$N$ should not be complete!!
$begingroup$
The sequence ($frac{1}{n}$) is a Cauchy sequence in $N$ but does not converge in $N$ as it converges to $0$.Then $N$ should not be complete. But $N$ is the closed subset of $R$ which is a complete metric space .Hence, $N$ should be complete and from here also link text Please clear my doubt.
And thanks for help in advance.
general-topology metric-spaces
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The sequence ($frac{1}{n}$) is a Cauchy sequence in $N$ but does not converge in $N$ as it converges to $0$.Then $N$ should not be complete. But $N$ is the closed subset of $R$ which is a complete metric space .Hence, $N$ should be complete and from here also link text Please clear my doubt.
And thanks for help in advance.
general-topology metric-spaces
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
$1/n$ is not a sequence in $mathbb{N}$, it is a sequence in, say, $mathbb{Q}$ or $mathbb{R}$.
$endgroup$
– Ian
Dec 1 '18 at 20:01
1
$begingroup$
"The sequence (1/n) is a Cauchy sequence in N" No, it isn't. $frac 1n$ is not a natural number. So ${frac 1n} not subset mathbb N$ and it is not a "sequence in $mathbb N$".
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 1 '18 at 20:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The sequence ($frac{1}{n}$) is a Cauchy sequence in $N$ but does not converge in $N$ as it converges to $0$.Then $N$ should not be complete. But $N$ is the closed subset of $R$ which is a complete metric space .Hence, $N$ should be complete and from here also link text Please clear my doubt.
And thanks for help in advance.
general-topology metric-spaces
$endgroup$
The sequence ($frac{1}{n}$) is a Cauchy sequence in $N$ but does not converge in $N$ as it converges to $0$.Then $N$ should not be complete. But $N$ is the closed subset of $R$ which is a complete metric space .Hence, $N$ should be complete and from here also link text Please clear my doubt.
And thanks for help in advance.
general-topology metric-spaces
general-topology metric-spaces
asked Dec 1 '18 at 19:53
SejySejy
445
445
2
$begingroup$
$1/n$ is not a sequence in $mathbb{N}$, it is a sequence in, say, $mathbb{Q}$ or $mathbb{R}$.
$endgroup$
– Ian
Dec 1 '18 at 20:01
1
$begingroup$
"The sequence (1/n) is a Cauchy sequence in N" No, it isn't. $frac 1n$ is not a natural number. So ${frac 1n} not subset mathbb N$ and it is not a "sequence in $mathbb N$".
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 1 '18 at 20:07
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
$1/n$ is not a sequence in $mathbb{N}$, it is a sequence in, say, $mathbb{Q}$ or $mathbb{R}$.
$endgroup$
– Ian
Dec 1 '18 at 20:01
1
$begingroup$
"The sequence (1/n) is a Cauchy sequence in N" No, it isn't. $frac 1n$ is not a natural number. So ${frac 1n} not subset mathbb N$ and it is not a "sequence in $mathbb N$".
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 1 '18 at 20:07
2
2
$begingroup$
$1/n$ is not a sequence in $mathbb{N}$, it is a sequence in, say, $mathbb{Q}$ or $mathbb{R}$.
$endgroup$
– Ian
Dec 1 '18 at 20:01
$begingroup$
$1/n$ is not a sequence in $mathbb{N}$, it is a sequence in, say, $mathbb{Q}$ or $mathbb{R}$.
$endgroup$
– Ian
Dec 1 '18 at 20:01
1
1
$begingroup$
"The sequence (1/n) is a Cauchy sequence in N" No, it isn't. $frac 1n$ is not a natural number. So ${frac 1n} not subset mathbb N$ and it is not a "sequence in $mathbb N$".
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 1 '18 at 20:07
$begingroup$
"The sequence (1/n) is a Cauchy sequence in N" No, it isn't. $frac 1n$ is not a natural number. So ${frac 1n} not subset mathbb N$ and it is not a "sequence in $mathbb N$".
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 1 '18 at 20:07
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$frac 1n$ is not a Cauchy sequence in $mathbb N$ as $frac 1n not in mathbb N$ for any $n ne 1$.
To be a cauchy sequence OF NATURAL NUMBERS there must come a point where all the terms are less than $1$ apart. As all the terms ARE natural numbers[$*$] that means there comes a point where all the terms are equal. In other words the sequence is "constant for all but finite terms". And such sequences do converge to the constant.
More formally. If ${m_i} subset mathbb N$ is causchy so that for any $epsilon > 0$ then there is an $M$ so that $n,p > M implies |m_n - m_p| < epsilon$. Then if $epsilon < 1$ then there is some $M$ so that $n,p > M implies |m_n - m_p | < 1$ which means $m_n = m_p$ for ALL $n,p> M$. And $m_n = m_p = c$ for some $c in mathbb N$.
SO $m_ito c$. Yep. It's complete.
[$*$] That's what "being a sequence in $X$" means. It means all the terms are elements of $X$. So ${frac 1n}$ must certainly is NOT a sequence "in $mathbb N$".
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank u so much all you .I was not able to find where I was going wrong !!
$endgroup$
– Sejy
Dec 1 '18 at 21:15
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3021743%2fn-should-not-be-complete%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$frac 1n$ is not a Cauchy sequence in $mathbb N$ as $frac 1n not in mathbb N$ for any $n ne 1$.
To be a cauchy sequence OF NATURAL NUMBERS there must come a point where all the terms are less than $1$ apart. As all the terms ARE natural numbers[$*$] that means there comes a point where all the terms are equal. In other words the sequence is "constant for all but finite terms". And such sequences do converge to the constant.
More formally. If ${m_i} subset mathbb N$ is causchy so that for any $epsilon > 0$ then there is an $M$ so that $n,p > M implies |m_n - m_p| < epsilon$. Then if $epsilon < 1$ then there is some $M$ so that $n,p > M implies |m_n - m_p | < 1$ which means $m_n = m_p$ for ALL $n,p> M$. And $m_n = m_p = c$ for some $c in mathbb N$.
SO $m_ito c$. Yep. It's complete.
[$*$] That's what "being a sequence in $X$" means. It means all the terms are elements of $X$. So ${frac 1n}$ must certainly is NOT a sequence "in $mathbb N$".
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank u so much all you .I was not able to find where I was going wrong !!
$endgroup$
– Sejy
Dec 1 '18 at 21:15
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$frac 1n$ is not a Cauchy sequence in $mathbb N$ as $frac 1n not in mathbb N$ for any $n ne 1$.
To be a cauchy sequence OF NATURAL NUMBERS there must come a point where all the terms are less than $1$ apart. As all the terms ARE natural numbers[$*$] that means there comes a point where all the terms are equal. In other words the sequence is "constant for all but finite terms". And such sequences do converge to the constant.
More formally. If ${m_i} subset mathbb N$ is causchy so that for any $epsilon > 0$ then there is an $M$ so that $n,p > M implies |m_n - m_p| < epsilon$. Then if $epsilon < 1$ then there is some $M$ so that $n,p > M implies |m_n - m_p | < 1$ which means $m_n = m_p$ for ALL $n,p> M$. And $m_n = m_p = c$ for some $c in mathbb N$.
SO $m_ito c$. Yep. It's complete.
[$*$] That's what "being a sequence in $X$" means. It means all the terms are elements of $X$. So ${frac 1n}$ must certainly is NOT a sequence "in $mathbb N$".
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank u so much all you .I was not able to find where I was going wrong !!
$endgroup$
– Sejy
Dec 1 '18 at 21:15
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$frac 1n$ is not a Cauchy sequence in $mathbb N$ as $frac 1n not in mathbb N$ for any $n ne 1$.
To be a cauchy sequence OF NATURAL NUMBERS there must come a point where all the terms are less than $1$ apart. As all the terms ARE natural numbers[$*$] that means there comes a point where all the terms are equal. In other words the sequence is "constant for all but finite terms". And such sequences do converge to the constant.
More formally. If ${m_i} subset mathbb N$ is causchy so that for any $epsilon > 0$ then there is an $M$ so that $n,p > M implies |m_n - m_p| < epsilon$. Then if $epsilon < 1$ then there is some $M$ so that $n,p > M implies |m_n - m_p | < 1$ which means $m_n = m_p$ for ALL $n,p> M$. And $m_n = m_p = c$ for some $c in mathbb N$.
SO $m_ito c$. Yep. It's complete.
[$*$] That's what "being a sequence in $X$" means. It means all the terms are elements of $X$. So ${frac 1n}$ must certainly is NOT a sequence "in $mathbb N$".
$endgroup$
$frac 1n$ is not a Cauchy sequence in $mathbb N$ as $frac 1n not in mathbb N$ for any $n ne 1$.
To be a cauchy sequence OF NATURAL NUMBERS there must come a point where all the terms are less than $1$ apart. As all the terms ARE natural numbers[$*$] that means there comes a point where all the terms are equal. In other words the sequence is "constant for all but finite terms". And such sequences do converge to the constant.
More formally. If ${m_i} subset mathbb N$ is causchy so that for any $epsilon > 0$ then there is an $M$ so that $n,p > M implies |m_n - m_p| < epsilon$. Then if $epsilon < 1$ then there is some $M$ so that $n,p > M implies |m_n - m_p | < 1$ which means $m_n = m_p$ for ALL $n,p> M$. And $m_n = m_p = c$ for some $c in mathbb N$.
SO $m_ito c$. Yep. It's complete.
[$*$] That's what "being a sequence in $X$" means. It means all the terms are elements of $X$. So ${frac 1n}$ must certainly is NOT a sequence "in $mathbb N$".
answered Dec 1 '18 at 20:05
fleabloodfleablood
70.8k22686
70.8k22686
$begingroup$
Thank u so much all you .I was not able to find where I was going wrong !!
$endgroup$
– Sejy
Dec 1 '18 at 21:15
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank u so much all you .I was not able to find where I was going wrong !!
$endgroup$
– Sejy
Dec 1 '18 at 21:15
$begingroup$
Thank u so much all you .I was not able to find where I was going wrong !!
$endgroup$
– Sejy
Dec 1 '18 at 21:15
$begingroup$
Thank u so much all you .I was not able to find where I was going wrong !!
$endgroup$
– Sejy
Dec 1 '18 at 21:15
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3021743%2fn-should-not-be-complete%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
$1/n$ is not a sequence in $mathbb{N}$, it is a sequence in, say, $mathbb{Q}$ or $mathbb{R}$.
$endgroup$
– Ian
Dec 1 '18 at 20:01
1
$begingroup$
"The sequence (1/n) is a Cauchy sequence in N" No, it isn't. $frac 1n$ is not a natural number. So ${frac 1n} not subset mathbb N$ and it is not a "sequence in $mathbb N$".
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 1 '18 at 20:07