real Grassmann manifolds, Schubert cells, and boundary maps for computing homology
$begingroup$
The problem: Compute $H_ast (G(n,k); mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z})$.
Define $G(n,k)$ to be the space of $k$-dimensional vector subspaces of $mathbb{R}^n$. Define the Schubert cell $e(m_1,...,m_s)$, so $m_j=m_j(pi)=inf{mmid dim(picap mathbb{R}^m)geq j}$ for $1leq jleq k$, where $pi$ is a $k$-plane in $e(m_1,...,m_s)$. Then the dimension of $e(m_1,...,m_s)$ is $sum_i m_i-i$.
The boundary of a Schubert cell has the form $partial e(m_1,...,m_s)=sum_i n_i e(m_1,...,m_{i-1},m_i-1,...,m_s)$ where $m_{i-1}<m_i-1$, and $n_i$ is the incidence number.
Let $D_i$ be the unit $m_i-1$-dimensional disk. Let $d$ be a Schubert cell belonging to the boundary, and since $dim(picap mathbb{R}^{m_i})=i$ we have that $d$ is spanned by $s$ unit vectors, $(u_1,...,u_s)$. Only one of the $u_i$ may belong to the boundary of the corresponding $D_i$ -- otherwise, since $dim(picap mathbb{R}^{m_i-1})geq i$ and $dim(picapmathbb{R}^{m_j-1})geq j$, we would have that $m_i(pi)leq m_i-i$ and $m_j(pi)leq m_j-j$, which gives a too-low dimension for this boundary component. Therefore every incidence number is either 2 or 0 (or -2, if you're mindful of orientations).
This means that if $m$ is odd, $H_i(G(n,k);mathbb{Z}_m)=0$ for $k(n-k)>i>0$, $mathbb{Z}_m$ for $i=0$, and either $mathbb{Z}_m$ or $0$ at $i=k(n-k)$ depending on the parity of $k(n-k)$. If $m=2$, $H_i(G(n,k);mathbb{Z}_2)=mathbb{Z}_2^{N_i(n,k)}$, where $N_i(n,k)$ is the number of Schubert cells of dimension $i$ in $G(n,k)$.
The general case of $m$ even eludes me, however. This problem was assigned before we covered the universal coefficient theorem, so I would like to solve it without using the theorem. It seems as though this would require a way to count the number of Schubert cells in each boundary with coefficient $pm2$, call it $mu$, and then the homology would be $mathbb{Z}_2^muoplusmathbb{Z}_m^{N_i-mu}$. If I am handed a concrete Schubert cell, I can of course write down its boundary, but have not been able to write down a more precise/general solution, and would appreciate a hint in this direction.
algebraic-topology schubert-calculus
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The problem: Compute $H_ast (G(n,k); mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z})$.
Define $G(n,k)$ to be the space of $k$-dimensional vector subspaces of $mathbb{R}^n$. Define the Schubert cell $e(m_1,...,m_s)$, so $m_j=m_j(pi)=inf{mmid dim(picap mathbb{R}^m)geq j}$ for $1leq jleq k$, where $pi$ is a $k$-plane in $e(m_1,...,m_s)$. Then the dimension of $e(m_1,...,m_s)$ is $sum_i m_i-i$.
The boundary of a Schubert cell has the form $partial e(m_1,...,m_s)=sum_i n_i e(m_1,...,m_{i-1},m_i-1,...,m_s)$ where $m_{i-1}<m_i-1$, and $n_i$ is the incidence number.
Let $D_i$ be the unit $m_i-1$-dimensional disk. Let $d$ be a Schubert cell belonging to the boundary, and since $dim(picap mathbb{R}^{m_i})=i$ we have that $d$ is spanned by $s$ unit vectors, $(u_1,...,u_s)$. Only one of the $u_i$ may belong to the boundary of the corresponding $D_i$ -- otherwise, since $dim(picap mathbb{R}^{m_i-1})geq i$ and $dim(picapmathbb{R}^{m_j-1})geq j$, we would have that $m_i(pi)leq m_i-i$ and $m_j(pi)leq m_j-j$, which gives a too-low dimension for this boundary component. Therefore every incidence number is either 2 or 0 (or -2, if you're mindful of orientations).
This means that if $m$ is odd, $H_i(G(n,k);mathbb{Z}_m)=0$ for $k(n-k)>i>0$, $mathbb{Z}_m$ for $i=0$, and either $mathbb{Z}_m$ or $0$ at $i=k(n-k)$ depending on the parity of $k(n-k)$. If $m=2$, $H_i(G(n,k);mathbb{Z}_2)=mathbb{Z}_2^{N_i(n,k)}$, where $N_i(n,k)$ is the number of Schubert cells of dimension $i$ in $G(n,k)$.
The general case of $m$ even eludes me, however. This problem was assigned before we covered the universal coefficient theorem, so I would like to solve it without using the theorem. It seems as though this would require a way to count the number of Schubert cells in each boundary with coefficient $pm2$, call it $mu$, and then the homology would be $mathbb{Z}_2^muoplusmathbb{Z}_m^{N_i-mu}$. If I am handed a concrete Schubert cell, I can of course write down its boundary, but have not been able to write down a more precise/general solution, and would appreciate a hint in this direction.
algebraic-topology schubert-calculus
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The problem: Compute $H_ast (G(n,k); mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z})$.
Define $G(n,k)$ to be the space of $k$-dimensional vector subspaces of $mathbb{R}^n$. Define the Schubert cell $e(m_1,...,m_s)$, so $m_j=m_j(pi)=inf{mmid dim(picap mathbb{R}^m)geq j}$ for $1leq jleq k$, where $pi$ is a $k$-plane in $e(m_1,...,m_s)$. Then the dimension of $e(m_1,...,m_s)$ is $sum_i m_i-i$.
The boundary of a Schubert cell has the form $partial e(m_1,...,m_s)=sum_i n_i e(m_1,...,m_{i-1},m_i-1,...,m_s)$ where $m_{i-1}<m_i-1$, and $n_i$ is the incidence number.
Let $D_i$ be the unit $m_i-1$-dimensional disk. Let $d$ be a Schubert cell belonging to the boundary, and since $dim(picap mathbb{R}^{m_i})=i$ we have that $d$ is spanned by $s$ unit vectors, $(u_1,...,u_s)$. Only one of the $u_i$ may belong to the boundary of the corresponding $D_i$ -- otherwise, since $dim(picap mathbb{R}^{m_i-1})geq i$ and $dim(picapmathbb{R}^{m_j-1})geq j$, we would have that $m_i(pi)leq m_i-i$ and $m_j(pi)leq m_j-j$, which gives a too-low dimension for this boundary component. Therefore every incidence number is either 2 or 0 (or -2, if you're mindful of orientations).
This means that if $m$ is odd, $H_i(G(n,k);mathbb{Z}_m)=0$ for $k(n-k)>i>0$, $mathbb{Z}_m$ for $i=0$, and either $mathbb{Z}_m$ or $0$ at $i=k(n-k)$ depending on the parity of $k(n-k)$. If $m=2$, $H_i(G(n,k);mathbb{Z}_2)=mathbb{Z}_2^{N_i(n,k)}$, where $N_i(n,k)$ is the number of Schubert cells of dimension $i$ in $G(n,k)$.
The general case of $m$ even eludes me, however. This problem was assigned before we covered the universal coefficient theorem, so I would like to solve it without using the theorem. It seems as though this would require a way to count the number of Schubert cells in each boundary with coefficient $pm2$, call it $mu$, and then the homology would be $mathbb{Z}_2^muoplusmathbb{Z}_m^{N_i-mu}$. If I am handed a concrete Schubert cell, I can of course write down its boundary, but have not been able to write down a more precise/general solution, and would appreciate a hint in this direction.
algebraic-topology schubert-calculus
$endgroup$
The problem: Compute $H_ast (G(n,k); mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z})$.
Define $G(n,k)$ to be the space of $k$-dimensional vector subspaces of $mathbb{R}^n$. Define the Schubert cell $e(m_1,...,m_s)$, so $m_j=m_j(pi)=inf{mmid dim(picap mathbb{R}^m)geq j}$ for $1leq jleq k$, where $pi$ is a $k$-plane in $e(m_1,...,m_s)$. Then the dimension of $e(m_1,...,m_s)$ is $sum_i m_i-i$.
The boundary of a Schubert cell has the form $partial e(m_1,...,m_s)=sum_i n_i e(m_1,...,m_{i-1},m_i-1,...,m_s)$ where $m_{i-1}<m_i-1$, and $n_i$ is the incidence number.
Let $D_i$ be the unit $m_i-1$-dimensional disk. Let $d$ be a Schubert cell belonging to the boundary, and since $dim(picap mathbb{R}^{m_i})=i$ we have that $d$ is spanned by $s$ unit vectors, $(u_1,...,u_s)$. Only one of the $u_i$ may belong to the boundary of the corresponding $D_i$ -- otherwise, since $dim(picap mathbb{R}^{m_i-1})geq i$ and $dim(picapmathbb{R}^{m_j-1})geq j$, we would have that $m_i(pi)leq m_i-i$ and $m_j(pi)leq m_j-j$, which gives a too-low dimension for this boundary component. Therefore every incidence number is either 2 or 0 (or -2, if you're mindful of orientations).
This means that if $m$ is odd, $H_i(G(n,k);mathbb{Z}_m)=0$ for $k(n-k)>i>0$, $mathbb{Z}_m$ for $i=0$, and either $mathbb{Z}_m$ or $0$ at $i=k(n-k)$ depending on the parity of $k(n-k)$. If $m=2$, $H_i(G(n,k);mathbb{Z}_2)=mathbb{Z}_2^{N_i(n,k)}$, where $N_i(n,k)$ is the number of Schubert cells of dimension $i$ in $G(n,k)$.
The general case of $m$ even eludes me, however. This problem was assigned before we covered the universal coefficient theorem, so I would like to solve it without using the theorem. It seems as though this would require a way to count the number of Schubert cells in each boundary with coefficient $pm2$, call it $mu$, and then the homology would be $mathbb{Z}_2^muoplusmathbb{Z}_m^{N_i-mu}$. If I am handed a concrete Schubert cell, I can of course write down its boundary, but have not been able to write down a more precise/general solution, and would appreciate a hint in this direction.
algebraic-topology schubert-calculus
algebraic-topology schubert-calculus
edited Dec 28 '18 at 11:01
Matt Samuel
39.2k63870
39.2k63870
asked Mar 5 '13 at 5:39
gmossgmoss
57239
57239
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I haven't explicitly worked out the answer yet (and will not do so soon), but a likely route seems related to Littlewood-Richardson numbers. It is known that the intersection of two cells $e(lambda)e(mu)=sum c^nu_{lambdamu}e(nu)$.
Moreover, my professor gave me the following hint (well, it's more of an answer than a hint): if one considers the Young tableaux corresponding to a Schubert cell, an element of the boundary of this cell is a Young tableaux with one box removed (one which can be removed). From consideration of the explicit inclusion map of $D^m=e(...)rightarrow G(n,k)$ (I do not want to write it out, but it can be found in J. T Schwartz's book Differential Geometry and Topology), it becomes evident that removing a box on an even-numbered diagonal of the Young tableaux will result in an incidence number of 2, and removing a box on an odd-numbered diagonal will result in an incidence number of 0. Then one can compute the (co)homology with coefficients in whatever $mathbb{Z}_m$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f321137%2freal-grassmann-manifolds-schubert-cells-and-boundary-maps-for-computing-homolo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I haven't explicitly worked out the answer yet (and will not do so soon), but a likely route seems related to Littlewood-Richardson numbers. It is known that the intersection of two cells $e(lambda)e(mu)=sum c^nu_{lambdamu}e(nu)$.
Moreover, my professor gave me the following hint (well, it's more of an answer than a hint): if one considers the Young tableaux corresponding to a Schubert cell, an element of the boundary of this cell is a Young tableaux with one box removed (one which can be removed). From consideration of the explicit inclusion map of $D^m=e(...)rightarrow G(n,k)$ (I do not want to write it out, but it can be found in J. T Schwartz's book Differential Geometry and Topology), it becomes evident that removing a box on an even-numbered diagonal of the Young tableaux will result in an incidence number of 2, and removing a box on an odd-numbered diagonal will result in an incidence number of 0. Then one can compute the (co)homology with coefficients in whatever $mathbb{Z}_m$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I haven't explicitly worked out the answer yet (and will not do so soon), but a likely route seems related to Littlewood-Richardson numbers. It is known that the intersection of two cells $e(lambda)e(mu)=sum c^nu_{lambdamu}e(nu)$.
Moreover, my professor gave me the following hint (well, it's more of an answer than a hint): if one considers the Young tableaux corresponding to a Schubert cell, an element of the boundary of this cell is a Young tableaux with one box removed (one which can be removed). From consideration of the explicit inclusion map of $D^m=e(...)rightarrow G(n,k)$ (I do not want to write it out, but it can be found in J. T Schwartz's book Differential Geometry and Topology), it becomes evident that removing a box on an even-numbered diagonal of the Young tableaux will result in an incidence number of 2, and removing a box on an odd-numbered diagonal will result in an incidence number of 0. Then one can compute the (co)homology with coefficients in whatever $mathbb{Z}_m$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I haven't explicitly worked out the answer yet (and will not do so soon), but a likely route seems related to Littlewood-Richardson numbers. It is known that the intersection of two cells $e(lambda)e(mu)=sum c^nu_{lambdamu}e(nu)$.
Moreover, my professor gave me the following hint (well, it's more of an answer than a hint): if one considers the Young tableaux corresponding to a Schubert cell, an element of the boundary of this cell is a Young tableaux with one box removed (one which can be removed). From consideration of the explicit inclusion map of $D^m=e(...)rightarrow G(n,k)$ (I do not want to write it out, but it can be found in J. T Schwartz's book Differential Geometry and Topology), it becomes evident that removing a box on an even-numbered diagonal of the Young tableaux will result in an incidence number of 2, and removing a box on an odd-numbered diagonal will result in an incidence number of 0. Then one can compute the (co)homology with coefficients in whatever $mathbb{Z}_m$.
$endgroup$
I haven't explicitly worked out the answer yet (and will not do so soon), but a likely route seems related to Littlewood-Richardson numbers. It is known that the intersection of two cells $e(lambda)e(mu)=sum c^nu_{lambdamu}e(nu)$.
Moreover, my professor gave me the following hint (well, it's more of an answer than a hint): if one considers the Young tableaux corresponding to a Schubert cell, an element of the boundary of this cell is a Young tableaux with one box removed (one which can be removed). From consideration of the explicit inclusion map of $D^m=e(...)rightarrow G(n,k)$ (I do not want to write it out, but it can be found in J. T Schwartz's book Differential Geometry and Topology), it becomes evident that removing a box on an even-numbered diagonal of the Young tableaux will result in an incidence number of 2, and removing a box on an odd-numbered diagonal will result in an incidence number of 0. Then one can compute the (co)homology with coefficients in whatever $mathbb{Z}_m$.
answered Mar 13 '13 at 5:23
gmossgmoss
57239
57239
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f321137%2freal-grassmann-manifolds-schubert-cells-and-boundary-maps-for-computing-homolo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown