Is aluminum electrical wire used on aircraft?












20












$begingroup$


Aluminum electrical wire got a bit of a bad reputation in household wiring due to reacting badly with terminals not properly rated for aluminum. Properly handled, it works fine, but it's so distrusted for small branch circuits that distributors won't even stock it.



Aluminum is a worse conductor than copper, by almost half. But that only considers it by volume (e.g. Wire diameter). By mass, the advantage swings back to aluminum. Nearly twice the ampacity for the same weight. Where would that matter? Aircraft.



Transport class aircraft are increasingly electrical, like the bleedless 787 where electrical does much of the heavy lifting.



Is aluminum wire actively used in aviation? Or is it "taboo" like it is with houses?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Probably even more taboo than with houses, as aluminum doesn't handle vibrations very well. Copper is more ductile.
    $endgroup$
    – vidarlo
    Mar 22 at 20:42






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I suggest you read up on the whole A380 wiring saga back in 2005, as it involved aluminium wiring...
    $endgroup$
    – Moo
    Mar 23 at 3:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @kebs popularmechanics.com/flight/a982/4201627 us-tech.com/RelId/1425875/pagenum/2/ISvars/default/… cadalyst.com/cad/product-design/what-grounded-airbus-a380-10903 old.seattletimes.com/html/businesstechnology/… prysmiangroup.com/en/products-and-solution/references/…
    $endgroup$
    – Moo
    Mar 24 at 7:47










  • $begingroup$
    Also note that like a car, there's no return wiring on an aircraft. It's done through the aluminum structure of the aircraft. (Article here on how they do it on carbon fiber fuselages)
    $endgroup$
    – user71659
    Mar 25 at 4:54
















20












$begingroup$


Aluminum electrical wire got a bit of a bad reputation in household wiring due to reacting badly with terminals not properly rated for aluminum. Properly handled, it works fine, but it's so distrusted for small branch circuits that distributors won't even stock it.



Aluminum is a worse conductor than copper, by almost half. But that only considers it by volume (e.g. Wire diameter). By mass, the advantage swings back to aluminum. Nearly twice the ampacity for the same weight. Where would that matter? Aircraft.



Transport class aircraft are increasingly electrical, like the bleedless 787 where electrical does much of the heavy lifting.



Is aluminum wire actively used in aviation? Or is it "taboo" like it is with houses?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Probably even more taboo than with houses, as aluminum doesn't handle vibrations very well. Copper is more ductile.
    $endgroup$
    – vidarlo
    Mar 22 at 20:42






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I suggest you read up on the whole A380 wiring saga back in 2005, as it involved aluminium wiring...
    $endgroup$
    – Moo
    Mar 23 at 3:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @kebs popularmechanics.com/flight/a982/4201627 us-tech.com/RelId/1425875/pagenum/2/ISvars/default/… cadalyst.com/cad/product-design/what-grounded-airbus-a380-10903 old.seattletimes.com/html/businesstechnology/… prysmiangroup.com/en/products-and-solution/references/…
    $endgroup$
    – Moo
    Mar 24 at 7:47










  • $begingroup$
    Also note that like a car, there's no return wiring on an aircraft. It's done through the aluminum structure of the aircraft. (Article here on how they do it on carbon fiber fuselages)
    $endgroup$
    – user71659
    Mar 25 at 4:54














20












20








20





$begingroup$


Aluminum electrical wire got a bit of a bad reputation in household wiring due to reacting badly with terminals not properly rated for aluminum. Properly handled, it works fine, but it's so distrusted for small branch circuits that distributors won't even stock it.



Aluminum is a worse conductor than copper, by almost half. But that only considers it by volume (e.g. Wire diameter). By mass, the advantage swings back to aluminum. Nearly twice the ampacity for the same weight. Where would that matter? Aircraft.



Transport class aircraft are increasingly electrical, like the bleedless 787 where electrical does much of the heavy lifting.



Is aluminum wire actively used in aviation? Or is it "taboo" like it is with houses?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




Aluminum electrical wire got a bit of a bad reputation in household wiring due to reacting badly with terminals not properly rated for aluminum. Properly handled, it works fine, but it's so distrusted for small branch circuits that distributors won't even stock it.



Aluminum is a worse conductor than copper, by almost half. But that only considers it by volume (e.g. Wire diameter). By mass, the advantage swings back to aluminum. Nearly twice the ampacity for the same weight. Where would that matter? Aircraft.



Transport class aircraft are increasingly electrical, like the bleedless 787 where electrical does much of the heavy lifting.



Is aluminum wire actively used in aviation? Or is it "taboo" like it is with houses?







electrical-system






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Mar 22 at 20:17









HarperHarper

4,259725




4,259725








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Probably even more taboo than with houses, as aluminum doesn't handle vibrations very well. Copper is more ductile.
    $endgroup$
    – vidarlo
    Mar 22 at 20:42






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I suggest you read up on the whole A380 wiring saga back in 2005, as it involved aluminium wiring...
    $endgroup$
    – Moo
    Mar 23 at 3:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @kebs popularmechanics.com/flight/a982/4201627 us-tech.com/RelId/1425875/pagenum/2/ISvars/default/… cadalyst.com/cad/product-design/what-grounded-airbus-a380-10903 old.seattletimes.com/html/businesstechnology/… prysmiangroup.com/en/products-and-solution/references/…
    $endgroup$
    – Moo
    Mar 24 at 7:47










  • $begingroup$
    Also note that like a car, there's no return wiring on an aircraft. It's done through the aluminum structure of the aircraft. (Article here on how they do it on carbon fiber fuselages)
    $endgroup$
    – user71659
    Mar 25 at 4:54














  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Probably even more taboo than with houses, as aluminum doesn't handle vibrations very well. Copper is more ductile.
    $endgroup$
    – vidarlo
    Mar 22 at 20:42






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I suggest you read up on the whole A380 wiring saga back in 2005, as it involved aluminium wiring...
    $endgroup$
    – Moo
    Mar 23 at 3:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @kebs popularmechanics.com/flight/a982/4201627 us-tech.com/RelId/1425875/pagenum/2/ISvars/default/… cadalyst.com/cad/product-design/what-grounded-airbus-a380-10903 old.seattletimes.com/html/businesstechnology/… prysmiangroup.com/en/products-and-solution/references/…
    $endgroup$
    – Moo
    Mar 24 at 7:47










  • $begingroup$
    Also note that like a car, there's no return wiring on an aircraft. It's done through the aluminum structure of the aircraft. (Article here on how they do it on carbon fiber fuselages)
    $endgroup$
    – user71659
    Mar 25 at 4:54








3




3




$begingroup$
Probably even more taboo than with houses, as aluminum doesn't handle vibrations very well. Copper is more ductile.
$endgroup$
– vidarlo
Mar 22 at 20:42




$begingroup$
Probably even more taboo than with houses, as aluminum doesn't handle vibrations very well. Copper is more ductile.
$endgroup$
– vidarlo
Mar 22 at 20:42




3




3




$begingroup$
I suggest you read up on the whole A380 wiring saga back in 2005, as it involved aluminium wiring...
$endgroup$
– Moo
Mar 23 at 3:44




$begingroup$
I suggest you read up on the whole A380 wiring saga back in 2005, as it involved aluminium wiring...
$endgroup$
– Moo
Mar 23 at 3:44




1




1




$begingroup$
@kebs popularmechanics.com/flight/a982/4201627 us-tech.com/RelId/1425875/pagenum/2/ISvars/default/… cadalyst.com/cad/product-design/what-grounded-airbus-a380-10903 old.seattletimes.com/html/businesstechnology/… prysmiangroup.com/en/products-and-solution/references/…
$endgroup$
– Moo
Mar 24 at 7:47




$begingroup$
@kebs popularmechanics.com/flight/a982/4201627 us-tech.com/RelId/1425875/pagenum/2/ISvars/default/… cadalyst.com/cad/product-design/what-grounded-airbus-a380-10903 old.seattletimes.com/html/businesstechnology/… prysmiangroup.com/en/products-and-solution/references/…
$endgroup$
– Moo
Mar 24 at 7:47












$begingroup$
Also note that like a car, there's no return wiring on an aircraft. It's done through the aluminum structure of the aircraft. (Article here on how they do it on carbon fiber fuselages)
$endgroup$
– user71659
Mar 25 at 4:54




$begingroup$
Also note that like a car, there's no return wiring on an aircraft. It's done through the aluminum structure of the aircraft. (Article here on how they do it on carbon fiber fuselages)
$endgroup$
– user71659
Mar 25 at 4:54










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















17












$begingroup$

Cable is not just the metal wire. It's also insulation, installation, cable channels, extra space at tight bends where cable flexibility is insufficient, and maintenance of said cable. Aluminum corrodes in a lot of conditions and happens to be one of the most fatigue-susceptible metals.



For these reasons, most aircraft wiring is copper and silver-plated or nickel-plated copper. Such wiring is reliable even under imperfect conditions.



But there are cases where different considerations prevail. Sometimes it's just the need to have some minimum cable thickness, for mechanical and handling reasons. Other times it's a thick bus bar where weight makes a difference and quality is easy to ensure.
So beside copper there is some steel, copper-nickel plated aluminum, copper-nickel plated steel, and pure aluminum wiring in aircraft.



In aircraft, safety is ensured and validated with engineering and testing; risks of the kind one can take with home wiring are not accepted. The price of aluminum wire is installation and maintenance complexity instead. The ends need to be cleaned and crimped or welded, sometimes the aluminum wire is terminated with a bimetallic insert. As a result, aluminum wiring is more expensive than copper, not less. It will likely require more maintenance work in the future.



Until recently, aluminum has been mostly avoided for these reasons, and used only for thick wires and bus bars. Currently there is enough confidence in quality management and maintenance that aluminum wiring is getting more use in attempts to save some weight, the A380 in particular uses aluminum wires up to 22 AWG. Such weight savings come at the cost of more parts and more work, both in production and later in service.



Specific percentages vary widely, but generally non-copper wiring accounts for more than 10% and less than 50% of overall wire weight in a production commercial aircraft.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "...risks of the kind one can take with home wiring are not accepted..." Ouch. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – T.J. Crowder
    Mar 23 at 15:57












  • $begingroup$
    As far as relative risk goes, in aviation, there is a lot of quality control and inspection - from manufacturing to routine maintenance. Issues that might develop over time should be caught during inspections. In domestic application, there is a lot of do-it-yourself installation of variable quality that can easily go uninspected until the house burns down. It's more important to go with the "ever reliable" in domestic use. In aviation, it doesn't have to be "ever reliable", provided developing issues can be caught and corrected during scheduled inspections.
    $endgroup$
    – Anthony X
    Mar 23 at 22:58










  • $begingroup$
    Al isn't just used for bus bars: the A320 forward, 757/767/747-400, L-1011, and the MD-11 all use Al feeder wiring. In terms of small aircraft, Piper and Cessna both used it for a while. The new technology, seen in the A380, is to cold weld large connections, not crimp.
    $endgroup$
    – user71659
    Mar 24 at 9:03














Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "528"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61510%2fis-aluminum-electrical-wire-used-on-aircraft%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









17












$begingroup$

Cable is not just the metal wire. It's also insulation, installation, cable channels, extra space at tight bends where cable flexibility is insufficient, and maintenance of said cable. Aluminum corrodes in a lot of conditions and happens to be one of the most fatigue-susceptible metals.



For these reasons, most aircraft wiring is copper and silver-plated or nickel-plated copper. Such wiring is reliable even under imperfect conditions.



But there are cases where different considerations prevail. Sometimes it's just the need to have some minimum cable thickness, for mechanical and handling reasons. Other times it's a thick bus bar where weight makes a difference and quality is easy to ensure.
So beside copper there is some steel, copper-nickel plated aluminum, copper-nickel plated steel, and pure aluminum wiring in aircraft.



In aircraft, safety is ensured and validated with engineering and testing; risks of the kind one can take with home wiring are not accepted. The price of aluminum wire is installation and maintenance complexity instead. The ends need to be cleaned and crimped or welded, sometimes the aluminum wire is terminated with a bimetallic insert. As a result, aluminum wiring is more expensive than copper, not less. It will likely require more maintenance work in the future.



Until recently, aluminum has been mostly avoided for these reasons, and used only for thick wires and bus bars. Currently there is enough confidence in quality management and maintenance that aluminum wiring is getting more use in attempts to save some weight, the A380 in particular uses aluminum wires up to 22 AWG. Such weight savings come at the cost of more parts and more work, both in production and later in service.



Specific percentages vary widely, but generally non-copper wiring accounts for more than 10% and less than 50% of overall wire weight in a production commercial aircraft.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "...risks of the kind one can take with home wiring are not accepted..." Ouch. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – T.J. Crowder
    Mar 23 at 15:57












  • $begingroup$
    As far as relative risk goes, in aviation, there is a lot of quality control and inspection - from manufacturing to routine maintenance. Issues that might develop over time should be caught during inspections. In domestic application, there is a lot of do-it-yourself installation of variable quality that can easily go uninspected until the house burns down. It's more important to go with the "ever reliable" in domestic use. In aviation, it doesn't have to be "ever reliable", provided developing issues can be caught and corrected during scheduled inspections.
    $endgroup$
    – Anthony X
    Mar 23 at 22:58










  • $begingroup$
    Al isn't just used for bus bars: the A320 forward, 757/767/747-400, L-1011, and the MD-11 all use Al feeder wiring. In terms of small aircraft, Piper and Cessna both used it for a while. The new technology, seen in the A380, is to cold weld large connections, not crimp.
    $endgroup$
    – user71659
    Mar 24 at 9:03


















17












$begingroup$

Cable is not just the metal wire. It's also insulation, installation, cable channels, extra space at tight bends where cable flexibility is insufficient, and maintenance of said cable. Aluminum corrodes in a lot of conditions and happens to be one of the most fatigue-susceptible metals.



For these reasons, most aircraft wiring is copper and silver-plated or nickel-plated copper. Such wiring is reliable even under imperfect conditions.



But there are cases where different considerations prevail. Sometimes it's just the need to have some minimum cable thickness, for mechanical and handling reasons. Other times it's a thick bus bar where weight makes a difference and quality is easy to ensure.
So beside copper there is some steel, copper-nickel plated aluminum, copper-nickel plated steel, and pure aluminum wiring in aircraft.



In aircraft, safety is ensured and validated with engineering and testing; risks of the kind one can take with home wiring are not accepted. The price of aluminum wire is installation and maintenance complexity instead. The ends need to be cleaned and crimped or welded, sometimes the aluminum wire is terminated with a bimetallic insert. As a result, aluminum wiring is more expensive than copper, not less. It will likely require more maintenance work in the future.



Until recently, aluminum has been mostly avoided for these reasons, and used only for thick wires and bus bars. Currently there is enough confidence in quality management and maintenance that aluminum wiring is getting more use in attempts to save some weight, the A380 in particular uses aluminum wires up to 22 AWG. Such weight savings come at the cost of more parts and more work, both in production and later in service.



Specific percentages vary widely, but generally non-copper wiring accounts for more than 10% and less than 50% of overall wire weight in a production commercial aircraft.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "...risks of the kind one can take with home wiring are not accepted..." Ouch. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – T.J. Crowder
    Mar 23 at 15:57












  • $begingroup$
    As far as relative risk goes, in aviation, there is a lot of quality control and inspection - from manufacturing to routine maintenance. Issues that might develop over time should be caught during inspections. In domestic application, there is a lot of do-it-yourself installation of variable quality that can easily go uninspected until the house burns down. It's more important to go with the "ever reliable" in domestic use. In aviation, it doesn't have to be "ever reliable", provided developing issues can be caught and corrected during scheduled inspections.
    $endgroup$
    – Anthony X
    Mar 23 at 22:58










  • $begingroup$
    Al isn't just used for bus bars: the A320 forward, 757/767/747-400, L-1011, and the MD-11 all use Al feeder wiring. In terms of small aircraft, Piper and Cessna both used it for a while. The new technology, seen in the A380, is to cold weld large connections, not crimp.
    $endgroup$
    – user71659
    Mar 24 at 9:03
















17












17








17





$begingroup$

Cable is not just the metal wire. It's also insulation, installation, cable channels, extra space at tight bends where cable flexibility is insufficient, and maintenance of said cable. Aluminum corrodes in a lot of conditions and happens to be one of the most fatigue-susceptible metals.



For these reasons, most aircraft wiring is copper and silver-plated or nickel-plated copper. Such wiring is reliable even under imperfect conditions.



But there are cases where different considerations prevail. Sometimes it's just the need to have some minimum cable thickness, for mechanical and handling reasons. Other times it's a thick bus bar where weight makes a difference and quality is easy to ensure.
So beside copper there is some steel, copper-nickel plated aluminum, copper-nickel plated steel, and pure aluminum wiring in aircraft.



In aircraft, safety is ensured and validated with engineering and testing; risks of the kind one can take with home wiring are not accepted. The price of aluminum wire is installation and maintenance complexity instead. The ends need to be cleaned and crimped or welded, sometimes the aluminum wire is terminated with a bimetallic insert. As a result, aluminum wiring is more expensive than copper, not less. It will likely require more maintenance work in the future.



Until recently, aluminum has been mostly avoided for these reasons, and used only for thick wires and bus bars. Currently there is enough confidence in quality management and maintenance that aluminum wiring is getting more use in attempts to save some weight, the A380 in particular uses aluminum wires up to 22 AWG. Such weight savings come at the cost of more parts and more work, both in production and later in service.



Specific percentages vary widely, but generally non-copper wiring accounts for more than 10% and less than 50% of overall wire weight in a production commercial aircraft.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Cable is not just the metal wire. It's also insulation, installation, cable channels, extra space at tight bends where cable flexibility is insufficient, and maintenance of said cable. Aluminum corrodes in a lot of conditions and happens to be one of the most fatigue-susceptible metals.



For these reasons, most aircraft wiring is copper and silver-plated or nickel-plated copper. Such wiring is reliable even under imperfect conditions.



But there are cases where different considerations prevail. Sometimes it's just the need to have some minimum cable thickness, for mechanical and handling reasons. Other times it's a thick bus bar where weight makes a difference and quality is easy to ensure.
So beside copper there is some steel, copper-nickel plated aluminum, copper-nickel plated steel, and pure aluminum wiring in aircraft.



In aircraft, safety is ensured and validated with engineering and testing; risks of the kind one can take with home wiring are not accepted. The price of aluminum wire is installation and maintenance complexity instead. The ends need to be cleaned and crimped or welded, sometimes the aluminum wire is terminated with a bimetallic insert. As a result, aluminum wiring is more expensive than copper, not less. It will likely require more maintenance work in the future.



Until recently, aluminum has been mostly avoided for these reasons, and used only for thick wires and bus bars. Currently there is enough confidence in quality management and maintenance that aluminum wiring is getting more use in attempts to save some weight, the A380 in particular uses aluminum wires up to 22 AWG. Such weight savings come at the cost of more parts and more work, both in production and later in service.



Specific percentages vary widely, but generally non-copper wiring accounts for more than 10% and less than 50% of overall wire weight in a production commercial aircraft.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 24 at 9:52

























answered Mar 22 at 20:54









TheracTherac

6,0831527




6,0831527








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "...risks of the kind one can take with home wiring are not accepted..." Ouch. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – T.J. Crowder
    Mar 23 at 15:57












  • $begingroup$
    As far as relative risk goes, in aviation, there is a lot of quality control and inspection - from manufacturing to routine maintenance. Issues that might develop over time should be caught during inspections. In domestic application, there is a lot of do-it-yourself installation of variable quality that can easily go uninspected until the house burns down. It's more important to go with the "ever reliable" in domestic use. In aviation, it doesn't have to be "ever reliable", provided developing issues can be caught and corrected during scheduled inspections.
    $endgroup$
    – Anthony X
    Mar 23 at 22:58










  • $begingroup$
    Al isn't just used for bus bars: the A320 forward, 757/767/747-400, L-1011, and the MD-11 all use Al feeder wiring. In terms of small aircraft, Piper and Cessna both used it for a while. The new technology, seen in the A380, is to cold weld large connections, not crimp.
    $endgroup$
    – user71659
    Mar 24 at 9:03
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "...risks of the kind one can take with home wiring are not accepted..." Ouch. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – T.J. Crowder
    Mar 23 at 15:57












  • $begingroup$
    As far as relative risk goes, in aviation, there is a lot of quality control and inspection - from manufacturing to routine maintenance. Issues that might develop over time should be caught during inspections. In domestic application, there is a lot of do-it-yourself installation of variable quality that can easily go uninspected until the house burns down. It's more important to go with the "ever reliable" in domestic use. In aviation, it doesn't have to be "ever reliable", provided developing issues can be caught and corrected during scheduled inspections.
    $endgroup$
    – Anthony X
    Mar 23 at 22:58










  • $begingroup$
    Al isn't just used for bus bars: the A320 forward, 757/767/747-400, L-1011, and the MD-11 all use Al feeder wiring. In terms of small aircraft, Piper and Cessna both used it for a while. The new technology, seen in the A380, is to cold weld large connections, not crimp.
    $endgroup$
    – user71659
    Mar 24 at 9:03










1




1




$begingroup$
"...risks of the kind one can take with home wiring are not accepted..." Ouch. :-)
$endgroup$
– T.J. Crowder
Mar 23 at 15:57






$begingroup$
"...risks of the kind one can take with home wiring are not accepted..." Ouch. :-)
$endgroup$
– T.J. Crowder
Mar 23 at 15:57














$begingroup$
As far as relative risk goes, in aviation, there is a lot of quality control and inspection - from manufacturing to routine maintenance. Issues that might develop over time should be caught during inspections. In domestic application, there is a lot of do-it-yourself installation of variable quality that can easily go uninspected until the house burns down. It's more important to go with the "ever reliable" in domestic use. In aviation, it doesn't have to be "ever reliable", provided developing issues can be caught and corrected during scheduled inspections.
$endgroup$
– Anthony X
Mar 23 at 22:58




$begingroup$
As far as relative risk goes, in aviation, there is a lot of quality control and inspection - from manufacturing to routine maintenance. Issues that might develop over time should be caught during inspections. In domestic application, there is a lot of do-it-yourself installation of variable quality that can easily go uninspected until the house burns down. It's more important to go with the "ever reliable" in domestic use. In aviation, it doesn't have to be "ever reliable", provided developing issues can be caught and corrected during scheduled inspections.
$endgroup$
– Anthony X
Mar 23 at 22:58












$begingroup$
Al isn't just used for bus bars: the A320 forward, 757/767/747-400, L-1011, and the MD-11 all use Al feeder wiring. In terms of small aircraft, Piper and Cessna both used it for a while. The new technology, seen in the A380, is to cold weld large connections, not crimp.
$endgroup$
– user71659
Mar 24 at 9:03






$begingroup$
Al isn't just used for bus bars: the A320 forward, 757/767/747-400, L-1011, and the MD-11 all use Al feeder wiring. In terms of small aircraft, Piper and Cessna both used it for a while. The new technology, seen in the A380, is to cold weld large connections, not crimp.
$endgroup$
– user71659
Mar 24 at 9:03




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61510%2fis-aluminum-electrical-wire-used-on-aircraft%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?