Forcing Mathematica's Integrate to give more general answers
$begingroup$
I have a simple gaussian integral: $int^{infty}_{-infty}dx:e^{ialpha x^2}$.
If $alpha in mathbb{R}$, then:
$$
int^infty_{-infty} dx; e^{i , alpha x^2} = sqrt{frac pi {-i alpha}} qquad qquad alpha <0
$$
Now if $alpha in mathbb{C}$ then we obtain the same answer but with different conditions:
$$
int^infty_{-infty} dx; e^{i , alpha x^2} = sqrt{frac pi {-i alpha}} qquad qquad Im(alpha)>0
$$
These can be combined into a simple answer with an OR statement:
$$
int^infty_{-infty} dx; e^{i , alpha x^2} = sqrt{frac pi {-i alpha}} qquad qquad Im(alpha)=0 , & , Re(alpha) <0 quad|| quad Im(alpha)>0
$$
When I I ask Mathematica to solve this for me
Integrate[E^(I x^2 a), {x, -∞, ∞}]
Mathematica returns only one of these cases:
ConditionalExpression[Sqrt[π]/Sqrt[-I a], Im[a] > 0]
I have tried specifying $Im(alpha)geq 0$ in the Assumptions but Mathematica disregards this and gives the same result. It can of course find the answer for $alpha in mathbb{R}$ but it cannot seem to give a fully general answer where both conditions are present.
calculus-and-analysis assumptions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a simple gaussian integral: $int^{infty}_{-infty}dx:e^{ialpha x^2}$.
If $alpha in mathbb{R}$, then:
$$
int^infty_{-infty} dx; e^{i , alpha x^2} = sqrt{frac pi {-i alpha}} qquad qquad alpha <0
$$
Now if $alpha in mathbb{C}$ then we obtain the same answer but with different conditions:
$$
int^infty_{-infty} dx; e^{i , alpha x^2} = sqrt{frac pi {-i alpha}} qquad qquad Im(alpha)>0
$$
These can be combined into a simple answer with an OR statement:
$$
int^infty_{-infty} dx; e^{i , alpha x^2} = sqrt{frac pi {-i alpha}} qquad qquad Im(alpha)=0 , & , Re(alpha) <0 quad|| quad Im(alpha)>0
$$
When I I ask Mathematica to solve this for me
Integrate[E^(I x^2 a), {x, -∞, ∞}]
Mathematica returns only one of these cases:
ConditionalExpression[Sqrt[π]/Sqrt[-I a], Im[a] > 0]
I have tried specifying $Im(alpha)geq 0$ in the Assumptions but Mathematica disregards this and gives the same result. It can of course find the answer for $alpha in mathbb{R}$ but it cannot seem to give a fully general answer where both conditions are present.
calculus-and-analysis assumptions
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Where did this integral come up?
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 7 at 18:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a simple gaussian integral: $int^{infty}_{-infty}dx:e^{ialpha x^2}$.
If $alpha in mathbb{R}$, then:
$$
int^infty_{-infty} dx; e^{i , alpha x^2} = sqrt{frac pi {-i alpha}} qquad qquad alpha <0
$$
Now if $alpha in mathbb{C}$ then we obtain the same answer but with different conditions:
$$
int^infty_{-infty} dx; e^{i , alpha x^2} = sqrt{frac pi {-i alpha}} qquad qquad Im(alpha)>0
$$
These can be combined into a simple answer with an OR statement:
$$
int^infty_{-infty} dx; e^{i , alpha x^2} = sqrt{frac pi {-i alpha}} qquad qquad Im(alpha)=0 , & , Re(alpha) <0 quad|| quad Im(alpha)>0
$$
When I I ask Mathematica to solve this for me
Integrate[E^(I x^2 a), {x, -∞, ∞}]
Mathematica returns only one of these cases:
ConditionalExpression[Sqrt[π]/Sqrt[-I a], Im[a] > 0]
I have tried specifying $Im(alpha)geq 0$ in the Assumptions but Mathematica disregards this and gives the same result. It can of course find the answer for $alpha in mathbb{R}$ but it cannot seem to give a fully general answer where both conditions are present.
calculus-and-analysis assumptions
$endgroup$
I have a simple gaussian integral: $int^{infty}_{-infty}dx:e^{ialpha x^2}$.
If $alpha in mathbb{R}$, then:
$$
int^infty_{-infty} dx; e^{i , alpha x^2} = sqrt{frac pi {-i alpha}} qquad qquad alpha <0
$$
Now if $alpha in mathbb{C}$ then we obtain the same answer but with different conditions:
$$
int^infty_{-infty} dx; e^{i , alpha x^2} = sqrt{frac pi {-i alpha}} qquad qquad Im(alpha)>0
$$
These can be combined into a simple answer with an OR statement:
$$
int^infty_{-infty} dx; e^{i , alpha x^2} = sqrt{frac pi {-i alpha}} qquad qquad Im(alpha)=0 , & , Re(alpha) <0 quad|| quad Im(alpha)>0
$$
When I I ask Mathematica to solve this for me
Integrate[E^(I x^2 a), {x, -∞, ∞}]
Mathematica returns only one of these cases:
ConditionalExpression[Sqrt[π]/Sqrt[-I a], Im[a] > 0]
I have tried specifying $Im(alpha)geq 0$ in the Assumptions but Mathematica disregards this and gives the same result. It can of course find the answer for $alpha in mathbb{R}$ but it cannot seem to give a fully general answer where both conditions are present.
calculus-and-analysis assumptions
calculus-and-analysis assumptions
edited Mar 8 at 2:04
J. M. is slightly pensive♦
97.9k10304464
97.9k10304464
asked Mar 7 at 15:02
OldTomMorrisOldTomMorris
30019
30019
$begingroup$
Where did this integral come up?
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 7 at 18:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Where did this integral come up?
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 7 at 18:45
$begingroup$
Where did this integral come up?
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 7 at 18:45
$begingroup$
Where did this integral come up?
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 7 at 18:45
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If $alpha$ is complex, then yes, The imaginary part of alpha should be strictly greater than zero. If $alpha$ is real, does it converge? If you complete the contour in the complex plane, with a semicircle, and replace $x$ by $z=x+ i y$, I do not see the integral converging along the semicircle.
$mathbf{UPDATE:}$
Okay, I looked the integral up in Gradshteyn and Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 6$^textrm{th}$ edition, p. 333. Looks like the integral for $alpha$ real converges for $alpha<0$ but with limits zero to infinity.
$displaystyle int_0^infty e^{-ilambda x^2} dx = frac{1}{2} sqrt{frac{pi}{lambda}} e^{-ipi/4}, quad (lambda>0)$.
We can infer from this (let $w=-x$ $Rightarrow$ $dw = - dx$)
$displaystyle int_{-infty}^infty e^{-ilambda x^2} dx = sqrt{frac{pi}{lambda}} e^{-ipi/4}, quad (lambda>0)$.
Replacing $lambda$ by $-lambda$ we get the complex conjugate:
$displaystyle int_{-infty}^infty e^{ilambda x^2} dx = sqrt{frac{pi}{-lambda}} e^{ipi/4}, quad (lambda<0)$.
Combining these:
$displaystyle int_{-infty}^infty e^{-ilambda x^2} dx = sqrt{frac{pi}{lambda}} e^{ - ipi ,textrm{sign }{(lambda)} /4}, quad (lambda ne 0, lambda in Re)$.
This is consistent with what Mathematica (Version 11.2.0.0, Mac OS X) gives:
Assuming[Element[a,Reals],Integrate[Exp[I a x^2],{x,-Infinity,Infinity}]
returning
Sqrt[Pi]/2 (1+ I Sign[a])/Sqrt[Abs[a]]
If anybody has an idea how to compute this integral with contour integration (or otherwise) from first principals, that would be interesting!
Also, we still haven't answered why Mathematica assumes that $alpha$ is not real if $alpha in mathbb{C}$!
$mathbf{ADDITIONAL ,, UPDATE:}$
This will take into account each case, and output the result or indicate if the integral does not converge:
q[a_] := Integrate[Exp[I a x^2], {x, -Infinity, Infinity}];
integral[a_] := If[Element[a, Reals], Assuming[Element[a, Reals], q[a]], q[a]];
Here are a few examples:
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I don't think Mathematica gave the proper response $alpha<0$. If it converges for $alpha<0$ why not $alpha>0$. and does it converge?
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 7 at 15:38
$begingroup$
I have assumed $x in mathbb{R}$ so convergence in that sense has not been accounted for.
$endgroup$
– OldTomMorris
Mar 7 at 16:28
$begingroup$
Well, I believe Gradshteyn and Ryzhik's listing. We can then make some substitutions to compute what happens for $alpha>0$. Mathematica (ver. 11.2) gives an answer that is consistent. Obviously, the integral diverges for $alpha=0$. Mathematica's result $rightarrow infty$ there.
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 7 at 18:44
$begingroup$
"Also, we still haven't answered why Mathematica assumes that 𝛼 is not real if 𝛼 ∈ ℂ!". This is exactly my problem!
$endgroup$
– OldTomMorris
Mar 8 at 10:26
1
$begingroup$
Agreed! I've updated my answer to output what we would have liked to have seen for cases when $alpha$ is real and when $alpha$ has a nonzero imaginary part.
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 8 at 18:36
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
By default, Mathematica assumes all symbols are complex valued, so this is what you get if you don't specify. You can see all the variations by making assumptions:
Integrate[E^(I x^2 a), {x, -∞, ∞}, Assumptions -> #]
& /@ {a ∈ Complexes, a ∈ Reals, Im[a] == 0,
Im[a] < 0, Im[a] > 0, Re[a] == 0, Im[a] >= 0, a == 0, a < 0}
One of these doesn't converge and another is equal to infinity, but they do give the full range of possibilities.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "387"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f192797%2fforcing-mathematicas-integrate-to-give-more-general-answers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If $alpha$ is complex, then yes, The imaginary part of alpha should be strictly greater than zero. If $alpha$ is real, does it converge? If you complete the contour in the complex plane, with a semicircle, and replace $x$ by $z=x+ i y$, I do not see the integral converging along the semicircle.
$mathbf{UPDATE:}$
Okay, I looked the integral up in Gradshteyn and Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 6$^textrm{th}$ edition, p. 333. Looks like the integral for $alpha$ real converges for $alpha<0$ but with limits zero to infinity.
$displaystyle int_0^infty e^{-ilambda x^2} dx = frac{1}{2} sqrt{frac{pi}{lambda}} e^{-ipi/4}, quad (lambda>0)$.
We can infer from this (let $w=-x$ $Rightarrow$ $dw = - dx$)
$displaystyle int_{-infty}^infty e^{-ilambda x^2} dx = sqrt{frac{pi}{lambda}} e^{-ipi/4}, quad (lambda>0)$.
Replacing $lambda$ by $-lambda$ we get the complex conjugate:
$displaystyle int_{-infty}^infty e^{ilambda x^2} dx = sqrt{frac{pi}{-lambda}} e^{ipi/4}, quad (lambda<0)$.
Combining these:
$displaystyle int_{-infty}^infty e^{-ilambda x^2} dx = sqrt{frac{pi}{lambda}} e^{ - ipi ,textrm{sign }{(lambda)} /4}, quad (lambda ne 0, lambda in Re)$.
This is consistent with what Mathematica (Version 11.2.0.0, Mac OS X) gives:
Assuming[Element[a,Reals],Integrate[Exp[I a x^2],{x,-Infinity,Infinity}]
returning
Sqrt[Pi]/2 (1+ I Sign[a])/Sqrt[Abs[a]]
If anybody has an idea how to compute this integral with contour integration (or otherwise) from first principals, that would be interesting!
Also, we still haven't answered why Mathematica assumes that $alpha$ is not real if $alpha in mathbb{C}$!
$mathbf{ADDITIONAL ,, UPDATE:}$
This will take into account each case, and output the result or indicate if the integral does not converge:
q[a_] := Integrate[Exp[I a x^2], {x, -Infinity, Infinity}];
integral[a_] := If[Element[a, Reals], Assuming[Element[a, Reals], q[a]], q[a]];
Here are a few examples:
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I don't think Mathematica gave the proper response $alpha<0$. If it converges for $alpha<0$ why not $alpha>0$. and does it converge?
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 7 at 15:38
$begingroup$
I have assumed $x in mathbb{R}$ so convergence in that sense has not been accounted for.
$endgroup$
– OldTomMorris
Mar 7 at 16:28
$begingroup$
Well, I believe Gradshteyn and Ryzhik's listing. We can then make some substitutions to compute what happens for $alpha>0$. Mathematica (ver. 11.2) gives an answer that is consistent. Obviously, the integral diverges for $alpha=0$. Mathematica's result $rightarrow infty$ there.
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 7 at 18:44
$begingroup$
"Also, we still haven't answered why Mathematica assumes that 𝛼 is not real if 𝛼 ∈ ℂ!". This is exactly my problem!
$endgroup$
– OldTomMorris
Mar 8 at 10:26
1
$begingroup$
Agreed! I've updated my answer to output what we would have liked to have seen for cases when $alpha$ is real and when $alpha$ has a nonzero imaginary part.
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 8 at 18:36
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
If $alpha$ is complex, then yes, The imaginary part of alpha should be strictly greater than zero. If $alpha$ is real, does it converge? If you complete the contour in the complex plane, with a semicircle, and replace $x$ by $z=x+ i y$, I do not see the integral converging along the semicircle.
$mathbf{UPDATE:}$
Okay, I looked the integral up in Gradshteyn and Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 6$^textrm{th}$ edition, p. 333. Looks like the integral for $alpha$ real converges for $alpha<0$ but with limits zero to infinity.
$displaystyle int_0^infty e^{-ilambda x^2} dx = frac{1}{2} sqrt{frac{pi}{lambda}} e^{-ipi/4}, quad (lambda>0)$.
We can infer from this (let $w=-x$ $Rightarrow$ $dw = - dx$)
$displaystyle int_{-infty}^infty e^{-ilambda x^2} dx = sqrt{frac{pi}{lambda}} e^{-ipi/4}, quad (lambda>0)$.
Replacing $lambda$ by $-lambda$ we get the complex conjugate:
$displaystyle int_{-infty}^infty e^{ilambda x^2} dx = sqrt{frac{pi}{-lambda}} e^{ipi/4}, quad (lambda<0)$.
Combining these:
$displaystyle int_{-infty}^infty e^{-ilambda x^2} dx = sqrt{frac{pi}{lambda}} e^{ - ipi ,textrm{sign }{(lambda)} /4}, quad (lambda ne 0, lambda in Re)$.
This is consistent with what Mathematica (Version 11.2.0.0, Mac OS X) gives:
Assuming[Element[a,Reals],Integrate[Exp[I a x^2],{x,-Infinity,Infinity}]
returning
Sqrt[Pi]/2 (1+ I Sign[a])/Sqrt[Abs[a]]
If anybody has an idea how to compute this integral with contour integration (or otherwise) from first principals, that would be interesting!
Also, we still haven't answered why Mathematica assumes that $alpha$ is not real if $alpha in mathbb{C}$!
$mathbf{ADDITIONAL ,, UPDATE:}$
This will take into account each case, and output the result or indicate if the integral does not converge:
q[a_] := Integrate[Exp[I a x^2], {x, -Infinity, Infinity}];
integral[a_] := If[Element[a, Reals], Assuming[Element[a, Reals], q[a]], q[a]];
Here are a few examples:
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I don't think Mathematica gave the proper response $alpha<0$. If it converges for $alpha<0$ why not $alpha>0$. and does it converge?
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 7 at 15:38
$begingroup$
I have assumed $x in mathbb{R}$ so convergence in that sense has not been accounted for.
$endgroup$
– OldTomMorris
Mar 7 at 16:28
$begingroup$
Well, I believe Gradshteyn and Ryzhik's listing. We can then make some substitutions to compute what happens for $alpha>0$. Mathematica (ver. 11.2) gives an answer that is consistent. Obviously, the integral diverges for $alpha=0$. Mathematica's result $rightarrow infty$ there.
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 7 at 18:44
$begingroup$
"Also, we still haven't answered why Mathematica assumes that 𝛼 is not real if 𝛼 ∈ ℂ!". This is exactly my problem!
$endgroup$
– OldTomMorris
Mar 8 at 10:26
1
$begingroup$
Agreed! I've updated my answer to output what we would have liked to have seen for cases when $alpha$ is real and when $alpha$ has a nonzero imaginary part.
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 8 at 18:36
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
If $alpha$ is complex, then yes, The imaginary part of alpha should be strictly greater than zero. If $alpha$ is real, does it converge? If you complete the contour in the complex plane, with a semicircle, and replace $x$ by $z=x+ i y$, I do not see the integral converging along the semicircle.
$mathbf{UPDATE:}$
Okay, I looked the integral up in Gradshteyn and Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 6$^textrm{th}$ edition, p. 333. Looks like the integral for $alpha$ real converges for $alpha<0$ but with limits zero to infinity.
$displaystyle int_0^infty e^{-ilambda x^2} dx = frac{1}{2} sqrt{frac{pi}{lambda}} e^{-ipi/4}, quad (lambda>0)$.
We can infer from this (let $w=-x$ $Rightarrow$ $dw = - dx$)
$displaystyle int_{-infty}^infty e^{-ilambda x^2} dx = sqrt{frac{pi}{lambda}} e^{-ipi/4}, quad (lambda>0)$.
Replacing $lambda$ by $-lambda$ we get the complex conjugate:
$displaystyle int_{-infty}^infty e^{ilambda x^2} dx = sqrt{frac{pi}{-lambda}} e^{ipi/4}, quad (lambda<0)$.
Combining these:
$displaystyle int_{-infty}^infty e^{-ilambda x^2} dx = sqrt{frac{pi}{lambda}} e^{ - ipi ,textrm{sign }{(lambda)} /4}, quad (lambda ne 0, lambda in Re)$.
This is consistent with what Mathematica (Version 11.2.0.0, Mac OS X) gives:
Assuming[Element[a,Reals],Integrate[Exp[I a x^2],{x,-Infinity,Infinity}]
returning
Sqrt[Pi]/2 (1+ I Sign[a])/Sqrt[Abs[a]]
If anybody has an idea how to compute this integral with contour integration (or otherwise) from first principals, that would be interesting!
Also, we still haven't answered why Mathematica assumes that $alpha$ is not real if $alpha in mathbb{C}$!
$mathbf{ADDITIONAL ,, UPDATE:}$
This will take into account each case, and output the result or indicate if the integral does not converge:
q[a_] := Integrate[Exp[I a x^2], {x, -Infinity, Infinity}];
integral[a_] := If[Element[a, Reals], Assuming[Element[a, Reals], q[a]], q[a]];
Here are a few examples:
$endgroup$
If $alpha$ is complex, then yes, The imaginary part of alpha should be strictly greater than zero. If $alpha$ is real, does it converge? If you complete the contour in the complex plane, with a semicircle, and replace $x$ by $z=x+ i y$, I do not see the integral converging along the semicircle.
$mathbf{UPDATE:}$
Okay, I looked the integral up in Gradshteyn and Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 6$^textrm{th}$ edition, p. 333. Looks like the integral for $alpha$ real converges for $alpha<0$ but with limits zero to infinity.
$displaystyle int_0^infty e^{-ilambda x^2} dx = frac{1}{2} sqrt{frac{pi}{lambda}} e^{-ipi/4}, quad (lambda>0)$.
We can infer from this (let $w=-x$ $Rightarrow$ $dw = - dx$)
$displaystyle int_{-infty}^infty e^{-ilambda x^2} dx = sqrt{frac{pi}{lambda}} e^{-ipi/4}, quad (lambda>0)$.
Replacing $lambda$ by $-lambda$ we get the complex conjugate:
$displaystyle int_{-infty}^infty e^{ilambda x^2} dx = sqrt{frac{pi}{-lambda}} e^{ipi/4}, quad (lambda<0)$.
Combining these:
$displaystyle int_{-infty}^infty e^{-ilambda x^2} dx = sqrt{frac{pi}{lambda}} e^{ - ipi ,textrm{sign }{(lambda)} /4}, quad (lambda ne 0, lambda in Re)$.
This is consistent with what Mathematica (Version 11.2.0.0, Mac OS X) gives:
Assuming[Element[a,Reals],Integrate[Exp[I a x^2],{x,-Infinity,Infinity}]
returning
Sqrt[Pi]/2 (1+ I Sign[a])/Sqrt[Abs[a]]
If anybody has an idea how to compute this integral with contour integration (or otherwise) from first principals, that would be interesting!
Also, we still haven't answered why Mathematica assumes that $alpha$ is not real if $alpha in mathbb{C}$!
$mathbf{ADDITIONAL ,, UPDATE:}$
This will take into account each case, and output the result or indicate if the integral does not converge:
q[a_] := Integrate[Exp[I a x^2], {x, -Infinity, Infinity}];
integral[a_] := If[Element[a, Reals], Assuming[Element[a, Reals], q[a]], q[a]];
Here are a few examples:
edited Mar 8 at 17:49
answered Mar 7 at 15:13
mjwmjw
5879
5879
1
$begingroup$
I don't think Mathematica gave the proper response $alpha<0$. If it converges for $alpha<0$ why not $alpha>0$. and does it converge?
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 7 at 15:38
$begingroup$
I have assumed $x in mathbb{R}$ so convergence in that sense has not been accounted for.
$endgroup$
– OldTomMorris
Mar 7 at 16:28
$begingroup$
Well, I believe Gradshteyn and Ryzhik's listing. We can then make some substitutions to compute what happens for $alpha>0$. Mathematica (ver. 11.2) gives an answer that is consistent. Obviously, the integral diverges for $alpha=0$. Mathematica's result $rightarrow infty$ there.
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 7 at 18:44
$begingroup$
"Also, we still haven't answered why Mathematica assumes that 𝛼 is not real if 𝛼 ∈ ℂ!". This is exactly my problem!
$endgroup$
– OldTomMorris
Mar 8 at 10:26
1
$begingroup$
Agreed! I've updated my answer to output what we would have liked to have seen for cases when $alpha$ is real and when $alpha$ has a nonzero imaginary part.
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 8 at 18:36
|
show 2 more comments
1
$begingroup$
I don't think Mathematica gave the proper response $alpha<0$. If it converges for $alpha<0$ why not $alpha>0$. and does it converge?
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 7 at 15:38
$begingroup$
I have assumed $x in mathbb{R}$ so convergence in that sense has not been accounted for.
$endgroup$
– OldTomMorris
Mar 7 at 16:28
$begingroup$
Well, I believe Gradshteyn and Ryzhik's listing. We can then make some substitutions to compute what happens for $alpha>0$. Mathematica (ver. 11.2) gives an answer that is consistent. Obviously, the integral diverges for $alpha=0$. Mathematica's result $rightarrow infty$ there.
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 7 at 18:44
$begingroup$
"Also, we still haven't answered why Mathematica assumes that 𝛼 is not real if 𝛼 ∈ ℂ!". This is exactly my problem!
$endgroup$
– OldTomMorris
Mar 8 at 10:26
1
$begingroup$
Agreed! I've updated my answer to output what we would have liked to have seen for cases when $alpha$ is real and when $alpha$ has a nonzero imaginary part.
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 8 at 18:36
1
1
$begingroup$
I don't think Mathematica gave the proper response $alpha<0$. If it converges for $alpha<0$ why not $alpha>0$. and does it converge?
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 7 at 15:38
$begingroup$
I don't think Mathematica gave the proper response $alpha<0$. If it converges for $alpha<0$ why not $alpha>0$. and does it converge?
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 7 at 15:38
$begingroup$
I have assumed $x in mathbb{R}$ so convergence in that sense has not been accounted for.
$endgroup$
– OldTomMorris
Mar 7 at 16:28
$begingroup$
I have assumed $x in mathbb{R}$ so convergence in that sense has not been accounted for.
$endgroup$
– OldTomMorris
Mar 7 at 16:28
$begingroup$
Well, I believe Gradshteyn and Ryzhik's listing. We can then make some substitutions to compute what happens for $alpha>0$. Mathematica (ver. 11.2) gives an answer that is consistent. Obviously, the integral diverges for $alpha=0$. Mathematica's result $rightarrow infty$ there.
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 7 at 18:44
$begingroup$
Well, I believe Gradshteyn and Ryzhik's listing. We can then make some substitutions to compute what happens for $alpha>0$. Mathematica (ver. 11.2) gives an answer that is consistent. Obviously, the integral diverges for $alpha=0$. Mathematica's result $rightarrow infty$ there.
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 7 at 18:44
$begingroup$
"Also, we still haven't answered why Mathematica assumes that 𝛼 is not real if 𝛼 ∈ ℂ!". This is exactly my problem!
$endgroup$
– OldTomMorris
Mar 8 at 10:26
$begingroup$
"Also, we still haven't answered why Mathematica assumes that 𝛼 is not real if 𝛼 ∈ ℂ!". This is exactly my problem!
$endgroup$
– OldTomMorris
Mar 8 at 10:26
1
1
$begingroup$
Agreed! I've updated my answer to output what we would have liked to have seen for cases when $alpha$ is real and when $alpha$ has a nonzero imaginary part.
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 8 at 18:36
$begingroup$
Agreed! I've updated my answer to output what we would have liked to have seen for cases when $alpha$ is real and when $alpha$ has a nonzero imaginary part.
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 8 at 18:36
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
By default, Mathematica assumes all symbols are complex valued, so this is what you get if you don't specify. You can see all the variations by making assumptions:
Integrate[E^(I x^2 a), {x, -∞, ∞}, Assumptions -> #]
& /@ {a ∈ Complexes, a ∈ Reals, Im[a] == 0,
Im[a] < 0, Im[a] > 0, Re[a] == 0, Im[a] >= 0, a == 0, a < 0}
One of these doesn't converge and another is equal to infinity, but they do give the full range of possibilities.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
By default, Mathematica assumes all symbols are complex valued, so this is what you get if you don't specify. You can see all the variations by making assumptions:
Integrate[E^(I x^2 a), {x, -∞, ∞}, Assumptions -> #]
& /@ {a ∈ Complexes, a ∈ Reals, Im[a] == 0,
Im[a] < 0, Im[a] > 0, Re[a] == 0, Im[a] >= 0, a == 0, a < 0}
One of these doesn't converge and another is equal to infinity, but they do give the full range of possibilities.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
By default, Mathematica assumes all symbols are complex valued, so this is what you get if you don't specify. You can see all the variations by making assumptions:
Integrate[E^(I x^2 a), {x, -∞, ∞}, Assumptions -> #]
& /@ {a ∈ Complexes, a ∈ Reals, Im[a] == 0,
Im[a] < 0, Im[a] > 0, Re[a] == 0, Im[a] >= 0, a == 0, a < 0}
One of these doesn't converge and another is equal to infinity, but they do give the full range of possibilities.
$endgroup$
By default, Mathematica assumes all symbols are complex valued, so this is what you get if you don't specify. You can see all the variations by making assumptions:
Integrate[E^(I x^2 a), {x, -∞, ∞}, Assumptions -> #]
& /@ {a ∈ Complexes, a ∈ Reals, Im[a] == 0,
Im[a] < 0, Im[a] > 0, Re[a] == 0, Im[a] >= 0, a == 0, a < 0}
One of these doesn't converge and another is equal to infinity, but they do give the full range of possibilities.
edited Mar 7 at 21:43
MarcoB
37.5k556113
37.5k556113
answered Mar 7 at 15:41
bill sbill s
54.2k377156
54.2k377156
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f192797%2fforcing-mathematicas-integrate-to-give-more-general-answers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Where did this integral come up?
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 7 at 18:45