Existence of minimizers in Evans chapter 8
$begingroup$
I am trying to understand the following point in Evans PDE book. In chapter 8, page 465, he proved the existence of minimizer to the following problem, let $U$ be open, bounded with connected, $C^1$ boundary and consider
$$ inf_{win mathcal{A}} int_U L(Dw(x),w(x),x);dx = inf_{win mathcal{A}} J[w]$$
over
$$mathcal{A} = {win W^{1,q}(U): w = g;text{on};partial U}$$.
Assuming coercivity of $L$, that is
$$L(p,z,x) geq alpha |p|^q - beta$$
for some $alpha > 0$ and $betageq 0$, then if we let
$$ m = inf_{win mathcal{A}} int_U L(Dw(x),w(x),x);dx$$
and take a minimizing sequence $u_kin mathcal{A}$ such that
$$ J(u_k) longrightarrow m$$
as $klongrightarrow infty$, one can easily see that
$$ Vert Du_kVert_{L^q(U)} leq C$$
He then use the fact that $u_k = g$ on $partial U$ to conclude that
$$ Vert u_kVert_{L^q(U)} leq C'$$
as well, which I don't understand how? It is of course clear if $g = 0$ by using Poincare's inequality, but if $gneq 0$ then I don't know how to do that estimate.
pde sobolev-spaces calculus-of-variations
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am trying to understand the following point in Evans PDE book. In chapter 8, page 465, he proved the existence of minimizer to the following problem, let $U$ be open, bounded with connected, $C^1$ boundary and consider
$$ inf_{win mathcal{A}} int_U L(Dw(x),w(x),x);dx = inf_{win mathcal{A}} J[w]$$
over
$$mathcal{A} = {win W^{1,q}(U): w = g;text{on};partial U}$$.
Assuming coercivity of $L$, that is
$$L(p,z,x) geq alpha |p|^q - beta$$
for some $alpha > 0$ and $betageq 0$, then if we let
$$ m = inf_{win mathcal{A}} int_U L(Dw(x),w(x),x);dx$$
and take a minimizing sequence $u_kin mathcal{A}$ such that
$$ J(u_k) longrightarrow m$$
as $klongrightarrow infty$, one can easily see that
$$ Vert Du_kVert_{L^q(U)} leq C$$
He then use the fact that $u_k = g$ on $partial U$ to conclude that
$$ Vert u_kVert_{L^q(U)} leq C'$$
as well, which I don't understand how? It is of course clear if $g = 0$ by using Poincare's inequality, but if $gneq 0$ then I don't know how to do that estimate.
pde sobolev-spaces calculus-of-variations
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
I think you can just consider $v_k=u_k-w$, where $win W^{1,q}(U)$ is a fixed function with boundary value $g$.
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Dec 9 '18 at 14:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am trying to understand the following point in Evans PDE book. In chapter 8, page 465, he proved the existence of minimizer to the following problem, let $U$ be open, bounded with connected, $C^1$ boundary and consider
$$ inf_{win mathcal{A}} int_U L(Dw(x),w(x),x);dx = inf_{win mathcal{A}} J[w]$$
over
$$mathcal{A} = {win W^{1,q}(U): w = g;text{on};partial U}$$.
Assuming coercivity of $L$, that is
$$L(p,z,x) geq alpha |p|^q - beta$$
for some $alpha > 0$ and $betageq 0$, then if we let
$$ m = inf_{win mathcal{A}} int_U L(Dw(x),w(x),x);dx$$
and take a minimizing sequence $u_kin mathcal{A}$ such that
$$ J(u_k) longrightarrow m$$
as $klongrightarrow infty$, one can easily see that
$$ Vert Du_kVert_{L^q(U)} leq C$$
He then use the fact that $u_k = g$ on $partial U$ to conclude that
$$ Vert u_kVert_{L^q(U)} leq C'$$
as well, which I don't understand how? It is of course clear if $g = 0$ by using Poincare's inequality, but if $gneq 0$ then I don't know how to do that estimate.
pde sobolev-spaces calculus-of-variations
$endgroup$
I am trying to understand the following point in Evans PDE book. In chapter 8, page 465, he proved the existence of minimizer to the following problem, let $U$ be open, bounded with connected, $C^1$ boundary and consider
$$ inf_{win mathcal{A}} int_U L(Dw(x),w(x),x);dx = inf_{win mathcal{A}} J[w]$$
over
$$mathcal{A} = {win W^{1,q}(U): w = g;text{on};partial U}$$.
Assuming coercivity of $L$, that is
$$L(p,z,x) geq alpha |p|^q - beta$$
for some $alpha > 0$ and $betageq 0$, then if we let
$$ m = inf_{win mathcal{A}} int_U L(Dw(x),w(x),x);dx$$
and take a minimizing sequence $u_kin mathcal{A}$ such that
$$ J(u_k) longrightarrow m$$
as $klongrightarrow infty$, one can easily see that
$$ Vert Du_kVert_{L^q(U)} leq C$$
He then use the fact that $u_k = g$ on $partial U$ to conclude that
$$ Vert u_kVert_{L^q(U)} leq C'$$
as well, which I don't understand how? It is of course clear if $g = 0$ by using Poincare's inequality, but if $gneq 0$ then I don't know how to do that estimate.
pde sobolev-spaces calculus-of-variations
pde sobolev-spaces calculus-of-variations
asked Dec 9 '18 at 2:17
SeanSean
532513
532513
2
$begingroup$
I think you can just consider $v_k=u_k-w$, where $win W^{1,q}(U)$ is a fixed function with boundary value $g$.
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Dec 9 '18 at 14:55
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
I think you can just consider $v_k=u_k-w$, where $win W^{1,q}(U)$ is a fixed function with boundary value $g$.
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Dec 9 '18 at 14:55
2
2
$begingroup$
I think you can just consider $v_k=u_k-w$, where $win W^{1,q}(U)$ is a fixed function with boundary value $g$.
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Dec 9 '18 at 14:55
$begingroup$
I think you can just consider $v_k=u_k-w$, where $win W^{1,q}(U)$ is a fixed function with boundary value $g$.
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Dec 9 '18 at 14:55
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031922%2fexistence-of-minimizers-in-evans-chapter-8%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031922%2fexistence-of-minimizers-in-evans-chapter-8%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
I think you can just consider $v_k=u_k-w$, where $win W^{1,q}(U)$ is a fixed function with boundary value $g$.
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Dec 9 '18 at 14:55