! Undefined control sequence. l.11 forall [duplicate]
This question already has an answer here:
What library do I have to use such that the document can render lt and gt as less than and greater than signs, respectively?
1 answer
I get ! Undefined control sequence. l.11 forall n,m gt
I don't understand why:
documentclass[preview, border=1pt, convert={outext=.png}]{standalone}
usepackage{amsfonts}
usepackage{mathtools}
usepackage{amsmath,esint}
usepackage{amssymb}
usepackage{siunitx}
usepackage{braket}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
forall n,m gt n_{varepsilon} quad Longrightarrow quad ||mathbf{x}_n - mathbf{x}_m|| lt varepsilon
end{equation*}
end{document}
math-mode
marked as duplicate by JouleV, Community♦ Mar 25 at 10:53
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
This question already has an answer here:
What library do I have to use such that the document can render lt and gt as less than and greater than signs, respectively?
1 answer
I get ! Undefined control sequence. l.11 forall n,m gt
I don't understand why:
documentclass[preview, border=1pt, convert={outext=.png}]{standalone}
usepackage{amsfonts}
usepackage{mathtools}
usepackage{amsmath,esint}
usepackage{amssymb}
usepackage{siunitx}
usepackage{braket}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
forall n,m gt n_{varepsilon} quad Longrightarrow quad ||mathbf{x}_n - mathbf{x}_m|| lt varepsilon
end{equation*}
end{document}
math-mode
marked as duplicate by JouleV, Community♦ Mar 25 at 10:53
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
This question already has an answer here:
What library do I have to use such that the document can render lt and gt as less than and greater than signs, respectively?
1 answer
I get ! Undefined control sequence. l.11 forall n,m gt
I don't understand why:
documentclass[preview, border=1pt, convert={outext=.png}]{standalone}
usepackage{amsfonts}
usepackage{mathtools}
usepackage{amsmath,esint}
usepackage{amssymb}
usepackage{siunitx}
usepackage{braket}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
forall n,m gt n_{varepsilon} quad Longrightarrow quad ||mathbf{x}_n - mathbf{x}_m|| lt varepsilon
end{equation*}
end{document}
math-mode
This question already has an answer here:
What library do I have to use such that the document can render lt and gt as less than and greater than signs, respectively?
1 answer
I get ! Undefined control sequence. l.11 forall n,m gt
I don't understand why:
documentclass[preview, border=1pt, convert={outext=.png}]{standalone}
usepackage{amsfonts}
usepackage{mathtools}
usepackage{amsmath,esint}
usepackage{amssymb}
usepackage{siunitx}
usepackage{braket}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
forall n,m gt n_{varepsilon} quad Longrightarrow quad ||mathbf{x}_n - mathbf{x}_m|| lt varepsilon
end{equation*}
end{document}
This question already has an answer here:
What library do I have to use such that the document can render lt and gt as less than and greater than signs, respectively?
1 answer
math-mode
math-mode
edited Mar 25 at 10:31
JouleV
10.5k22559
10.5k22559
asked Mar 25 at 10:29
Giuliano MalatestaGiuliano Malatesta
314
314
marked as duplicate by JouleV, Community♦ Mar 25 at 10:53
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by JouleV, Community♦ Mar 25 at 10:53
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I think you are looking for ge and le. gt and lt are not defined.
documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
forall n,m ge n_{varepsilon} quad Longrightarrow quad ||mathbf{x}_n - mathbf{x}_m|| le varepsilon
end{equation*}
end{document}

Edit 1
The > and < signs are already on your keyboard:
documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
forall n,m > n_{varepsilon} quad Longrightarrow quad ||mathbf{x}_n - mathbf{x}_m|| < varepsilon
end{equation*}
end{document}

In case you want to use gt or lt, you have to define it. The definition below is taken from this answer:
documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{lt}{symbol{"3C}}
newcommand{gt}{symbol{"3E}}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
forall n,m lt n_{varepsilon} quad Longrightarrow quad ||mathbf{x}_n - mathbf{x}_m|| gt varepsilon
end{equation*}
end{document}

no I don't want the equal sign
– Giuliano Malatesta
Mar 25 at 10:34
@GiulianoMalatesta Then why don't you use>and<?
– JouleV
Mar 25 at 10:35
that's ok. What's the difference betweem gt lt and > < ?
– Giuliano Malatesta
Mar 25 at 10:40
@GiulianoMalatestagtandltare not already defined. I think you are following this answer or something similar, but you should make sure thatnewcommands are included. IMHO you should just use>and<. We should not make things more complicated.
– JouleV
Mar 25 at 10:43
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I think you are looking for ge and le. gt and lt are not defined.
documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
forall n,m ge n_{varepsilon} quad Longrightarrow quad ||mathbf{x}_n - mathbf{x}_m|| le varepsilon
end{equation*}
end{document}

Edit 1
The > and < signs are already on your keyboard:
documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
forall n,m > n_{varepsilon} quad Longrightarrow quad ||mathbf{x}_n - mathbf{x}_m|| < varepsilon
end{equation*}
end{document}

In case you want to use gt or lt, you have to define it. The definition below is taken from this answer:
documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{lt}{symbol{"3C}}
newcommand{gt}{symbol{"3E}}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
forall n,m lt n_{varepsilon} quad Longrightarrow quad ||mathbf{x}_n - mathbf{x}_m|| gt varepsilon
end{equation*}
end{document}

no I don't want the equal sign
– Giuliano Malatesta
Mar 25 at 10:34
@GiulianoMalatesta Then why don't you use>and<?
– JouleV
Mar 25 at 10:35
that's ok. What's the difference betweem gt lt and > < ?
– Giuliano Malatesta
Mar 25 at 10:40
@GiulianoMalatestagtandltare not already defined. I think you are following this answer or something similar, but you should make sure thatnewcommands are included. IMHO you should just use>and<. We should not make things more complicated.
– JouleV
Mar 25 at 10:43
add a comment |
I think you are looking for ge and le. gt and lt are not defined.
documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
forall n,m ge n_{varepsilon} quad Longrightarrow quad ||mathbf{x}_n - mathbf{x}_m|| le varepsilon
end{equation*}
end{document}

Edit 1
The > and < signs are already on your keyboard:
documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
forall n,m > n_{varepsilon} quad Longrightarrow quad ||mathbf{x}_n - mathbf{x}_m|| < varepsilon
end{equation*}
end{document}

In case you want to use gt or lt, you have to define it. The definition below is taken from this answer:
documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{lt}{symbol{"3C}}
newcommand{gt}{symbol{"3E}}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
forall n,m lt n_{varepsilon} quad Longrightarrow quad ||mathbf{x}_n - mathbf{x}_m|| gt varepsilon
end{equation*}
end{document}

no I don't want the equal sign
– Giuliano Malatesta
Mar 25 at 10:34
@GiulianoMalatesta Then why don't you use>and<?
– JouleV
Mar 25 at 10:35
that's ok. What's the difference betweem gt lt and > < ?
– Giuliano Malatesta
Mar 25 at 10:40
@GiulianoMalatestagtandltare not already defined. I think you are following this answer or something similar, but you should make sure thatnewcommands are included. IMHO you should just use>and<. We should not make things more complicated.
– JouleV
Mar 25 at 10:43
add a comment |
I think you are looking for ge and le. gt and lt are not defined.
documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
forall n,m ge n_{varepsilon} quad Longrightarrow quad ||mathbf{x}_n - mathbf{x}_m|| le varepsilon
end{equation*}
end{document}

Edit 1
The > and < signs are already on your keyboard:
documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
forall n,m > n_{varepsilon} quad Longrightarrow quad ||mathbf{x}_n - mathbf{x}_m|| < varepsilon
end{equation*}
end{document}

In case you want to use gt or lt, you have to define it. The definition below is taken from this answer:
documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{lt}{symbol{"3C}}
newcommand{gt}{symbol{"3E}}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
forall n,m lt n_{varepsilon} quad Longrightarrow quad ||mathbf{x}_n - mathbf{x}_m|| gt varepsilon
end{equation*}
end{document}

I think you are looking for ge and le. gt and lt are not defined.
documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
forall n,m ge n_{varepsilon} quad Longrightarrow quad ||mathbf{x}_n - mathbf{x}_m|| le varepsilon
end{equation*}
end{document}

Edit 1
The > and < signs are already on your keyboard:
documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
forall n,m > n_{varepsilon} quad Longrightarrow quad ||mathbf{x}_n - mathbf{x}_m|| < varepsilon
end{equation*}
end{document}

In case you want to use gt or lt, you have to define it. The definition below is taken from this answer:
documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{lt}{symbol{"3C}}
newcommand{gt}{symbol{"3E}}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
forall n,m lt n_{varepsilon} quad Longrightarrow quad ||mathbf{x}_n - mathbf{x}_m|| gt varepsilon
end{equation*}
end{document}

edited Mar 25 at 10:43
answered Mar 25 at 10:33
JouleVJouleV
10.5k22559
10.5k22559
no I don't want the equal sign
– Giuliano Malatesta
Mar 25 at 10:34
@GiulianoMalatesta Then why don't you use>and<?
– JouleV
Mar 25 at 10:35
that's ok. What's the difference betweem gt lt and > < ?
– Giuliano Malatesta
Mar 25 at 10:40
@GiulianoMalatestagtandltare not already defined. I think you are following this answer or something similar, but you should make sure thatnewcommands are included. IMHO you should just use>and<. We should not make things more complicated.
– JouleV
Mar 25 at 10:43
add a comment |
no I don't want the equal sign
– Giuliano Malatesta
Mar 25 at 10:34
@GiulianoMalatesta Then why don't you use>and<?
– JouleV
Mar 25 at 10:35
that's ok. What's the difference betweem gt lt and > < ?
– Giuliano Malatesta
Mar 25 at 10:40
@GiulianoMalatestagtandltare not already defined. I think you are following this answer or something similar, but you should make sure thatnewcommands are included. IMHO you should just use>and<. We should not make things more complicated.
– JouleV
Mar 25 at 10:43
no I don't want the equal sign
– Giuliano Malatesta
Mar 25 at 10:34
no I don't want the equal sign
– Giuliano Malatesta
Mar 25 at 10:34
@GiulianoMalatesta Then why don't you use
> and <?– JouleV
Mar 25 at 10:35
@GiulianoMalatesta Then why don't you use
> and <?– JouleV
Mar 25 at 10:35
that's ok. What's the difference betweem gt lt and > < ?
– Giuliano Malatesta
Mar 25 at 10:40
that's ok. What's the difference betweem gt lt and > < ?
– Giuliano Malatesta
Mar 25 at 10:40
@GiulianoMalatesta
gt and lt are not already defined. I think you are following this answer or something similar, but you should make sure that newcommands are included. IMHO you should just use > and <. We should not make things more complicated.– JouleV
Mar 25 at 10:43
@GiulianoMalatesta
gt and lt are not already defined. I think you are following this answer or something similar, but you should make sure that newcommands are included. IMHO you should just use > and <. We should not make things more complicated.– JouleV
Mar 25 at 10:43
add a comment |