Why doesn't a 20 degree rotation change the slopes of $y=x$ and $y=frac{x}{2}$ by the same amount?












1












$begingroup$


It seems that if I rotate different lines (lying in the same quadrant) the same number of degrees they move different amounts (in terms of their slope). (where the rotation is such that all the lines do not enter a different quadrant)



Can someone give me intuition why this is?



My guess was that maybe it has something to do with the nature of a circle.






graphing-functions intuition rotations







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Because the slope the tangent of the angle, and the tangent function is nonlinear.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Dec 12 '18 at 2:00












  • $begingroup$
    @MattSamuel That helps, thank you. but now I'm wondering why the tangent function is nonlinear.
    $endgroup$
    – user106860
    Dec 12 '18 at 2:05








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Perhaps you should wonder why it would be linear!
    $endgroup$
    – The Chaz 2.0
    Dec 12 '18 at 2:06










  • $begingroup$
    @user Tongue in cheek, that seems more like a philosophy question to me. From my perspective, it is what it is. But perhaps someone has a more insightful answer than that.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Dec 12 '18 at 2:07






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    A rotation can't add the same constant to every slope, because then it would never make a line vertical.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Dec 12 '18 at 2:18
















1












$begingroup$


It seems that if I rotate different lines (lying in the same quadrant) the same number of degrees they move different amounts (in terms of their slope). (where the rotation is such that all the lines do not enter a different quadrant)



Can someone give me intuition why this is?



My guess was that maybe it has something to do with the nature of a circle.






graphing-functions intuition rotations







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Because the slope the tangent of the angle, and the tangent function is nonlinear.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Dec 12 '18 at 2:00












  • $begingroup$
    @MattSamuel That helps, thank you. but now I'm wondering why the tangent function is nonlinear.
    $endgroup$
    – user106860
    Dec 12 '18 at 2:05








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Perhaps you should wonder why it would be linear!
    $endgroup$
    – The Chaz 2.0
    Dec 12 '18 at 2:06










  • $begingroup$
    @user Tongue in cheek, that seems more like a philosophy question to me. From my perspective, it is what it is. But perhaps someone has a more insightful answer than that.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Dec 12 '18 at 2:07






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    A rotation can't add the same constant to every slope, because then it would never make a line vertical.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Dec 12 '18 at 2:18














1












1








1





$begingroup$


It seems that if I rotate different lines (lying in the same quadrant) the same number of degrees they move different amounts (in terms of their slope). (where the rotation is such that all the lines do not enter a different quadrant)



Can someone give me intuition why this is?



My guess was that maybe it has something to do with the nature of a circle.






graphing-functions intuition rotations







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




It seems that if I rotate different lines (lying in the same quadrant) the same number of degrees they move different amounts (in terms of their slope). (where the rotation is such that all the lines do not enter a different quadrant)



Can someone give me intuition why this is?



My guess was that maybe it has something to do with the nature of a circle.






graphing-functions intuition rotations




graphing-functions intuition rotations






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 12 '18 at 1:57









user106860user106860

373315




373315








  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Because the slope the tangent of the angle, and the tangent function is nonlinear.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Dec 12 '18 at 2:00












  • $begingroup$
    @MattSamuel That helps, thank you. but now I'm wondering why the tangent function is nonlinear.
    $endgroup$
    – user106860
    Dec 12 '18 at 2:05








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Perhaps you should wonder why it would be linear!
    $endgroup$
    – The Chaz 2.0
    Dec 12 '18 at 2:06










  • $begingroup$
    @user Tongue in cheek, that seems more like a philosophy question to me. From my perspective, it is what it is. But perhaps someone has a more insightful answer than that.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Dec 12 '18 at 2:07






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    A rotation can't add the same constant to every slope, because then it would never make a line vertical.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Dec 12 '18 at 2:18














  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Because the slope the tangent of the angle, and the tangent function is nonlinear.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Dec 12 '18 at 2:00












  • $begingroup$
    @MattSamuel That helps, thank you. but now I'm wondering why the tangent function is nonlinear.
    $endgroup$
    – user106860
    Dec 12 '18 at 2:05








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Perhaps you should wonder why it would be linear!
    $endgroup$
    – The Chaz 2.0
    Dec 12 '18 at 2:06










  • $begingroup$
    @user Tongue in cheek, that seems more like a philosophy question to me. From my perspective, it is what it is. But perhaps someone has a more insightful answer than that.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Dec 12 '18 at 2:07






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    A rotation can't add the same constant to every slope, because then it would never make a line vertical.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Dec 12 '18 at 2:18








7




7




$begingroup$
Because the slope the tangent of the angle, and the tangent function is nonlinear.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Dec 12 '18 at 2:00






$begingroup$
Because the slope the tangent of the angle, and the tangent function is nonlinear.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Dec 12 '18 at 2:00














$begingroup$
@MattSamuel That helps, thank you. but now I'm wondering why the tangent function is nonlinear.
$endgroup$
– user106860
Dec 12 '18 at 2:05






$begingroup$
@MattSamuel That helps, thank you. but now I'm wondering why the tangent function is nonlinear.
$endgroup$
– user106860
Dec 12 '18 at 2:05






2




2




$begingroup$
Perhaps you should wonder why it would be linear!
$endgroup$
– The Chaz 2.0
Dec 12 '18 at 2:06




$begingroup$
Perhaps you should wonder why it would be linear!
$endgroup$
– The Chaz 2.0
Dec 12 '18 at 2:06












$begingroup$
@user Tongue in cheek, that seems more like a philosophy question to me. From my perspective, it is what it is. But perhaps someone has a more insightful answer than that.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Dec 12 '18 at 2:07




$begingroup$
@user Tongue in cheek, that seems more like a philosophy question to me. From my perspective, it is what it is. But perhaps someone has a more insightful answer than that.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Dec 12 '18 at 2:07




2




2




$begingroup$
A rotation can't add the same constant to every slope, because then it would never make a line vertical.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Dec 12 '18 at 2:18




$begingroup$
A rotation can't add the same constant to every slope, because then it would never make a line vertical.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Dec 12 '18 at 2:18










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Slope is $tan x$ , $x$ being the angle the line makes with $x$ axis. $x$ is 45 in the line $y=x$ and around 26 when $2y=x$. As you know that $tan$ approaches infinity when $x$ approaches 90, so as we add 20 to 45, the value of $tan$ will increase at a greater rate than when we add 20 to ~26.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    No, $tan$ approaches $infty$ at $fracpi2$ is not sufficient to prove the increase is greater. You need to prove $tan''(x)>0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Kemono Chen
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:56










  • $begingroup$
    @Kemono Chen I was just trying to give the general idea with using only angles. For more rigorous proof, your approach is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Raghav
    Dec 12 '18 at 10:41



















0












$begingroup$

Just reposting Matt Samuel's comment as an answer:



The slope is the tangent of the angle. The tangent is a nonlinear function (so going from, for example, 5 to 25 degrees will yield a different change in slope from going from 10-30 degrees, even though the change in degrees is the same)






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3036144%2fwhy-doesnt-a-20-degree-rotation-change-the-slopes-of-y-x-and-y-fracx2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    Slope is $tan x$ , $x$ being the angle the line makes with $x$ axis. $x$ is 45 in the line $y=x$ and around 26 when $2y=x$. As you know that $tan$ approaches infinity when $x$ approaches 90, so as we add 20 to 45, the value of $tan$ will increase at a greater rate than when we add 20 to ~26.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      No, $tan$ approaches $infty$ at $fracpi2$ is not sufficient to prove the increase is greater. You need to prove $tan''(x)>0$.
      $endgroup$
      – Kemono Chen
      Dec 12 '18 at 3:56










    • $begingroup$
      @Kemono Chen I was just trying to give the general idea with using only angles. For more rigorous proof, your approach is correct.
      $endgroup$
      – Raghav
      Dec 12 '18 at 10:41
















    0












    $begingroup$

    Slope is $tan x$ , $x$ being the angle the line makes with $x$ axis. $x$ is 45 in the line $y=x$ and around 26 when $2y=x$. As you know that $tan$ approaches infinity when $x$ approaches 90, so as we add 20 to 45, the value of $tan$ will increase at a greater rate than when we add 20 to ~26.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      No, $tan$ approaches $infty$ at $fracpi2$ is not sufficient to prove the increase is greater. You need to prove $tan''(x)>0$.
      $endgroup$
      – Kemono Chen
      Dec 12 '18 at 3:56










    • $begingroup$
      @Kemono Chen I was just trying to give the general idea with using only angles. For more rigorous proof, your approach is correct.
      $endgroup$
      – Raghav
      Dec 12 '18 at 10:41














    0












    0








    0





    $begingroup$

    Slope is $tan x$ , $x$ being the angle the line makes with $x$ axis. $x$ is 45 in the line $y=x$ and around 26 when $2y=x$. As you know that $tan$ approaches infinity when $x$ approaches 90, so as we add 20 to 45, the value of $tan$ will increase at a greater rate than when we add 20 to ~26.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Slope is $tan x$ , $x$ being the angle the line makes with $x$ axis. $x$ is 45 in the line $y=x$ and around 26 when $2y=x$. As you know that $tan$ approaches infinity when $x$ approaches 90, so as we add 20 to 45, the value of $tan$ will increase at a greater rate than when we add 20 to ~26.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Dec 12 '18 at 2:14









    RaghavRaghav

    647




    647












    • $begingroup$
      No, $tan$ approaches $infty$ at $fracpi2$ is not sufficient to prove the increase is greater. You need to prove $tan''(x)>0$.
      $endgroup$
      – Kemono Chen
      Dec 12 '18 at 3:56










    • $begingroup$
      @Kemono Chen I was just trying to give the general idea with using only angles. For more rigorous proof, your approach is correct.
      $endgroup$
      – Raghav
      Dec 12 '18 at 10:41


















    • $begingroup$
      No, $tan$ approaches $infty$ at $fracpi2$ is not sufficient to prove the increase is greater. You need to prove $tan''(x)>0$.
      $endgroup$
      – Kemono Chen
      Dec 12 '18 at 3:56










    • $begingroup$
      @Kemono Chen I was just trying to give the general idea with using only angles. For more rigorous proof, your approach is correct.
      $endgroup$
      – Raghav
      Dec 12 '18 at 10:41
















    $begingroup$
    No, $tan$ approaches $infty$ at $fracpi2$ is not sufficient to prove the increase is greater. You need to prove $tan''(x)>0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Kemono Chen
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:56




    $begingroup$
    No, $tan$ approaches $infty$ at $fracpi2$ is not sufficient to prove the increase is greater. You need to prove $tan''(x)>0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Kemono Chen
    Dec 12 '18 at 3:56












    $begingroup$
    @Kemono Chen I was just trying to give the general idea with using only angles. For more rigorous proof, your approach is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Raghav
    Dec 12 '18 at 10:41




    $begingroup$
    @Kemono Chen I was just trying to give the general idea with using only angles. For more rigorous proof, your approach is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Raghav
    Dec 12 '18 at 10:41











    0












    $begingroup$

    Just reposting Matt Samuel's comment as an answer:



    The slope is the tangent of the angle. The tangent is a nonlinear function (so going from, for example, 5 to 25 degrees will yield a different change in slope from going from 10-30 degrees, even though the change in degrees is the same)






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      Just reposting Matt Samuel's comment as an answer:



      The slope is the tangent of the angle. The tangent is a nonlinear function (so going from, for example, 5 to 25 degrees will yield a different change in slope from going from 10-30 degrees, even though the change in degrees is the same)






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Just reposting Matt Samuel's comment as an answer:



        The slope is the tangent of the angle. The tangent is a nonlinear function (so going from, for example, 5 to 25 degrees will yield a different change in slope from going from 10-30 degrees, even though the change in degrees is the same)






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Just reposting Matt Samuel's comment as an answer:



        The slope is the tangent of the angle. The tangent is a nonlinear function (so going from, for example, 5 to 25 degrees will yield a different change in slope from going from 10-30 degrees, even though the change in degrees is the same)







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 17 '18 at 21:29









        user106860user106860

        373315




        373315






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3036144%2fwhy-doesnt-a-20-degree-rotation-change-the-slopes-of-y-x-and-y-fracx2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

            Image
            3 Recently upgrade to 18.10 from 18.04, and using the terminal is becoming annoying: the new alert sound is a drip ( /usr/share/sounds/gnome/default/alerts/drip.ogg ), and the previous one is still located at ( /usr/share/sounds/ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg ). My issue is that at the gnome-terminal, when autocompleting or pressing left BOTH sounds are reproduced, at the same time. I want to just have ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg active, not both . At the moment I have been only able to reduce the volume of the alerts (but still both are played), or turn the alerts down (but I dislike both "solutions"). gnome-terminal 18.10 teminal-bell share | improve this question
            Read more

            Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

            Image
            up vote 5 down vote favorite 2 I would like to make it so that the vertical space below the title of each chapter is the same when using the Bjornstrup package (i.e. so that the descenders do not affect the spacing - as shown by the red arrow in the picture below). I think I'm fairly happy with the spacing around "A chapter", so I'd really like titles without descenders (e.g. "Contents") to have the same vertical spacing as "A chapter" below the title. I would also like to remove the large "0" in the contents title. Any help appreciated, as always. documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{book} % Packages[![enter image description here][1]][1] usepackage[left=3.5cm, right=3.5cm, top=4.3cm, bottom=4.25cm]{geometry} usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} usepackage{libertine} usepackage[libertine]{newtx
            Read more

            Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

            Image
            0 I want to add Tabulator js to my java project. I added tabulator.min.js, tabulator.min.css to resources folder. After that added to my html page these dependencies as recommending in readme.md. <link rel="stylesheet" th:href="@{/css/tabulator.min.css}"> <script type="text/javascript" th:src="@{/js/tabulator.min.js}"></script> Now my tables view all elements, that I have in the html page, but not correct. In the documentation of Tabulator is example how to create header and table, var table = new Tabulator("#example-table", { columns:[ {title:"Name", field:"name", sorter:"string", width:200, editor:true}, {title:"Age", field:"age", sorter:"
            Read more