$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1 cdot 0+1 = 12$ or $1$?
$begingroup$
Does the expression $1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1 cdot 0+1$ equal $1$ or $12$ ?
I thought it would be 12
this as per pemdas rule:
$$(1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1)cdot (0+1) = 12 cdot 1 = 12$$
Wanted to confirm the right answer from you guys. Thanks for your help.
arithmetic
$endgroup$
migrated from mathematica.stackexchange.com May 29 '13 at 8:57
This question came from our site for users of Wolfram Mathematica.
|
show 8 more comments
$begingroup$
Does the expression $1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1 cdot 0+1$ equal $1$ or $12$ ?
I thought it would be 12
this as per pemdas rule:
$$(1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1)cdot (0+1) = 12 cdot 1 = 12$$
Wanted to confirm the right answer from you guys. Thanks for your help.
arithmetic
$endgroup$
migrated from mathematica.stackexchange.com May 29 '13 at 8:57
This question came from our site for users of Wolfram Mathematica.
1
$begingroup$
linear-algebra? modular-arithmetic? Why did someone edit those tags in??
$endgroup$
– mrf
May 29 '13 at 9:03
2
$begingroup$
@Matt: I don’t know, unless there are folks who think that being confused deserves a downvote. I certainly don’t, and have given it a compensatory upvote.
$endgroup$
– Brian M. Scott
May 29 '13 at 9:04
3
$begingroup$
Dear downvoters: I'm not sure that you should downvote simply because the OP was wrong. I don't quite see what's so bad about this question. It contains a simple, clear question with a straightforward answer, to which the OP offered their attempt in good faith. It also seems no more specific than any other question, and AFAIK is in the right place.
$endgroup$
– Sharkos
May 29 '13 at 9:05
2
$begingroup$
@Sharkos "Dear" downvoters? : )
$endgroup$
– Rudy the Reindeer
May 29 '13 at 9:06
4
$begingroup$
Hail @Matt: It's a form of address, a salutation. If politeness is banned from M.SE, my good man, do direct me to the relevant meta page. Yours sincerely, Carl Turner, Esq. PS: Biting sarcasm actually might be, in which case I'm royally screwed.
$endgroup$
– Sharkos
May 29 '13 at 9:11
|
show 8 more comments
$begingroup$
Does the expression $1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1 cdot 0+1$ equal $1$ or $12$ ?
I thought it would be 12
this as per pemdas rule:
$$(1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1)cdot (0+1) = 12 cdot 1 = 12$$
Wanted to confirm the right answer from you guys. Thanks for your help.
arithmetic
$endgroup$
Does the expression $1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1 cdot 0+1$ equal $1$ or $12$ ?
I thought it would be 12
this as per pemdas rule:
$$(1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1)cdot (0+1) = 12 cdot 1 = 12$$
Wanted to confirm the right answer from you guys. Thanks for your help.
arithmetic
arithmetic
edited May 29 '13 at 11:21
Sharkos
13.4k22350
13.4k22350
asked May 29 '13 at 8:51
Dev01Dev01
1293
1293
migrated from mathematica.stackexchange.com May 29 '13 at 8:57
This question came from our site for users of Wolfram Mathematica.
migrated from mathematica.stackexchange.com May 29 '13 at 8:57
This question came from our site for users of Wolfram Mathematica.
1
$begingroup$
linear-algebra? modular-arithmetic? Why did someone edit those tags in??
$endgroup$
– mrf
May 29 '13 at 9:03
2
$begingroup$
@Matt: I don’t know, unless there are folks who think that being confused deserves a downvote. I certainly don’t, and have given it a compensatory upvote.
$endgroup$
– Brian M. Scott
May 29 '13 at 9:04
3
$begingroup$
Dear downvoters: I'm not sure that you should downvote simply because the OP was wrong. I don't quite see what's so bad about this question. It contains a simple, clear question with a straightforward answer, to which the OP offered their attempt in good faith. It also seems no more specific than any other question, and AFAIK is in the right place.
$endgroup$
– Sharkos
May 29 '13 at 9:05
2
$begingroup$
@Sharkos "Dear" downvoters? : )
$endgroup$
– Rudy the Reindeer
May 29 '13 at 9:06
4
$begingroup$
Hail @Matt: It's a form of address, a salutation. If politeness is banned from M.SE, my good man, do direct me to the relevant meta page. Yours sincerely, Carl Turner, Esq. PS: Biting sarcasm actually might be, in which case I'm royally screwed.
$endgroup$
– Sharkos
May 29 '13 at 9:11
|
show 8 more comments
1
$begingroup$
linear-algebra? modular-arithmetic? Why did someone edit those tags in??
$endgroup$
– mrf
May 29 '13 at 9:03
2
$begingroup$
@Matt: I don’t know, unless there are folks who think that being confused deserves a downvote. I certainly don’t, and have given it a compensatory upvote.
$endgroup$
– Brian M. Scott
May 29 '13 at 9:04
3
$begingroup$
Dear downvoters: I'm not sure that you should downvote simply because the OP was wrong. I don't quite see what's so bad about this question. It contains a simple, clear question with a straightforward answer, to which the OP offered their attempt in good faith. It also seems no more specific than any other question, and AFAIK is in the right place.
$endgroup$
– Sharkos
May 29 '13 at 9:05
2
$begingroup$
@Sharkos "Dear" downvoters? : )
$endgroup$
– Rudy the Reindeer
May 29 '13 at 9:06
4
$begingroup$
Hail @Matt: It's a form of address, a salutation. If politeness is banned from M.SE, my good man, do direct me to the relevant meta page. Yours sincerely, Carl Turner, Esq. PS: Biting sarcasm actually might be, in which case I'm royally screwed.
$endgroup$
– Sharkos
May 29 '13 at 9:11
1
1
$begingroup$
linear-algebra? modular-arithmetic? Why did someone edit those tags in??
$endgroup$
– mrf
May 29 '13 at 9:03
$begingroup$
linear-algebra? modular-arithmetic? Why did someone edit those tags in??
$endgroup$
– mrf
May 29 '13 at 9:03
2
2
$begingroup$
@Matt: I don’t know, unless there are folks who think that being confused deserves a downvote. I certainly don’t, and have given it a compensatory upvote.
$endgroup$
– Brian M. Scott
May 29 '13 at 9:04
$begingroup$
@Matt: I don’t know, unless there are folks who think that being confused deserves a downvote. I certainly don’t, and have given it a compensatory upvote.
$endgroup$
– Brian M. Scott
May 29 '13 at 9:04
3
3
$begingroup$
Dear downvoters: I'm not sure that you should downvote simply because the OP was wrong. I don't quite see what's so bad about this question. It contains a simple, clear question with a straightforward answer, to which the OP offered their attempt in good faith. It also seems no more specific than any other question, and AFAIK is in the right place.
$endgroup$
– Sharkos
May 29 '13 at 9:05
$begingroup$
Dear downvoters: I'm not sure that you should downvote simply because the OP was wrong. I don't quite see what's so bad about this question. It contains a simple, clear question with a straightforward answer, to which the OP offered their attempt in good faith. It also seems no more specific than any other question, and AFAIK is in the right place.
$endgroup$
– Sharkos
May 29 '13 at 9:05
2
2
$begingroup$
@Sharkos "Dear" downvoters? : )
$endgroup$
– Rudy the Reindeer
May 29 '13 at 9:06
$begingroup$
@Sharkos "Dear" downvoters? : )
$endgroup$
– Rudy the Reindeer
May 29 '13 at 9:06
4
4
$begingroup$
Hail @Matt: It's a form of address, a salutation. If politeness is banned from M.SE, my good man, do direct me to the relevant meta page. Yours sincerely, Carl Turner, Esq. PS: Biting sarcasm actually might be, in which case I'm royally screwed.
$endgroup$
– Sharkos
May 29 '13 at 9:11
$begingroup$
Hail @Matt: It's a form of address, a salutation. If politeness is banned from M.SE, my good man, do direct me to the relevant meta page. Yours sincerely, Carl Turner, Esq. PS: Biting sarcasm actually might be, in which case I'm royally screwed.
$endgroup$
– Sharkos
May 29 '13 at 9:11
|
show 8 more comments
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your answer of $12$ is numerically correct, but you’ve applied the precedence rules incorrectly. In the absence of parentheses multiplication is done before addition, so
$$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1cdot 0+1$$
is to be evaluated as
$$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+(1cdot 0)+1;,$$
not as
$$(1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1)cdot(0+1);.$$
Since $1cdot0=0$, this simplifies to
$$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+0+1=12;.$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Multiplication takes priority over addition, so this
$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1times0+1$
becomes:
$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+0+1$
Now add everything which gives you 12.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you type $1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1⋅0+1$ into most pocket calculators you will get the answer $1$. This is because the calculator applies the next operation to the result of the previous one, effectively computing$$(1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1)⋅0+1=0+1=1$$
When using a calculator you have to respect the logic of the machine. When writing mathematics you need to be aware of the standard conventions for brackets, which give the answer $12$ in this case. I suspect that the confusion arises because the two are not the same. Understanding why will help you to make better use of a calculator and to write correct mathematical equations.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Which pocket calculator are you using? Mine gives $13$ because typing $1cdot 0$ gives $1.0$ which is just$~1$.
$endgroup$
– Marc van Leeuwen
May 29 '13 at 12:19
$begingroup$
@MarcvanLeeuwen - good spot: I was assuming "dot" to be "times" of course - an easy assumption to make, and perhaps, as you suggest, a mistake!
$endgroup$
– Mark Bennet
May 29 '13 at 12:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
begin{align*}
& 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + (1times0) + 1\
= &1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 0 + 1\
= &12
end{align*}
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1 cdot 0+1$
since priority of multiplication $times$ or $cdot$ is greater than addition $+$ so expression will be:
$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+0+1implies 12$
This is the order of operation:
$1$ B:- Brackets first
$2$ O:- Orders (i.e. Powers and Square Roots, etc.)
$3$ DM:- Division and Multiplication (left-to-right)
$4$ AS:- Addition and Subtraction (left-to-right)
I think this will helpful :
http://www.magicalmaths.org/bodmas-starter-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-x-0-i-bet-more-people-will-answer-it-wrongp-give-a-try/
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1⋅0+1$
So, $1*0=0$ witch means that we Are Left with
$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1(+0)$ witch is $12$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f405543%2f111111111111-cdot-01-12-or-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your answer of $12$ is numerically correct, but you’ve applied the precedence rules incorrectly. In the absence of parentheses multiplication is done before addition, so
$$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1cdot 0+1$$
is to be evaluated as
$$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+(1cdot 0)+1;,$$
not as
$$(1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1)cdot(0+1);.$$
Since $1cdot0=0$, this simplifies to
$$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+0+1=12;.$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your answer of $12$ is numerically correct, but you’ve applied the precedence rules incorrectly. In the absence of parentheses multiplication is done before addition, so
$$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1cdot 0+1$$
is to be evaluated as
$$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+(1cdot 0)+1;,$$
not as
$$(1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1)cdot(0+1);.$$
Since $1cdot0=0$, this simplifies to
$$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+0+1=12;.$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your answer of $12$ is numerically correct, but you’ve applied the precedence rules incorrectly. In the absence of parentheses multiplication is done before addition, so
$$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1cdot 0+1$$
is to be evaluated as
$$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+(1cdot 0)+1;,$$
not as
$$(1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1)cdot(0+1);.$$
Since $1cdot0=0$, this simplifies to
$$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+0+1=12;.$$
$endgroup$
Your answer of $12$ is numerically correct, but you’ve applied the precedence rules incorrectly. In the absence of parentheses multiplication is done before addition, so
$$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1cdot 0+1$$
is to be evaluated as
$$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+(1cdot 0)+1;,$$
not as
$$(1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1)cdot(0+1);.$$
Since $1cdot0=0$, this simplifies to
$$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+0+1=12;.$$
answered May 29 '13 at 9:08
Brian M. ScottBrian M. Scott
460k40516917
460k40516917
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Multiplication takes priority over addition, so this
$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1times0+1$
becomes:
$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+0+1$
Now add everything which gives you 12.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Multiplication takes priority over addition, so this
$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1times0+1$
becomes:
$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+0+1$
Now add everything which gives you 12.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Multiplication takes priority over addition, so this
$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1times0+1$
becomes:
$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+0+1$
Now add everything which gives you 12.
$endgroup$
Multiplication takes priority over addition, so this
$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1times0+1$
becomes:
$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+0+1$
Now add everything which gives you 12.
answered May 29 '13 at 8:59
JerryJerry
831615
831615
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you type $1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1⋅0+1$ into most pocket calculators you will get the answer $1$. This is because the calculator applies the next operation to the result of the previous one, effectively computing$$(1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1)⋅0+1=0+1=1$$
When using a calculator you have to respect the logic of the machine. When writing mathematics you need to be aware of the standard conventions for brackets, which give the answer $12$ in this case. I suspect that the confusion arises because the two are not the same. Understanding why will help you to make better use of a calculator and to write correct mathematical equations.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Which pocket calculator are you using? Mine gives $13$ because typing $1cdot 0$ gives $1.0$ which is just$~1$.
$endgroup$
– Marc van Leeuwen
May 29 '13 at 12:19
$begingroup$
@MarcvanLeeuwen - good spot: I was assuming "dot" to be "times" of course - an easy assumption to make, and perhaps, as you suggest, a mistake!
$endgroup$
– Mark Bennet
May 29 '13 at 12:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you type $1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1⋅0+1$ into most pocket calculators you will get the answer $1$. This is because the calculator applies the next operation to the result of the previous one, effectively computing$$(1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1)⋅0+1=0+1=1$$
When using a calculator you have to respect the logic of the machine. When writing mathematics you need to be aware of the standard conventions for brackets, which give the answer $12$ in this case. I suspect that the confusion arises because the two are not the same. Understanding why will help you to make better use of a calculator and to write correct mathematical equations.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Which pocket calculator are you using? Mine gives $13$ because typing $1cdot 0$ gives $1.0$ which is just$~1$.
$endgroup$
– Marc van Leeuwen
May 29 '13 at 12:19
$begingroup$
@MarcvanLeeuwen - good spot: I was assuming "dot" to be "times" of course - an easy assumption to make, and perhaps, as you suggest, a mistake!
$endgroup$
– Mark Bennet
May 29 '13 at 12:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you type $1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1⋅0+1$ into most pocket calculators you will get the answer $1$. This is because the calculator applies the next operation to the result of the previous one, effectively computing$$(1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1)⋅0+1=0+1=1$$
When using a calculator you have to respect the logic of the machine. When writing mathematics you need to be aware of the standard conventions for brackets, which give the answer $12$ in this case. I suspect that the confusion arises because the two are not the same. Understanding why will help you to make better use of a calculator and to write correct mathematical equations.
$endgroup$
If you type $1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1⋅0+1$ into most pocket calculators you will get the answer $1$. This is because the calculator applies the next operation to the result of the previous one, effectively computing$$(1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1)⋅0+1=0+1=1$$
When using a calculator you have to respect the logic of the machine. When writing mathematics you need to be aware of the standard conventions for brackets, which give the answer $12$ in this case. I suspect that the confusion arises because the two are not the same. Understanding why will help you to make better use of a calculator and to write correct mathematical equations.
answered May 29 '13 at 9:17
Mark BennetMark Bennet
81.9k984183
81.9k984183
1
$begingroup$
Which pocket calculator are you using? Mine gives $13$ because typing $1cdot 0$ gives $1.0$ which is just$~1$.
$endgroup$
– Marc van Leeuwen
May 29 '13 at 12:19
$begingroup$
@MarcvanLeeuwen - good spot: I was assuming "dot" to be "times" of course - an easy assumption to make, and perhaps, as you suggest, a mistake!
$endgroup$
– Mark Bennet
May 29 '13 at 12:24
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Which pocket calculator are you using? Mine gives $13$ because typing $1cdot 0$ gives $1.0$ which is just$~1$.
$endgroup$
– Marc van Leeuwen
May 29 '13 at 12:19
$begingroup$
@MarcvanLeeuwen - good spot: I was assuming "dot" to be "times" of course - an easy assumption to make, and perhaps, as you suggest, a mistake!
$endgroup$
– Mark Bennet
May 29 '13 at 12:24
1
1
$begingroup$
Which pocket calculator are you using? Mine gives $13$ because typing $1cdot 0$ gives $1.0$ which is just$~1$.
$endgroup$
– Marc van Leeuwen
May 29 '13 at 12:19
$begingroup$
Which pocket calculator are you using? Mine gives $13$ because typing $1cdot 0$ gives $1.0$ which is just$~1$.
$endgroup$
– Marc van Leeuwen
May 29 '13 at 12:19
$begingroup$
@MarcvanLeeuwen - good spot: I was assuming "dot" to be "times" of course - an easy assumption to make, and perhaps, as you suggest, a mistake!
$endgroup$
– Mark Bennet
May 29 '13 at 12:24
$begingroup$
@MarcvanLeeuwen - good spot: I was assuming "dot" to be "times" of course - an easy assumption to make, and perhaps, as you suggest, a mistake!
$endgroup$
– Mark Bennet
May 29 '13 at 12:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
begin{align*}
& 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + (1times0) + 1\
= &1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 0 + 1\
= &12
end{align*}
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
begin{align*}
& 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + (1times0) + 1\
= &1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 0 + 1\
= &12
end{align*}
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
begin{align*}
& 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + (1times0) + 1\
= &1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 0 + 1\
= &12
end{align*}
$endgroup$
begin{align*}
& 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + (1times0) + 1\
= &1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 0 + 1\
= &12
end{align*}
edited May 29 '13 at 9:18
Michael Albanese
64.4k1599314
64.4k1599314
answered May 29 '13 at 9:00
user54297user54297
426517
426517
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1 cdot 0+1$
since priority of multiplication $times$ or $cdot$ is greater than addition $+$ so expression will be:
$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+0+1implies 12$
This is the order of operation:
$1$ B:- Brackets first
$2$ O:- Orders (i.e. Powers and Square Roots, etc.)
$3$ DM:- Division and Multiplication (left-to-right)
$4$ AS:- Addition and Subtraction (left-to-right)
I think this will helpful :
http://www.magicalmaths.org/bodmas-starter-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-x-0-i-bet-more-people-will-answer-it-wrongp-give-a-try/
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1 cdot 0+1$
since priority of multiplication $times$ or $cdot$ is greater than addition $+$ so expression will be:
$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+0+1implies 12$
This is the order of operation:
$1$ B:- Brackets first
$2$ O:- Orders (i.e. Powers and Square Roots, etc.)
$3$ DM:- Division and Multiplication (left-to-right)
$4$ AS:- Addition and Subtraction (left-to-right)
I think this will helpful :
http://www.magicalmaths.org/bodmas-starter-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-x-0-i-bet-more-people-will-answer-it-wrongp-give-a-try/
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1 cdot 0+1$
since priority of multiplication $times$ or $cdot$ is greater than addition $+$ so expression will be:
$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+0+1implies 12$
This is the order of operation:
$1$ B:- Brackets first
$2$ O:- Orders (i.e. Powers and Square Roots, etc.)
$3$ DM:- Division and Multiplication (left-to-right)
$4$ AS:- Addition and Subtraction (left-to-right)
I think this will helpful :
http://www.magicalmaths.org/bodmas-starter-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-x-0-i-bet-more-people-will-answer-it-wrongp-give-a-try/
$endgroup$
$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1 cdot 0+1$
since priority of multiplication $times$ or $cdot$ is greater than addition $+$ so expression will be:
$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+0+1implies 12$
This is the order of operation:
$1$ B:- Brackets first
$2$ O:- Orders (i.e. Powers and Square Roots, etc.)
$3$ DM:- Division and Multiplication (left-to-right)
$4$ AS:- Addition and Subtraction (left-to-right)
I think this will helpful :
http://www.magicalmaths.org/bodmas-starter-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-x-0-i-bet-more-people-will-answer-it-wrongp-give-a-try/
edited May 29 '13 at 9:25
answered May 29 '13 at 9:12
iostream007iostream007
3,71931439
3,71931439
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1⋅0+1$
So, $1*0=0$ witch means that we Are Left with
$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1(+0)$ witch is $12$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1⋅0+1$
So, $1*0=0$ witch means that we Are Left with
$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1(+0)$ witch is $12$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1⋅0+1$
So, $1*0=0$ witch means that we Are Left with
$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1(+0)$ witch is $12$
$endgroup$
$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1⋅0+1$
So, $1*0=0$ witch means that we Are Left with
$1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1(+0)$ witch is $12$
answered Dec 12 '18 at 1:15
A.usernemaA.usernema
113
113
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f405543%2f111111111111-cdot-01-12-or-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
linear-algebra? modular-arithmetic? Why did someone edit those tags in??
$endgroup$
– mrf
May 29 '13 at 9:03
2
$begingroup$
@Matt: I don’t know, unless there are folks who think that being confused deserves a downvote. I certainly don’t, and have given it a compensatory upvote.
$endgroup$
– Brian M. Scott
May 29 '13 at 9:04
3
$begingroup$
Dear downvoters: I'm not sure that you should downvote simply because the OP was wrong. I don't quite see what's so bad about this question. It contains a simple, clear question with a straightforward answer, to which the OP offered their attempt in good faith. It also seems no more specific than any other question, and AFAIK is in the right place.
$endgroup$
– Sharkos
May 29 '13 at 9:05
2
$begingroup$
@Sharkos "Dear" downvoters? : )
$endgroup$
– Rudy the Reindeer
May 29 '13 at 9:06
4
$begingroup$
Hail @Matt: It's a form of address, a salutation. If politeness is banned from M.SE, my good man, do direct me to the relevant meta page. Yours sincerely, Carl Turner, Esq. PS: Biting sarcasm actually might be, in which case I'm royally screwed.
$endgroup$
– Sharkos
May 29 '13 at 9:11