What is the lore-based reason that the Spectator has the Create Food and Water trait, instead of simply not...












15












$begingroup$


The Spectator has the Create Food and Water action (Monster Manual, p. 31):




Create Food and Water. The spectator magically creates enough food and water to sustain itself for 24 hours.




I don't understand why the Spectator must to use an action in order to create its own food and water to sustain itself.



Wouldn't be easier to add something like the banshee's Undead Nature trait?




Undead Nature. A banshee doesn't require air, food, drink, or sleep.




They could have given it a trait like this instead:




Spectator Nature. A spectator doesn't require food or drink.




Is there any important mechanical difference between both abilities? I mean, any exploit, advantage or drawback that has create food and water over it doesn't need food nor water.






dnd-5e monsters lore







share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @HeyICanChan, but I mean if there is any important mechanical difference? Like an exploit or something that could be done with the other? Can I ask that?
    $endgroup$
    – Ender Look
    Feb 28 at 23:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @NautArch I just want to know why Spectator has create food and water instead of no requiring food and water. And in order to understand that I think I show know about the mechanical difference of both features, like: which one is better? In the sense of: how can you exploit each feature?
    $endgroup$
    – Ender Look
    Mar 1 at 0:33








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @NateEldredge: That sounds like an entirely different question, and should be asked separately.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Mar 1 at 5:33
















15












$begingroup$


The Spectator has the Create Food and Water action (Monster Manual, p. 31):




Create Food and Water. The spectator magically creates enough food and water to sustain itself for 24 hours.




I don't understand why the Spectator must to use an action in order to create its own food and water to sustain itself.



Wouldn't be easier to add something like the banshee's Undead Nature trait?




Undead Nature. A banshee doesn't require air, food, drink, or sleep.




They could have given it a trait like this instead:




Spectator Nature. A spectator doesn't require food or drink.




Is there any important mechanical difference between both abilities? I mean, any exploit, advantage or drawback that has create food and water over it doesn't need food nor water.






dnd-5e monsters lore







share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @HeyICanChan, but I mean if there is any important mechanical difference? Like an exploit or something that could be done with the other? Can I ask that?
    $endgroup$
    – Ender Look
    Feb 28 at 23:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @NautArch I just want to know why Spectator has create food and water instead of no requiring food and water. And in order to understand that I think I show know about the mechanical difference of both features, like: which one is better? In the sense of: how can you exploit each feature?
    $endgroup$
    – Ender Look
    Mar 1 at 0:33








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @NateEldredge: That sounds like an entirely different question, and should be asked separately.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Mar 1 at 5:33














15












15








15


1



$begingroup$


The Spectator has the Create Food and Water action (Monster Manual, p. 31):




Create Food and Water. The spectator magically creates enough food and water to sustain itself for 24 hours.




I don't understand why the Spectator must to use an action in order to create its own food and water to sustain itself.



Wouldn't be easier to add something like the banshee's Undead Nature trait?




Undead Nature. A banshee doesn't require air, food, drink, or sleep.




They could have given it a trait like this instead:




Spectator Nature. A spectator doesn't require food or drink.




Is there any important mechanical difference between both abilities? I mean, any exploit, advantage or drawback that has create food and water over it doesn't need food nor water.






dnd-5e monsters lore







share|improve this question











$endgroup$




The Spectator has the Create Food and Water action (Monster Manual, p. 31):




Create Food and Water. The spectator magically creates enough food and water to sustain itself for 24 hours.




I don't understand why the Spectator must to use an action in order to create its own food and water to sustain itself.



Wouldn't be easier to add something like the banshee's Undead Nature trait?




Undead Nature. A banshee doesn't require air, food, drink, or sleep.




They could have given it a trait like this instead:




Spectator Nature. A spectator doesn't require food or drink.




Is there any important mechanical difference between both abilities? I mean, any exploit, advantage or drawback that has create food and water over it doesn't need food nor water.






dnd-5e monsters lore




dnd-5e monsters lore






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 1 at 5:32









V2Blast

23.7k378150




23.7k378150










asked Feb 28 at 23:05









Ender LookEnder Look

1,2141835




1,2141835








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @HeyICanChan, but I mean if there is any important mechanical difference? Like an exploit or something that could be done with the other? Can I ask that?
    $endgroup$
    – Ender Look
    Feb 28 at 23:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @NautArch I just want to know why Spectator has create food and water instead of no requiring food and water. And in order to understand that I think I show know about the mechanical difference of both features, like: which one is better? In the sense of: how can you exploit each feature?
    $endgroup$
    – Ender Look
    Mar 1 at 0:33








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @NateEldredge: That sounds like an entirely different question, and should be asked separately.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Mar 1 at 5:33














  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @HeyICanChan, but I mean if there is any important mechanical difference? Like an exploit or something that could be done with the other? Can I ask that?
    $endgroup$
    – Ender Look
    Feb 28 at 23:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @NautArch I just want to know why Spectator has create food and water instead of no requiring food and water. And in order to understand that I think I show know about the mechanical difference of both features, like: which one is better? In the sense of: how can you exploit each feature?
    $endgroup$
    – Ender Look
    Mar 1 at 0:33








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @NateEldredge: That sounds like an entirely different question, and should be asked separately.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Mar 1 at 5:33








3




3




$begingroup$
@HeyICanChan, but I mean if there is any important mechanical difference? Like an exploit or something that could be done with the other? Can I ask that?
$endgroup$
– Ender Look
Feb 28 at 23:12




$begingroup$
@HeyICanChan, but I mean if there is any important mechanical difference? Like an exploit or something that could be done with the other? Can I ask that?
$endgroup$
– Ender Look
Feb 28 at 23:12




1




1




$begingroup$
@NautArch I just want to know why Spectator has create food and water instead of no requiring food and water. And in order to understand that I think I show know about the mechanical difference of both features, like: which one is better? In the sense of: how can you exploit each feature?
$endgroup$
– Ender Look
Mar 1 at 0:33






$begingroup$
@NautArch I just want to know why Spectator has create food and water instead of no requiring food and water. And in order to understand that I think I show know about the mechanical difference of both features, like: which one is better? In the sense of: how can you exploit each feature?
$endgroup$
– Ender Look
Mar 1 at 0:33






1




1




$begingroup$
@NateEldredge: That sounds like an entirely different question, and should be asked separately.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Mar 1 at 5:33




$begingroup$
@NateEldredge: That sounds like an entirely different question, and should be asked separately.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Mar 1 at 5:33










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















26












$begingroup$

Because that was that power of one of its eyestalks in previous editions of the game.



In AD&D book Monster Manual II (1983) by Gary Gygax, the ability to create food and water is one of the spectator's four eyestalks, the others being cause serious wounds, paralyzation ray, and telepathy.



The special quality of "Undead Traits" didn't really exist until D&D 3e (2000), which took design influence from Magic: the Gathering to apply general traits to specific monster types. The fact that undead don't need to eat or sleep wasn't really considered relevant by the designers of the very early editions of the game, when D&D was largely about fighting monsters in dungeons rather than any kind of realism.



In the D&D third edition book Magic of Faerûn (2001), the spectator similarly has the ability to create food and water with one of its eyestalks. Its other three were inflict serious wounds, hold monster, and suggestion. An updated version of the creature in Lords of Madness (2005) changes the creature so it creates food and drink as an innate ability, and one of its eye stalks instead causes fatigue.



It needs to eat and drink because according to its lore, the spectator is dedicated to to guard a specific place or thing without the luxury of leaving to hunt for food. Beholders are traditionally a type of living creature known as an Aberration, and therefore it would not be correct to simply make them Undead. Aberrations frequently have to eat, and the large mouth of beholder-like creatures strongly suggests that it is a creature which must eat to survive, and perhaps even greatly enjoys eating. It's therefore highly thematically appropriate for the spectator to be able to create food.



Giving creatures the ability to cast a single spell is a long-standing D&D mechanical tradition that dates back to the earliest editions of the game, when the easiest way for designers to give a monster a magical capability was simply to allow it to cast a spell normally available to a player character spellcasting class such as the cleric. D&D third edition often did this, where they were generally known as spell-like abilities.



It's not unthinkable for living creatures to be immune to the need to eat and drink, of course. The elan are a race of people who are of Aberration type, and they can sustain themselves without food or drink.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    10












    $begingroup$

    Because monster quirks bring them to life



    There is indeed an important mechanical difference between a Spectator and the banshee you chose as your example: Aberrations are not dead. The Death Tyrant, you will notice, has the Undead type and not the Aberration type. On the other hand, Mind flayers are Aberrations too, and it is their choice of diet that defines them as a staple of D&D. The need for food and drink of the Spectator is not quite as vital as all that, but it's still part of its flavour.



    Frankly, the ability to create food and water is not the most 'complex' trait of the Spectator, from a DM's point of view; its madness is, if you want to bring it forth well. First of all you need to determine what form this madness takes (the Madness tables in the Dungeon Master's Guide will certainly help), and then you need to think about how it affects the Spectator's reactions and decision-making.



    But little, or big, details like this help make monsters feel unique. If every guardian monster didn't need to eat or drink, they might as well all be golems. The Monster Manual is there to give you inspiration.



    You are, of course, always free to modify any monster however you see fit for your campaign. And even if you and your players simply cannot come up with ways to play such a quirk out, you can safely ignore them, nothing bad will happen. But imagine a Spectator refusing gold, but letting itself be bribed by a delicious and moist cake, because decades of eating bland created food make it unable to resist the temptation? That could become a scene to remember.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Your last paragraph is very interesting. Also, I didn't know about the madness table. I'll have to take a look at it.
      $endgroup$
      – Ender Look
      Mar 1 at 1:00






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      The tables are meant to be used for Call-of-Cthulhu-like campaigns, but I find them very useful as inspiration for other madness-related stuff as well, such as roleplaying mad creatures.
      $endgroup$
      – Rukbat
      Mar 1 at 1:20










    • $begingroup$
      Great answer. +1 The bit about moist cake is a nice touch. I've often imagined that each individual beholder (or spectator, etc.) has very particular eating habits and food preferences. When I GM these creatures what and how they eat is usually part of their personality.
      $endgroup$
      – lightcat
      Mar 1 at 15:14



















    8












    $begingroup$

    A spectator is living.



    The creature feature that allows a monster to function without food or drink is generally reserved for Undead, Constructs or Elemental creature types.



    Undead Creature Types



    Crawling Claw, Mummy, Skeleton and Bone Naga are some examples of undead creature types from the MM that require no food or drink (or air or sleep). Even Zombies in D&D 5e require no food or drink - no brains for D&D zombies.



    Death Knights are the only undead in the Monster Manual that do not have this feature. They apparently require food and water. Will-O'-Wisps do not need drink, sleep or air, but they do feed on fear.



    Construct Creature Types



    Constructs are made, not born (MM 6) and often do not require food or drink (or air or sleep). Golems, Animated Objects, Scarecrow and Shield Guardians are some creatures of the Construct creature type from the MM that do not require food or drink.



    Homunculus and Modrons are the only two constructs in the MM that do not have this feature. They do require food and drink.



    Elemental Creature Types



    Elemental creature types also generally do not need food or drink. This includes Elementals, Water Weird, Mephits and Azers and others in the MM.



    Genies, Salamanders and Xorn are the only Elemental creature type that do not have this feature.



    Other than powerful immortal beings, like Angels there are no other creatures that can survive without food and drink.



    What about the Spectator?



    A Spectator probably doesn't have this creature feature because it doesn't fit in with the general standards established in the MM for creatures with this feature. It's partially an issue of narrative, and partially an issue of consistency.



    A Spectator is not of the Undead, Elemental, or Construct type. They are just badass and can conjure themselves all the food they need. This is probably necessary because they have to hang around one spot for 101 years guarding some treasure they've been summoned to protect.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "122"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142195%2fwhat-is-the-lore-based-reason-that-the-spectator-has-the-create-food-and-water-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      26












      $begingroup$

      Because that was that power of one of its eyestalks in previous editions of the game.



      In AD&D book Monster Manual II (1983) by Gary Gygax, the ability to create food and water is one of the spectator's four eyestalks, the others being cause serious wounds, paralyzation ray, and telepathy.



      The special quality of "Undead Traits" didn't really exist until D&D 3e (2000), which took design influence from Magic: the Gathering to apply general traits to specific monster types. The fact that undead don't need to eat or sleep wasn't really considered relevant by the designers of the very early editions of the game, when D&D was largely about fighting monsters in dungeons rather than any kind of realism.



      In the D&D third edition book Magic of Faerûn (2001), the spectator similarly has the ability to create food and water with one of its eyestalks. Its other three were inflict serious wounds, hold monster, and suggestion. An updated version of the creature in Lords of Madness (2005) changes the creature so it creates food and drink as an innate ability, and one of its eye stalks instead causes fatigue.



      It needs to eat and drink because according to its lore, the spectator is dedicated to to guard a specific place or thing without the luxury of leaving to hunt for food. Beholders are traditionally a type of living creature known as an Aberration, and therefore it would not be correct to simply make them Undead. Aberrations frequently have to eat, and the large mouth of beholder-like creatures strongly suggests that it is a creature which must eat to survive, and perhaps even greatly enjoys eating. It's therefore highly thematically appropriate for the spectator to be able to create food.



      Giving creatures the ability to cast a single spell is a long-standing D&D mechanical tradition that dates back to the earliest editions of the game, when the easiest way for designers to give a monster a magical capability was simply to allow it to cast a spell normally available to a player character spellcasting class such as the cleric. D&D third edition often did this, where they were generally known as spell-like abilities.



      It's not unthinkable for living creatures to be immune to the need to eat and drink, of course. The elan are a race of people who are of Aberration type, and they can sustain themselves without food or drink.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$


















        26












        $begingroup$

        Because that was that power of one of its eyestalks in previous editions of the game.



        In AD&D book Monster Manual II (1983) by Gary Gygax, the ability to create food and water is one of the spectator's four eyestalks, the others being cause serious wounds, paralyzation ray, and telepathy.



        The special quality of "Undead Traits" didn't really exist until D&D 3e (2000), which took design influence from Magic: the Gathering to apply general traits to specific monster types. The fact that undead don't need to eat or sleep wasn't really considered relevant by the designers of the very early editions of the game, when D&D was largely about fighting monsters in dungeons rather than any kind of realism.



        In the D&D third edition book Magic of Faerûn (2001), the spectator similarly has the ability to create food and water with one of its eyestalks. Its other three were inflict serious wounds, hold monster, and suggestion. An updated version of the creature in Lords of Madness (2005) changes the creature so it creates food and drink as an innate ability, and one of its eye stalks instead causes fatigue.



        It needs to eat and drink because according to its lore, the spectator is dedicated to to guard a specific place or thing without the luxury of leaving to hunt for food. Beholders are traditionally a type of living creature known as an Aberration, and therefore it would not be correct to simply make them Undead. Aberrations frequently have to eat, and the large mouth of beholder-like creatures strongly suggests that it is a creature which must eat to survive, and perhaps even greatly enjoys eating. It's therefore highly thematically appropriate for the spectator to be able to create food.



        Giving creatures the ability to cast a single spell is a long-standing D&D mechanical tradition that dates back to the earliest editions of the game, when the easiest way for designers to give a monster a magical capability was simply to allow it to cast a spell normally available to a player character spellcasting class such as the cleric. D&D third edition often did this, where they were generally known as spell-like abilities.



        It's not unthinkable for living creatures to be immune to the need to eat and drink, of course. The elan are a race of people who are of Aberration type, and they can sustain themselves without food or drink.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$
















          26












          26








          26





          $begingroup$

          Because that was that power of one of its eyestalks in previous editions of the game.



          In AD&D book Monster Manual II (1983) by Gary Gygax, the ability to create food and water is one of the spectator's four eyestalks, the others being cause serious wounds, paralyzation ray, and telepathy.



          The special quality of "Undead Traits" didn't really exist until D&D 3e (2000), which took design influence from Magic: the Gathering to apply general traits to specific monster types. The fact that undead don't need to eat or sleep wasn't really considered relevant by the designers of the very early editions of the game, when D&D was largely about fighting monsters in dungeons rather than any kind of realism.



          In the D&D third edition book Magic of Faerûn (2001), the spectator similarly has the ability to create food and water with one of its eyestalks. Its other three were inflict serious wounds, hold monster, and suggestion. An updated version of the creature in Lords of Madness (2005) changes the creature so it creates food and drink as an innate ability, and one of its eye stalks instead causes fatigue.



          It needs to eat and drink because according to its lore, the spectator is dedicated to to guard a specific place or thing without the luxury of leaving to hunt for food. Beholders are traditionally a type of living creature known as an Aberration, and therefore it would not be correct to simply make them Undead. Aberrations frequently have to eat, and the large mouth of beholder-like creatures strongly suggests that it is a creature which must eat to survive, and perhaps even greatly enjoys eating. It's therefore highly thematically appropriate for the spectator to be able to create food.



          Giving creatures the ability to cast a single spell is a long-standing D&D mechanical tradition that dates back to the earliest editions of the game, when the easiest way for designers to give a monster a magical capability was simply to allow it to cast a spell normally available to a player character spellcasting class such as the cleric. D&D third edition often did this, where they were generally known as spell-like abilities.



          It's not unthinkable for living creatures to be immune to the need to eat and drink, of course. The elan are a race of people who are of Aberration type, and they can sustain themselves without food or drink.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Because that was that power of one of its eyestalks in previous editions of the game.



          In AD&D book Monster Manual II (1983) by Gary Gygax, the ability to create food and water is one of the spectator's four eyestalks, the others being cause serious wounds, paralyzation ray, and telepathy.



          The special quality of "Undead Traits" didn't really exist until D&D 3e (2000), which took design influence from Magic: the Gathering to apply general traits to specific monster types. The fact that undead don't need to eat or sleep wasn't really considered relevant by the designers of the very early editions of the game, when D&D was largely about fighting monsters in dungeons rather than any kind of realism.



          In the D&D third edition book Magic of Faerûn (2001), the spectator similarly has the ability to create food and water with one of its eyestalks. Its other three were inflict serious wounds, hold monster, and suggestion. An updated version of the creature in Lords of Madness (2005) changes the creature so it creates food and drink as an innate ability, and one of its eye stalks instead causes fatigue.



          It needs to eat and drink because according to its lore, the spectator is dedicated to to guard a specific place or thing without the luxury of leaving to hunt for food. Beholders are traditionally a type of living creature known as an Aberration, and therefore it would not be correct to simply make them Undead. Aberrations frequently have to eat, and the large mouth of beholder-like creatures strongly suggests that it is a creature which must eat to survive, and perhaps even greatly enjoys eating. It's therefore highly thematically appropriate for the spectator to be able to create food.



          Giving creatures the ability to cast a single spell is a long-standing D&D mechanical tradition that dates back to the earliest editions of the game, when the easiest way for designers to give a monster a magical capability was simply to allow it to cast a spell normally available to a player character spellcasting class such as the cleric. D&D third edition often did this, where they were generally known as spell-like abilities.



          It's not unthinkable for living creatures to be immune to the need to eat and drink, of course. The elan are a race of people who are of Aberration type, and they can sustain themselves without food or drink.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Mar 1 at 20:42

























          answered Feb 28 at 23:31









          Quadratic WizardQuadratic Wizard

          29.6k397160




          29.6k397160

























              10












              $begingroup$

              Because monster quirks bring them to life



              There is indeed an important mechanical difference between a Spectator and the banshee you chose as your example: Aberrations are not dead. The Death Tyrant, you will notice, has the Undead type and not the Aberration type. On the other hand, Mind flayers are Aberrations too, and it is their choice of diet that defines them as a staple of D&D. The need for food and drink of the Spectator is not quite as vital as all that, but it's still part of its flavour.



              Frankly, the ability to create food and water is not the most 'complex' trait of the Spectator, from a DM's point of view; its madness is, if you want to bring it forth well. First of all you need to determine what form this madness takes (the Madness tables in the Dungeon Master's Guide will certainly help), and then you need to think about how it affects the Spectator's reactions and decision-making.



              But little, or big, details like this help make monsters feel unique. If every guardian monster didn't need to eat or drink, they might as well all be golems. The Monster Manual is there to give you inspiration.



              You are, of course, always free to modify any monster however you see fit for your campaign. And even if you and your players simply cannot come up with ways to play such a quirk out, you can safely ignore them, nothing bad will happen. But imagine a Spectator refusing gold, but letting itself be bribed by a delicious and moist cake, because decades of eating bland created food make it unable to resist the temptation? That could become a scene to remember.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                Your last paragraph is very interesting. Also, I didn't know about the madness table. I'll have to take a look at it.
                $endgroup$
                – Ender Look
                Mar 1 at 1:00






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                The tables are meant to be used for Call-of-Cthulhu-like campaigns, but I find them very useful as inspiration for other madness-related stuff as well, such as roleplaying mad creatures.
                $endgroup$
                – Rukbat
                Mar 1 at 1:20










              • $begingroup$
                Great answer. +1 The bit about moist cake is a nice touch. I've often imagined that each individual beholder (or spectator, etc.) has very particular eating habits and food preferences. When I GM these creatures what and how they eat is usually part of their personality.
                $endgroup$
                – lightcat
                Mar 1 at 15:14
















              10












              $begingroup$

              Because monster quirks bring them to life



              There is indeed an important mechanical difference between a Spectator and the banshee you chose as your example: Aberrations are not dead. The Death Tyrant, you will notice, has the Undead type and not the Aberration type. On the other hand, Mind flayers are Aberrations too, and it is their choice of diet that defines them as a staple of D&D. The need for food and drink of the Spectator is not quite as vital as all that, but it's still part of its flavour.



              Frankly, the ability to create food and water is not the most 'complex' trait of the Spectator, from a DM's point of view; its madness is, if you want to bring it forth well. First of all you need to determine what form this madness takes (the Madness tables in the Dungeon Master's Guide will certainly help), and then you need to think about how it affects the Spectator's reactions and decision-making.



              But little, or big, details like this help make monsters feel unique. If every guardian monster didn't need to eat or drink, they might as well all be golems. The Monster Manual is there to give you inspiration.



              You are, of course, always free to modify any monster however you see fit for your campaign. And even if you and your players simply cannot come up with ways to play such a quirk out, you can safely ignore them, nothing bad will happen. But imagine a Spectator refusing gold, but letting itself be bribed by a delicious and moist cake, because decades of eating bland created food make it unable to resist the temptation? That could become a scene to remember.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                Your last paragraph is very interesting. Also, I didn't know about the madness table. I'll have to take a look at it.
                $endgroup$
                – Ender Look
                Mar 1 at 1:00






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                The tables are meant to be used for Call-of-Cthulhu-like campaigns, but I find them very useful as inspiration for other madness-related stuff as well, such as roleplaying mad creatures.
                $endgroup$
                – Rukbat
                Mar 1 at 1:20










              • $begingroup$
                Great answer. +1 The bit about moist cake is a nice touch. I've often imagined that each individual beholder (or spectator, etc.) has very particular eating habits and food preferences. When I GM these creatures what and how they eat is usually part of their personality.
                $endgroup$
                – lightcat
                Mar 1 at 15:14














              10












              10








              10





              $begingroup$

              Because monster quirks bring them to life



              There is indeed an important mechanical difference between a Spectator and the banshee you chose as your example: Aberrations are not dead. The Death Tyrant, you will notice, has the Undead type and not the Aberration type. On the other hand, Mind flayers are Aberrations too, and it is their choice of diet that defines them as a staple of D&D. The need for food and drink of the Spectator is not quite as vital as all that, but it's still part of its flavour.



              Frankly, the ability to create food and water is not the most 'complex' trait of the Spectator, from a DM's point of view; its madness is, if you want to bring it forth well. First of all you need to determine what form this madness takes (the Madness tables in the Dungeon Master's Guide will certainly help), and then you need to think about how it affects the Spectator's reactions and decision-making.



              But little, or big, details like this help make monsters feel unique. If every guardian monster didn't need to eat or drink, they might as well all be golems. The Monster Manual is there to give you inspiration.



              You are, of course, always free to modify any monster however you see fit for your campaign. And even if you and your players simply cannot come up with ways to play such a quirk out, you can safely ignore them, nothing bad will happen. But imagine a Spectator refusing gold, but letting itself be bribed by a delicious and moist cake, because decades of eating bland created food make it unable to resist the temptation? That could become a scene to remember.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              Because monster quirks bring them to life



              There is indeed an important mechanical difference between a Spectator and the banshee you chose as your example: Aberrations are not dead. The Death Tyrant, you will notice, has the Undead type and not the Aberration type. On the other hand, Mind flayers are Aberrations too, and it is their choice of diet that defines them as a staple of D&D. The need for food and drink of the Spectator is not quite as vital as all that, but it's still part of its flavour.



              Frankly, the ability to create food and water is not the most 'complex' trait of the Spectator, from a DM's point of view; its madness is, if you want to bring it forth well. First of all you need to determine what form this madness takes (the Madness tables in the Dungeon Master's Guide will certainly help), and then you need to think about how it affects the Spectator's reactions and decision-making.



              But little, or big, details like this help make monsters feel unique. If every guardian monster didn't need to eat or drink, they might as well all be golems. The Monster Manual is there to give you inspiration.



              You are, of course, always free to modify any monster however you see fit for your campaign. And even if you and your players simply cannot come up with ways to play such a quirk out, you can safely ignore them, nothing bad will happen. But imagine a Spectator refusing gold, but letting itself be bribed by a delicious and moist cake, because decades of eating bland created food make it unable to resist the temptation? That could become a scene to remember.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Mar 1 at 0:50









              RukbatRukbat

              2367




              2367












              • $begingroup$
                Your last paragraph is very interesting. Also, I didn't know about the madness table. I'll have to take a look at it.
                $endgroup$
                – Ender Look
                Mar 1 at 1:00






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                The tables are meant to be used for Call-of-Cthulhu-like campaigns, but I find them very useful as inspiration for other madness-related stuff as well, such as roleplaying mad creatures.
                $endgroup$
                – Rukbat
                Mar 1 at 1:20










              • $begingroup$
                Great answer. +1 The bit about moist cake is a nice touch. I've often imagined that each individual beholder (or spectator, etc.) has very particular eating habits and food preferences. When I GM these creatures what and how they eat is usually part of their personality.
                $endgroup$
                – lightcat
                Mar 1 at 15:14


















              • $begingroup$
                Your last paragraph is very interesting. Also, I didn't know about the madness table. I'll have to take a look at it.
                $endgroup$
                – Ender Look
                Mar 1 at 1:00






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                The tables are meant to be used for Call-of-Cthulhu-like campaigns, but I find them very useful as inspiration for other madness-related stuff as well, such as roleplaying mad creatures.
                $endgroup$
                – Rukbat
                Mar 1 at 1:20










              • $begingroup$
                Great answer. +1 The bit about moist cake is a nice touch. I've often imagined that each individual beholder (or spectator, etc.) has very particular eating habits and food preferences. When I GM these creatures what and how they eat is usually part of their personality.
                $endgroup$
                – lightcat
                Mar 1 at 15:14
















              $begingroup$
              Your last paragraph is very interesting. Also, I didn't know about the madness table. I'll have to take a look at it.
              $endgroup$
              – Ender Look
              Mar 1 at 1:00




              $begingroup$
              Your last paragraph is very interesting. Also, I didn't know about the madness table. I'll have to take a look at it.
              $endgroup$
              – Ender Look
              Mar 1 at 1:00




              1




              1




              $begingroup$
              The tables are meant to be used for Call-of-Cthulhu-like campaigns, but I find them very useful as inspiration for other madness-related stuff as well, such as roleplaying mad creatures.
              $endgroup$
              – Rukbat
              Mar 1 at 1:20




              $begingroup$
              The tables are meant to be used for Call-of-Cthulhu-like campaigns, but I find them very useful as inspiration for other madness-related stuff as well, such as roleplaying mad creatures.
              $endgroup$
              – Rukbat
              Mar 1 at 1:20












              $begingroup$
              Great answer. +1 The bit about moist cake is a nice touch. I've often imagined that each individual beholder (or spectator, etc.) has very particular eating habits and food preferences. When I GM these creatures what and how they eat is usually part of their personality.
              $endgroup$
              – lightcat
              Mar 1 at 15:14




              $begingroup$
              Great answer. +1 The bit about moist cake is a nice touch. I've often imagined that each individual beholder (or spectator, etc.) has very particular eating habits and food preferences. When I GM these creatures what and how they eat is usually part of their personality.
              $endgroup$
              – lightcat
              Mar 1 at 15:14











              8












              $begingroup$

              A spectator is living.



              The creature feature that allows a monster to function without food or drink is generally reserved for Undead, Constructs or Elemental creature types.



              Undead Creature Types



              Crawling Claw, Mummy, Skeleton and Bone Naga are some examples of undead creature types from the MM that require no food or drink (or air or sleep). Even Zombies in D&D 5e require no food or drink - no brains for D&D zombies.



              Death Knights are the only undead in the Monster Manual that do not have this feature. They apparently require food and water. Will-O'-Wisps do not need drink, sleep or air, but they do feed on fear.



              Construct Creature Types



              Constructs are made, not born (MM 6) and often do not require food or drink (or air or sleep). Golems, Animated Objects, Scarecrow and Shield Guardians are some creatures of the Construct creature type from the MM that do not require food or drink.



              Homunculus and Modrons are the only two constructs in the MM that do not have this feature. They do require food and drink.



              Elemental Creature Types



              Elemental creature types also generally do not need food or drink. This includes Elementals, Water Weird, Mephits and Azers and others in the MM.



              Genies, Salamanders and Xorn are the only Elemental creature type that do not have this feature.



              Other than powerful immortal beings, like Angels there are no other creatures that can survive without food and drink.



              What about the Spectator?



              A Spectator probably doesn't have this creature feature because it doesn't fit in with the general standards established in the MM for creatures with this feature. It's partially an issue of narrative, and partially an issue of consistency.



              A Spectator is not of the Undead, Elemental, or Construct type. They are just badass and can conjure themselves all the food they need. This is probably necessary because they have to hang around one spot for 101 years guarding some treasure they've been summoned to protect.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                8












                $begingroup$

                A spectator is living.



                The creature feature that allows a monster to function without food or drink is generally reserved for Undead, Constructs or Elemental creature types.



                Undead Creature Types



                Crawling Claw, Mummy, Skeleton and Bone Naga are some examples of undead creature types from the MM that require no food or drink (or air or sleep). Even Zombies in D&D 5e require no food or drink - no brains for D&D zombies.



                Death Knights are the only undead in the Monster Manual that do not have this feature. They apparently require food and water. Will-O'-Wisps do not need drink, sleep or air, but they do feed on fear.



                Construct Creature Types



                Constructs are made, not born (MM 6) and often do not require food or drink (or air or sleep). Golems, Animated Objects, Scarecrow and Shield Guardians are some creatures of the Construct creature type from the MM that do not require food or drink.



                Homunculus and Modrons are the only two constructs in the MM that do not have this feature. They do require food and drink.



                Elemental Creature Types



                Elemental creature types also generally do not need food or drink. This includes Elementals, Water Weird, Mephits and Azers and others in the MM.



                Genies, Salamanders and Xorn are the only Elemental creature type that do not have this feature.



                Other than powerful immortal beings, like Angels there are no other creatures that can survive without food and drink.



                What about the Spectator?



                A Spectator probably doesn't have this creature feature because it doesn't fit in with the general standards established in the MM for creatures with this feature. It's partially an issue of narrative, and partially an issue of consistency.



                A Spectator is not of the Undead, Elemental, or Construct type. They are just badass and can conjure themselves all the food they need. This is probably necessary because they have to hang around one spot for 101 years guarding some treasure they've been summoned to protect.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  8












                  8








                  8





                  $begingroup$

                  A spectator is living.



                  The creature feature that allows a monster to function without food or drink is generally reserved for Undead, Constructs or Elemental creature types.



                  Undead Creature Types



                  Crawling Claw, Mummy, Skeleton and Bone Naga are some examples of undead creature types from the MM that require no food or drink (or air or sleep). Even Zombies in D&D 5e require no food or drink - no brains for D&D zombies.



                  Death Knights are the only undead in the Monster Manual that do not have this feature. They apparently require food and water. Will-O'-Wisps do not need drink, sleep or air, but they do feed on fear.



                  Construct Creature Types



                  Constructs are made, not born (MM 6) and often do not require food or drink (or air or sleep). Golems, Animated Objects, Scarecrow and Shield Guardians are some creatures of the Construct creature type from the MM that do not require food or drink.



                  Homunculus and Modrons are the only two constructs in the MM that do not have this feature. They do require food and drink.



                  Elemental Creature Types



                  Elemental creature types also generally do not need food or drink. This includes Elementals, Water Weird, Mephits and Azers and others in the MM.



                  Genies, Salamanders and Xorn are the only Elemental creature type that do not have this feature.



                  Other than powerful immortal beings, like Angels there are no other creatures that can survive without food and drink.



                  What about the Spectator?



                  A Spectator probably doesn't have this creature feature because it doesn't fit in with the general standards established in the MM for creatures with this feature. It's partially an issue of narrative, and partially an issue of consistency.



                  A Spectator is not of the Undead, Elemental, or Construct type. They are just badass and can conjure themselves all the food they need. This is probably necessary because they have to hang around one spot for 101 years guarding some treasure they've been summoned to protect.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  A spectator is living.



                  The creature feature that allows a monster to function without food or drink is generally reserved for Undead, Constructs or Elemental creature types.



                  Undead Creature Types



                  Crawling Claw, Mummy, Skeleton and Bone Naga are some examples of undead creature types from the MM that require no food or drink (or air or sleep). Even Zombies in D&D 5e require no food or drink - no brains for D&D zombies.



                  Death Knights are the only undead in the Monster Manual that do not have this feature. They apparently require food and water. Will-O'-Wisps do not need drink, sleep or air, but they do feed on fear.



                  Construct Creature Types



                  Constructs are made, not born (MM 6) and often do not require food or drink (or air or sleep). Golems, Animated Objects, Scarecrow and Shield Guardians are some creatures of the Construct creature type from the MM that do not require food or drink.



                  Homunculus and Modrons are the only two constructs in the MM that do not have this feature. They do require food and drink.



                  Elemental Creature Types



                  Elemental creature types also generally do not need food or drink. This includes Elementals, Water Weird, Mephits and Azers and others in the MM.



                  Genies, Salamanders and Xorn are the only Elemental creature type that do not have this feature.



                  Other than powerful immortal beings, like Angels there are no other creatures that can survive without food and drink.



                  What about the Spectator?



                  A Spectator probably doesn't have this creature feature because it doesn't fit in with the general standards established in the MM for creatures with this feature. It's partially an issue of narrative, and partially an issue of consistency.



                  A Spectator is not of the Undead, Elemental, or Construct type. They are just badass and can conjure themselves all the food they need. This is probably necessary because they have to hang around one spot for 101 years guarding some treasure they've been summoned to protect.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Mar 1 at 5:34









                  V2Blast

                  23.7k378150




                  23.7k378150










                  answered Mar 1 at 1:23









                  lightcatlightcat

                  4,8141855




                  4,8141855






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142195%2fwhat-is-the-lore-based-reason-that-the-spectator-has-the-create-food-and-water-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      -

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

                      Image
                      3 Recently upgrade to 18.10 from 18.04, and using the terminal is becoming annoying: the new alert sound is a drip ( /usr/share/sounds/gnome/default/alerts/drip.ogg ), and the previous one is still located at ( /usr/share/sounds/ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg ). My issue is that at the gnome-terminal, when autocompleting or pressing left BOTH sounds are reproduced, at the same time. I want to just have ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg active, not both . At the moment I have been only able to reduce the volume of the alerts (but still both are played), or turn the alerts down (but I dislike both "solutions"). gnome-terminal 18.10 teminal-bell share | improve this question
                      Read more

                      Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

                      Image
                      up vote 5 down vote favorite 2 I would like to make it so that the vertical space below the title of each chapter is the same when using the Bjornstrup package (i.e. so that the descenders do not affect the spacing - as shown by the red arrow in the picture below). I think I'm fairly happy with the spacing around "A chapter", so I'd really like titles without descenders (e.g. "Contents") to have the same vertical spacing as "A chapter" below the title. I would also like to remove the large "0" in the contents title. Any help appreciated, as always. documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{book} % Packages[![enter image description here][1]][1] usepackage[left=3.5cm, right=3.5cm, top=4.3cm, bottom=4.25cm]{geometry} usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} usepackage{libertine} usepackage[libertine]{newtx
                      Read more

                      Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

                      Image
                      0 I want to add Tabulator js to my java project. I added tabulator.min.js, tabulator.min.css to resources folder. After that added to my html page these dependencies as recommending in readme.md. <link rel="stylesheet" th:href="@{/css/tabulator.min.css}"> <script type="text/javascript" th:src="@{/js/tabulator.min.js}"></script> Now my tables view all elements, that I have in the html page, but not correct. In the documentation of Tabulator is example how to create header and table, var table = new Tabulator("#example-table", { columns:[ {title:"Name", field:"name", sorter:"string", width:200, editor:true}, {title:"Age", field:"age", sorter:"
                      Read more