Prove that $overline{pi}(C) = S_0^1$ if $text{ess} sup S_1^1 = infty$ and $text{ess}inf S_1^1 = 0$
Exercise :
We consider a financial market of one period $(Omega,mathcal{F},mathbb{P},S^0,S^1)$, where the sample space $Omega$ is finite and the $sigma$-algebra $mathcal{F} = 2^Omega$. Furthermore, $S^0$ is the risk-free asset with initial value $S_0^0 = 1$ at time $t=0$ and interest rate $r>-1$ (which means that $S_1^0 = 1+r)$ and $S^1$ is the risky asset with initial value $S_0^1 >0$ at time $t=0$ and value $S_1^1$ at time $t=1$ which is a random variable. Furthermore, we consider a buying right with payout $C=(S_1^1 - K)^+$ with exercise value $K>0$ and maturity time $T=1$. Let $overline{pi}(C)$ be the no-arbitrage upper bound for $C$. Show that :
$$overline{pi}(C) leq S_0^1$$
and that the equality holds
$$overline{pi}(C) = S_0^1$$
if it is also assumed that $text{ess} sup S_1^1 = infty$ and $text{ess}inf S_1^1 = 0$.
Attempt :
We know, that :
$$overline{pi}(C) = sup_{mathbb{Q} in mathcal{P}}mathbb{E}_mathbb{Q}bigg[frac{C}{1+r}bigg]=sup_{mathbb{Q} in mathcal{P}}mathbb{E}_mathbb{Q}bigg[frac{(S_1^1 - K)^+}{1+r}bigg]$$
But, note that :
$$mathbb{E}_mathbb{Q}bigg[frac{(S_1^1 - K)^+}{1+r}bigg] leq mathbb{E}_mathbb{Q}bigg[frac{S_1^1}{1+r}bigg] = frac{mathbb{E}_mathbb{Q}(S_1^1)}{1+r} = S_0^1 $$
Thus, indeed it is :
$$overline{pi}(C) leq S_0^1$$
Question : I would like to request some help proving the equality. I am really not very familiar with essential infimum and supremum and I would really appreciate a thorough elaboration or explanation over the specific example.
probability-theory discrete-mathematics stochastic-processes martingales finance
add a comment |
Exercise :
We consider a financial market of one period $(Omega,mathcal{F},mathbb{P},S^0,S^1)$, where the sample space $Omega$ is finite and the $sigma$-algebra $mathcal{F} = 2^Omega$. Furthermore, $S^0$ is the risk-free asset with initial value $S_0^0 = 1$ at time $t=0$ and interest rate $r>-1$ (which means that $S_1^0 = 1+r)$ and $S^1$ is the risky asset with initial value $S_0^1 >0$ at time $t=0$ and value $S_1^1$ at time $t=1$ which is a random variable. Furthermore, we consider a buying right with payout $C=(S_1^1 - K)^+$ with exercise value $K>0$ and maturity time $T=1$. Let $overline{pi}(C)$ be the no-arbitrage upper bound for $C$. Show that :
$$overline{pi}(C) leq S_0^1$$
and that the equality holds
$$overline{pi}(C) = S_0^1$$
if it is also assumed that $text{ess} sup S_1^1 = infty$ and $text{ess}inf S_1^1 = 0$.
Attempt :
We know, that :
$$overline{pi}(C) = sup_{mathbb{Q} in mathcal{P}}mathbb{E}_mathbb{Q}bigg[frac{C}{1+r}bigg]=sup_{mathbb{Q} in mathcal{P}}mathbb{E}_mathbb{Q}bigg[frac{(S_1^1 - K)^+}{1+r}bigg]$$
But, note that :
$$mathbb{E}_mathbb{Q}bigg[frac{(S_1^1 - K)^+}{1+r}bigg] leq mathbb{E}_mathbb{Q}bigg[frac{S_1^1}{1+r}bigg] = frac{mathbb{E}_mathbb{Q}(S_1^1)}{1+r} = S_0^1 $$
Thus, indeed it is :
$$overline{pi}(C) leq S_0^1$$
Question : I would like to request some help proving the equality. I am really not very familiar with essential infimum and supremum and I would really appreciate a thorough elaboration or explanation over the specific example.
probability-theory discrete-mathematics stochastic-processes martingales finance
add a comment |
Exercise :
We consider a financial market of one period $(Omega,mathcal{F},mathbb{P},S^0,S^1)$, where the sample space $Omega$ is finite and the $sigma$-algebra $mathcal{F} = 2^Omega$. Furthermore, $S^0$ is the risk-free asset with initial value $S_0^0 = 1$ at time $t=0$ and interest rate $r>-1$ (which means that $S_1^0 = 1+r)$ and $S^1$ is the risky asset with initial value $S_0^1 >0$ at time $t=0$ and value $S_1^1$ at time $t=1$ which is a random variable. Furthermore, we consider a buying right with payout $C=(S_1^1 - K)^+$ with exercise value $K>0$ and maturity time $T=1$. Let $overline{pi}(C)$ be the no-arbitrage upper bound for $C$. Show that :
$$overline{pi}(C) leq S_0^1$$
and that the equality holds
$$overline{pi}(C) = S_0^1$$
if it is also assumed that $text{ess} sup S_1^1 = infty$ and $text{ess}inf S_1^1 = 0$.
Attempt :
We know, that :
$$overline{pi}(C) = sup_{mathbb{Q} in mathcal{P}}mathbb{E}_mathbb{Q}bigg[frac{C}{1+r}bigg]=sup_{mathbb{Q} in mathcal{P}}mathbb{E}_mathbb{Q}bigg[frac{(S_1^1 - K)^+}{1+r}bigg]$$
But, note that :
$$mathbb{E}_mathbb{Q}bigg[frac{(S_1^1 - K)^+}{1+r}bigg] leq mathbb{E}_mathbb{Q}bigg[frac{S_1^1}{1+r}bigg] = frac{mathbb{E}_mathbb{Q}(S_1^1)}{1+r} = S_0^1 $$
Thus, indeed it is :
$$overline{pi}(C) leq S_0^1$$
Question : I would like to request some help proving the equality. I am really not very familiar with essential infimum and supremum and I would really appreciate a thorough elaboration or explanation over the specific example.
probability-theory discrete-mathematics stochastic-processes martingales finance
Exercise :
We consider a financial market of one period $(Omega,mathcal{F},mathbb{P},S^0,S^1)$, where the sample space $Omega$ is finite and the $sigma$-algebra $mathcal{F} = 2^Omega$. Furthermore, $S^0$ is the risk-free asset with initial value $S_0^0 = 1$ at time $t=0$ and interest rate $r>-1$ (which means that $S_1^0 = 1+r)$ and $S^1$ is the risky asset with initial value $S_0^1 >0$ at time $t=0$ and value $S_1^1$ at time $t=1$ which is a random variable. Furthermore, we consider a buying right with payout $C=(S_1^1 - K)^+$ with exercise value $K>0$ and maturity time $T=1$. Let $overline{pi}(C)$ be the no-arbitrage upper bound for $C$. Show that :
$$overline{pi}(C) leq S_0^1$$
and that the equality holds
$$overline{pi}(C) = S_0^1$$
if it is also assumed that $text{ess} sup S_1^1 = infty$ and $text{ess}inf S_1^1 = 0$.
Attempt :
We know, that :
$$overline{pi}(C) = sup_{mathbb{Q} in mathcal{P}}mathbb{E}_mathbb{Q}bigg[frac{C}{1+r}bigg]=sup_{mathbb{Q} in mathcal{P}}mathbb{E}_mathbb{Q}bigg[frac{(S_1^1 - K)^+}{1+r}bigg]$$
But, note that :
$$mathbb{E}_mathbb{Q}bigg[frac{(S_1^1 - K)^+}{1+r}bigg] leq mathbb{E}_mathbb{Q}bigg[frac{S_1^1}{1+r}bigg] = frac{mathbb{E}_mathbb{Q}(S_1^1)}{1+r} = S_0^1 $$
Thus, indeed it is :
$$overline{pi}(C) leq S_0^1$$
Question : I would like to request some help proving the equality. I am really not very familiar with essential infimum and supremum and I would really appreciate a thorough elaboration or explanation over the specific example.
probability-theory discrete-mathematics stochastic-processes martingales finance
probability-theory discrete-mathematics stochastic-processes martingales finance
asked Nov 20 at 18:01
Rebellos
14.4k31245
14.4k31245
add a comment |
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006675%2fprove-that-overline-pic-s-01-if-textess-sup-s-11-infty-and%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006675%2fprove-that-overline-pic-s-01-if-textess-sup-s-11-infty-and%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown