Suggestion on Missing Index Creation
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
I have been using sp_blitzindex and it is very very helpful(Thanks to Brent Ozar and Team). I executed this procedure against my database and below is the finding for one table falling in Indexaphobia group:
below is definition of underlying table:
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[table_name](
[L] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[R] [varchar](15) NOT NULL,
[A] [int] NOT NULL,
[VAR32_01] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_02] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_03] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_04] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_05] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_06] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_07] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_08] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_09] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_10] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_11] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_12] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_13] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_14] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_15] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_16] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_17] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_18] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_19] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_20] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_21] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_22] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_23] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_24] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_25] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_26] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_27] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_28] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_29] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_30] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_31] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_32] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_33] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_34] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_35] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_36] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_37] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_38] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_39] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_40] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_41] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_42] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_43] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_44] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_45] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_46] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_47] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_48] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_49] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_50] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_51] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_52] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_53] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_54] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_55] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_56] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_57] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_58] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_59] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_60] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_61] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_62] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_63] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_64] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR64_01] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_02] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_03] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_04] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_05] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_06] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_07] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_08] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_09] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_10] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_11] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_12] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_13] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_14] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_15] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_16] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_17] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_18] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_19] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_20] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_21] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_22] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_23] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_24] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_25] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_26] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_27] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_28] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_29] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_30] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_31] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_32] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR128_01] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_02] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_03] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_04] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_05] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_06] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_07] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_08] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_09] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_10] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_11] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_12] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_13] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_14] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_15] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_16] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR256_01] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_02] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_03] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_04] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_05] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_06] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_07] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_08] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR512_01] [varchar](512) NULL,
[VAR512_02] [varchar](512) NULL,
[VAR512_03] [varchar](512) NULL,
[VAR512_04] [varchar](512) NULL,
[VAR1024_01] [varchar](1024) NULL,
[VAR1024_02] [varchar](1024) NULL,
[E] [varchar](20) NULL,
[M] [varchar](40) NULL,
[E] [varchar](50) NULL,
[N] [varchar](40) NULL,
[TN] [int] NULL,
[T] [numeric](1, 0) NULL,
[D] [numeric](1, 0) NULL,
CONSTRAINT [XPKtable_name] PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED
(
[L] ASC,
[R] ASC
)
Following these missing index details, I am planning to create index with below definition:
create nonclustered index table_name_incl(A,VAR32_02) include(L,R,E,T,D,VAR32_10,VAR32_18,VAR32_19,VAR32_20,VAR64_11,VAR64_02,VAR32_42,VAR32_39,VAR32_38,VAR32_35,VAR32_39,VAR32_24,VAR32_25,VAR32_27)
I have arrived at above columns based on the number of occurrences of these columns in all 6 missing index stats.
As you can see from table definition, this is a heap and doesn't have clustered index on this table.
Appreciate your guidance or any assistance on this.
Version: Microsoft SQL Server 2014 (SP3) (KB4022619) - 12.0.6024.0 (X64) Sep 7 2018 01:37:51 Enterprise Edition: Core-based Licensing (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.3 (Build 9600: ) (Hypervisor)
sql-server index sp-blitzindex
add a comment |
I have been using sp_blitzindex and it is very very helpful(Thanks to Brent Ozar and Team). I executed this procedure against my database and below is the finding for one table falling in Indexaphobia group:
below is definition of underlying table:
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[table_name](
[L] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[R] [varchar](15) NOT NULL,
[A] [int] NOT NULL,
[VAR32_01] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_02] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_03] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_04] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_05] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_06] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_07] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_08] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_09] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_10] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_11] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_12] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_13] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_14] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_15] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_16] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_17] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_18] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_19] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_20] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_21] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_22] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_23] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_24] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_25] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_26] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_27] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_28] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_29] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_30] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_31] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_32] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_33] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_34] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_35] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_36] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_37] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_38] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_39] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_40] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_41] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_42] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_43] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_44] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_45] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_46] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_47] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_48] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_49] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_50] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_51] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_52] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_53] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_54] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_55] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_56] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_57] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_58] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_59] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_60] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_61] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_62] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_63] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_64] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR64_01] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_02] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_03] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_04] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_05] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_06] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_07] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_08] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_09] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_10] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_11] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_12] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_13] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_14] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_15] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_16] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_17] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_18] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_19] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_20] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_21] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_22] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_23] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_24] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_25] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_26] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_27] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_28] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_29] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_30] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_31] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_32] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR128_01] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_02] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_03] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_04] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_05] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_06] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_07] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_08] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_09] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_10] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_11] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_12] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_13] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_14] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_15] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_16] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR256_01] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_02] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_03] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_04] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_05] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_06] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_07] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_08] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR512_01] [varchar](512) NULL,
[VAR512_02] [varchar](512) NULL,
[VAR512_03] [varchar](512) NULL,
[VAR512_04] [varchar](512) NULL,
[VAR1024_01] [varchar](1024) NULL,
[VAR1024_02] [varchar](1024) NULL,
[E] [varchar](20) NULL,
[M] [varchar](40) NULL,
[E] [varchar](50) NULL,
[N] [varchar](40) NULL,
[TN] [int] NULL,
[T] [numeric](1, 0) NULL,
[D] [numeric](1, 0) NULL,
CONSTRAINT [XPKtable_name] PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED
(
[L] ASC,
[R] ASC
)
Following these missing index details, I am planning to create index with below definition:
create nonclustered index table_name_incl(A,VAR32_02) include(L,R,E,T,D,VAR32_10,VAR32_18,VAR32_19,VAR32_20,VAR64_11,VAR64_02,VAR32_42,VAR32_39,VAR32_38,VAR32_35,VAR32_39,VAR32_24,VAR32_25,VAR32_27)
I have arrived at above columns based on the number of occurrences of these columns in all 6 missing index stats.
As you can see from table definition, this is a heap and doesn't have clustered index on this table.
Appreciate your guidance or any assistance on this.
Version: Microsoft SQL Server 2014 (SP3) (KB4022619) - 12.0.6024.0 (X64) Sep 7 2018 01:37:51 Enterprise Edition: Core-based Licensing (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.3 (Build 9600: ) (Hypervisor)
sql-server index sp-blitzindex
add a comment |
I have been using sp_blitzindex and it is very very helpful(Thanks to Brent Ozar and Team). I executed this procedure against my database and below is the finding for one table falling in Indexaphobia group:
below is definition of underlying table:
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[table_name](
[L] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[R] [varchar](15) NOT NULL,
[A] [int] NOT NULL,
[VAR32_01] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_02] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_03] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_04] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_05] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_06] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_07] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_08] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_09] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_10] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_11] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_12] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_13] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_14] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_15] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_16] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_17] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_18] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_19] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_20] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_21] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_22] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_23] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_24] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_25] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_26] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_27] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_28] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_29] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_30] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_31] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_32] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_33] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_34] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_35] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_36] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_37] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_38] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_39] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_40] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_41] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_42] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_43] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_44] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_45] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_46] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_47] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_48] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_49] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_50] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_51] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_52] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_53] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_54] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_55] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_56] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_57] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_58] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_59] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_60] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_61] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_62] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_63] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_64] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR64_01] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_02] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_03] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_04] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_05] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_06] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_07] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_08] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_09] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_10] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_11] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_12] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_13] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_14] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_15] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_16] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_17] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_18] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_19] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_20] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_21] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_22] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_23] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_24] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_25] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_26] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_27] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_28] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_29] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_30] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_31] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_32] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR128_01] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_02] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_03] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_04] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_05] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_06] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_07] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_08] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_09] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_10] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_11] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_12] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_13] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_14] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_15] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_16] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR256_01] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_02] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_03] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_04] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_05] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_06] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_07] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_08] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR512_01] [varchar](512) NULL,
[VAR512_02] [varchar](512) NULL,
[VAR512_03] [varchar](512) NULL,
[VAR512_04] [varchar](512) NULL,
[VAR1024_01] [varchar](1024) NULL,
[VAR1024_02] [varchar](1024) NULL,
[E] [varchar](20) NULL,
[M] [varchar](40) NULL,
[E] [varchar](50) NULL,
[N] [varchar](40) NULL,
[TN] [int] NULL,
[T] [numeric](1, 0) NULL,
[D] [numeric](1, 0) NULL,
CONSTRAINT [XPKtable_name] PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED
(
[L] ASC,
[R] ASC
)
Following these missing index details, I am planning to create index with below definition:
create nonclustered index table_name_incl(A,VAR32_02) include(L,R,E,T,D,VAR32_10,VAR32_18,VAR32_19,VAR32_20,VAR64_11,VAR64_02,VAR32_42,VAR32_39,VAR32_38,VAR32_35,VAR32_39,VAR32_24,VAR32_25,VAR32_27)
I have arrived at above columns based on the number of occurrences of these columns in all 6 missing index stats.
As you can see from table definition, this is a heap and doesn't have clustered index on this table.
Appreciate your guidance or any assistance on this.
Version: Microsoft SQL Server 2014 (SP3) (KB4022619) - 12.0.6024.0 (X64) Sep 7 2018 01:37:51 Enterprise Edition: Core-based Licensing (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.3 (Build 9600: ) (Hypervisor)
sql-server index sp-blitzindex
I have been using sp_blitzindex and it is very very helpful(Thanks to Brent Ozar and Team). I executed this procedure against my database and below is the finding for one table falling in Indexaphobia group:
below is definition of underlying table:
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[table_name](
[L] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[R] [varchar](15) NOT NULL,
[A] [int] NOT NULL,
[VAR32_01] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_02] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_03] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_04] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_05] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_06] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_07] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_08] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_09] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_10] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_11] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_12] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_13] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_14] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_15] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_16] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_17] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_18] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_19] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_20] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_21] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_22] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_23] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_24] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_25] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_26] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_27] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_28] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_29] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_30] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_31] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_32] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_33] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_34] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_35] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_36] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_37] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_38] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_39] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_40] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_41] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_42] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_43] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_44] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_45] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_46] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_47] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_48] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_49] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_50] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_51] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_52] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_53] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_54] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_55] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_56] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_57] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_58] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_59] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_60] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_61] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_62] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_63] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR32_64] [varchar](32) NULL,
[VAR64_01] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_02] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_03] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_04] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_05] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_06] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_07] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_08] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_09] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_10] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_11] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_12] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_13] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_14] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_15] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_16] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_17] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_18] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_19] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_20] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_21] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_22] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_23] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_24] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_25] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_26] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_27] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_28] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_29] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_30] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_31] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR64_32] [varchar](64) NULL,
[VAR128_01] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_02] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_03] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_04] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_05] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_06] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_07] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_08] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_09] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_10] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_11] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_12] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_13] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_14] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_15] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR128_16] [varchar](128) NULL,
[VAR256_01] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_02] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_03] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_04] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_05] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_06] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_07] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR256_08] [varchar](256) NULL,
[VAR512_01] [varchar](512) NULL,
[VAR512_02] [varchar](512) NULL,
[VAR512_03] [varchar](512) NULL,
[VAR512_04] [varchar](512) NULL,
[VAR1024_01] [varchar](1024) NULL,
[VAR1024_02] [varchar](1024) NULL,
[E] [varchar](20) NULL,
[M] [varchar](40) NULL,
[E] [varchar](50) NULL,
[N] [varchar](40) NULL,
[TN] [int] NULL,
[T] [numeric](1, 0) NULL,
[D] [numeric](1, 0) NULL,
CONSTRAINT [XPKtable_name] PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED
(
[L] ASC,
[R] ASC
)
Following these missing index details, I am planning to create index with below definition:
create nonclustered index table_name_incl(A,VAR32_02) include(L,R,E,T,D,VAR32_10,VAR32_18,VAR32_19,VAR32_20,VAR64_11,VAR64_02,VAR32_42,VAR32_39,VAR32_38,VAR32_35,VAR32_39,VAR32_24,VAR32_25,VAR32_27)
I have arrived at above columns based on the number of occurrences of these columns in all 6 missing index stats.
As you can see from table definition, this is a heap and doesn't have clustered index on this table.
Appreciate your guidance or any assistance on this.
Version: Microsoft SQL Server 2014 (SP3) (KB4022619) - 12.0.6024.0 (X64) Sep 7 2018 01:37:51 Enterprise Edition: Core-based Licensing (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.3 (Build 9600: ) (Hypervisor)
sql-server index sp-blitzindex
sql-server index sp-blitzindex
asked Mar 25 at 12:53
Learning_DBAdminLearning_DBAdmin
443214
443214
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
From Comments
Clustered index poses many constraints like null, duplicates etc
whereas non-clustered doesn't pose any risk for vendor and they agree
on it easily.
This isn't true, clustered indexes don't disallow duplicates, NULLs, or even duplicate NULLs unless they're declared as UNIQUE.
These inserts will all succeed:
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS dbo.t;
CREATE TABLE dbo.t ( id INT NULL );
CREATE CLUSTERED INDEX c ON dbo.t ( id );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( 1 );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( 1 );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( 1 );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( NULL );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( NULL );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( NULL );
SELECT *
FROM dbo.t AS t;
These inserts will fail after the first unique value:
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS dbo.t;
CREATE TABLE dbo.t ( id INT NULL );
CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX c ON dbo.t ( id );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( 1 );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( 1 );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( 1 );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( NULL );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( NULL );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( NULL );
SELECT *
FROM dbo.t AS t;
Your suggestion did the trick, I created clustered index on column A
in test environment and so far no complaint of missing index at all,
just to add that there was missing index complaint in Test also. We
will be promoting this change to Production very soon after confirming
with vendor. Thanks a lot.
👍👍👍
add a comment |
sp_BlitzIndex is just taking SQL Server's recommendations straight from sys.dm_db_missing_index_details, which have a lot of gotchas:
- They'll recommend indexes similar to indexes that already exist
- They have minimal concern about the speed of delete/update/insert (DUI) operations, and will recommend so many indexes that your DUIs will slow down
- They'll recommend indexes that are way too large (too many fields) that your hardware may not be able to support
- The fields aren't necessarily in the order - the missing index recommendation key order is driven by field order in the table
- They won't recommend clustered indexes
With all that in mind, sp_BlitzIndex is a tool to be used with training, just like any other tool. You're on the right track by thinking about a clustered index first - I'd start there before adding nonclustered indexes.
add a comment |
I've created indexes from recommendations of the missing index DMV's on SQL 2005, 2012 and 2016 and have had mixed results. Sometimes the same recommendations kept on popping even though the exact index had been created. Other times the index that I had created based on the recommendation was never used and I'd end up deleting it a month or two later.
I prefer to create indexes based on profiler or extended events session as well as some other scripts i've written to look for usage of other indexes on the table along with row locks and page splitting.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "182"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f233020%2fsuggestion-on-missing-index-creation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
From Comments
Clustered index poses many constraints like null, duplicates etc
whereas non-clustered doesn't pose any risk for vendor and they agree
on it easily.
This isn't true, clustered indexes don't disallow duplicates, NULLs, or even duplicate NULLs unless they're declared as UNIQUE.
These inserts will all succeed:
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS dbo.t;
CREATE TABLE dbo.t ( id INT NULL );
CREATE CLUSTERED INDEX c ON dbo.t ( id );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( 1 );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( 1 );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( 1 );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( NULL );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( NULL );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( NULL );
SELECT *
FROM dbo.t AS t;
These inserts will fail after the first unique value:
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS dbo.t;
CREATE TABLE dbo.t ( id INT NULL );
CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX c ON dbo.t ( id );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( 1 );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( 1 );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( 1 );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( NULL );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( NULL );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( NULL );
SELECT *
FROM dbo.t AS t;
Your suggestion did the trick, I created clustered index on column A
in test environment and so far no complaint of missing index at all,
just to add that there was missing index complaint in Test also. We
will be promoting this change to Production very soon after confirming
with vendor. Thanks a lot.
👍👍👍
add a comment |
From Comments
Clustered index poses many constraints like null, duplicates etc
whereas non-clustered doesn't pose any risk for vendor and they agree
on it easily.
This isn't true, clustered indexes don't disallow duplicates, NULLs, or even duplicate NULLs unless they're declared as UNIQUE.
These inserts will all succeed:
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS dbo.t;
CREATE TABLE dbo.t ( id INT NULL );
CREATE CLUSTERED INDEX c ON dbo.t ( id );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( 1 );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( 1 );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( 1 );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( NULL );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( NULL );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( NULL );
SELECT *
FROM dbo.t AS t;
These inserts will fail after the first unique value:
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS dbo.t;
CREATE TABLE dbo.t ( id INT NULL );
CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX c ON dbo.t ( id );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( 1 );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( 1 );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( 1 );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( NULL );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( NULL );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( NULL );
SELECT *
FROM dbo.t AS t;
Your suggestion did the trick, I created clustered index on column A
in test environment and so far no complaint of missing index at all,
just to add that there was missing index complaint in Test also. We
will be promoting this change to Production very soon after confirming
with vendor. Thanks a lot.
👍👍👍
add a comment |
From Comments
Clustered index poses many constraints like null, duplicates etc
whereas non-clustered doesn't pose any risk for vendor and they agree
on it easily.
This isn't true, clustered indexes don't disallow duplicates, NULLs, or even duplicate NULLs unless they're declared as UNIQUE.
These inserts will all succeed:
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS dbo.t;
CREATE TABLE dbo.t ( id INT NULL );
CREATE CLUSTERED INDEX c ON dbo.t ( id );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( 1 );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( 1 );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( 1 );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( NULL );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( NULL );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( NULL );
SELECT *
FROM dbo.t AS t;
These inserts will fail after the first unique value:
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS dbo.t;
CREATE TABLE dbo.t ( id INT NULL );
CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX c ON dbo.t ( id );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( 1 );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( 1 );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( 1 );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( NULL );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( NULL );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( NULL );
SELECT *
FROM dbo.t AS t;
Your suggestion did the trick, I created clustered index on column A
in test environment and so far no complaint of missing index at all,
just to add that there was missing index complaint in Test also. We
will be promoting this change to Production very soon after confirming
with vendor. Thanks a lot.
👍👍👍
From Comments
Clustered index poses many constraints like null, duplicates etc
whereas non-clustered doesn't pose any risk for vendor and they agree
on it easily.
This isn't true, clustered indexes don't disallow duplicates, NULLs, or even duplicate NULLs unless they're declared as UNIQUE.
These inserts will all succeed:
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS dbo.t;
CREATE TABLE dbo.t ( id INT NULL );
CREATE CLUSTERED INDEX c ON dbo.t ( id );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( 1 );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( 1 );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( 1 );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( NULL );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( NULL );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( NULL );
SELECT *
FROM dbo.t AS t;
These inserts will fail after the first unique value:
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS dbo.t;
CREATE TABLE dbo.t ( id INT NULL );
CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX c ON dbo.t ( id );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( 1 );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( 1 );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( 1 );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( NULL );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( NULL );
INSERT dbo.t ( id )
VALUES ( NULL );
SELECT *
FROM dbo.t AS t;
Your suggestion did the trick, I created clustered index on column A
in test environment and so far no complaint of missing index at all,
just to add that there was missing index complaint in Test also. We
will be promoting this change to Production very soon after confirming
with vendor. Thanks a lot.
👍👍👍
answered yesterday
Erik DarlingErik Darling
22.7k1269113
22.7k1269113
add a comment |
add a comment |
sp_BlitzIndex is just taking SQL Server's recommendations straight from sys.dm_db_missing_index_details, which have a lot of gotchas:
- They'll recommend indexes similar to indexes that already exist
- They have minimal concern about the speed of delete/update/insert (DUI) operations, and will recommend so many indexes that your DUIs will slow down
- They'll recommend indexes that are way too large (too many fields) that your hardware may not be able to support
- The fields aren't necessarily in the order - the missing index recommendation key order is driven by field order in the table
- They won't recommend clustered indexes
With all that in mind, sp_BlitzIndex is a tool to be used with training, just like any other tool. You're on the right track by thinking about a clustered index first - I'd start there before adding nonclustered indexes.
add a comment |
sp_BlitzIndex is just taking SQL Server's recommendations straight from sys.dm_db_missing_index_details, which have a lot of gotchas:
- They'll recommend indexes similar to indexes that already exist
- They have minimal concern about the speed of delete/update/insert (DUI) operations, and will recommend so many indexes that your DUIs will slow down
- They'll recommend indexes that are way too large (too many fields) that your hardware may not be able to support
- The fields aren't necessarily in the order - the missing index recommendation key order is driven by field order in the table
- They won't recommend clustered indexes
With all that in mind, sp_BlitzIndex is a tool to be used with training, just like any other tool. You're on the right track by thinking about a clustered index first - I'd start there before adding nonclustered indexes.
add a comment |
sp_BlitzIndex is just taking SQL Server's recommendations straight from sys.dm_db_missing_index_details, which have a lot of gotchas:
- They'll recommend indexes similar to indexes that already exist
- They have minimal concern about the speed of delete/update/insert (DUI) operations, and will recommend so many indexes that your DUIs will slow down
- They'll recommend indexes that are way too large (too many fields) that your hardware may not be able to support
- The fields aren't necessarily in the order - the missing index recommendation key order is driven by field order in the table
- They won't recommend clustered indexes
With all that in mind, sp_BlitzIndex is a tool to be used with training, just like any other tool. You're on the right track by thinking about a clustered index first - I'd start there before adding nonclustered indexes.
sp_BlitzIndex is just taking SQL Server's recommendations straight from sys.dm_db_missing_index_details, which have a lot of gotchas:
- They'll recommend indexes similar to indexes that already exist
- They have minimal concern about the speed of delete/update/insert (DUI) operations, and will recommend so many indexes that your DUIs will slow down
- They'll recommend indexes that are way too large (too many fields) that your hardware may not be able to support
- The fields aren't necessarily in the order - the missing index recommendation key order is driven by field order in the table
- They won't recommend clustered indexes
With all that in mind, sp_BlitzIndex is a tool to be used with training, just like any other tool. You're on the right track by thinking about a clustered index first - I'd start there before adding nonclustered indexes.
answered Mar 25 at 13:05
Brent OzarBrent Ozar
35.8k19110241
35.8k19110241
add a comment |
add a comment |
I've created indexes from recommendations of the missing index DMV's on SQL 2005, 2012 and 2016 and have had mixed results. Sometimes the same recommendations kept on popping even though the exact index had been created. Other times the index that I had created based on the recommendation was never used and I'd end up deleting it a month or two later.
I prefer to create indexes based on profiler or extended events session as well as some other scripts i've written to look for usage of other indexes on the table along with row locks and page splitting.
add a comment |
I've created indexes from recommendations of the missing index DMV's on SQL 2005, 2012 and 2016 and have had mixed results. Sometimes the same recommendations kept on popping even though the exact index had been created. Other times the index that I had created based on the recommendation was never used and I'd end up deleting it a month or two later.
I prefer to create indexes based on profiler or extended events session as well as some other scripts i've written to look for usage of other indexes on the table along with row locks and page splitting.
add a comment |
I've created indexes from recommendations of the missing index DMV's on SQL 2005, 2012 and 2016 and have had mixed results. Sometimes the same recommendations kept on popping even though the exact index had been created. Other times the index that I had created based on the recommendation was never used and I'd end up deleting it a month or two later.
I prefer to create indexes based on profiler or extended events session as well as some other scripts i've written to look for usage of other indexes on the table along with row locks and page splitting.
I've created indexes from recommendations of the missing index DMV's on SQL 2005, 2012 and 2016 and have had mixed results. Sometimes the same recommendations kept on popping even though the exact index had been created. Other times the index that I had created based on the recommendation was never used and I'd end up deleting it a month or two later.
I prefer to create indexes based on profiler or extended events session as well as some other scripts i've written to look for usage of other indexes on the table along with row locks and page splitting.
answered yesterday
AlenAlen
44026
44026
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f233020%2fsuggestion-on-missing-index-creation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown