Are there any minor extensions of Dirichlet's theorem?
$begingroup$
For example, can we say that for $k$ $odd$, there are infinitely many primes of the form $a+bk$, for a fixed $a,b$ with $gcd(a,b)=1$?
How about for $k$ $odd$, there are infinitely many primes of the form $1+bk$, for a fixed $a,b$?
elementary-number-theory dirichlet-series
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For example, can we say that for $k$ $odd$, there are infinitely many primes of the form $a+bk$, for a fixed $a,b$ with $gcd(a,b)=1$?
How about for $k$ $odd$, there are infinitely many primes of the form $1+bk$, for a fixed $a,b$?
elementary-number-theory dirichlet-series
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I would suggest that you go over Dirichlet's proof and see if you can modify it to work for $a=1$.
$endgroup$
– Mustafa Said
Dec 30 '18 at 2:32
$begingroup$
Note that for either case, for $k$ being odd, there won't be infinitely many primes if $a$ and $b$ are both odd as $a + bk$ will then always be even.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Dec 30 '18 at 2:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For example, can we say that for $k$ $odd$, there are infinitely many primes of the form $a+bk$, for a fixed $a,b$ with $gcd(a,b)=1$?
How about for $k$ $odd$, there are infinitely many primes of the form $1+bk$, for a fixed $a,b$?
elementary-number-theory dirichlet-series
$endgroup$
For example, can we say that for $k$ $odd$, there are infinitely many primes of the form $a+bk$, for a fixed $a,b$ with $gcd(a,b)=1$?
How about for $k$ $odd$, there are infinitely many primes of the form $1+bk$, for a fixed $a,b$?
elementary-number-theory dirichlet-series
elementary-number-theory dirichlet-series
asked Dec 30 '18 at 2:27
Tejas RaoTejas Rao
34211
34211
1
$begingroup$
I would suggest that you go over Dirichlet's proof and see if you can modify it to work for $a=1$.
$endgroup$
– Mustafa Said
Dec 30 '18 at 2:32
$begingroup$
Note that for either case, for $k$ being odd, there won't be infinitely many primes if $a$ and $b$ are both odd as $a + bk$ will then always be even.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Dec 30 '18 at 2:33
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
I would suggest that you go over Dirichlet's proof and see if you can modify it to work for $a=1$.
$endgroup$
– Mustafa Said
Dec 30 '18 at 2:32
$begingroup$
Note that for either case, for $k$ being odd, there won't be infinitely many primes if $a$ and $b$ are both odd as $a + bk$ will then always be even.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Dec 30 '18 at 2:33
1
1
$begingroup$
I would suggest that you go over Dirichlet's proof and see if you can modify it to work for $a=1$.
$endgroup$
– Mustafa Said
Dec 30 '18 at 2:32
$begingroup$
I would suggest that you go over Dirichlet's proof and see if you can modify it to work for $a=1$.
$endgroup$
– Mustafa Said
Dec 30 '18 at 2:32
$begingroup$
Note that for either case, for $k$ being odd, there won't be infinitely many primes if $a$ and $b$ are both odd as $a + bk$ will then always be even.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Dec 30 '18 at 2:33
$begingroup$
Note that for either case, for $k$ being odd, there won't be infinitely many primes if $a$ and $b$ are both odd as $a + bk$ will then always be even.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Dec 30 '18 at 2:33
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
For certain cases, you can say that $k$ must be odd, but it doesn't really add any restriction. For example, if $a$ is even and $b$ is odd, with $gcd left(a, bright) = 1$, then $k$ must be odd for $a + bk$ to be a prime, except from the one possible case of $2$. Apart from such relatively basic cases, I don't believe there is much more that restricting $k$ to be odd, or just $1$, will do. Nonetheless, I agree with Mustafa Said that you may wish to check Dirichlet's proof (e.g., do an online search about any extensions to it) to see about this yourself.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056458%2fare-there-any-minor-extensions-of-dirichlets-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
For certain cases, you can say that $k$ must be odd, but it doesn't really add any restriction. For example, if $a$ is even and $b$ is odd, with $gcd left(a, bright) = 1$, then $k$ must be odd for $a + bk$ to be a prime, except from the one possible case of $2$. Apart from such relatively basic cases, I don't believe there is much more that restricting $k$ to be odd, or just $1$, will do. Nonetheless, I agree with Mustafa Said that you may wish to check Dirichlet's proof (e.g., do an online search about any extensions to it) to see about this yourself.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For certain cases, you can say that $k$ must be odd, but it doesn't really add any restriction. For example, if $a$ is even and $b$ is odd, with $gcd left(a, bright) = 1$, then $k$ must be odd for $a + bk$ to be a prime, except from the one possible case of $2$. Apart from such relatively basic cases, I don't believe there is much more that restricting $k$ to be odd, or just $1$, will do. Nonetheless, I agree with Mustafa Said that you may wish to check Dirichlet's proof (e.g., do an online search about any extensions to it) to see about this yourself.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For certain cases, you can say that $k$ must be odd, but it doesn't really add any restriction. For example, if $a$ is even and $b$ is odd, with $gcd left(a, bright) = 1$, then $k$ must be odd for $a + bk$ to be a prime, except from the one possible case of $2$. Apart from such relatively basic cases, I don't believe there is much more that restricting $k$ to be odd, or just $1$, will do. Nonetheless, I agree with Mustafa Said that you may wish to check Dirichlet's proof (e.g., do an online search about any extensions to it) to see about this yourself.
$endgroup$
For certain cases, you can say that $k$ must be odd, but it doesn't really add any restriction. For example, if $a$ is even and $b$ is odd, with $gcd left(a, bright) = 1$, then $k$ must be odd for $a + bk$ to be a prime, except from the one possible case of $2$. Apart from such relatively basic cases, I don't believe there is much more that restricting $k$ to be odd, or just $1$, will do. Nonetheless, I agree with Mustafa Said that you may wish to check Dirichlet's proof (e.g., do an online search about any extensions to it) to see about this yourself.
edited Dec 30 '18 at 4:05
answered Dec 30 '18 at 2:38
John OmielanJohn Omielan
5,1042218
5,1042218
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056458%2fare-there-any-minor-extensions-of-dirichlets-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
I would suggest that you go over Dirichlet's proof and see if you can modify it to work for $a=1$.
$endgroup$
– Mustafa Said
Dec 30 '18 at 2:32
$begingroup$
Note that for either case, for $k$ being odd, there won't be infinitely many primes if $a$ and $b$ are both odd as $a + bk$ will then always be even.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Dec 30 '18 at 2:33