Expected value of randomly filling buckets until conflict











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












The problem is directly related to the famous birthday paradox, but with a twist/complication.



problem



We have $n$ buckets and we randomly put balls into them. What’s the expected value of balls to be put if we stop after the first collision—attempt to put a ball into an already filled bucket?



What if we have $s$ tries for every ball?



context



What makes things easier, is that I need only an approximate solution and I can use computer to do the heavyweight calculus. What makes things harder is that I’d like to solve that for values $n$ somewhere around $[2^{32};2^{64}]$ so calculating the sum the most straightforward way isn’t feasible.



XY problem, alternatives



The actual problem behind is evaluating efficiency of a [kind of] hash-table implementation. So if there’s a way to estimate efficiency, by calculating another function of distribution, I’m OK with that. Actually, in the birthday problem we find a number of items $k$ such that collision probability is $approx 0.5$. I was able to “experimentally” find that for $s = 1$, $k propto n^{1/2}$ and for $s = 2$ $k propto n^{2/3}$ which leads to extrapolation for $s = 4$: $k propto n^{4/5}$, but that’s too speculative and I’m not sure finding that $k$ is meaningful for my case.



where I am currently with solving



In the case $s = 1$ The value would be:



$$frac{1}{n}cdot1 + frac{n-1}{n}frac{2}{n}cdot2 + frac{n-1}{n}frac{n-2}{n}frac{3}{n}cdot3+cdots$$ or
$$frac{1}{n}sum_{k=1}^{n} frac{n!}{(n-k)!}k^{2}frac{1}{n^{k}}$$ which is not very hard to solve approximately. E.g. by turning a sum into an integral with factorial expressed by Stirling’s approximation and then it might be solved symbolically (haven’t tried TBH).



I actually wanted to solve the problem for $s = 4$, but generic solution would be better.



$$frac{1}{n^s}cdot1 + frac{n^s-1}{n^s}frac{2^s}{n^s}cdot2 + frac{n^s-1}{n^s}frac{n^s-2^s}{n^s}frac{3^s}{n^s}cdot3+cdots$$ or
$$frac{1}{n^s}sum_{k=1}^{n} k^{s+1}prod_{j=0}^{k-1}frac{n^s - j^s}{n^s}$$



For $s = 2$ we are getting $a^2 - b^2 = (a-b)(a+b)$, which easily collapses into pretty simple factorials combinations like for $s = 1$, but for $s = 4$ I found no way to simplify the expression.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • For $s=1$, Wikipedia gives a good approximation for $Q(M)$ though you want $1+Q(M)$ as your expected number. What does "$s$ tries" mean? If you have a collision with a particular ball you can try again up to $s-1$ more times?
    – Henry
    2 days ago








  • 1




    @Henry yes, that’s exactly how collisions fallback works: up to $s - 1$ tries. In reality I have $s$ hashing algorithms, I try them and I store hash as well as index of algorithm used with $log s$ extra bits.
    – kirilloid
    2 days ago

















up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












The problem is directly related to the famous birthday paradox, but with a twist/complication.



problem



We have $n$ buckets and we randomly put balls into them. What’s the expected value of balls to be put if we stop after the first collision—attempt to put a ball into an already filled bucket?



What if we have $s$ tries for every ball?



context



What makes things easier, is that I need only an approximate solution and I can use computer to do the heavyweight calculus. What makes things harder is that I’d like to solve that for values $n$ somewhere around $[2^{32};2^{64}]$ so calculating the sum the most straightforward way isn’t feasible.



XY problem, alternatives



The actual problem behind is evaluating efficiency of a [kind of] hash-table implementation. So if there’s a way to estimate efficiency, by calculating another function of distribution, I’m OK with that. Actually, in the birthday problem we find a number of items $k$ such that collision probability is $approx 0.5$. I was able to “experimentally” find that for $s = 1$, $k propto n^{1/2}$ and for $s = 2$ $k propto n^{2/3}$ which leads to extrapolation for $s = 4$: $k propto n^{4/5}$, but that’s too speculative and I’m not sure finding that $k$ is meaningful for my case.



where I am currently with solving



In the case $s = 1$ The value would be:



$$frac{1}{n}cdot1 + frac{n-1}{n}frac{2}{n}cdot2 + frac{n-1}{n}frac{n-2}{n}frac{3}{n}cdot3+cdots$$ or
$$frac{1}{n}sum_{k=1}^{n} frac{n!}{(n-k)!}k^{2}frac{1}{n^{k}}$$ which is not very hard to solve approximately. E.g. by turning a sum into an integral with factorial expressed by Stirling’s approximation and then it might be solved symbolically (haven’t tried TBH).



I actually wanted to solve the problem for $s = 4$, but generic solution would be better.



$$frac{1}{n^s}cdot1 + frac{n^s-1}{n^s}frac{2^s}{n^s}cdot2 + frac{n^s-1}{n^s}frac{n^s-2^s}{n^s}frac{3^s}{n^s}cdot3+cdots$$ or
$$frac{1}{n^s}sum_{k=1}^{n} k^{s+1}prod_{j=0}^{k-1}frac{n^s - j^s}{n^s}$$



For $s = 2$ we are getting $a^2 - b^2 = (a-b)(a+b)$, which easily collapses into pretty simple factorials combinations like for $s = 1$, but for $s = 4$ I found no way to simplify the expression.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • For $s=1$, Wikipedia gives a good approximation for $Q(M)$ though you want $1+Q(M)$ as your expected number. What does "$s$ tries" mean? If you have a collision with a particular ball you can try again up to $s-1$ more times?
    – Henry
    2 days ago








  • 1




    @Henry yes, that’s exactly how collisions fallback works: up to $s - 1$ tries. In reality I have $s$ hashing algorithms, I try them and I store hash as well as index of algorithm used with $log s$ extra bits.
    – kirilloid
    2 days ago















up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1






1





The problem is directly related to the famous birthday paradox, but with a twist/complication.



problem



We have $n$ buckets and we randomly put balls into them. What’s the expected value of balls to be put if we stop after the first collision—attempt to put a ball into an already filled bucket?



What if we have $s$ tries for every ball?



context



What makes things easier, is that I need only an approximate solution and I can use computer to do the heavyweight calculus. What makes things harder is that I’d like to solve that for values $n$ somewhere around $[2^{32};2^{64}]$ so calculating the sum the most straightforward way isn’t feasible.



XY problem, alternatives



The actual problem behind is evaluating efficiency of a [kind of] hash-table implementation. So if there’s a way to estimate efficiency, by calculating another function of distribution, I’m OK with that. Actually, in the birthday problem we find a number of items $k$ such that collision probability is $approx 0.5$. I was able to “experimentally” find that for $s = 1$, $k propto n^{1/2}$ and for $s = 2$ $k propto n^{2/3}$ which leads to extrapolation for $s = 4$: $k propto n^{4/5}$, but that’s too speculative and I’m not sure finding that $k$ is meaningful for my case.



where I am currently with solving



In the case $s = 1$ The value would be:



$$frac{1}{n}cdot1 + frac{n-1}{n}frac{2}{n}cdot2 + frac{n-1}{n}frac{n-2}{n}frac{3}{n}cdot3+cdots$$ or
$$frac{1}{n}sum_{k=1}^{n} frac{n!}{(n-k)!}k^{2}frac{1}{n^{k}}$$ which is not very hard to solve approximately. E.g. by turning a sum into an integral with factorial expressed by Stirling’s approximation and then it might be solved symbolically (haven’t tried TBH).



I actually wanted to solve the problem for $s = 4$, but generic solution would be better.



$$frac{1}{n^s}cdot1 + frac{n^s-1}{n^s}frac{2^s}{n^s}cdot2 + frac{n^s-1}{n^s}frac{n^s-2^s}{n^s}frac{3^s}{n^s}cdot3+cdots$$ or
$$frac{1}{n^s}sum_{k=1}^{n} k^{s+1}prod_{j=0}^{k-1}frac{n^s - j^s}{n^s}$$



For $s = 2$ we are getting $a^2 - b^2 = (a-b)(a+b)$, which easily collapses into pretty simple factorials combinations like for $s = 1$, but for $s = 4$ I found no way to simplify the expression.










share|cite|improve this question















The problem is directly related to the famous birthday paradox, but with a twist/complication.



problem



We have $n$ buckets and we randomly put balls into them. What’s the expected value of balls to be put if we stop after the first collision—attempt to put a ball into an already filled bucket?



What if we have $s$ tries for every ball?



context



What makes things easier, is that I need only an approximate solution and I can use computer to do the heavyweight calculus. What makes things harder is that I’d like to solve that for values $n$ somewhere around $[2^{32};2^{64}]$ so calculating the sum the most straightforward way isn’t feasible.



XY problem, alternatives



The actual problem behind is evaluating efficiency of a [kind of] hash-table implementation. So if there’s a way to estimate efficiency, by calculating another function of distribution, I’m OK with that. Actually, in the birthday problem we find a number of items $k$ such that collision probability is $approx 0.5$. I was able to “experimentally” find that for $s = 1$, $k propto n^{1/2}$ and for $s = 2$ $k propto n^{2/3}$ which leads to extrapolation for $s = 4$: $k propto n^{4/5}$, but that’s too speculative and I’m not sure finding that $k$ is meaningful for my case.



where I am currently with solving



In the case $s = 1$ The value would be:



$$frac{1}{n}cdot1 + frac{n-1}{n}frac{2}{n}cdot2 + frac{n-1}{n}frac{n-2}{n}frac{3}{n}cdot3+cdots$$ or
$$frac{1}{n}sum_{k=1}^{n} frac{n!}{(n-k)!}k^{2}frac{1}{n^{k}}$$ which is not very hard to solve approximately. E.g. by turning a sum into an integral with factorial expressed by Stirling’s approximation and then it might be solved symbolically (haven’t tried TBH).



I actually wanted to solve the problem for $s = 4$, but generic solution would be better.



$$frac{1}{n^s}cdot1 + frac{n^s-1}{n^s}frac{2^s}{n^s}cdot2 + frac{n^s-1}{n^s}frac{n^s-2^s}{n^s}frac{3^s}{n^s}cdot3+cdots$$ or
$$frac{1}{n^s}sum_{k=1}^{n} k^{s+1}prod_{j=0}^{k-1}frac{n^s - j^s}{n^s}$$



For $s = 2$ we are getting $a^2 - b^2 = (a-b)(a+b)$, which easily collapses into pretty simple factorials combinations like for $s = 1$, but for $s = 4$ I found no way to simplify the expression.







calculus probability-theory summation






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 2 days ago

























asked 2 days ago









kirilloid

1486




1486












  • For $s=1$, Wikipedia gives a good approximation for $Q(M)$ though you want $1+Q(M)$ as your expected number. What does "$s$ tries" mean? If you have a collision with a particular ball you can try again up to $s-1$ more times?
    – Henry
    2 days ago








  • 1




    @Henry yes, that’s exactly how collisions fallback works: up to $s - 1$ tries. In reality I have $s$ hashing algorithms, I try them and I store hash as well as index of algorithm used with $log s$ extra bits.
    – kirilloid
    2 days ago




















  • For $s=1$, Wikipedia gives a good approximation for $Q(M)$ though you want $1+Q(M)$ as your expected number. What does "$s$ tries" mean? If you have a collision with a particular ball you can try again up to $s-1$ more times?
    – Henry
    2 days ago








  • 1




    @Henry yes, that’s exactly how collisions fallback works: up to $s - 1$ tries. In reality I have $s$ hashing algorithms, I try them and I store hash as well as index of algorithm used with $log s$ extra bits.
    – kirilloid
    2 days ago


















For $s=1$, Wikipedia gives a good approximation for $Q(M)$ though you want $1+Q(M)$ as your expected number. What does "$s$ tries" mean? If you have a collision with a particular ball you can try again up to $s-1$ more times?
– Henry
2 days ago






For $s=1$, Wikipedia gives a good approximation for $Q(M)$ though you want $1+Q(M)$ as your expected number. What does "$s$ tries" mean? If you have a collision with a particular ball you can try again up to $s-1$ more times?
– Henry
2 days ago






1




1




@Henry yes, that’s exactly how collisions fallback works: up to $s - 1$ tries. In reality I have $s$ hashing algorithms, I try them and I store hash as well as index of algorithm used with $log s$ extra bits.
– kirilloid
2 days ago






@Henry yes, that’s exactly how collisions fallback works: up to $s - 1$ tries. In reality I have $s$ hashing algorithms, I try them and I store hash as well as index of algorithm used with $log s$ extra bits.
– kirilloid
2 days ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













For the first collision, we have the generalized birthday problem. To get a $frac 12$ chance of a collision (not the same as the expected number, but not far off) you need $sqrt {2 ln 2 n}$ balls.



For $s$ tries per ball, I will assume for each ball you pick a random bucket. If the bucket is occupied, you again pick a random bucket, which could be the same as the one you just tried. If you get $s$ occupied buckets for a single ball you stop.



The first ball succeeds. The second fails with probability $frac 1{n^s}$ because you have to hit the one occupied bucket $s$ times. Assuming the second succeeded, the third fails with probability $frac {2^s}{n^s}$ because there are two occupied buckets to hit. The chance you succeed out to $k$ balls is
$$prod_{i=1}^kleft(1-frac {(i-1)^s}{n^s}right)$$



I wrote a quick program. With $s$ down the first column and $n$ across the top, I find the number of balls to have a $frac 12$ chance of collision is as follows
$$begin {array} {r|r|r|r} &10^6&10^7&10^8\ hline 1&1,178&3,724&11,775
\2&12,765&59,245&274,990\3&40,807&229,468&1,290,392\
4&80,903&510,458&3,220,766\5&126,814&863,966&5,886,125end {array}$$

The first line checks against the Wikipedia formula.






share|cite|improve this answer




























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    I also measured with a program, but this time it was the mean value:



    function mean(s, n) {
    var sum = 0;
    var prod_log = 0;
    for (var k = 1; k <= n; k++) {
    sum += k ** (s+1) * Math.exp(prod_log);
    prod_log += Math.log1p(-1 * (k/n) ** s);
    }
    return sum / n**s;
    }


    warning: measuring $n=2^{30}$ takes a whole minute



    Results fit empirical formula $$k propto n^{frac{s}{s+1}+varepsilon}$$



    $$begin {array} {r|r} s&2^{10}&2^{15}&2^{20}&2^{25}&2^{30}&k=f(n)\ hline 1&5.314&7.824&10.325&12.826&15.325&log kapproxfrac{1}{2}log n+0.325
    \2&7.028&10.365&13.698&17.032&20.365&log kapproxfrac{2}{3}log n+0.365 \
    4&8.340&12.341&16.341&20.341&24.341&log kapproxfrac{4}{5}log n+0.341\9&9.260&13.760&18.260&22.760&27.260&log kapproxfrac{9}{10}log n+0.260end {array}$$






    share|cite|improve this answer





















      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2994339%2fexpected-value-of-randomly-filling-buckets-until-conflict%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest
































      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      1
      down vote













      For the first collision, we have the generalized birthday problem. To get a $frac 12$ chance of a collision (not the same as the expected number, but not far off) you need $sqrt {2 ln 2 n}$ balls.



      For $s$ tries per ball, I will assume for each ball you pick a random bucket. If the bucket is occupied, you again pick a random bucket, which could be the same as the one you just tried. If you get $s$ occupied buckets for a single ball you stop.



      The first ball succeeds. The second fails with probability $frac 1{n^s}$ because you have to hit the one occupied bucket $s$ times. Assuming the second succeeded, the third fails with probability $frac {2^s}{n^s}$ because there are two occupied buckets to hit. The chance you succeed out to $k$ balls is
      $$prod_{i=1}^kleft(1-frac {(i-1)^s}{n^s}right)$$



      I wrote a quick program. With $s$ down the first column and $n$ across the top, I find the number of balls to have a $frac 12$ chance of collision is as follows
      $$begin {array} {r|r|r|r} &10^6&10^7&10^8\ hline 1&1,178&3,724&11,775
      \2&12,765&59,245&274,990\3&40,807&229,468&1,290,392\
      4&80,903&510,458&3,220,766\5&126,814&863,966&5,886,125end {array}$$

      The first line checks against the Wikipedia formula.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        1
        down vote













        For the first collision, we have the generalized birthday problem. To get a $frac 12$ chance of a collision (not the same as the expected number, but not far off) you need $sqrt {2 ln 2 n}$ balls.



        For $s$ tries per ball, I will assume for each ball you pick a random bucket. If the bucket is occupied, you again pick a random bucket, which could be the same as the one you just tried. If you get $s$ occupied buckets for a single ball you stop.



        The first ball succeeds. The second fails with probability $frac 1{n^s}$ because you have to hit the one occupied bucket $s$ times. Assuming the second succeeded, the third fails with probability $frac {2^s}{n^s}$ because there are two occupied buckets to hit. The chance you succeed out to $k$ balls is
        $$prod_{i=1}^kleft(1-frac {(i-1)^s}{n^s}right)$$



        I wrote a quick program. With $s$ down the first column and $n$ across the top, I find the number of balls to have a $frac 12$ chance of collision is as follows
        $$begin {array} {r|r|r|r} &10^6&10^7&10^8\ hline 1&1,178&3,724&11,775
        \2&12,765&59,245&274,990\3&40,807&229,468&1,290,392\
        4&80,903&510,458&3,220,766\5&126,814&863,966&5,886,125end {array}$$

        The first line checks against the Wikipedia formula.






        share|cite|improve this answer























          up vote
          1
          down vote










          up vote
          1
          down vote









          For the first collision, we have the generalized birthday problem. To get a $frac 12$ chance of a collision (not the same as the expected number, but not far off) you need $sqrt {2 ln 2 n}$ balls.



          For $s$ tries per ball, I will assume for each ball you pick a random bucket. If the bucket is occupied, you again pick a random bucket, which could be the same as the one you just tried. If you get $s$ occupied buckets for a single ball you stop.



          The first ball succeeds. The second fails with probability $frac 1{n^s}$ because you have to hit the one occupied bucket $s$ times. Assuming the second succeeded, the third fails with probability $frac {2^s}{n^s}$ because there are two occupied buckets to hit. The chance you succeed out to $k$ balls is
          $$prod_{i=1}^kleft(1-frac {(i-1)^s}{n^s}right)$$



          I wrote a quick program. With $s$ down the first column and $n$ across the top, I find the number of balls to have a $frac 12$ chance of collision is as follows
          $$begin {array} {r|r|r|r} &10^6&10^7&10^8\ hline 1&1,178&3,724&11,775
          \2&12,765&59,245&274,990\3&40,807&229,468&1,290,392\
          4&80,903&510,458&3,220,766\5&126,814&863,966&5,886,125end {array}$$

          The first line checks against the Wikipedia formula.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          For the first collision, we have the generalized birthday problem. To get a $frac 12$ chance of a collision (not the same as the expected number, but not far off) you need $sqrt {2 ln 2 n}$ balls.



          For $s$ tries per ball, I will assume for each ball you pick a random bucket. If the bucket is occupied, you again pick a random bucket, which could be the same as the one you just tried. If you get $s$ occupied buckets for a single ball you stop.



          The first ball succeeds. The second fails with probability $frac 1{n^s}$ because you have to hit the one occupied bucket $s$ times. Assuming the second succeeded, the third fails with probability $frac {2^s}{n^s}$ because there are two occupied buckets to hit. The chance you succeed out to $k$ balls is
          $$prod_{i=1}^kleft(1-frac {(i-1)^s}{n^s}right)$$



          I wrote a quick program. With $s$ down the first column and $n$ across the top, I find the number of balls to have a $frac 12$ chance of collision is as follows
          $$begin {array} {r|r|r|r} &10^6&10^7&10^8\ hline 1&1,178&3,724&11,775
          \2&12,765&59,245&274,990\3&40,807&229,468&1,290,392\
          4&80,903&510,458&3,220,766\5&126,814&863,966&5,886,125end {array}$$

          The first line checks against the Wikipedia formula.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 2 days ago









          Ross Millikan

          286k23195363




          286k23195363






















              up vote
              0
              down vote













              I also measured with a program, but this time it was the mean value:



              function mean(s, n) {
              var sum = 0;
              var prod_log = 0;
              for (var k = 1; k <= n; k++) {
              sum += k ** (s+1) * Math.exp(prod_log);
              prod_log += Math.log1p(-1 * (k/n) ** s);
              }
              return sum / n**s;
              }


              warning: measuring $n=2^{30}$ takes a whole minute



              Results fit empirical formula $$k propto n^{frac{s}{s+1}+varepsilon}$$



              $$begin {array} {r|r} s&2^{10}&2^{15}&2^{20}&2^{25}&2^{30}&k=f(n)\ hline 1&5.314&7.824&10.325&12.826&15.325&log kapproxfrac{1}{2}log n+0.325
              \2&7.028&10.365&13.698&17.032&20.365&log kapproxfrac{2}{3}log n+0.365 \
              4&8.340&12.341&16.341&20.341&24.341&log kapproxfrac{4}{5}log n+0.341\9&9.260&13.760&18.260&22.760&27.260&log kapproxfrac{9}{10}log n+0.260end {array}$$






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                0
                down vote













                I also measured with a program, but this time it was the mean value:



                function mean(s, n) {
                var sum = 0;
                var prod_log = 0;
                for (var k = 1; k <= n; k++) {
                sum += k ** (s+1) * Math.exp(prod_log);
                prod_log += Math.log1p(-1 * (k/n) ** s);
                }
                return sum / n**s;
                }


                warning: measuring $n=2^{30}$ takes a whole minute



                Results fit empirical formula $$k propto n^{frac{s}{s+1}+varepsilon}$$



                $$begin {array} {r|r} s&2^{10}&2^{15}&2^{20}&2^{25}&2^{30}&k=f(n)\ hline 1&5.314&7.824&10.325&12.826&15.325&log kapproxfrac{1}{2}log n+0.325
                \2&7.028&10.365&13.698&17.032&20.365&log kapproxfrac{2}{3}log n+0.365 \
                4&8.340&12.341&16.341&20.341&24.341&log kapproxfrac{4}{5}log n+0.341\9&9.260&13.760&18.260&22.760&27.260&log kapproxfrac{9}{10}log n+0.260end {array}$$






                share|cite|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote









                  I also measured with a program, but this time it was the mean value:



                  function mean(s, n) {
                  var sum = 0;
                  var prod_log = 0;
                  for (var k = 1; k <= n; k++) {
                  sum += k ** (s+1) * Math.exp(prod_log);
                  prod_log += Math.log1p(-1 * (k/n) ** s);
                  }
                  return sum / n**s;
                  }


                  warning: measuring $n=2^{30}$ takes a whole minute



                  Results fit empirical formula $$k propto n^{frac{s}{s+1}+varepsilon}$$



                  $$begin {array} {r|r} s&2^{10}&2^{15}&2^{20}&2^{25}&2^{30}&k=f(n)\ hline 1&5.314&7.824&10.325&12.826&15.325&log kapproxfrac{1}{2}log n+0.325
                  \2&7.028&10.365&13.698&17.032&20.365&log kapproxfrac{2}{3}log n+0.365 \
                  4&8.340&12.341&16.341&20.341&24.341&log kapproxfrac{4}{5}log n+0.341\9&9.260&13.760&18.260&22.760&27.260&log kapproxfrac{9}{10}log n+0.260end {array}$$






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  I also measured with a program, but this time it was the mean value:



                  function mean(s, n) {
                  var sum = 0;
                  var prod_log = 0;
                  for (var k = 1; k <= n; k++) {
                  sum += k ** (s+1) * Math.exp(prod_log);
                  prod_log += Math.log1p(-1 * (k/n) ** s);
                  }
                  return sum / n**s;
                  }


                  warning: measuring $n=2^{30}$ takes a whole minute



                  Results fit empirical formula $$k propto n^{frac{s}{s+1}+varepsilon}$$



                  $$begin {array} {r|r} s&2^{10}&2^{15}&2^{20}&2^{25}&2^{30}&k=f(n)\ hline 1&5.314&7.824&10.325&12.826&15.325&log kapproxfrac{1}{2}log n+0.325
                  \2&7.028&10.365&13.698&17.032&20.365&log kapproxfrac{2}{3}log n+0.365 \
                  4&8.340&12.341&16.341&20.341&24.341&log kapproxfrac{4}{5}log n+0.341\9&9.260&13.760&18.260&22.760&27.260&log kapproxfrac{9}{10}log n+0.260end {array}$$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered yesterday









                  kirilloid

                  1486




                  1486






























                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded



















































                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2994339%2fexpected-value-of-randomly-filling-buckets-until-conflict%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest




















































































                      Popular posts from this blog

                      How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

                      Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

                      Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?