Finitely axiomatized conservative set theories
$begingroup$
Is it possible to finitely axiomatize any theory conservatively by some generally applicable trick?
Do the Gödel and Bernays trick work for any set theory like ZFC+large cardinal axioms?
Is it possible to finitely axiomatize some conservative extension of set theory without introducing a new sort (the class sort) or an additional predicate like Gödel's sethood?
Thank you.
logic set-theory
asked Dec 10 '18 at 15:23
plmplm
90849
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is it possible to finitely axiomatize any theory conservatively by some generally applicable trick?
Do the Gödel and Bernays trick work for any set theory like ZFC+large cardinal axioms?
Is it possible to finitely axiomatize some conservative extension of set theory without introducing a new sort (the class sort) or an additional predicate like Gödel's sethood?
Thank you.
logic set-theory
asked Dec 10 '18 at 15:23
plmplm
90849
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What do you mean by Godel's set-hood?.....
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
Dec 17 '18 at 10:17
$begingroup$
I mean his 1st-order (basic) predicate in the formulation of Bernays-Gödel-Neumann set theory. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_Neumann–Bernays–Gödel_set_theory, while Bernays used different sorts of variables.
$endgroup$
– plm
Dec 29 '18 at 11:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is it possible to finitely axiomatize any theory conservatively by some generally applicable trick?
Do the Gödel and Bernays trick work for any set theory like ZFC+large cardinal axioms?
Is it possible to finitely axiomatize some conservative extension of set theory without introducing a new sort (the class sort) or an additional predicate like Gödel's sethood?
Thank you.
logic set-theory
asked Dec 10 '18 at 15:23
plmplm
90849
$endgroup$
Is it possible to finitely axiomatize any theory conservatively by some generally applicable trick?
Do the Gödel and Bernays trick work for any set theory like ZFC+large cardinal axioms?
Is it possible to finitely axiomatize some conservative extension of set theory without introducing a new sort (the class sort) or an additional predicate like Gödel's sethood?
Thank you.
logic set-theory
logic set-theory
asked Dec 10 '18 at 15:23
plmplm
90849
asked Dec 10 '18 at 15:23
plmplm
90849
asked Dec 10 '18 at 15:23
plmplm
90849
asked Dec 10 '18 at 15:23
plmplm
90849
asked Dec 10 '18 at 15:23
plmplm
90849
90849
$begingroup$
What do you mean by Godel's set-hood?.....
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
Dec 17 '18 at 10:17
$begingroup$
I mean his 1st-order (basic) predicate in the formulation of Bernays-Gödel-Neumann set theory. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_Neumann–Bernays–Gödel_set_theory, while Bernays used different sorts of variables.
$endgroup$
– plm
Dec 29 '18 at 11:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What do you mean by Godel's set-hood?.....
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
Dec 17 '18 at 10:17
$begingroup$
I mean his 1st-order (basic) predicate in the formulation of Bernays-Gödel-Neumann set theory. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_Neumann–Bernays–Gödel_set_theory, while Bernays used different sorts of variables.
$endgroup$
– plm
Dec 29 '18 at 11:55
$begingroup$
What do you mean by Godel's set-hood?.....
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
Dec 17 '18 at 10:17
$begingroup$
What do you mean by Godel's set-hood?.....
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
Dec 17 '18 at 10:17
$begingroup$
I mean his 1st-order (basic) predicate in the formulation of Bernays-Gödel-Neumann set theory. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_Neumann–Bernays–Gödel_set_theory, while Bernays used different sorts of variables.
$endgroup$
– plm
Dec 29 '18 at 11:55
$begingroup$
I mean his 1st-order (basic) predicate in the formulation of Bernays-Gödel-Neumann set theory. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_Neumann–Bernays–Gödel_set_theory, while Bernays used different sorts of variables.
$endgroup$
– plm
Dec 29 '18 at 11:55
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3034054%2ffinitely-axiomatized-conservative-set-theories%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3034054%2ffinitely-axiomatized-conservative-set-theories%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
What do you mean by Godel's set-hood?.....
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
Dec 17 '18 at 10:17
$begingroup$
I mean his 1st-order (basic) predicate in the formulation of Bernays-Gödel-Neumann set theory. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_Neumann–Bernays–Gödel_set_theory, while Bernays used different sorts of variables.
$endgroup$
– plm
Dec 29 '18 at 11:55