BibTeX styles that use all the info that Zotero outputs to bib file for less common sources?
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I'm also using Zotero to generate the bib file, then I'm using BibTeX and Natbib for a paper and I'm trying to find a style, preferably something that looks like APA or at least uses name and year formats in the parenthetical citations, that will work for less common sources.
For instance, one of my sources is a blog post. Zotero enters this in the bib file:
@misc{goren_uga_2017-1,
type = {Blog},
title = {{UGA} {Words} {You}’ve {Been} {Saying} {Wrong}},
url = {https://theblacksheeponline.com/georgia/5-uga-words-youve-saying-wrong},
abstract = {Too many of us fail to respect the UGA vernacular, mispronouncing the names of the people and places that make up our UGA family, which is plain not cool. How would you like it if your own family mispronounced your name? And I mean your whole family for once, not just your aunt’s shitty […]},
language = {English},
urldate = {2018-11-09},
journal = {The Black Sheep},
author = {Goren, Ben},
month = apr,
year = {2017}
}
That's a good amount of information. Unfortunately, after trying 5 or so styles, they all print something like the follow:
Goren, B., 2017. UGA Words You’ve Been Saying Wrong.
Occasionally, the URL is also included, but the ones that include the URL also manage to horribly mangle the spacing.
Similarly, I have a dictionary entry. The bib ends up having all this:
@misc{noauthor_niche_2018,
title = {niche, n.},
url = {http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/126748},
language = {English},
urldate = {2018-11-13},
journal = {OED Online},
publisher = {Oxford University Press},
month = jul,
year = {2018},
}
But the reference typically ends up being something extroardinarily minimal, like:
(2018) niche, n.
It's hard to imagine that this is the best that can be done with BibTeX styles. Are there others that handle this better out of the box?
bibtex natbib apa-style zotero
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I'm also using Zotero to generate the bib file, then I'm using BibTeX and Natbib for a paper and I'm trying to find a style, preferably something that looks like APA or at least uses name and year formats in the parenthetical citations, that will work for less common sources.
For instance, one of my sources is a blog post. Zotero enters this in the bib file:
@misc{goren_uga_2017-1,
type = {Blog},
title = {{UGA} {Words} {You}’ve {Been} {Saying} {Wrong}},
url = {https://theblacksheeponline.com/georgia/5-uga-words-youve-saying-wrong},
abstract = {Too many of us fail to respect the UGA vernacular, mispronouncing the names of the people and places that make up our UGA family, which is plain not cool. How would you like it if your own family mispronounced your name? And I mean your whole family for once, not just your aunt’s shitty […]},
language = {English},
urldate = {2018-11-09},
journal = {The Black Sheep},
author = {Goren, Ben},
month = apr,
year = {2017}
}
That's a good amount of information. Unfortunately, after trying 5 or so styles, they all print something like the follow:
Goren, B., 2017. UGA Words You’ve Been Saying Wrong.
Occasionally, the URL is also included, but the ones that include the URL also manage to horribly mangle the spacing.
Similarly, I have a dictionary entry. The bib ends up having all this:
@misc{noauthor_niche_2018,
title = {niche, n.},
url = {http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/126748},
language = {English},
urldate = {2018-11-13},
journal = {OED Online},
publisher = {Oxford University Press},
month = jul,
year = {2018},
}
But the reference typically ends up being something extroardinarily minimal, like:
(2018) niche, n.
It's hard to imagine that this is the best that can be done with BibTeX styles. Are there others that handle this better out of the box?
bibtex natbib apa-style zotero
New contributor
2
Welcome to TeX.SE. Please do tell us which bibliography styles you've tried so far. Did you try theapacite
style (requires theapacite
package)? A separate thought: Did you consider the possibility that some of the meta information provided by Zotero could be flat-out wrong? For example, it makes no sense at all to use thejournal
field in entries of type@misc
. Rather than search for the "perfect" bibliography style, your time and effort would be better spent on fixing the Zotero-supplied entries.
– Mico
Nov 13 at 5:21
1
A separate comment: If you wish to generate authoryear-style rather than numeric-style citation call-outs, you've got to make sure that all entries have anauthor
oreditor
field.
– Mico
Nov 13 at 5:33
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I'm also using Zotero to generate the bib file, then I'm using BibTeX and Natbib for a paper and I'm trying to find a style, preferably something that looks like APA or at least uses name and year formats in the parenthetical citations, that will work for less common sources.
For instance, one of my sources is a blog post. Zotero enters this in the bib file:
@misc{goren_uga_2017-1,
type = {Blog},
title = {{UGA} {Words} {You}’ve {Been} {Saying} {Wrong}},
url = {https://theblacksheeponline.com/georgia/5-uga-words-youve-saying-wrong},
abstract = {Too many of us fail to respect the UGA vernacular, mispronouncing the names of the people and places that make up our UGA family, which is plain not cool. How would you like it if your own family mispronounced your name? And I mean your whole family for once, not just your aunt’s shitty […]},
language = {English},
urldate = {2018-11-09},
journal = {The Black Sheep},
author = {Goren, Ben},
month = apr,
year = {2017}
}
That's a good amount of information. Unfortunately, after trying 5 or so styles, they all print something like the follow:
Goren, B., 2017. UGA Words You’ve Been Saying Wrong.
Occasionally, the URL is also included, but the ones that include the URL also manage to horribly mangle the spacing.
Similarly, I have a dictionary entry. The bib ends up having all this:
@misc{noauthor_niche_2018,
title = {niche, n.},
url = {http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/126748},
language = {English},
urldate = {2018-11-13},
journal = {OED Online},
publisher = {Oxford University Press},
month = jul,
year = {2018},
}
But the reference typically ends up being something extroardinarily minimal, like:
(2018) niche, n.
It's hard to imagine that this is the best that can be done with BibTeX styles. Are there others that handle this better out of the box?
bibtex natbib apa-style zotero
New contributor
I'm also using Zotero to generate the bib file, then I'm using BibTeX and Natbib for a paper and I'm trying to find a style, preferably something that looks like APA or at least uses name and year formats in the parenthetical citations, that will work for less common sources.
For instance, one of my sources is a blog post. Zotero enters this in the bib file:
@misc{goren_uga_2017-1,
type = {Blog},
title = {{UGA} {Words} {You}’ve {Been} {Saying} {Wrong}},
url = {https://theblacksheeponline.com/georgia/5-uga-words-youve-saying-wrong},
abstract = {Too many of us fail to respect the UGA vernacular, mispronouncing the names of the people and places that make up our UGA family, which is plain not cool. How would you like it if your own family mispronounced your name? And I mean your whole family for once, not just your aunt’s shitty […]},
language = {English},
urldate = {2018-11-09},
journal = {The Black Sheep},
author = {Goren, Ben},
month = apr,
year = {2017}
}
That's a good amount of information. Unfortunately, after trying 5 or so styles, they all print something like the follow:
Goren, B., 2017. UGA Words You’ve Been Saying Wrong.
Occasionally, the URL is also included, but the ones that include the URL also manage to horribly mangle the spacing.
Similarly, I have a dictionary entry. The bib ends up having all this:
@misc{noauthor_niche_2018,
title = {niche, n.},
url = {http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/126748},
language = {English},
urldate = {2018-11-13},
journal = {OED Online},
publisher = {Oxford University Press},
month = jul,
year = {2018},
}
But the reference typically ends up being something extroardinarily minimal, like:
(2018) niche, n.
It's hard to imagine that this is the best that can be done with BibTeX styles. Are there others that handle this better out of the box?
bibtex natbib apa-style zotero
bibtex natbib apa-style zotero
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked Nov 13 at 1:41
joshisanonymous
184
184
New contributor
New contributor
2
Welcome to TeX.SE. Please do tell us which bibliography styles you've tried so far. Did you try theapacite
style (requires theapacite
package)? A separate thought: Did you consider the possibility that some of the meta information provided by Zotero could be flat-out wrong? For example, it makes no sense at all to use thejournal
field in entries of type@misc
. Rather than search for the "perfect" bibliography style, your time and effort would be better spent on fixing the Zotero-supplied entries.
– Mico
Nov 13 at 5:21
1
A separate comment: If you wish to generate authoryear-style rather than numeric-style citation call-outs, you've got to make sure that all entries have anauthor
oreditor
field.
– Mico
Nov 13 at 5:33
add a comment |
2
Welcome to TeX.SE. Please do tell us which bibliography styles you've tried so far. Did you try theapacite
style (requires theapacite
package)? A separate thought: Did you consider the possibility that some of the meta information provided by Zotero could be flat-out wrong? For example, it makes no sense at all to use thejournal
field in entries of type@misc
. Rather than search for the "perfect" bibliography style, your time and effort would be better spent on fixing the Zotero-supplied entries.
– Mico
Nov 13 at 5:21
1
A separate comment: If you wish to generate authoryear-style rather than numeric-style citation call-outs, you've got to make sure that all entries have anauthor
oreditor
field.
– Mico
Nov 13 at 5:33
2
2
Welcome to TeX.SE. Please do tell us which bibliography styles you've tried so far. Did you try the
apacite
style (requires the apacite
package)? A separate thought: Did you consider the possibility that some of the meta information provided by Zotero could be flat-out wrong? For example, it makes no sense at all to use the journal
field in entries of type @misc
. Rather than search for the "perfect" bibliography style, your time and effort would be better spent on fixing the Zotero-supplied entries.– Mico
Nov 13 at 5:21
Welcome to TeX.SE. Please do tell us which bibliography styles you've tried so far. Did you try the
apacite
style (requires the apacite
package)? A separate thought: Did you consider the possibility that some of the meta information provided by Zotero could be flat-out wrong? For example, it makes no sense at all to use the journal
field in entries of type @misc
. Rather than search for the "perfect" bibliography style, your time and effort would be better spent on fixing the Zotero-supplied entries.– Mico
Nov 13 at 5:21
1
1
A separate comment: If you wish to generate authoryear-style rather than numeric-style citation call-outs, you've got to make sure that all entries have an
author
or editor
field.– Mico
Nov 13 at 5:33
A separate comment: If you wish to generate authoryear-style rather than numeric-style citation call-outs, you've got to make sure that all entries have an
author
or editor
field.– Mico
Nov 13 at 5:33
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
You may want to give the apacite
bibliography style (which requires the apacite
citation management package) a shot. It recognizes fields such as type
and urldate
. Of course, if you can't stand the way the apacite
bib style formats the bibliographic entries, don't feel obliged to use this particular bib style.
As I noted earlier in a comment below your posting, there's nothing to stop you from augmenting and correcting the Zotero-supplied entries. E.g., if an entry is lacking an author
or editor
field, be sure to provide a key
field so that authoryear-style citation call-outs can be formed correctly. And, consider adding the line field = {Dictionary entry}
for the entry that is, well, a dictionary entry.
RequirePackage{filecontents}
begin{filecontents}{mybib.bib}
@misc{noauthor_niche_2018,
key = {OED},
type = {Dictionary Entry},
title = {niche, n.},
url = {http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/126748},
language = {English},
urldate = {2018-11-13},
journal = {OED Online},
publisher = {OED (Oxford University Press) Online},
month = jul,
year = {2018},
}
@misc{goren_uga_2017-1,
type = {Blog},
title = {{UGA} Words You've Been Saying Wrong},
url = {https://theblacksheeponline.com/georgia/5-uga-words-youve-saying-wrong},
abstract = {Too many of us fail to respect the UGA vernacular, mispronouncing the names of the people and places that make up our UGA family, which is plain not cool. How would you like it if your own family mispronounced your name? And I mean your whole family for once, not just your aunt's shitty~dots},
language = {English},
urldate = {2018-11-09},
journal = {The Black Sheep},
author = {Goren, Ben},
month = apr,
year = {2017},
}
end{filecontents}
documentclass{article}
usepackage[natbibapa]{apacite}
bibliographystyle{apacite}
usepackage[hyphens,spaces]{url}
usepackage[colorlinks,allcolors=blue]{hyperref}
begin{document}
noindent
citet{noauthor_niche_2018}, citep{goren_uga_2017-1}
bibliography{mybib}
end{document}
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
You may want to give the apacite
bibliography style (which requires the apacite
citation management package) a shot. It recognizes fields such as type
and urldate
. Of course, if you can't stand the way the apacite
bib style formats the bibliographic entries, don't feel obliged to use this particular bib style.
As I noted earlier in a comment below your posting, there's nothing to stop you from augmenting and correcting the Zotero-supplied entries. E.g., if an entry is lacking an author
or editor
field, be sure to provide a key
field so that authoryear-style citation call-outs can be formed correctly. And, consider adding the line field = {Dictionary entry}
for the entry that is, well, a dictionary entry.
RequirePackage{filecontents}
begin{filecontents}{mybib.bib}
@misc{noauthor_niche_2018,
key = {OED},
type = {Dictionary Entry},
title = {niche, n.},
url = {http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/126748},
language = {English},
urldate = {2018-11-13},
journal = {OED Online},
publisher = {OED (Oxford University Press) Online},
month = jul,
year = {2018},
}
@misc{goren_uga_2017-1,
type = {Blog},
title = {{UGA} Words You've Been Saying Wrong},
url = {https://theblacksheeponline.com/georgia/5-uga-words-youve-saying-wrong},
abstract = {Too many of us fail to respect the UGA vernacular, mispronouncing the names of the people and places that make up our UGA family, which is plain not cool. How would you like it if your own family mispronounced your name? And I mean your whole family for once, not just your aunt's shitty~dots},
language = {English},
urldate = {2018-11-09},
journal = {The Black Sheep},
author = {Goren, Ben},
month = apr,
year = {2017},
}
end{filecontents}
documentclass{article}
usepackage[natbibapa]{apacite}
bibliographystyle{apacite}
usepackage[hyphens,spaces]{url}
usepackage[colorlinks,allcolors=blue]{hyperref}
begin{document}
noindent
citet{noauthor_niche_2018}, citep{goren_uga_2017-1}
bibliography{mybib}
end{document}
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
You may want to give the apacite
bibliography style (which requires the apacite
citation management package) a shot. It recognizes fields such as type
and urldate
. Of course, if you can't stand the way the apacite
bib style formats the bibliographic entries, don't feel obliged to use this particular bib style.
As I noted earlier in a comment below your posting, there's nothing to stop you from augmenting and correcting the Zotero-supplied entries. E.g., if an entry is lacking an author
or editor
field, be sure to provide a key
field so that authoryear-style citation call-outs can be formed correctly. And, consider adding the line field = {Dictionary entry}
for the entry that is, well, a dictionary entry.
RequirePackage{filecontents}
begin{filecontents}{mybib.bib}
@misc{noauthor_niche_2018,
key = {OED},
type = {Dictionary Entry},
title = {niche, n.},
url = {http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/126748},
language = {English},
urldate = {2018-11-13},
journal = {OED Online},
publisher = {OED (Oxford University Press) Online},
month = jul,
year = {2018},
}
@misc{goren_uga_2017-1,
type = {Blog},
title = {{UGA} Words You've Been Saying Wrong},
url = {https://theblacksheeponline.com/georgia/5-uga-words-youve-saying-wrong},
abstract = {Too many of us fail to respect the UGA vernacular, mispronouncing the names of the people and places that make up our UGA family, which is plain not cool. How would you like it if your own family mispronounced your name? And I mean your whole family for once, not just your aunt's shitty~dots},
language = {English},
urldate = {2018-11-09},
journal = {The Black Sheep},
author = {Goren, Ben},
month = apr,
year = {2017},
}
end{filecontents}
documentclass{article}
usepackage[natbibapa]{apacite}
bibliographystyle{apacite}
usepackage[hyphens,spaces]{url}
usepackage[colorlinks,allcolors=blue]{hyperref}
begin{document}
noindent
citet{noauthor_niche_2018}, citep{goren_uga_2017-1}
bibliography{mybib}
end{document}
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
You may want to give the apacite
bibliography style (which requires the apacite
citation management package) a shot. It recognizes fields such as type
and urldate
. Of course, if you can't stand the way the apacite
bib style formats the bibliographic entries, don't feel obliged to use this particular bib style.
As I noted earlier in a comment below your posting, there's nothing to stop you from augmenting and correcting the Zotero-supplied entries. E.g., if an entry is lacking an author
or editor
field, be sure to provide a key
field so that authoryear-style citation call-outs can be formed correctly. And, consider adding the line field = {Dictionary entry}
for the entry that is, well, a dictionary entry.
RequirePackage{filecontents}
begin{filecontents}{mybib.bib}
@misc{noauthor_niche_2018,
key = {OED},
type = {Dictionary Entry},
title = {niche, n.},
url = {http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/126748},
language = {English},
urldate = {2018-11-13},
journal = {OED Online},
publisher = {OED (Oxford University Press) Online},
month = jul,
year = {2018},
}
@misc{goren_uga_2017-1,
type = {Blog},
title = {{UGA} Words You've Been Saying Wrong},
url = {https://theblacksheeponline.com/georgia/5-uga-words-youve-saying-wrong},
abstract = {Too many of us fail to respect the UGA vernacular, mispronouncing the names of the people and places that make up our UGA family, which is plain not cool. How would you like it if your own family mispronounced your name? And I mean your whole family for once, not just your aunt's shitty~dots},
language = {English},
urldate = {2018-11-09},
journal = {The Black Sheep},
author = {Goren, Ben},
month = apr,
year = {2017},
}
end{filecontents}
documentclass{article}
usepackage[natbibapa]{apacite}
bibliographystyle{apacite}
usepackage[hyphens,spaces]{url}
usepackage[colorlinks,allcolors=blue]{hyperref}
begin{document}
noindent
citet{noauthor_niche_2018}, citep{goren_uga_2017-1}
bibliography{mybib}
end{document}
You may want to give the apacite
bibliography style (which requires the apacite
citation management package) a shot. It recognizes fields such as type
and urldate
. Of course, if you can't stand the way the apacite
bib style formats the bibliographic entries, don't feel obliged to use this particular bib style.
As I noted earlier in a comment below your posting, there's nothing to stop you from augmenting and correcting the Zotero-supplied entries. E.g., if an entry is lacking an author
or editor
field, be sure to provide a key
field so that authoryear-style citation call-outs can be formed correctly. And, consider adding the line field = {Dictionary entry}
for the entry that is, well, a dictionary entry.
RequirePackage{filecontents}
begin{filecontents}{mybib.bib}
@misc{noauthor_niche_2018,
key = {OED},
type = {Dictionary Entry},
title = {niche, n.},
url = {http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/126748},
language = {English},
urldate = {2018-11-13},
journal = {OED Online},
publisher = {OED (Oxford University Press) Online},
month = jul,
year = {2018},
}
@misc{goren_uga_2017-1,
type = {Blog},
title = {{UGA} Words You've Been Saying Wrong},
url = {https://theblacksheeponline.com/georgia/5-uga-words-youve-saying-wrong},
abstract = {Too many of us fail to respect the UGA vernacular, mispronouncing the names of the people and places that make up our UGA family, which is plain not cool. How would you like it if your own family mispronounced your name? And I mean your whole family for once, not just your aunt's shitty~dots},
language = {English},
urldate = {2018-11-09},
journal = {The Black Sheep},
author = {Goren, Ben},
month = apr,
year = {2017},
}
end{filecontents}
documentclass{article}
usepackage[natbibapa]{apacite}
bibliographystyle{apacite}
usepackage[hyphens,spaces]{url}
usepackage[colorlinks,allcolors=blue]{hyperref}
begin{document}
noindent
citet{noauthor_niche_2018}, citep{goren_uga_2017-1}
bibliography{mybib}
end{document}
answered Nov 13 at 13:56
Mico
269k30364748
269k30364748
add a comment |
add a comment |
joshisanonymous is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
joshisanonymous is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
joshisanonymous is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
joshisanonymous is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f459720%2fbibtex-styles-that-use-all-the-info-that-zotero-outputs-to-bib-file-for-less-com%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
Welcome to TeX.SE. Please do tell us which bibliography styles you've tried so far. Did you try the
apacite
style (requires theapacite
package)? A separate thought: Did you consider the possibility that some of the meta information provided by Zotero could be flat-out wrong? For example, it makes no sense at all to use thejournal
field in entries of type@misc
. Rather than search for the "perfect" bibliography style, your time and effort would be better spent on fixing the Zotero-supplied entries.– Mico
Nov 13 at 5:21
1
A separate comment: If you wish to generate authoryear-style rather than numeric-style citation call-outs, you've got to make sure that all entries have an
author
oreditor
field.– Mico
Nov 13 at 5:33