pgfplots change distance of only one xtick [closed]
I have a semilog plot with the xticks 10^0, 10^1, 10^2, 10^3 and 10^50, whereby the xlabels have the same symbols, with the exception of 10^50 which has an infinity label. Now, when I plot this the step between xticks is constant and the labels 10^0 to 10^3 are illegible. Is there a way of changing the step between the 10^3 and 10^50 labels or, more generally, of representing a point "at infinity" and finite points on the same axis?
Thanks!
pgfplots
edited Mar 10 at 11:38
Stefan Pinnow
20.2k83377
asked Jul 19 '18 at 15:20
EuclidesEuclides
31
closed as unclear what you're asking by Kurt, JouleV, Stefan Pinnow, Raaja, samcarter Mar 10 at 12:19
Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
I have a semilog plot with the xticks 10^0, 10^1, 10^2, 10^3 and 10^50, whereby the xlabels have the same symbols, with the exception of 10^50 which has an infinity label. Now, when I plot this the step between xticks is constant and the labels 10^0 to 10^3 are illegible. Is there a way of changing the step between the 10^3 and 10^50 labels or, more generally, of representing a point "at infinity" and finite points on the same axis?
Thanks!
pgfplots
edited Mar 10 at 11:38
Stefan Pinnow
20.2k83377
asked Jul 19 '18 at 15:20
EuclidesEuclides
31
closed as unclear what you're asking by Kurt, JouleV, Stefan Pinnow, Raaja, samcarter Mar 10 at 12:19
Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
I have a semilog plot with the xticks 10^0, 10^1, 10^2, 10^3 and 10^50, whereby the xlabels have the same symbols, with the exception of 10^50 which has an infinity label. Now, when I plot this the step between xticks is constant and the labels 10^0 to 10^3 are illegible. Is there a way of changing the step between the 10^3 and 10^50 labels or, more generally, of representing a point "at infinity" and finite points on the same axis?
Thanks!
pgfplots
edited Mar 10 at 11:38
Stefan Pinnow
20.2k83377
asked Jul 19 '18 at 15:20
EuclidesEuclides
31
I have a semilog plot with the xticks 10^0, 10^1, 10^2, 10^3 and 10^50, whereby the xlabels have the same symbols, with the exception of 10^50 which has an infinity label. Now, when I plot this the step between xticks is constant and the labels 10^0 to 10^3 are illegible. Is there a way of changing the step between the 10^3 and 10^50 labels or, more generally, of representing a point "at infinity" and finite points on the same axis?
Thanks!
pgfplots
pgfplots
edited Mar 10 at 11:38
Stefan Pinnow
20.2k83377
asked Jul 19 '18 at 15:20
EuclidesEuclides
31
edited Mar 10 at 11:38
Stefan Pinnow
20.2k83377
asked Jul 19 '18 at 15:20
EuclidesEuclides
31
edited Mar 10 at 11:38
Stefan Pinnow
20.2k83377
edited Mar 10 at 11:38
Stefan Pinnow
20.2k83377
edited Mar 10 at 11:38
Stefan Pinnow
20.2k83377
20.2k83377
asked Jul 19 '18 at 15:20
EuclidesEuclides
31
asked Jul 19 '18 at 15:20
EuclidesEuclides
31
asked Jul 19 '18 at 15:20
EuclidesEuclides
31
31
closed as unclear what you're asking by Kurt, JouleV, Stefan Pinnow, Raaja, samcarter Mar 10 at 12:19
Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
closed as unclear what you're asking by Kurt, JouleV, Stefan Pinnow, Raaja, samcarter Mar 10 at 12:19
Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Forget about the question. I just take my data at infinity and change its xtick from 10^50 to let's say 10^6. That should give enough room for the other ticks to become legible, while keeping the "10^50" point far enough to be seen as a point at infinity. Any alternative approaches are welcome!
answered Jul 19 '18 at 15:32
EuclidesEuclides
31
2
You can delete your question by yourself (deleting your answer first).
– CarLaTeX
Dec 17 '18 at 4:34
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Forget about the question. I just take my data at infinity and change its xtick from 10^50 to let's say 10^6. That should give enough room for the other ticks to become legible, while keeping the "10^50" point far enough to be seen as a point at infinity. Any alternative approaches are welcome!
answered Jul 19 '18 at 15:32
EuclidesEuclides
31
2
You can delete your question by yourself (deleting your answer first).
– CarLaTeX
Dec 17 '18 at 4:34
add a comment |
Forget about the question. I just take my data at infinity and change its xtick from 10^50 to let's say 10^6. That should give enough room for the other ticks to become legible, while keeping the "10^50" point far enough to be seen as a point at infinity. Any alternative approaches are welcome!
answered Jul 19 '18 at 15:32
EuclidesEuclides
31
2
You can delete your question by yourself (deleting your answer first).
– CarLaTeX
Dec 17 '18 at 4:34
add a comment |
Forget about the question. I just take my data at infinity and change its xtick from 10^50 to let's say 10^6. That should give enough room for the other ticks to become legible, while keeping the "10^50" point far enough to be seen as a point at infinity. Any alternative approaches are welcome!
answered Jul 19 '18 at 15:32
EuclidesEuclides
31
Forget about the question. I just take my data at infinity and change its xtick from 10^50 to let's say 10^6. That should give enough room for the other ticks to become legible, while keeping the "10^50" point far enough to be seen as a point at infinity. Any alternative approaches are welcome!
answered Jul 19 '18 at 15:32
EuclidesEuclides
31
answered Jul 19 '18 at 15:32
EuclidesEuclides
31
answered Jul 19 '18 at 15:32
EuclidesEuclides
31
answered Jul 19 '18 at 15:32
EuclidesEuclides
31
31
2
You can delete your question by yourself (deleting your answer first).
– CarLaTeX
Dec 17 '18 at 4:34
add a comment |
2
You can delete your question by yourself (deleting your answer first).
– CarLaTeX
Dec 17 '18 at 4:34
2
2
You can delete your question by yourself (deleting your answer first).
– CarLaTeX
Dec 17 '18 at 4:34
You can delete your question by yourself (deleting your answer first).
– CarLaTeX
Dec 17 '18 at 4:34
add a comment |
