How to prove $frac{tan (A)}{tan (A)}+frac{cot (A)}{cot (A)}=frac{1}{1-2cos(A)^2}$
$begingroup$
I am unable to prove this trigonometric identity
$$frac{tan (A)}{tan (A)}+frac{cot (A)}{cot (A)}=frac{1}{1-2cos^2(A)}$$
I have tried to transform the left-hand side and stuck with this
$$frac{2sin(A)cos(A)}{sin(A)cos(A)}$$
And I have tried to transform the right-hand side by changing the $$2cos^2(A)$$ to $$frac{2}{sec^2(A)}$$, and used the trigonometric identity $$1+tan^2(A)=sec^2(A)$$ and got this instead
$$frac{1+tan^2(A)}{tan^2(A)-1}$$ which I can transform to $$frac{cot(A)+tan(A)}{tan(A)-cot(A)}$$.
I cannot get both sides equal, help please?
trigonometry
$endgroup$
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
I am unable to prove this trigonometric identity
$$frac{tan (A)}{tan (A)}+frac{cot (A)}{cot (A)}=frac{1}{1-2cos^2(A)}$$
I have tried to transform the left-hand side and stuck with this
$$frac{2sin(A)cos(A)}{sin(A)cos(A)}$$
And I have tried to transform the right-hand side by changing the $$2cos^2(A)$$ to $$frac{2}{sec^2(A)}$$, and used the trigonometric identity $$1+tan^2(A)=sec^2(A)$$ and got this instead
$$frac{1+tan^2(A)}{tan^2(A)-1}$$ which I can transform to $$frac{cot(A)+tan(A)}{tan(A)-cot(A)}$$.
I cannot get both sides equal, help please?
trigonometry
$endgroup$
7
$begingroup$
I think there's a typo as the left side is always $1 + 1 = 2$, so it's independent of $A$, while the right side is definitely not a constant.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Dec 30 '18 at 1:09
$begingroup$
@JohnOmielan but that's exactly how the question on textbook is written?
$endgroup$
– user569622
Dec 30 '18 at 1:11
3
$begingroup$
Then your textbook must have a typo, because this identity clearly can not be proven true.
$endgroup$
– Noble Mushtak
Dec 30 '18 at 1:12
$begingroup$
@JohnOmielan does that mean every equation that has a dependent variable on one side and a constant on the other side cannot be proven?
$endgroup$
– user569622
Dec 30 '18 at 1:14
$begingroup$
@NobleMushtak I see, thank you for the answer. That must be the case, the book is so old
$endgroup$
– user569622
Dec 30 '18 at 1:15
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
I am unable to prove this trigonometric identity
$$frac{tan (A)}{tan (A)}+frac{cot (A)}{cot (A)}=frac{1}{1-2cos^2(A)}$$
I have tried to transform the left-hand side and stuck with this
$$frac{2sin(A)cos(A)}{sin(A)cos(A)}$$
And I have tried to transform the right-hand side by changing the $$2cos^2(A)$$ to $$frac{2}{sec^2(A)}$$, and used the trigonometric identity $$1+tan^2(A)=sec^2(A)$$ and got this instead
$$frac{1+tan^2(A)}{tan^2(A)-1}$$ which I can transform to $$frac{cot(A)+tan(A)}{tan(A)-cot(A)}$$.
I cannot get both sides equal, help please?
trigonometry
$endgroup$
I am unable to prove this trigonometric identity
$$frac{tan (A)}{tan (A)}+frac{cot (A)}{cot (A)}=frac{1}{1-2cos^2(A)}$$
I have tried to transform the left-hand side and stuck with this
$$frac{2sin(A)cos(A)}{sin(A)cos(A)}$$
And I have tried to transform the right-hand side by changing the $$2cos^2(A)$$ to $$frac{2}{sec^2(A)}$$, and used the trigonometric identity $$1+tan^2(A)=sec^2(A)$$ and got this instead
$$frac{1+tan^2(A)}{tan^2(A)-1}$$ which I can transform to $$frac{cot(A)+tan(A)}{tan(A)-cot(A)}$$.
I cannot get both sides equal, help please?
trigonometry
trigonometry
edited Dec 30 '18 at 2:05
bjcolby15
1,51711016
1,51711016
asked Dec 30 '18 at 1:07
user569622user569622
345
345
7
$begingroup$
I think there's a typo as the left side is always $1 + 1 = 2$, so it's independent of $A$, while the right side is definitely not a constant.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Dec 30 '18 at 1:09
$begingroup$
@JohnOmielan but that's exactly how the question on textbook is written?
$endgroup$
– user569622
Dec 30 '18 at 1:11
3
$begingroup$
Then your textbook must have a typo, because this identity clearly can not be proven true.
$endgroup$
– Noble Mushtak
Dec 30 '18 at 1:12
$begingroup$
@JohnOmielan does that mean every equation that has a dependent variable on one side and a constant on the other side cannot be proven?
$endgroup$
– user569622
Dec 30 '18 at 1:14
$begingroup$
@NobleMushtak I see, thank you for the answer. That must be the case, the book is so old
$endgroup$
– user569622
Dec 30 '18 at 1:15
|
show 4 more comments
7
$begingroup$
I think there's a typo as the left side is always $1 + 1 = 2$, so it's independent of $A$, while the right side is definitely not a constant.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Dec 30 '18 at 1:09
$begingroup$
@JohnOmielan but that's exactly how the question on textbook is written?
$endgroup$
– user569622
Dec 30 '18 at 1:11
3
$begingroup$
Then your textbook must have a typo, because this identity clearly can not be proven true.
$endgroup$
– Noble Mushtak
Dec 30 '18 at 1:12
$begingroup$
@JohnOmielan does that mean every equation that has a dependent variable on one side and a constant on the other side cannot be proven?
$endgroup$
– user569622
Dec 30 '18 at 1:14
$begingroup$
@NobleMushtak I see, thank you for the answer. That must be the case, the book is so old
$endgroup$
– user569622
Dec 30 '18 at 1:15
7
7
$begingroup$
I think there's a typo as the left side is always $1 + 1 = 2$, so it's independent of $A$, while the right side is definitely not a constant.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Dec 30 '18 at 1:09
$begingroup$
I think there's a typo as the left side is always $1 + 1 = 2$, so it's independent of $A$, while the right side is definitely not a constant.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Dec 30 '18 at 1:09
$begingroup$
@JohnOmielan but that's exactly how the question on textbook is written?
$endgroup$
– user569622
Dec 30 '18 at 1:11
$begingroup$
@JohnOmielan but that's exactly how the question on textbook is written?
$endgroup$
– user569622
Dec 30 '18 at 1:11
3
3
$begingroup$
Then your textbook must have a typo, because this identity clearly can not be proven true.
$endgroup$
– Noble Mushtak
Dec 30 '18 at 1:12
$begingroup$
Then your textbook must have a typo, because this identity clearly can not be proven true.
$endgroup$
– Noble Mushtak
Dec 30 '18 at 1:12
$begingroup$
@JohnOmielan does that mean every equation that has a dependent variable on one side and a constant on the other side cannot be proven?
$endgroup$
– user569622
Dec 30 '18 at 1:14
$begingroup$
@JohnOmielan does that mean every equation that has a dependent variable on one side and a constant on the other side cannot be proven?
$endgroup$
– user569622
Dec 30 '18 at 1:14
$begingroup$
@NobleMushtak I see, thank you for the answer. That must be the case, the book is so old
$endgroup$
– user569622
Dec 30 '18 at 1:15
$begingroup$
@NobleMushtak I see, thank you for the answer. That must be the case, the book is so old
$endgroup$
– user569622
Dec 30 '18 at 1:15
|
show 4 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
One way we can prove the identity false is as follows:
$$begin {align}
dfrac {tan A} {tan A} + dfrac{cot A}{cot A} = dfrac {1}{1-2cos^2 2A} \
2 = dfrac {1}{1-2cos^2 2A} \
2 (1-2cos^2 2A) = 1 \
2 - 4cos^2 2A = 1 \
- 4cos^2 2A = dfrac {1}{2} \
cos^2 2A = -dfrac {1}{8}
end {align}$$
Since the last line would require us to take the square root of a negative number, $A$ does not exist, and the identity is false.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056419%2fhow-to-prove-frac-tan-a-tan-a-frac-cot-a-cot-a-frac11-2-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
One way we can prove the identity false is as follows:
$$begin {align}
dfrac {tan A} {tan A} + dfrac{cot A}{cot A} = dfrac {1}{1-2cos^2 2A} \
2 = dfrac {1}{1-2cos^2 2A} \
2 (1-2cos^2 2A) = 1 \
2 - 4cos^2 2A = 1 \
- 4cos^2 2A = dfrac {1}{2} \
cos^2 2A = -dfrac {1}{8}
end {align}$$
Since the last line would require us to take the square root of a negative number, $A$ does not exist, and the identity is false.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
One way we can prove the identity false is as follows:
$$begin {align}
dfrac {tan A} {tan A} + dfrac{cot A}{cot A} = dfrac {1}{1-2cos^2 2A} \
2 = dfrac {1}{1-2cos^2 2A} \
2 (1-2cos^2 2A) = 1 \
2 - 4cos^2 2A = 1 \
- 4cos^2 2A = dfrac {1}{2} \
cos^2 2A = -dfrac {1}{8}
end {align}$$
Since the last line would require us to take the square root of a negative number, $A$ does not exist, and the identity is false.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
One way we can prove the identity false is as follows:
$$begin {align}
dfrac {tan A} {tan A} + dfrac{cot A}{cot A} = dfrac {1}{1-2cos^2 2A} \
2 = dfrac {1}{1-2cos^2 2A} \
2 (1-2cos^2 2A) = 1 \
2 - 4cos^2 2A = 1 \
- 4cos^2 2A = dfrac {1}{2} \
cos^2 2A = -dfrac {1}{8}
end {align}$$
Since the last line would require us to take the square root of a negative number, $A$ does not exist, and the identity is false.
$endgroup$
One way we can prove the identity false is as follows:
$$begin {align}
dfrac {tan A} {tan A} + dfrac{cot A}{cot A} = dfrac {1}{1-2cos^2 2A} \
2 = dfrac {1}{1-2cos^2 2A} \
2 (1-2cos^2 2A) = 1 \
2 - 4cos^2 2A = 1 \
- 4cos^2 2A = dfrac {1}{2} \
cos^2 2A = -dfrac {1}{8}
end {align}$$
Since the last line would require us to take the square root of a negative number, $A$ does not exist, and the identity is false.
edited Dec 30 '18 at 21:22
answered Dec 30 '18 at 18:15
bjcolby15bjcolby15
1,51711016
1,51711016
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056419%2fhow-to-prove-frac-tan-a-tan-a-frac-cot-a-cot-a-frac11-2-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
7
$begingroup$
I think there's a typo as the left side is always $1 + 1 = 2$, so it's independent of $A$, while the right side is definitely not a constant.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Dec 30 '18 at 1:09
$begingroup$
@JohnOmielan but that's exactly how the question on textbook is written?
$endgroup$
– user569622
Dec 30 '18 at 1:11
3
$begingroup$
Then your textbook must have a typo, because this identity clearly can not be proven true.
$endgroup$
– Noble Mushtak
Dec 30 '18 at 1:12
$begingroup$
@JohnOmielan does that mean every equation that has a dependent variable on one side and a constant on the other side cannot be proven?
$endgroup$
– user569622
Dec 30 '18 at 1:14
$begingroup$
@NobleMushtak I see, thank you for the answer. That must be the case, the book is so old
$endgroup$
– user569622
Dec 30 '18 at 1:15