ratiotest and radius of convergence of Taylor expansion of $xsin(x)$
$begingroup$
Today I helped a student who did not understand Taylor approximations. One of the exercises he had trouble with, was to determine the Taylor series of the function $$f: mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}: x mapsto xsin(x)$$
around $0$.
The Taylor-approximation only has even powers of $x$. The solution he had, determined the radius of convergence using the ratio test. However, the ratio test uses consecutive coefficients $c_k$ (if the power series is $sum c_k(x-a)^k$ and all $c_{2k+1}$ are zero. In the solution, the ratio of $c_{2k}/c_{2k+2}$ is computed and its limit is taken.
My question: is there a theorem which states that we can 'skip' coefficients because they are zero?
taylor-expansion
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Today I helped a student who did not understand Taylor approximations. One of the exercises he had trouble with, was to determine the Taylor series of the function $$f: mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}: x mapsto xsin(x)$$
around $0$.
The Taylor-approximation only has even powers of $x$. The solution he had, determined the radius of convergence using the ratio test. However, the ratio test uses consecutive coefficients $c_k$ (if the power series is $sum c_k(x-a)^k$ and all $c_{2k+1}$ are zero. In the solution, the ratio of $c_{2k}/c_{2k+2}$ is computed and its limit is taken.
My question: is there a theorem which states that we can 'skip' coefficients because they are zero?
taylor-expansion
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Today I helped a student who did not understand Taylor approximations. One of the exercises he had trouble with, was to determine the Taylor series of the function $$f: mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}: x mapsto xsin(x)$$
around $0$.
The Taylor-approximation only has even powers of $x$. The solution he had, determined the radius of convergence using the ratio test. However, the ratio test uses consecutive coefficients $c_k$ (if the power series is $sum c_k(x-a)^k$ and all $c_{2k+1}$ are zero. In the solution, the ratio of $c_{2k}/c_{2k+2}$ is computed and its limit is taken.
My question: is there a theorem which states that we can 'skip' coefficients because they are zero?
taylor-expansion
$endgroup$
Today I helped a student who did not understand Taylor approximations. One of the exercises he had trouble with, was to determine the Taylor series of the function $$f: mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}: x mapsto xsin(x)$$
around $0$.
The Taylor-approximation only has even powers of $x$. The solution he had, determined the radius of convergence using the ratio test. However, the ratio test uses consecutive coefficients $c_k$ (if the power series is $sum c_k(x-a)^k$ and all $c_{2k+1}$ are zero. In the solution, the ratio of $c_{2k}/c_{2k+2}$ is computed and its limit is taken.
My question: is there a theorem which states that we can 'skip' coefficients because they are zero?
taylor-expansion
taylor-expansion
asked Dec 12 '18 at 22:36
StudentStudent
2,1641727
2,1641727
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There is the root test.
Here the best thing is to note that the whole series can be written as a power series in $x^2$, and using the ratio test on this new power series yields the result for the new power series, thus for the original one.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks! One more question: suppose that the radius of convergence would turn out to be finite using the root-test and after rewritting as powers of $x^2$, do I have to take this into account (i.e. does the radius of convergence needs to be squared or something in that case?)
$endgroup$
– Student
Dec 12 '18 at 23:27
$begingroup$
Yes: if the radius of $sum_n{a_nx^n}$ is $R geq 0$, the radius of $sum_n{a_nx^{2n}}$ is $R^{1/2}$.
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Dec 12 '18 at 23:29
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot!..
$endgroup$
– Student
Dec 12 '18 at 23:29
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037318%2fratiotest-and-radius-of-convergence-of-taylor-expansion-of-x-sinx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There is the root test.
Here the best thing is to note that the whole series can be written as a power series in $x^2$, and using the ratio test on this new power series yields the result for the new power series, thus for the original one.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks! One more question: suppose that the radius of convergence would turn out to be finite using the root-test and after rewritting as powers of $x^2$, do I have to take this into account (i.e. does the radius of convergence needs to be squared or something in that case?)
$endgroup$
– Student
Dec 12 '18 at 23:27
$begingroup$
Yes: if the radius of $sum_n{a_nx^n}$ is $R geq 0$, the radius of $sum_n{a_nx^{2n}}$ is $R^{1/2}$.
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Dec 12 '18 at 23:29
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot!..
$endgroup$
– Student
Dec 12 '18 at 23:29
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is the root test.
Here the best thing is to note that the whole series can be written as a power series in $x^2$, and using the ratio test on this new power series yields the result for the new power series, thus for the original one.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks! One more question: suppose that the radius of convergence would turn out to be finite using the root-test and after rewritting as powers of $x^2$, do I have to take this into account (i.e. does the radius of convergence needs to be squared or something in that case?)
$endgroup$
– Student
Dec 12 '18 at 23:27
$begingroup$
Yes: if the radius of $sum_n{a_nx^n}$ is $R geq 0$, the radius of $sum_n{a_nx^{2n}}$ is $R^{1/2}$.
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Dec 12 '18 at 23:29
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot!..
$endgroup$
– Student
Dec 12 '18 at 23:29
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is the root test.
Here the best thing is to note that the whole series can be written as a power series in $x^2$, and using the ratio test on this new power series yields the result for the new power series, thus for the original one.
$endgroup$
There is the root test.
Here the best thing is to note that the whole series can be written as a power series in $x^2$, and using the ratio test on this new power series yields the result for the new power series, thus for the original one.
answered Dec 12 '18 at 23:11
MindlackMindlack
4,900211
4,900211
$begingroup$
Thanks! One more question: suppose that the radius of convergence would turn out to be finite using the root-test and after rewritting as powers of $x^2$, do I have to take this into account (i.e. does the radius of convergence needs to be squared or something in that case?)
$endgroup$
– Student
Dec 12 '18 at 23:27
$begingroup$
Yes: if the radius of $sum_n{a_nx^n}$ is $R geq 0$, the radius of $sum_n{a_nx^{2n}}$ is $R^{1/2}$.
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Dec 12 '18 at 23:29
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot!..
$endgroup$
– Student
Dec 12 '18 at 23:29
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks! One more question: suppose that the radius of convergence would turn out to be finite using the root-test and after rewritting as powers of $x^2$, do I have to take this into account (i.e. does the radius of convergence needs to be squared or something in that case?)
$endgroup$
– Student
Dec 12 '18 at 23:27
$begingroup$
Yes: if the radius of $sum_n{a_nx^n}$ is $R geq 0$, the radius of $sum_n{a_nx^{2n}}$ is $R^{1/2}$.
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Dec 12 '18 at 23:29
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot!..
$endgroup$
– Student
Dec 12 '18 at 23:29
$begingroup$
Thanks! One more question: suppose that the radius of convergence would turn out to be finite using the root-test and after rewritting as powers of $x^2$, do I have to take this into account (i.e. does the radius of convergence needs to be squared or something in that case?)
$endgroup$
– Student
Dec 12 '18 at 23:27
$begingroup$
Thanks! One more question: suppose that the radius of convergence would turn out to be finite using the root-test and after rewritting as powers of $x^2$, do I have to take this into account (i.e. does the radius of convergence needs to be squared or something in that case?)
$endgroup$
– Student
Dec 12 '18 at 23:27
$begingroup$
Yes: if the radius of $sum_n{a_nx^n}$ is $R geq 0$, the radius of $sum_n{a_nx^{2n}}$ is $R^{1/2}$.
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Dec 12 '18 at 23:29
$begingroup$
Yes: if the radius of $sum_n{a_nx^n}$ is $R geq 0$, the radius of $sum_n{a_nx^{2n}}$ is $R^{1/2}$.
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Dec 12 '18 at 23:29
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot!..
$endgroup$
– Student
Dec 12 '18 at 23:29
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot!..
$endgroup$
– Student
Dec 12 '18 at 23:29
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037318%2fratiotest-and-radius-of-convergence-of-taylor-expansion-of-x-sinx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown