Exact sequences of sheaves












0














I don't understand something : in the notes by Justin Campell "Some examples of the Riemann-Hilbert correspondence", it is stated that there is an exact sequence $$ 0 to delta_{infty} to j_!IC_{Bbb A^1} to IC_{Bbb P^1}to 0$$ where $Bbb P^1$ is stratified as $Bbb A^1 sqcup {infty}$ and $delta_{infty} $ is the skyscraper sheaf with constant stalk $Bbb Q$.



However, taking the stalk at infinity gives $0 to Bbb Q to 0 to Bbb Q to 0 $ which is clearly a contradiction. As far as I understand, that this sequence was obtained by taking the Verdier dual of the sequence $$ 0 to IC_{Bbb P^1} to j_*IC_{Bbb A^1} to delta_{infty} to 0 $$ which seems plausible but where is my mistake ?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • I think the author meant exact sequence of perverse sheaves.
    – Roland
    Nov 20 at 18:25












  • @Roland : I see, so is there a "concrete" description of what is an exact sequence of perverse sheaves ? Is there a way I can think of it in term of classical exact sequence of sheaves ? I find it really confusing that perverse epimorphism does not induce surjective map on stalks.
    – student
    Nov 20 at 18:30










  • Think in term of derived category. For a sequence $0to Ato Bto Cto 0$ in a triangulated category $mathcal{T}$ to be exact for a $t$-structure, it is enough that they all lie in the heart and that $Ato Bto Cto A[1]$ is distinguished (Just take the long exact sequence of cohomology). I'm not sure about the converse though. But here, you have the triangle $delta_{infty}to j_! IC_{mathbb{A}^1}to IC_{mathbb{P}^1}todelta_{infty}[1]$ (which is just a rotation of a triangle of sheaves), and they all are perverse sheaves. So this is an exact sequence of perverse sheaves.
    – Roland
    Nov 20 at 18:42












  • But yes, the stalk functor is not exact in the category of perverse sheaves.
    – Roland
    Nov 20 at 18:43










  • @Roland : thanks a lot, your explanations are wonderful as always !
    – student
    Nov 20 at 19:54
















0














I don't understand something : in the notes by Justin Campell "Some examples of the Riemann-Hilbert correspondence", it is stated that there is an exact sequence $$ 0 to delta_{infty} to j_!IC_{Bbb A^1} to IC_{Bbb P^1}to 0$$ where $Bbb P^1$ is stratified as $Bbb A^1 sqcup {infty}$ and $delta_{infty} $ is the skyscraper sheaf with constant stalk $Bbb Q$.



However, taking the stalk at infinity gives $0 to Bbb Q to 0 to Bbb Q to 0 $ which is clearly a contradiction. As far as I understand, that this sequence was obtained by taking the Verdier dual of the sequence $$ 0 to IC_{Bbb P^1} to j_*IC_{Bbb A^1} to delta_{infty} to 0 $$ which seems plausible but where is my mistake ?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • I think the author meant exact sequence of perverse sheaves.
    – Roland
    Nov 20 at 18:25












  • @Roland : I see, so is there a "concrete" description of what is an exact sequence of perverse sheaves ? Is there a way I can think of it in term of classical exact sequence of sheaves ? I find it really confusing that perverse epimorphism does not induce surjective map on stalks.
    – student
    Nov 20 at 18:30










  • Think in term of derived category. For a sequence $0to Ato Bto Cto 0$ in a triangulated category $mathcal{T}$ to be exact for a $t$-structure, it is enough that they all lie in the heart and that $Ato Bto Cto A[1]$ is distinguished (Just take the long exact sequence of cohomology). I'm not sure about the converse though. But here, you have the triangle $delta_{infty}to j_! IC_{mathbb{A}^1}to IC_{mathbb{P}^1}todelta_{infty}[1]$ (which is just a rotation of a triangle of sheaves), and they all are perverse sheaves. So this is an exact sequence of perverse sheaves.
    – Roland
    Nov 20 at 18:42












  • But yes, the stalk functor is not exact in the category of perverse sheaves.
    – Roland
    Nov 20 at 18:43










  • @Roland : thanks a lot, your explanations are wonderful as always !
    – student
    Nov 20 at 19:54














0












0








0







I don't understand something : in the notes by Justin Campell "Some examples of the Riemann-Hilbert correspondence", it is stated that there is an exact sequence $$ 0 to delta_{infty} to j_!IC_{Bbb A^1} to IC_{Bbb P^1}to 0$$ where $Bbb P^1$ is stratified as $Bbb A^1 sqcup {infty}$ and $delta_{infty} $ is the skyscraper sheaf with constant stalk $Bbb Q$.



However, taking the stalk at infinity gives $0 to Bbb Q to 0 to Bbb Q to 0 $ which is clearly a contradiction. As far as I understand, that this sequence was obtained by taking the Verdier dual of the sequence $$ 0 to IC_{Bbb P^1} to j_*IC_{Bbb A^1} to delta_{infty} to 0 $$ which seems plausible but where is my mistake ?










share|cite|improve this question













I don't understand something : in the notes by Justin Campell "Some examples of the Riemann-Hilbert correspondence", it is stated that there is an exact sequence $$ 0 to delta_{infty} to j_!IC_{Bbb A^1} to IC_{Bbb P^1}to 0$$ where $Bbb P^1$ is stratified as $Bbb A^1 sqcup {infty}$ and $delta_{infty} $ is the skyscraper sheaf with constant stalk $Bbb Q$.



However, taking the stalk at infinity gives $0 to Bbb Q to 0 to Bbb Q to 0 $ which is clearly a contradiction. As far as I understand, that this sequence was obtained by taking the Verdier dual of the sequence $$ 0 to IC_{Bbb P^1} to j_*IC_{Bbb A^1} to delta_{infty} to 0 $$ which seems plausible but where is my mistake ?







algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology sheaf-cohomology






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 20 at 18:01









student

1078




1078












  • I think the author meant exact sequence of perverse sheaves.
    – Roland
    Nov 20 at 18:25












  • @Roland : I see, so is there a "concrete" description of what is an exact sequence of perverse sheaves ? Is there a way I can think of it in term of classical exact sequence of sheaves ? I find it really confusing that perverse epimorphism does not induce surjective map on stalks.
    – student
    Nov 20 at 18:30










  • Think in term of derived category. For a sequence $0to Ato Bto Cto 0$ in a triangulated category $mathcal{T}$ to be exact for a $t$-structure, it is enough that they all lie in the heart and that $Ato Bto Cto A[1]$ is distinguished (Just take the long exact sequence of cohomology). I'm not sure about the converse though. But here, you have the triangle $delta_{infty}to j_! IC_{mathbb{A}^1}to IC_{mathbb{P}^1}todelta_{infty}[1]$ (which is just a rotation of a triangle of sheaves), and they all are perverse sheaves. So this is an exact sequence of perverse sheaves.
    – Roland
    Nov 20 at 18:42












  • But yes, the stalk functor is not exact in the category of perverse sheaves.
    – Roland
    Nov 20 at 18:43










  • @Roland : thanks a lot, your explanations are wonderful as always !
    – student
    Nov 20 at 19:54


















  • I think the author meant exact sequence of perverse sheaves.
    – Roland
    Nov 20 at 18:25












  • @Roland : I see, so is there a "concrete" description of what is an exact sequence of perverse sheaves ? Is there a way I can think of it in term of classical exact sequence of sheaves ? I find it really confusing that perverse epimorphism does not induce surjective map on stalks.
    – student
    Nov 20 at 18:30










  • Think in term of derived category. For a sequence $0to Ato Bto Cto 0$ in a triangulated category $mathcal{T}$ to be exact for a $t$-structure, it is enough that they all lie in the heart and that $Ato Bto Cto A[1]$ is distinguished (Just take the long exact sequence of cohomology). I'm not sure about the converse though. But here, you have the triangle $delta_{infty}to j_! IC_{mathbb{A}^1}to IC_{mathbb{P}^1}todelta_{infty}[1]$ (which is just a rotation of a triangle of sheaves), and they all are perverse sheaves. So this is an exact sequence of perverse sheaves.
    – Roland
    Nov 20 at 18:42












  • But yes, the stalk functor is not exact in the category of perverse sheaves.
    – Roland
    Nov 20 at 18:43










  • @Roland : thanks a lot, your explanations are wonderful as always !
    – student
    Nov 20 at 19:54
















I think the author meant exact sequence of perverse sheaves.
– Roland
Nov 20 at 18:25






I think the author meant exact sequence of perverse sheaves.
– Roland
Nov 20 at 18:25














@Roland : I see, so is there a "concrete" description of what is an exact sequence of perverse sheaves ? Is there a way I can think of it in term of classical exact sequence of sheaves ? I find it really confusing that perverse epimorphism does not induce surjective map on stalks.
– student
Nov 20 at 18:30




@Roland : I see, so is there a "concrete" description of what is an exact sequence of perverse sheaves ? Is there a way I can think of it in term of classical exact sequence of sheaves ? I find it really confusing that perverse epimorphism does not induce surjective map on stalks.
– student
Nov 20 at 18:30












Think in term of derived category. For a sequence $0to Ato Bto Cto 0$ in a triangulated category $mathcal{T}$ to be exact for a $t$-structure, it is enough that they all lie in the heart and that $Ato Bto Cto A[1]$ is distinguished (Just take the long exact sequence of cohomology). I'm not sure about the converse though. But here, you have the triangle $delta_{infty}to j_! IC_{mathbb{A}^1}to IC_{mathbb{P}^1}todelta_{infty}[1]$ (which is just a rotation of a triangle of sheaves), and they all are perverse sheaves. So this is an exact sequence of perverse sheaves.
– Roland
Nov 20 at 18:42






Think in term of derived category. For a sequence $0to Ato Bto Cto 0$ in a triangulated category $mathcal{T}$ to be exact for a $t$-structure, it is enough that they all lie in the heart and that $Ato Bto Cto A[1]$ is distinguished (Just take the long exact sequence of cohomology). I'm not sure about the converse though. But here, you have the triangle $delta_{infty}to j_! IC_{mathbb{A}^1}to IC_{mathbb{P}^1}todelta_{infty}[1]$ (which is just a rotation of a triangle of sheaves), and they all are perverse sheaves. So this is an exact sequence of perverse sheaves.
– Roland
Nov 20 at 18:42














But yes, the stalk functor is not exact in the category of perverse sheaves.
– Roland
Nov 20 at 18:43




But yes, the stalk functor is not exact in the category of perverse sheaves.
– Roland
Nov 20 at 18:43












@Roland : thanks a lot, your explanations are wonderful as always !
– student
Nov 20 at 19:54




@Roland : thanks a lot, your explanations are wonderful as always !
– student
Nov 20 at 19:54















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006674%2fexact-sequences-of-sheaves%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006674%2fexact-sequences-of-sheaves%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?