Prove the equality of Parseval












0












$begingroup$


Let $f$ a continuous function in $[-L,L]$ with $f'$ piecewise continuous. Suppose $f(-L)=f(L)$, then the coefficients of fourier of $f$ in $[-L,L]$ satisfy:



$$2a_0+sum_{n=1}^infty (a_n^2+b_n^2)=frac{1}{L}int_{-L}^{L}f^2(x)dx.$$



My attempt



As $f$ is integrable in $[-L,L]$ the coefficients of fourier serie is



$$a_0=frac{1}{2L}intlimits_{-L}^{L}f(x)dx$$
$$a_n=frac{1}{L}intlimits_{-L}^{L}f(x)cos(frac{npi x}{L})dx$$
$$b_n=frac{1}{L}intlimits_{-L}^{L}f(x)sin(frac{npi x}{L})dx.$$



Let the N-esima partial sum of fourier serie of $f$



$$S_N(x)=a_0+sumlimits_{n=1}^{N}[a_ncos(frac{npi x}{L})+b_nsin(frac{npi x}{L})].$$



I know by Bessel inequality



$$2a_0+sum_{n=1}^infty (a_n^2+b_n^2)leqfrac{1}{L}int_{-L}^{L}f^2(x)dx.$$



Here I'm stuck. Can someone help me?






calculus fourier-analysis harmonic-analysis







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think the first term is wrong. Just plug in $f(x)=C$.
    $endgroup$
    – Andrei
    Dec 10 '18 at 16:34










  • $begingroup$
    Yes sorry @Andrei is $2L$
    $endgroup$
    – Bvss12
    Dec 10 '18 at 16:35










  • $begingroup$
    There should be a square too.
    $endgroup$
    – Andrei
    Dec 10 '18 at 16:42
















0












$begingroup$


Let $f$ a continuous function in $[-L,L]$ with $f'$ piecewise continuous. Suppose $f(-L)=f(L)$, then the coefficients of fourier of $f$ in $[-L,L]$ satisfy:



$$2a_0+sum_{n=1}^infty (a_n^2+b_n^2)=frac{1}{L}int_{-L}^{L}f^2(x)dx.$$



My attempt



As $f$ is integrable in $[-L,L]$ the coefficients of fourier serie is



$$a_0=frac{1}{2L}intlimits_{-L}^{L}f(x)dx$$
$$a_n=frac{1}{L}intlimits_{-L}^{L}f(x)cos(frac{npi x}{L})dx$$
$$b_n=frac{1}{L}intlimits_{-L}^{L}f(x)sin(frac{npi x}{L})dx.$$



Let the N-esima partial sum of fourier serie of $f$



$$S_N(x)=a_0+sumlimits_{n=1}^{N}[a_ncos(frac{npi x}{L})+b_nsin(frac{npi x}{L})].$$



I know by Bessel inequality



$$2a_0+sum_{n=1}^infty (a_n^2+b_n^2)leqfrac{1}{L}int_{-L}^{L}f^2(x)dx.$$



Here I'm stuck. Can someone help me?






calculus fourier-analysis harmonic-analysis







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think the first term is wrong. Just plug in $f(x)=C$.
    $endgroup$
    – Andrei
    Dec 10 '18 at 16:34










  • $begingroup$
    Yes sorry @Andrei is $2L$
    $endgroup$
    – Bvss12
    Dec 10 '18 at 16:35










  • $begingroup$
    There should be a square too.
    $endgroup$
    – Andrei
    Dec 10 '18 at 16:42














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Let $f$ a continuous function in $[-L,L]$ with $f'$ piecewise continuous. Suppose $f(-L)=f(L)$, then the coefficients of fourier of $f$ in $[-L,L]$ satisfy:



$$2a_0+sum_{n=1}^infty (a_n^2+b_n^2)=frac{1}{L}int_{-L}^{L}f^2(x)dx.$$



My attempt



As $f$ is integrable in $[-L,L]$ the coefficients of fourier serie is



$$a_0=frac{1}{2L}intlimits_{-L}^{L}f(x)dx$$
$$a_n=frac{1}{L}intlimits_{-L}^{L}f(x)cos(frac{npi x}{L})dx$$
$$b_n=frac{1}{L}intlimits_{-L}^{L}f(x)sin(frac{npi x}{L})dx.$$



Let the N-esima partial sum of fourier serie of $f$



$$S_N(x)=a_0+sumlimits_{n=1}^{N}[a_ncos(frac{npi x}{L})+b_nsin(frac{npi x}{L})].$$



I know by Bessel inequality



$$2a_0+sum_{n=1}^infty (a_n^2+b_n^2)leqfrac{1}{L}int_{-L}^{L}f^2(x)dx.$$



Here I'm stuck. Can someone help me?






calculus fourier-analysis harmonic-analysis







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $f$ a continuous function in $[-L,L]$ with $f'$ piecewise continuous. Suppose $f(-L)=f(L)$, then the coefficients of fourier of $f$ in $[-L,L]$ satisfy:



$$2a_0+sum_{n=1}^infty (a_n^2+b_n^2)=frac{1}{L}int_{-L}^{L}f^2(x)dx.$$



My attempt



As $f$ is integrable in $[-L,L]$ the coefficients of fourier serie is



$$a_0=frac{1}{2L}intlimits_{-L}^{L}f(x)dx$$
$$a_n=frac{1}{L}intlimits_{-L}^{L}f(x)cos(frac{npi x}{L})dx$$
$$b_n=frac{1}{L}intlimits_{-L}^{L}f(x)sin(frac{npi x}{L})dx.$$



Let the N-esima partial sum of fourier serie of $f$



$$S_N(x)=a_0+sumlimits_{n=1}^{N}[a_ncos(frac{npi x}{L})+b_nsin(frac{npi x}{L})].$$



I know by Bessel inequality



$$2a_0+sum_{n=1}^infty (a_n^2+b_n^2)leqfrac{1}{L}int_{-L}^{L}f^2(x)dx.$$



Here I'm stuck. Can someone help me?






calculus fourier-analysis harmonic-analysis




calculus fourier-analysis harmonic-analysis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 10 '18 at 16:59









rafa11111

1,1932417




1,1932417










asked Dec 10 '18 at 16:14









Bvss12Bvss12

1,821619




1,821619








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think the first term is wrong. Just plug in $f(x)=C$.
    $endgroup$
    – Andrei
    Dec 10 '18 at 16:34










  • $begingroup$
    Yes sorry @Andrei is $2L$
    $endgroup$
    – Bvss12
    Dec 10 '18 at 16:35










  • $begingroup$
    There should be a square too.
    $endgroup$
    – Andrei
    Dec 10 '18 at 16:42














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think the first term is wrong. Just plug in $f(x)=C$.
    $endgroup$
    – Andrei
    Dec 10 '18 at 16:34










  • $begingroup$
    Yes sorry @Andrei is $2L$
    $endgroup$
    – Bvss12
    Dec 10 '18 at 16:35










  • $begingroup$
    There should be a square too.
    $endgroup$
    – Andrei
    Dec 10 '18 at 16:42








1




1




$begingroup$
I think the first term is wrong. Just plug in $f(x)=C$.
$endgroup$
– Andrei
Dec 10 '18 at 16:34




$begingroup$
I think the first term is wrong. Just plug in $f(x)=C$.
$endgroup$
– Andrei
Dec 10 '18 at 16:34












$begingroup$
Yes sorry @Andrei is $2L$
$endgroup$
– Bvss12
Dec 10 '18 at 16:35




$begingroup$
Yes sorry @Andrei is $2L$
$endgroup$
– Bvss12
Dec 10 '18 at 16:35












$begingroup$
There should be a square too.
$endgroup$
– Andrei
Dec 10 '18 at 16:42




$begingroup$
There should be a square too.
$endgroup$
– Andrei
Dec 10 '18 at 16:42










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Hint: Just consider it intuitively. Suppose that
$$f=sum_{n=1}^{N}b_nsinleft(frac{pi n x}{L}right)$$
then
$$f^2=sum_{n,k=1}^{N}b_{n}b_{k}sinleft(frac{pi n x}{L}right)sinleft(frac{pi k x}{L}right).$$
Since
$$int_{-L}^L sinleft(frac{pi n x}{L}right)sinleft(frac{pi k x}{L}right)dx=Ldelta_{n,k}$$
we have that in this case
$$int_{-L}^L f^2 dx=Lsum_{n,k=1}^{N}b_{n}b_{k}delta_{n,k}=Lsum_{n=1}^N b_n^2.$$
The square of the function will sum over all possible pairs, and pairs that aren't the same will integrate to zero. How can you extend this intuition for finite sums to infinite sums? The argument is also the same when you toss in cosines and a constant term.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    In this case i need $f=a_0+sum_{n=1}^{N}[a_ncos (frac{npi x}{L}+b_nsin(frac{pi n x}{L})]$ and the square of this. no?
    $endgroup$
    – Bvss12
    Dec 10 '18 at 16:59












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, but it is the same argument when you also add those terms in because $$int_{-L}^Lsinleft(frac{pi n x}{L}right)cosleft(frac{pi k x}{L}right)dx = 0.$$
    $endgroup$
    – Will Fisher
    Dec 10 '18 at 17:02












  • $begingroup$
    By the way, Parsevel's theorem gives $$frac{1}{L}int_{-L}^L f^2 dx=frac{1}{2}a_0^2+sum_{nge 1}(a_n^2+b_n^2).$$ Your $a_0$ term is off.
    $endgroup$
    – Will Fisher
    Dec 10 '18 at 17:03













Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3034111%2fprove-the-equality-of-parseval%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

Hint: Just consider it intuitively. Suppose that
$$f=sum_{n=1}^{N}b_nsinleft(frac{pi n x}{L}right)$$
then
$$f^2=sum_{n,k=1}^{N}b_{n}b_{k}sinleft(frac{pi n x}{L}right)sinleft(frac{pi k x}{L}right).$$
Since
$$int_{-L}^L sinleft(frac{pi n x}{L}right)sinleft(frac{pi k x}{L}right)dx=Ldelta_{n,k}$$
we have that in this case
$$int_{-L}^L f^2 dx=Lsum_{n,k=1}^{N}b_{n}b_{k}delta_{n,k}=Lsum_{n=1}^N b_n^2.$$
The square of the function will sum over all possible pairs, and pairs that aren't the same will integrate to zero. How can you extend this intuition for finite sums to infinite sums? The argument is also the same when you toss in cosines and a constant term.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    In this case i need $f=a_0+sum_{n=1}^{N}[a_ncos (frac{npi x}{L}+b_nsin(frac{pi n x}{L})]$ and the square of this. no?
    $endgroup$
    – Bvss12
    Dec 10 '18 at 16:59












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, but it is the same argument when you also add those terms in because $$int_{-L}^Lsinleft(frac{pi n x}{L}right)cosleft(frac{pi k x}{L}right)dx = 0.$$
    $endgroup$
    – Will Fisher
    Dec 10 '18 at 17:02












  • $begingroup$
    By the way, Parsevel's theorem gives $$frac{1}{L}int_{-L}^L f^2 dx=frac{1}{2}a_0^2+sum_{nge 1}(a_n^2+b_n^2).$$ Your $a_0$ term is off.
    $endgroup$
    – Will Fisher
    Dec 10 '18 at 17:03


















2












$begingroup$

Hint: Just consider it intuitively. Suppose that
$$f=sum_{n=1}^{N}b_nsinleft(frac{pi n x}{L}right)$$
then
$$f^2=sum_{n,k=1}^{N}b_{n}b_{k}sinleft(frac{pi n x}{L}right)sinleft(frac{pi k x}{L}right).$$
Since
$$int_{-L}^L sinleft(frac{pi n x}{L}right)sinleft(frac{pi k x}{L}right)dx=Ldelta_{n,k}$$
we have that in this case
$$int_{-L}^L f^2 dx=Lsum_{n,k=1}^{N}b_{n}b_{k}delta_{n,k}=Lsum_{n=1}^N b_n^2.$$
The square of the function will sum over all possible pairs, and pairs that aren't the same will integrate to zero. How can you extend this intuition for finite sums to infinite sums? The argument is also the same when you toss in cosines and a constant term.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    In this case i need $f=a_0+sum_{n=1}^{N}[a_ncos (frac{npi x}{L}+b_nsin(frac{pi n x}{L})]$ and the square of this. no?
    $endgroup$
    – Bvss12
    Dec 10 '18 at 16:59












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, but it is the same argument when you also add those terms in because $$int_{-L}^Lsinleft(frac{pi n x}{L}right)cosleft(frac{pi k x}{L}right)dx = 0.$$
    $endgroup$
    – Will Fisher
    Dec 10 '18 at 17:02












  • $begingroup$
    By the way, Parsevel's theorem gives $$frac{1}{L}int_{-L}^L f^2 dx=frac{1}{2}a_0^2+sum_{nge 1}(a_n^2+b_n^2).$$ Your $a_0$ term is off.
    $endgroup$
    – Will Fisher
    Dec 10 '18 at 17:03
















2












2








2





$begingroup$

Hint: Just consider it intuitively. Suppose that
$$f=sum_{n=1}^{N}b_nsinleft(frac{pi n x}{L}right)$$
then
$$f^2=sum_{n,k=1}^{N}b_{n}b_{k}sinleft(frac{pi n x}{L}right)sinleft(frac{pi k x}{L}right).$$
Since
$$int_{-L}^L sinleft(frac{pi n x}{L}right)sinleft(frac{pi k x}{L}right)dx=Ldelta_{n,k}$$
we have that in this case
$$int_{-L}^L f^2 dx=Lsum_{n,k=1}^{N}b_{n}b_{k}delta_{n,k}=Lsum_{n=1}^N b_n^2.$$
The square of the function will sum over all possible pairs, and pairs that aren't the same will integrate to zero. How can you extend this intuition for finite sums to infinite sums? The argument is also the same when you toss in cosines and a constant term.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Hint: Just consider it intuitively. Suppose that
$$f=sum_{n=1}^{N}b_nsinleft(frac{pi n x}{L}right)$$
then
$$f^2=sum_{n,k=1}^{N}b_{n}b_{k}sinleft(frac{pi n x}{L}right)sinleft(frac{pi k x}{L}right).$$
Since
$$int_{-L}^L sinleft(frac{pi n x}{L}right)sinleft(frac{pi k x}{L}right)dx=Ldelta_{n,k}$$
we have that in this case
$$int_{-L}^L f^2 dx=Lsum_{n,k=1}^{N}b_{n}b_{k}delta_{n,k}=Lsum_{n=1}^N b_n^2.$$
The square of the function will sum over all possible pairs, and pairs that aren't the same will integrate to zero. How can you extend this intuition for finite sums to infinite sums? The argument is also the same when you toss in cosines and a constant term.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 10 '18 at 16:51

























answered Dec 10 '18 at 16:42









Will FisherWill Fisher

4,05311132




4,05311132












  • $begingroup$
    In this case i need $f=a_0+sum_{n=1}^{N}[a_ncos (frac{npi x}{L}+b_nsin(frac{pi n x}{L})]$ and the square of this. no?
    $endgroup$
    – Bvss12
    Dec 10 '18 at 16:59












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, but it is the same argument when you also add those terms in because $$int_{-L}^Lsinleft(frac{pi n x}{L}right)cosleft(frac{pi k x}{L}right)dx = 0.$$
    $endgroup$
    – Will Fisher
    Dec 10 '18 at 17:02












  • $begingroup$
    By the way, Parsevel's theorem gives $$frac{1}{L}int_{-L}^L f^2 dx=frac{1}{2}a_0^2+sum_{nge 1}(a_n^2+b_n^2).$$ Your $a_0$ term is off.
    $endgroup$
    – Will Fisher
    Dec 10 '18 at 17:03




















  • $begingroup$
    In this case i need $f=a_0+sum_{n=1}^{N}[a_ncos (frac{npi x}{L}+b_nsin(frac{pi n x}{L})]$ and the square of this. no?
    $endgroup$
    – Bvss12
    Dec 10 '18 at 16:59












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, but it is the same argument when you also add those terms in because $$int_{-L}^Lsinleft(frac{pi n x}{L}right)cosleft(frac{pi k x}{L}right)dx = 0.$$
    $endgroup$
    – Will Fisher
    Dec 10 '18 at 17:02












  • $begingroup$
    By the way, Parsevel's theorem gives $$frac{1}{L}int_{-L}^L f^2 dx=frac{1}{2}a_0^2+sum_{nge 1}(a_n^2+b_n^2).$$ Your $a_0$ term is off.
    $endgroup$
    – Will Fisher
    Dec 10 '18 at 17:03


















$begingroup$
In this case i need $f=a_0+sum_{n=1}^{N}[a_ncos (frac{npi x}{L}+b_nsin(frac{pi n x}{L})]$ and the square of this. no?
$endgroup$
– Bvss12
Dec 10 '18 at 16:59






$begingroup$
In this case i need $f=a_0+sum_{n=1}^{N}[a_ncos (frac{npi x}{L}+b_nsin(frac{pi n x}{L})]$ and the square of this. no?
$endgroup$
– Bvss12
Dec 10 '18 at 16:59














$begingroup$
Yes, but it is the same argument when you also add those terms in because $$int_{-L}^Lsinleft(frac{pi n x}{L}right)cosleft(frac{pi k x}{L}right)dx = 0.$$
$endgroup$
– Will Fisher
Dec 10 '18 at 17:02






$begingroup$
Yes, but it is the same argument when you also add those terms in because $$int_{-L}^Lsinleft(frac{pi n x}{L}right)cosleft(frac{pi k x}{L}right)dx = 0.$$
$endgroup$
– Will Fisher
Dec 10 '18 at 17:02














$begingroup$
By the way, Parsevel's theorem gives $$frac{1}{L}int_{-L}^L f^2 dx=frac{1}{2}a_0^2+sum_{nge 1}(a_n^2+b_n^2).$$ Your $a_0$ term is off.
$endgroup$
– Will Fisher
Dec 10 '18 at 17:03






$begingroup$
By the way, Parsevel's theorem gives $$frac{1}{L}int_{-L}^L f^2 dx=frac{1}{2}a_0^2+sum_{nge 1}(a_n^2+b_n^2).$$ Your $a_0$ term is off.
$endgroup$
– Will Fisher
Dec 10 '18 at 17:03




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3034111%2fprove-the-equality-of-parseval%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

Image
3 Recently upgrade to 18.10 from 18.04, and using the terminal is becoming annoying: the new alert sound is a drip ( /usr/share/sounds/gnome/default/alerts/drip.ogg ), and the previous one is still located at ( /usr/share/sounds/ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg ). My issue is that at the gnome-terminal, when autocompleting or pressing left BOTH sounds are reproduced, at the same time. I want to just have ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg active, not both . At the moment I have been only able to reduce the volume of the alerts (but still both are played), or turn the alerts down (but I dislike both "solutions"). gnome-terminal 18.10 teminal-bell share | improve this question ...
Read more

Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

Image
0 I want to add Tabulator js to my java project. I added tabulator.min.js, tabulator.min.css to resources folder. After that added to my html page these dependencies as recommending in readme.md. <link rel="stylesheet" th:href="@{/css/tabulator.min.css}"> <script type="text/javascript" th:src="@{/js/tabulator.min.js}"></script> Now my tables view all elements, that I have in the html page, but not correct. In the documentation of Tabulator is example how to create header and table, var table = new Tabulator("#example-table", { columns:[ {title:"Name", field:"name", sorter:"string", width:200, editor:true}, {title:"Age", field:"age", sorter:"...
Read more

Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

Image
up vote 5 down vote favorite 2 I would like to make it so that the vertical space below the title of each chapter is the same when using the Bjornstrup package (i.e. so that the descenders do not affect the spacing - as shown by the red arrow in the picture below). I think I'm fairly happy with the spacing around "A chapter", so I'd really like titles without descenders (e.g. "Contents") to have the same vertical spacing as "A chapter" below the title. I would also like to remove the large "0" in the contents title. Any help appreciated, as always. documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{book} % Packages[![enter image description here][1]][1] usepackage[left=3.5cm, right=3.5cm, top=4.3cm, bottom=4.25cm]{geometry} usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} usepackage{libertine} usepackage[libertine]{newtx...
Read more