Random forest - Out-of-bag estimates
I am reading the chapter on random forests by Leo Breiman (found here: https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~breiman/randomforest2001.pdf).
In section 3.1 Using out-of-bag estimates to monitor error, strength, and correlation (page 11), it says:
In each bootstrap training set, about one-third of the instances are
left out. Therefore, the out-of-bag estimates are based on combining
only about one-third as many classifiers as in the ongoing main
combination.
I am not sure I understand how the first sentence (that about one-third of cases are left out of each bootstrap sample) implies the second (that each case is OOB in about one-third of the trees)?
random-forest bootstrap
add a comment |
I am reading the chapter on random forests by Leo Breiman (found here: https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~breiman/randomforest2001.pdf).
In section 3.1 Using out-of-bag estimates to monitor error, strength, and correlation (page 11), it says:
In each bootstrap training set, about one-third of the instances are
left out. Therefore, the out-of-bag estimates are based on combining
only about one-third as many classifiers as in the ongoing main
combination.
I am not sure I understand how the first sentence (that about one-third of cases are left out of each bootstrap sample) implies the second (that each case is OOB in about one-third of the trees)?
random-forest bootstrap
add a comment |
I am reading the chapter on random forests by Leo Breiman (found here: https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~breiman/randomforest2001.pdf).
In section 3.1 Using out-of-bag estimates to monitor error, strength, and correlation (page 11), it says:
In each bootstrap training set, about one-third of the instances are
left out. Therefore, the out-of-bag estimates are based on combining
only about one-third as many classifiers as in the ongoing main
combination.
I am not sure I understand how the first sentence (that about one-third of cases are left out of each bootstrap sample) implies the second (that each case is OOB in about one-third of the trees)?
random-forest bootstrap
I am reading the chapter on random forests by Leo Breiman (found here: https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~breiman/randomforest2001.pdf).
In section 3.1 Using out-of-bag estimates to monitor error, strength, and correlation (page 11), it says:
In each bootstrap training set, about one-third of the instances are
left out. Therefore, the out-of-bag estimates are based on combining
only about one-third as many classifiers as in the ongoing main
combination.
I am not sure I understand how the first sentence (that about one-third of cases are left out of each bootstrap sample) implies the second (that each case is OOB in about one-third of the trees)?
random-forest bootstrap
random-forest bootstrap
edited Jan 3 at 4:07
user51462
asked Jan 2 at 0:14
user51462user51462
1184
1184
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
In a bootstrap sample we replace. The probability of a subject x being sampled with replacement is at about 2/3. If we build for example 1000 trees with different bootstrap samples, we therefore expect that x will be in (2/3)*1000 of these samples. One third of the trees were therefore not build with subject x. The OOB only calculates the error for the trees that have not been build with x, which is (1/3)*1000 in that case.
+1 Nice explanation. I think that you could make your first sentence more clear if you write "Bootstrapping samples from the original data set with replacement." Also, stats.SE supports math typesetting. More information: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
– Sycorax
Jan 2 at 0:53
Thank you @Peter, that cleared it up.
– user51462
Jan 3 at 4:16
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "65"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f385216%2frandom-forest-out-of-bag-estimates%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
In a bootstrap sample we replace. The probability of a subject x being sampled with replacement is at about 2/3. If we build for example 1000 trees with different bootstrap samples, we therefore expect that x will be in (2/3)*1000 of these samples. One third of the trees were therefore not build with subject x. The OOB only calculates the error for the trees that have not been build with x, which is (1/3)*1000 in that case.
+1 Nice explanation. I think that you could make your first sentence more clear if you write "Bootstrapping samples from the original data set with replacement." Also, stats.SE supports math typesetting. More information: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
– Sycorax
Jan 2 at 0:53
Thank you @Peter, that cleared it up.
– user51462
Jan 3 at 4:16
add a comment |
In a bootstrap sample we replace. The probability of a subject x being sampled with replacement is at about 2/3. If we build for example 1000 trees with different bootstrap samples, we therefore expect that x will be in (2/3)*1000 of these samples. One third of the trees were therefore not build with subject x. The OOB only calculates the error for the trees that have not been build with x, which is (1/3)*1000 in that case.
+1 Nice explanation. I think that you could make your first sentence more clear if you write "Bootstrapping samples from the original data set with replacement." Also, stats.SE supports math typesetting. More information: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
– Sycorax
Jan 2 at 0:53
Thank you @Peter, that cleared it up.
– user51462
Jan 3 at 4:16
add a comment |
In a bootstrap sample we replace. The probability of a subject x being sampled with replacement is at about 2/3. If we build for example 1000 trees with different bootstrap samples, we therefore expect that x will be in (2/3)*1000 of these samples. One third of the trees were therefore not build with subject x. The OOB only calculates the error for the trees that have not been build with x, which is (1/3)*1000 in that case.
In a bootstrap sample we replace. The probability of a subject x being sampled with replacement is at about 2/3. If we build for example 1000 trees with different bootstrap samples, we therefore expect that x will be in (2/3)*1000 of these samples. One third of the trees were therefore not build with subject x. The OOB only calculates the error for the trees that have not been build with x, which is (1/3)*1000 in that case.
answered Jan 2 at 0:50
Peter DieterPeter Dieter
536
536
+1 Nice explanation. I think that you could make your first sentence more clear if you write "Bootstrapping samples from the original data set with replacement." Also, stats.SE supports math typesetting. More information: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
– Sycorax
Jan 2 at 0:53
Thank you @Peter, that cleared it up.
– user51462
Jan 3 at 4:16
add a comment |
+1 Nice explanation. I think that you could make your first sentence more clear if you write "Bootstrapping samples from the original data set with replacement." Also, stats.SE supports math typesetting. More information: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
– Sycorax
Jan 2 at 0:53
Thank you @Peter, that cleared it up.
– user51462
Jan 3 at 4:16
+1 Nice explanation. I think that you could make your first sentence more clear if you write "Bootstrapping samples from the original data set with replacement." Also, stats.SE supports math typesetting. More information: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
– Sycorax
Jan 2 at 0:53
+1 Nice explanation. I think that you could make your first sentence more clear if you write "Bootstrapping samples from the original data set with replacement." Also, stats.SE supports math typesetting. More information: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
– Sycorax
Jan 2 at 0:53
Thank you @Peter, that cleared it up.
– user51462
Jan 3 at 4:16
Thank you @Peter, that cleared it up.
– user51462
Jan 3 at 4:16
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f385216%2frandom-forest-out-of-bag-estimates%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown