How to set single spacing after punctuation in bibliography section using apacite?
I am working in APA6
class option, and with the apacite
citation package.
I want to have strict single spacing after punctuation / between sentences. In text, I used the frenchspacing
command. However, this does not apply to bibliography section.
Any suggestion?
spacing bibliographies punctuation apacite
add a comment |
I am working in APA6
class option, and with the apacite
citation package.
I want to have strict single spacing after punctuation / between sentences. In text, I used the frenchspacing
command. However, this does not apply to bibliography section.
Any suggestion?
spacing bibliographies punctuation apacite
add a comment |
I am working in APA6
class option, and with the apacite
citation package.
I want to have strict single spacing after punctuation / between sentences. In text, I used the frenchspacing
command. However, this does not apply to bibliography section.
Any suggestion?
spacing bibliographies punctuation apacite
I am working in APA6
class option, and with the apacite
citation package.
I want to have strict single spacing after punctuation / between sentences. In text, I used the frenchspacing
command. However, this does not apply to bibliography section.
Any suggestion?
spacing bibliographies punctuation apacite
spacing bibliographies punctuation apacite
asked Mar 21 at 22:05
Ségolène GuérinSégolène Guérin
254
254
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
LaTeX generally already typesets its bibliography without extra space after periods. Indeed apacite
is no exception, its redefinition of thebibliography
has sfcode`.=1000relax
, which means that a full stop/period will not trigger the behaviour of nonfrenchspacing
to add a bit of space afterwards.
Bibliographies do, however, have the additional command newblock
. This command is used to separate larger chunks of information in the bibliography. Traditionally it adds a little bit of extra space between those blocks and allows for extra stretchiness. The default definition of newblock
for apacite
is defnewblock{hskip .11em plus .33em minus .07em}
. As it happens, a newblock
after a full stop in the bibliography will roughly have the same visual effect as the additional space after a full stop in nonfrenchspacing
.
If you want to get rid of the additional space introduced by newblock
you can patch its definition in thebibliography
. The effect is quite miniscule though.
documentclass[british]{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{babel}
usepackage{csquotes}
usepackage{apacite}
usepackage{etoolbox}
apptocmd{thebibliography}
{defnewblock{}}
{}{}
usepackage{filecontents}
begin{filecontents}{jobname.bib}
@book{appleby,
author = {Humphrey Appleby},
title = {On the Importance of the Civil Service},
year = {1980},
}
end{filecontents}
begin{document}
{frenchspacing Appleby, H. (1980). emph{On the importance...}par}
{nonfrenchspacing Appleby, H. (1980). emph{On the importance...}par}
cite{appleby}
bibliographystyle{apacite}
bibliography{jobname}
end{document}
Here is a direct comparison of the two: Red is the original definition, blue the new one with disabled newblock
.
Thank you so much! The effects are quite minuscule indeed, but enough to be notice by my supervisor, I can assure you!
– Ségolène Guérin
Mar 22 at 7:16
add a comment |
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480787%2fhow-to-set-single-spacing-after-punctuation-in-bibliography-section-using-apacit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
LaTeX generally already typesets its bibliography without extra space after periods. Indeed apacite
is no exception, its redefinition of thebibliography
has sfcode`.=1000relax
, which means that a full stop/period will not trigger the behaviour of nonfrenchspacing
to add a bit of space afterwards.
Bibliographies do, however, have the additional command newblock
. This command is used to separate larger chunks of information in the bibliography. Traditionally it adds a little bit of extra space between those blocks and allows for extra stretchiness. The default definition of newblock
for apacite
is defnewblock{hskip .11em plus .33em minus .07em}
. As it happens, a newblock
after a full stop in the bibliography will roughly have the same visual effect as the additional space after a full stop in nonfrenchspacing
.
If you want to get rid of the additional space introduced by newblock
you can patch its definition in thebibliography
. The effect is quite miniscule though.
documentclass[british]{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{babel}
usepackage{csquotes}
usepackage{apacite}
usepackage{etoolbox}
apptocmd{thebibliography}
{defnewblock{}}
{}{}
usepackage{filecontents}
begin{filecontents}{jobname.bib}
@book{appleby,
author = {Humphrey Appleby},
title = {On the Importance of the Civil Service},
year = {1980},
}
end{filecontents}
begin{document}
{frenchspacing Appleby, H. (1980). emph{On the importance...}par}
{nonfrenchspacing Appleby, H. (1980). emph{On the importance...}par}
cite{appleby}
bibliographystyle{apacite}
bibliography{jobname}
end{document}
Here is a direct comparison of the two: Red is the original definition, blue the new one with disabled newblock
.
Thank you so much! The effects are quite minuscule indeed, but enough to be notice by my supervisor, I can assure you!
– Ségolène Guérin
Mar 22 at 7:16
add a comment |
LaTeX generally already typesets its bibliography without extra space after periods. Indeed apacite
is no exception, its redefinition of thebibliography
has sfcode`.=1000relax
, which means that a full stop/period will not trigger the behaviour of nonfrenchspacing
to add a bit of space afterwards.
Bibliographies do, however, have the additional command newblock
. This command is used to separate larger chunks of information in the bibliography. Traditionally it adds a little bit of extra space between those blocks and allows for extra stretchiness. The default definition of newblock
for apacite
is defnewblock{hskip .11em plus .33em minus .07em}
. As it happens, a newblock
after a full stop in the bibliography will roughly have the same visual effect as the additional space after a full stop in nonfrenchspacing
.
If you want to get rid of the additional space introduced by newblock
you can patch its definition in thebibliography
. The effect is quite miniscule though.
documentclass[british]{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{babel}
usepackage{csquotes}
usepackage{apacite}
usepackage{etoolbox}
apptocmd{thebibliography}
{defnewblock{}}
{}{}
usepackage{filecontents}
begin{filecontents}{jobname.bib}
@book{appleby,
author = {Humphrey Appleby},
title = {On the Importance of the Civil Service},
year = {1980},
}
end{filecontents}
begin{document}
{frenchspacing Appleby, H. (1980). emph{On the importance...}par}
{nonfrenchspacing Appleby, H. (1980). emph{On the importance...}par}
cite{appleby}
bibliographystyle{apacite}
bibliography{jobname}
end{document}
Here is a direct comparison of the two: Red is the original definition, blue the new one with disabled newblock
.
Thank you so much! The effects are quite minuscule indeed, but enough to be notice by my supervisor, I can assure you!
– Ségolène Guérin
Mar 22 at 7:16
add a comment |
LaTeX generally already typesets its bibliography without extra space after periods. Indeed apacite
is no exception, its redefinition of thebibliography
has sfcode`.=1000relax
, which means that a full stop/period will not trigger the behaviour of nonfrenchspacing
to add a bit of space afterwards.
Bibliographies do, however, have the additional command newblock
. This command is used to separate larger chunks of information in the bibliography. Traditionally it adds a little bit of extra space between those blocks and allows for extra stretchiness. The default definition of newblock
for apacite
is defnewblock{hskip .11em plus .33em minus .07em}
. As it happens, a newblock
after a full stop in the bibliography will roughly have the same visual effect as the additional space after a full stop in nonfrenchspacing
.
If you want to get rid of the additional space introduced by newblock
you can patch its definition in thebibliography
. The effect is quite miniscule though.
documentclass[british]{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{babel}
usepackage{csquotes}
usepackage{apacite}
usepackage{etoolbox}
apptocmd{thebibliography}
{defnewblock{}}
{}{}
usepackage{filecontents}
begin{filecontents}{jobname.bib}
@book{appleby,
author = {Humphrey Appleby},
title = {On the Importance of the Civil Service},
year = {1980},
}
end{filecontents}
begin{document}
{frenchspacing Appleby, H. (1980). emph{On the importance...}par}
{nonfrenchspacing Appleby, H. (1980). emph{On the importance...}par}
cite{appleby}
bibliographystyle{apacite}
bibliography{jobname}
end{document}
Here is a direct comparison of the two: Red is the original definition, blue the new one with disabled newblock
.
LaTeX generally already typesets its bibliography without extra space after periods. Indeed apacite
is no exception, its redefinition of thebibliography
has sfcode`.=1000relax
, which means that a full stop/period will not trigger the behaviour of nonfrenchspacing
to add a bit of space afterwards.
Bibliographies do, however, have the additional command newblock
. This command is used to separate larger chunks of information in the bibliography. Traditionally it adds a little bit of extra space between those blocks and allows for extra stretchiness. The default definition of newblock
for apacite
is defnewblock{hskip .11em plus .33em minus .07em}
. As it happens, a newblock
after a full stop in the bibliography will roughly have the same visual effect as the additional space after a full stop in nonfrenchspacing
.
If you want to get rid of the additional space introduced by newblock
you can patch its definition in thebibliography
. The effect is quite miniscule though.
documentclass[british]{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{babel}
usepackage{csquotes}
usepackage{apacite}
usepackage{etoolbox}
apptocmd{thebibliography}
{defnewblock{}}
{}{}
usepackage{filecontents}
begin{filecontents}{jobname.bib}
@book{appleby,
author = {Humphrey Appleby},
title = {On the Importance of the Civil Service},
year = {1980},
}
end{filecontents}
begin{document}
{frenchspacing Appleby, H. (1980). emph{On the importance...}par}
{nonfrenchspacing Appleby, H. (1980). emph{On the importance...}par}
cite{appleby}
bibliographystyle{apacite}
bibliography{jobname}
end{document}
Here is a direct comparison of the two: Red is the original definition, blue the new one with disabled newblock
.
answered Mar 22 at 6:14
moewemoewe
95.8k10116359
95.8k10116359
Thank you so much! The effects are quite minuscule indeed, but enough to be notice by my supervisor, I can assure you!
– Ségolène Guérin
Mar 22 at 7:16
add a comment |
Thank you so much! The effects are quite minuscule indeed, but enough to be notice by my supervisor, I can assure you!
– Ségolène Guérin
Mar 22 at 7:16
Thank you so much! The effects are quite minuscule indeed, but enough to be notice by my supervisor, I can assure you!
– Ségolène Guérin
Mar 22 at 7:16
Thank you so much! The effects are quite minuscule indeed, but enough to be notice by my supervisor, I can assure you!
– Ségolène Guérin
Mar 22 at 7:16
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480787%2fhow-to-set-single-spacing-after-punctuation-in-bibliography-section-using-apacit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown