Why is a very small peak with larger m/z not considered to be the molecular ion?












6












$begingroup$


With regards to the following spectrum:



enter image description here



When asked for the M/Z for the molecular ion, the peak at 58 was taken, not 59.



What causes the peak at 59, and why isn't it taken as the molecular ion?






mass-spectrometry







share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The gist here is that nobody can just "know" what the various peaks are. Rather you look at the spectrum and start to look for clues to put together a consistent explanation. So you have a peak at 58 and 43, the difference is 15 where you also have a large peak. 15 is the mass of a methyl group so... and on the analysis goes.
    $endgroup$
    – MaxW
    Mar 10 at 18:16


















6












$begingroup$


With regards to the following spectrum:



enter image description here



When asked for the M/Z for the molecular ion, the peak at 58 was taken, not 59.



What causes the peak at 59, and why isn't it taken as the molecular ion?






mass-spectrometry







share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The gist here is that nobody can just "know" what the various peaks are. Rather you look at the spectrum and start to look for clues to put together a consistent explanation. So you have a peak at 58 and 43, the difference is 15 where you also have a large peak. 15 is the mass of a methyl group so... and on the analysis goes.
    $endgroup$
    – MaxW
    Mar 10 at 18:16
















6












6








6





$begingroup$


With regards to the following spectrum:



enter image description here



When asked for the M/Z for the molecular ion, the peak at 58 was taken, not 59.



What causes the peak at 59, and why isn't it taken as the molecular ion?






mass-spectrometry







share|improve this question











$endgroup$




With regards to the following spectrum:



enter image description here



When asked for the M/Z for the molecular ion, the peak at 58 was taken, not 59.



What causes the peak at 59, and why isn't it taken as the molecular ion?






mass-spectrometry




mass-spectrometry






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 10 at 12:27









orthocresol♦

39.6k7114242




39.6k7114242










asked Mar 10 at 12:08









George TianGeorge Tian

717218




717218








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The gist here is that nobody can just "know" what the various peaks are. Rather you look at the spectrum and start to look for clues to put together a consistent explanation. So you have a peak at 58 and 43, the difference is 15 where you also have a large peak. 15 is the mass of a methyl group so... and on the analysis goes.
    $endgroup$
    – MaxW
    Mar 10 at 18:16
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The gist here is that nobody can just "know" what the various peaks are. Rather you look at the spectrum and start to look for clues to put together a consistent explanation. So you have a peak at 58 and 43, the difference is 15 where you also have a large peak. 15 is the mass of a methyl group so... and on the analysis goes.
    $endgroup$
    – MaxW
    Mar 10 at 18:16










1




1




$begingroup$
The gist here is that nobody can just "know" what the various peaks are. Rather you look at the spectrum and start to look for clues to put together a consistent explanation. So you have a peak at 58 and 43, the difference is 15 where you also have a large peak. 15 is the mass of a methyl group so... and on the analysis goes.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
Mar 10 at 18:16






$begingroup$
The gist here is that nobody can just "know" what the various peaks are. Rather you look at the spectrum and start to look for clues to put together a consistent explanation. So you have a peak at 58 and 43, the difference is 15 where you also have a large peak. 15 is the mass of a methyl group so... and on the analysis goes.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
Mar 10 at 18:16












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















13












$begingroup$

Without knowing more details, it is hard to guess, but at this $m/z$, it seems likely that the peak is the result of one $^{12}ce{C}$ being substituted by one $^{13}ce{C}$. It is more useful to assume a uniform mass of 12 for carbon when analyzing such a spectrum.



Note that with more carbons in a larger molecule, it becomes more likely that at least one of them is a $^{13}ce{C}$. Thus, the spectra become more complicated that way.



This whole analysis goes out the window if this is not an organic molecule, though similar patterns may arise for other molecules - it depends on the isotopes and their distribution.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 4




    $begingroup$
    It looks like the mass spectrum of butane, so I think it's quite a safe assumption that it's organic ;)
    $endgroup$
    – orthocresol♦
    Mar 10 at 12:27





















10












$begingroup$

The peak at $m/z = 59$ with lower intensity in respect to the one at $m / z =58$ (the molecular ion) is not overseen. Mass spectroscopy is capable to deliver information about the isotopic composition of your sample, too. Since -- accounting over all carbon atoms of your sample -- about 1.1% are of the non-radioactive isotope of $ce{^{13}C}$, you may use this information to determine the carbon atoms in total present.



The story indeed contiues further, as to establish by this "isotope fingerprint" if you have one or two chlorines per molecule present ($ce{^{35}Cl}$ and $ce{^{37}Cl}$), bromines, presence / absence of nitrogen, etc.:



1]
(source)






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "431"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f110752%2fwhy-is-a-very-small-peak-with-larger-m-z-not-considered-to-be-the-molecular-ion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    13












    $begingroup$

    Without knowing more details, it is hard to guess, but at this $m/z$, it seems likely that the peak is the result of one $^{12}ce{C}$ being substituted by one $^{13}ce{C}$. It is more useful to assume a uniform mass of 12 for carbon when analyzing such a spectrum.



    Note that with more carbons in a larger molecule, it becomes more likely that at least one of them is a $^{13}ce{C}$. Thus, the spectra become more complicated that way.



    This whole analysis goes out the window if this is not an organic molecule, though similar patterns may arise for other molecules - it depends on the isotopes and their distribution.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 4




      $begingroup$
      It looks like the mass spectrum of butane, so I think it's quite a safe assumption that it's organic ;)
      $endgroup$
      – orthocresol♦
      Mar 10 at 12:27


















    13












    $begingroup$

    Without knowing more details, it is hard to guess, but at this $m/z$, it seems likely that the peak is the result of one $^{12}ce{C}$ being substituted by one $^{13}ce{C}$. It is more useful to assume a uniform mass of 12 for carbon when analyzing such a spectrum.



    Note that with more carbons in a larger molecule, it becomes more likely that at least one of them is a $^{13}ce{C}$. Thus, the spectra become more complicated that way.



    This whole analysis goes out the window if this is not an organic molecule, though similar patterns may arise for other molecules - it depends on the isotopes and their distribution.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 4




      $begingroup$
      It looks like the mass spectrum of butane, so I think it's quite a safe assumption that it's organic ;)
      $endgroup$
      – orthocresol♦
      Mar 10 at 12:27
















    13












    13








    13





    $begingroup$

    Without knowing more details, it is hard to guess, but at this $m/z$, it seems likely that the peak is the result of one $^{12}ce{C}$ being substituted by one $^{13}ce{C}$. It is more useful to assume a uniform mass of 12 for carbon when analyzing such a spectrum.



    Note that with more carbons in a larger molecule, it becomes more likely that at least one of them is a $^{13}ce{C}$. Thus, the spectra become more complicated that way.



    This whole analysis goes out the window if this is not an organic molecule, though similar patterns may arise for other molecules - it depends on the isotopes and their distribution.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Without knowing more details, it is hard to guess, but at this $m/z$, it seems likely that the peak is the result of one $^{12}ce{C}$ being substituted by one $^{13}ce{C}$. It is more useful to assume a uniform mass of 12 for carbon when analyzing such a spectrum.



    Note that with more carbons in a larger molecule, it becomes more likely that at least one of them is a $^{13}ce{C}$. Thus, the spectra become more complicated that way.



    This whole analysis goes out the window if this is not an organic molecule, though similar patterns may arise for other molecules - it depends on the isotopes and their distribution.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Mar 10 at 12:25









    TAR86TAR86

    4,91911031




    4,91911031








    • 4




      $begingroup$
      It looks like the mass spectrum of butane, so I think it's quite a safe assumption that it's organic ;)
      $endgroup$
      – orthocresol♦
      Mar 10 at 12:27
















    • 4




      $begingroup$
      It looks like the mass spectrum of butane, so I think it's quite a safe assumption that it's organic ;)
      $endgroup$
      – orthocresol♦
      Mar 10 at 12:27










    4




    4




    $begingroup$
    It looks like the mass spectrum of butane, so I think it's quite a safe assumption that it's organic ;)
    $endgroup$
    – orthocresol♦
    Mar 10 at 12:27






    $begingroup$
    It looks like the mass spectrum of butane, so I think it's quite a safe assumption that it's organic ;)
    $endgroup$
    – orthocresol♦
    Mar 10 at 12:27













    10












    $begingroup$

    The peak at $m/z = 59$ with lower intensity in respect to the one at $m / z =58$ (the molecular ion) is not overseen. Mass spectroscopy is capable to deliver information about the isotopic composition of your sample, too. Since -- accounting over all carbon atoms of your sample -- about 1.1% are of the non-radioactive isotope of $ce{^{13}C}$, you may use this information to determine the carbon atoms in total present.



    The story indeed contiues further, as to establish by this "isotope fingerprint" if you have one or two chlorines per molecule present ($ce{^{35}Cl}$ and $ce{^{37}Cl}$), bromines, presence / absence of nitrogen, etc.:



    1]
    (source)






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      10












      $begingroup$

      The peak at $m/z = 59$ with lower intensity in respect to the one at $m / z =58$ (the molecular ion) is not overseen. Mass spectroscopy is capable to deliver information about the isotopic composition of your sample, too. Since -- accounting over all carbon atoms of your sample -- about 1.1% are of the non-radioactive isotope of $ce{^{13}C}$, you may use this information to determine the carbon atoms in total present.



      The story indeed contiues further, as to establish by this "isotope fingerprint" if you have one or two chlorines per molecule present ($ce{^{35}Cl}$ and $ce{^{37}Cl}$), bromines, presence / absence of nitrogen, etc.:



      1]
      (source)






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        10












        10








        10





        $begingroup$

        The peak at $m/z = 59$ with lower intensity in respect to the one at $m / z =58$ (the molecular ion) is not overseen. Mass spectroscopy is capable to deliver information about the isotopic composition of your sample, too. Since -- accounting over all carbon atoms of your sample -- about 1.1% are of the non-radioactive isotope of $ce{^{13}C}$, you may use this information to determine the carbon atoms in total present.



        The story indeed contiues further, as to establish by this "isotope fingerprint" if you have one or two chlorines per molecule present ($ce{^{35}Cl}$ and $ce{^{37}Cl}$), bromines, presence / absence of nitrogen, etc.:



        1]
        (source)






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The peak at $m/z = 59$ with lower intensity in respect to the one at $m / z =58$ (the molecular ion) is not overseen. Mass spectroscopy is capable to deliver information about the isotopic composition of your sample, too. Since -- accounting over all carbon atoms of your sample -- about 1.1% are of the non-radioactive isotope of $ce{^{13}C}$, you may use this information to determine the carbon atoms in total present.



        The story indeed contiues further, as to establish by this "isotope fingerprint" if you have one or two chlorines per molecule present ($ce{^{35}Cl}$ and $ce{^{37}Cl}$), bromines, presence / absence of nitrogen, etc.:



        1]
        (source)







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Mar 10 at 12:34









        ButtonwoodButtonwood

        9,61211942




        9,61211942






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f110752%2fwhy-is-a-very-small-peak-with-larger-m-z-not-considered-to-be-the-molecular-ion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

            Image
            3 Recently upgrade to 18.10 from 18.04, and using the terminal is becoming annoying: the new alert sound is a drip ( /usr/share/sounds/gnome/default/alerts/drip.ogg ), and the previous one is still located at ( /usr/share/sounds/ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg ). My issue is that at the gnome-terminal, when autocompleting or pressing left BOTH sounds are reproduced, at the same time. I want to just have ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg active, not both . At the moment I have been only able to reduce the volume of the alerts (but still both are played), or turn the alerts down (but I dislike both "solutions"). gnome-terminal 18.10 teminal-bell share | improve this question
            Read more

            Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

            Image
            up vote 5 down vote favorite 2 I would like to make it so that the vertical space below the title of each chapter is the same when using the Bjornstrup package (i.e. so that the descenders do not affect the spacing - as shown by the red arrow in the picture below). I think I'm fairly happy with the spacing around "A chapter", so I'd really like titles without descenders (e.g. "Contents") to have the same vertical spacing as "A chapter" below the title. I would also like to remove the large "0" in the contents title. Any help appreciated, as always. documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{book} % Packages[![enter image description here][1]][1] usepackage[left=3.5cm, right=3.5cm, top=4.3cm, bottom=4.25cm]{geometry} usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} usepackage{libertine} usepackage[libertine]{newtx
            Read more

            Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

            Image
            0 I want to add Tabulator js to my java project. I added tabulator.min.js, tabulator.min.css to resources folder. After that added to my html page these dependencies as recommending in readme.md. <link rel="stylesheet" th:href="@{/css/tabulator.min.css}"> <script type="text/javascript" th:src="@{/js/tabulator.min.js}"></script> Now my tables view all elements, that I have in the html page, but not correct. In the documentation of Tabulator is example how to create header and table, var table = new Tabulator("#example-table", { columns:[ {title:"Name", field:"name", sorter:"string", width:200, editor:true}, {title:"Age", field:"age", sorter:"
            Read more