15 '14 at 14:06
naslundxnaslundx
8,00352941
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For the horizontal asypmtotes, you want to see what happens when $x$ gets larger and larger (towards $infty$), or when it gets smaller and smaller (towards $-infty$).
Note that $frac{3}{8x-3}$ gets closer and closer to zero for larger values of $x$ (because the degree of $8x-3$ is greater than the degree of the constant $3$). That means that the horizontal asymptote to the right is 0. The same goes for the left side.
Note that, for the method you included, there is no $ax$-term in the numerator, hence $a=0$, and so you get the horizontal asymptotes at $y=frac{0}{c}=0$, just as it should be.
answered Apr 15 '14 at 14:06
naslundxnaslundx
8,00352941
$endgroup$
For the horizontal asypmtotes, you want to see what happens when $x$ gets larger and larger (towards $infty$), or when it gets smaller and smaller (towards $-infty$).
Note that $frac{3}{8x-3}$ gets closer and closer to zero for larger values of $x$ (because the degree of $8x-3$ is greater than the degree of the constant $3$). That means that the horizontal asymptote to the right is 0. The same goes for the left side.
Note that, for the method you included, there is no $ax$-term in the numerator, hence $a=0$, and so you get the horizontal asymptotes at $y=frac{0}{c}=0$, just as it should be.
answered Apr 15 '14 at 14:06
naslundxnaslundx
8,00352941
answered Apr 15 '14 at 14:06
naslundxnaslundx
8,00352941
answered Apr 15 '14 at 14:06
naslundxnaslundx
8,00352941
answered Apr 15 '14 at 14:06
naslundxnaslundx
8,00352941
8,00352941
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When the degree of the denominator is greater than the degree of the numerator, limits at $infty$ and at $-infty$ are both $0$. And yes, if you divide $3$ by any number (as in the function) the result can never be $0$, so there is no $x$-intercept.
answered Apr 15 '14 at 12:42
ajotatxeajotatxe
54.1k24190
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I have not studied limits, ever. So that statement confuses me somewhat (i.e. I do not fully understand it).
$endgroup$
– Noah
Apr 15 '14 at 13:19
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When the degree of the denominator is greater than the degree of the numerator, limits at $infty$ and at $-infty$ are both $0$. And yes, if you divide $3$ by any number (as in the function) the result can never be $0$, so there is no $x$-intercept.
answered Apr 15 '14 at 12:42
ajotatxeajotatxe
54.1k24190
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I have not studied limits, ever. So that statement confuses me somewhat (i.e. I do not fully understand it).
$endgroup$
– Noah
Apr 15 '14 at 13:19
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When the degree of the denominator is greater than the degree of the numerator, limits at $infty$ and at $-infty$ are both $0$. And yes, if you divide $3$ by any number (as in the function) the result can never be $0$, so there is no $x$-intercept.
answered Apr 15 '14 at 12:42
ajotatxeajotatxe
54.1k24190
$endgroup$
When the degree of the denominator is greater than the degree of the numerator, limits at $infty$ and at $-infty$ are both $0$. And yes, if you divide $3$ by any number (as in the function) the result can never be $0$, so there is no $x$-intercept.
answered Apr 15 '14 at 12:42
ajotatxeajotatxe
54.1k24190
answered Apr 15 '14 at 12:42
ajotatxeajotatxe
54.1k24190
answered Apr 15 '14 at 12:42
ajotatxeajotatxe
54.1k24190
answered Apr 15 '14 at 12:42
ajotatxeajotatxe
54.1k24190
54.1k24190
$begingroup$
I have not studied limits, ever. So that statement confuses me somewhat (i.e. I do not fully understand it).
$endgroup$
– Noah
Apr 15 '14 at 13:19
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have not studied limits, ever. So that statement confuses me somewhat (i.e. I do not fully understand it).
$endgroup$
– Noah
Apr 15 '14 at 13:19
$begingroup$
I have not studied limits, ever. So that statement confuses me somewhat (i.e. I do not fully understand it).
$endgroup$
– Noah
Apr 15 '14 at 13:19
$begingroup$
I have not studied limits, ever. So that statement confuses me somewhat (i.e. I do not fully understand it).
$endgroup$
– Noah
Apr 15 '14 at 13:19
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f754746%2ffinding-the-asymptote-root-of-a-reciprocal-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
