Iterated induced outermeasures from premeasure












1












$begingroup$


Let $X$ be a set, $mathcal{A} subseteq mathcal{P}(X)$ be an algebra (i.e., a set closed under complements and finite unions), $mu_0$ be a premeasure defined on $mathcal{A}$, and $mathcal{M}$ be the $sigma$-algebra generated by $mathcal{A}$. Denote $mu^*$ to be the outer measure induced by $mu_0$; explicitly, for $E in mathcal{P}(X)$, define
$$mu^*(E) = inf left{sum_{i=1}^{infty}mu_0(E_i): {E_i}_{i=1}^{infty}subseteq mathcal{A} text{ is disjoint and } E subseteq bigcup_{i=1}^{infty}E_iright}.$$
Further, define
$$mathcal{M}^*=left{E in mathcal{P}(X): forall K in mathcal{P}(X), ;mu^*(K) = mu^*(Kcap E) + mu^*(Kcap E^c)right}.$$
That $mathcal{M}^*$ is a $sigma$-algebra, $mathcal{A} subseteq mathcal{M}^*$, and hence $mathcal{M} subseteq mathcal{M}^*$ are known facts. When does $mathcal{M} = mathcal{M}^*$? Since $mu^* Big|_{mathcal{A}} = mu_0$, $mu^*Big|_{mathcal{M}}$ is a measure that extends $mu_0$, and $mu^* Big|_{mathcal{M}^*} $ is a complete measure, the above equality would imply $mu = mu^*Big|_{mathcal{M}} = mu^*Big|_{mathcal{M}^*}$ is a complete measure extending $mu_0$.



Now, leaving the question of the above equality aside, denote $mu^{**}$ to be the outer measure induced by $mu = mu^*Big|_{mathcal{M}}$; that is,
for $E in mathcal{P}(X)$, define
$$mu^{**}(E) = inf left{sum_{i=1}^{infty}mu(E_i) = sum_{i=1}^{infty}mu^*(E_i): {E_i}_{i=1}^{infty}subseteq mathcal{M} text{ is disjoint and } E subseteq bigcup_{i=1}^{infty}E_iright}.$$
What is the relationship between $mu^*$ and $mu^{**}$? More generally, if I define $mu^{overbrace{*ldots*}^{n+1}}$ to be the outer measure induced by $mu^{overbrace{*ldots*}^{n}}Big|_{mathcal{M}}$ inductively for $n in mathbb{N}$ as above, what is the relationship between these outer measures? What is the pointwise limit of this sequence of induced outer measures?



Examples elucidating your arguments will be much appreciated.






measure-theory







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    the condition of ${E_i}_{iinBbb N}$ be disjoint is suprefluous, because they are elements of a $sigma$-algebra, that is, for every ${B_i}_{iinBbb N}$ of non-disjoint sets we can build a sequence of pair-wise disjoint sets ${E_i}$, by example $E_i:=B_isetminus(bigcup_{j=0}^{i-1} B_j)$, such that $bigcup_{iinBbb N} B_i=bigcup_{iinBbb N} E_i$
    $endgroup$
    – Masacroso
    Dec 12 '18 at 1:55


















1












$begingroup$


Let $X$ be a set, $mathcal{A} subseteq mathcal{P}(X)$ be an algebra (i.e., a set closed under complements and finite unions), $mu_0$ be a premeasure defined on $mathcal{A}$, and $mathcal{M}$ be the $sigma$-algebra generated by $mathcal{A}$. Denote $mu^*$ to be the outer measure induced by $mu_0$; explicitly, for $E in mathcal{P}(X)$, define
$$mu^*(E) = inf left{sum_{i=1}^{infty}mu_0(E_i): {E_i}_{i=1}^{infty}subseteq mathcal{A} text{ is disjoint and } E subseteq bigcup_{i=1}^{infty}E_iright}.$$
Further, define
$$mathcal{M}^*=left{E in mathcal{P}(X): forall K in mathcal{P}(X), ;mu^*(K) = mu^*(Kcap E) + mu^*(Kcap E^c)right}.$$
That $mathcal{M}^*$ is a $sigma$-algebra, $mathcal{A} subseteq mathcal{M}^*$, and hence $mathcal{M} subseteq mathcal{M}^*$ are known facts. When does $mathcal{M} = mathcal{M}^*$? Since $mu^* Big|_{mathcal{A}} = mu_0$, $mu^*Big|_{mathcal{M}}$ is a measure that extends $mu_0$, and $mu^* Big|_{mathcal{M}^*} $ is a complete measure, the above equality would imply $mu = mu^*Big|_{mathcal{M}} = mu^*Big|_{mathcal{M}^*}$ is a complete measure extending $mu_0$.



Now, leaving the question of the above equality aside, denote $mu^{**}$ to be the outer measure induced by $mu = mu^*Big|_{mathcal{M}}$; that is,
for $E in mathcal{P}(X)$, define
$$mu^{**}(E) = inf left{sum_{i=1}^{infty}mu(E_i) = sum_{i=1}^{infty}mu^*(E_i): {E_i}_{i=1}^{infty}subseteq mathcal{M} text{ is disjoint and } E subseteq bigcup_{i=1}^{infty}E_iright}.$$
What is the relationship between $mu^*$ and $mu^{**}$? More generally, if I define $mu^{overbrace{*ldots*}^{n+1}}$ to be the outer measure induced by $mu^{overbrace{*ldots*}^{n}}Big|_{mathcal{M}}$ inductively for $n in mathbb{N}$ as above, what is the relationship between these outer measures? What is the pointwise limit of this sequence of induced outer measures?



Examples elucidating your arguments will be much appreciated.






measure-theory







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    the condition of ${E_i}_{iinBbb N}$ be disjoint is suprefluous, because they are elements of a $sigma$-algebra, that is, for every ${B_i}_{iinBbb N}$ of non-disjoint sets we can build a sequence of pair-wise disjoint sets ${E_i}$, by example $E_i:=B_isetminus(bigcup_{j=0}^{i-1} B_j)$, such that $bigcup_{iinBbb N} B_i=bigcup_{iinBbb N} E_i$
    $endgroup$
    – Masacroso
    Dec 12 '18 at 1:55
















1












1








1





$begingroup$


Let $X$ be a set, $mathcal{A} subseteq mathcal{P}(X)$ be an algebra (i.e., a set closed under complements and finite unions), $mu_0$ be a premeasure defined on $mathcal{A}$, and $mathcal{M}$ be the $sigma$-algebra generated by $mathcal{A}$. Denote $mu^*$ to be the outer measure induced by $mu_0$; explicitly, for $E in mathcal{P}(X)$, define
$$mu^*(E) = inf left{sum_{i=1}^{infty}mu_0(E_i): {E_i}_{i=1}^{infty}subseteq mathcal{A} text{ is disjoint and } E subseteq bigcup_{i=1}^{infty}E_iright}.$$
Further, define
$$mathcal{M}^*=left{E in mathcal{P}(X): forall K in mathcal{P}(X), ;mu^*(K) = mu^*(Kcap E) + mu^*(Kcap E^c)right}.$$
That $mathcal{M}^*$ is a $sigma$-algebra, $mathcal{A} subseteq mathcal{M}^*$, and hence $mathcal{M} subseteq mathcal{M}^*$ are known facts. When does $mathcal{M} = mathcal{M}^*$? Since $mu^* Big|_{mathcal{A}} = mu_0$, $mu^*Big|_{mathcal{M}}$ is a measure that extends $mu_0$, and $mu^* Big|_{mathcal{M}^*} $ is a complete measure, the above equality would imply $mu = mu^*Big|_{mathcal{M}} = mu^*Big|_{mathcal{M}^*}$ is a complete measure extending $mu_0$.



Now, leaving the question of the above equality aside, denote $mu^{**}$ to be the outer measure induced by $mu = mu^*Big|_{mathcal{M}}$; that is,
for $E in mathcal{P}(X)$, define
$$mu^{**}(E) = inf left{sum_{i=1}^{infty}mu(E_i) = sum_{i=1}^{infty}mu^*(E_i): {E_i}_{i=1}^{infty}subseteq mathcal{M} text{ is disjoint and } E subseteq bigcup_{i=1}^{infty}E_iright}.$$
What is the relationship between $mu^*$ and $mu^{**}$? More generally, if I define $mu^{overbrace{*ldots*}^{n+1}}$ to be the outer measure induced by $mu^{overbrace{*ldots*}^{n}}Big|_{mathcal{M}}$ inductively for $n in mathbb{N}$ as above, what is the relationship between these outer measures? What is the pointwise limit of this sequence of induced outer measures?



Examples elucidating your arguments will be much appreciated.






measure-theory







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $X$ be a set, $mathcal{A} subseteq mathcal{P}(X)$ be an algebra (i.e., a set closed under complements and finite unions), $mu_0$ be a premeasure defined on $mathcal{A}$, and $mathcal{M}$ be the $sigma$-algebra generated by $mathcal{A}$. Denote $mu^*$ to be the outer measure induced by $mu_0$; explicitly, for $E in mathcal{P}(X)$, define
$$mu^*(E) = inf left{sum_{i=1}^{infty}mu_0(E_i): {E_i}_{i=1}^{infty}subseteq mathcal{A} text{ is disjoint and } E subseteq bigcup_{i=1}^{infty}E_iright}.$$
Further, define
$$mathcal{M}^*=left{E in mathcal{P}(X): forall K in mathcal{P}(X), ;mu^*(K) = mu^*(Kcap E) + mu^*(Kcap E^c)right}.$$
That $mathcal{M}^*$ is a $sigma$-algebra, $mathcal{A} subseteq mathcal{M}^*$, and hence $mathcal{M} subseteq mathcal{M}^*$ are known facts. When does $mathcal{M} = mathcal{M}^*$? Since $mu^* Big|_{mathcal{A}} = mu_0$, $mu^*Big|_{mathcal{M}}$ is a measure that extends $mu_0$, and $mu^* Big|_{mathcal{M}^*} $ is a complete measure, the above equality would imply $mu = mu^*Big|_{mathcal{M}} = mu^*Big|_{mathcal{M}^*}$ is a complete measure extending $mu_0$.



Now, leaving the question of the above equality aside, denote $mu^{**}$ to be the outer measure induced by $mu = mu^*Big|_{mathcal{M}}$; that is,
for $E in mathcal{P}(X)$, define
$$mu^{**}(E) = inf left{sum_{i=1}^{infty}mu(E_i) = sum_{i=1}^{infty}mu^*(E_i): {E_i}_{i=1}^{infty}subseteq mathcal{M} text{ is disjoint and } E subseteq bigcup_{i=1}^{infty}E_iright}.$$
What is the relationship between $mu^*$ and $mu^{**}$? More generally, if I define $mu^{overbrace{*ldots*}^{n+1}}$ to be the outer measure induced by $mu^{overbrace{*ldots*}^{n}}Big|_{mathcal{M}}$ inductively for $n in mathbb{N}$ as above, what is the relationship between these outer measures? What is the pointwise limit of this sequence of induced outer measures?



Examples elucidating your arguments will be much appreciated.






measure-theory




measure-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 12 '18 at 2:06







SystematicDisintegration

















asked Dec 12 '18 at 1:46









SystematicDisintegrationSystematicDisintegration

279211




279211








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    the condition of ${E_i}_{iinBbb N}$ be disjoint is suprefluous, because they are elements of a $sigma$-algebra, that is, for every ${B_i}_{iinBbb N}$ of non-disjoint sets we can build a sequence of pair-wise disjoint sets ${E_i}$, by example $E_i:=B_isetminus(bigcup_{j=0}^{i-1} B_j)$, such that $bigcup_{iinBbb N} B_i=bigcup_{iinBbb N} E_i$
    $endgroup$
    – Masacroso
    Dec 12 '18 at 1:55
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    the condition of ${E_i}_{iinBbb N}$ be disjoint is suprefluous, because they are elements of a $sigma$-algebra, that is, for every ${B_i}_{iinBbb N}$ of non-disjoint sets we can build a sequence of pair-wise disjoint sets ${E_i}$, by example $E_i:=B_isetminus(bigcup_{j=0}^{i-1} B_j)$, such that $bigcup_{iinBbb N} B_i=bigcup_{iinBbb N} E_i$
    $endgroup$
    – Masacroso
    Dec 12 '18 at 1:55










1




1




$begingroup$
the condition of ${E_i}_{iinBbb N}$ be disjoint is suprefluous, because they are elements of a $sigma$-algebra, that is, for every ${B_i}_{iinBbb N}$ of non-disjoint sets we can build a sequence of pair-wise disjoint sets ${E_i}$, by example $E_i:=B_isetminus(bigcup_{j=0}^{i-1} B_j)$, such that $bigcup_{iinBbb N} B_i=bigcup_{iinBbb N} E_i$
$endgroup$
– Masacroso
Dec 12 '18 at 1:55






$begingroup$
the condition of ${E_i}_{iinBbb N}$ be disjoint is suprefluous, because they are elements of a $sigma$-algebra, that is, for every ${B_i}_{iinBbb N}$ of non-disjoint sets we can build a sequence of pair-wise disjoint sets ${E_i}$, by example $E_i:=B_isetminus(bigcup_{j=0}^{i-1} B_j)$, such that $bigcup_{iinBbb N} B_i=bigcup_{iinBbb N} E_i$
$endgroup$
– Masacroso
Dec 12 '18 at 1:55












0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3036136%2fiterated-induced-outermeasures-from-premeasure%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3036136%2fiterated-induced-outermeasures-from-premeasure%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

Image
3 Recently upgrade to 18.10 from 18.04, and using the terminal is becoming annoying: the new alert sound is a drip ( /usr/share/sounds/gnome/default/alerts/drip.ogg ), and the previous one is still located at ( /usr/share/sounds/ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg ). My issue is that at the gnome-terminal, when autocompleting or pressing left BOTH sounds are reproduced, at the same time. I want to just have ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg active, not both . At the moment I have been only able to reduce the volume of the alerts (but still both are played), or turn the alerts down (but I dislike both "solutions"). gnome-terminal 18.10 teminal-bell share | improve this question
Read more

Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

Image
up vote 5 down vote favorite 2 I would like to make it so that the vertical space below the title of each chapter is the same when using the Bjornstrup package (i.e. so that the descenders do not affect the spacing - as shown by the red arrow in the picture below). I think I'm fairly happy with the spacing around "A chapter", so I'd really like titles without descenders (e.g. "Contents") to have the same vertical spacing as "A chapter" below the title. I would also like to remove the large "0" in the contents title. Any help appreciated, as always. documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{book} % Packages[![enter image description here][1]][1] usepackage[left=3.5cm, right=3.5cm, top=4.3cm, bottom=4.25cm]{geometry} usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} usepackage{libertine} usepackage[libertine]{newtx
Read more

Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

Image
0 I want to add Tabulator js to my java project. I added tabulator.min.js, tabulator.min.css to resources folder. After that added to my html page these dependencies as recommending in readme.md. <link rel="stylesheet" th:href="@{/css/tabulator.min.css}"> <script type="text/javascript" th:src="@{/js/tabulator.min.js}"></script> Now my tables view all elements, that I have in the html page, but not correct. In the documentation of Tabulator is example how to create header and table, var table = new Tabulator("#example-table", { columns:[ {title:"Name", field:"name", sorter:"string", width:200, editor:true}, {title:"Age", field:"age", sorter:"
Read more